Verdict from 100+ user reviews

8 reasons to buy

  • A majority of consumers praised the Nike Free TR Flyknit 3 for the comfort it provided.
  • This model was marked as true to size and width by many users.
  • The merchandise performed well during different types of high-intensity workouts because it was supportive and stable, commented numerous training enthusiasts.
  • Multiple owners felt that they were wearing nothing because it was so light, which they liked.
  • Plenty of testers appreciated the roomy toe box as it allowed their toes to spread during weightlifting, while the rearfoot remained snug and steady.
  • The high back collar delighted several people as it prevented their socks from sliding down while working out and walking.
  • The overall flexibility of the trainer impressed a handful of reviewers.
  • A few gym-goers raved about the traction of the outsole during squats, lunges, and other dynamic movements.

3 reasons not to buy

  • A few buyers complained about the Flyknit material stretching out with use.
  • The product needed breaking in to feel comfortable on the foot, said some reviewers.
  • A couple of owners ranted that the back of the collar chafed their Achilles.

Bottom line

The Nike Free TR Flyknit 3 exceeded the expectations of consumers when it came to comfort. The lightweight nature, flexibility, and traction of this model resonated well with its owners. Though many liked the fit, some had issues with the Flyknit material losing structure. But despite the minor grievances, many recommended the trainer to their peers.

Tip: see the best training shoes.

Good to know

With fitness regimens constantly evolving, Nike delivers a host of updates to the Free TR Flyknit 3 that would allow women to cope up with the intense demands of today’s workouts.

The midsole of the Nike Free TR Flyknit 3 doubles as its outsole. This foam compound is engineered to be lightweight and durable.

The outsole features a honeycomb tread pattern that facilitates multidirectional traction. It also has sipings that extend to the sides of the sole unit to facilitate natural foot flexion. Both features are concentrated in the forefoot area where bending of the foot occurs.

As for the heel, it is constructed to be flat to give stability to the rearfoot. Rubber pods are strategically placed in the high-wear areas but are more prominent in the heel for improved durability, traction, and steadiness.

The Nike Free TR Flyknit 3 employs a full-length foam midsole. This type of cushioning platform is developed to attenuate shock. It is also responsive to prepare the foot for toe-off. It is devised to wrap around the sides of the foot, particularly in the midfoot section to lend lateral stability to the upper.

Inside is a molded sockliner. It is fashioned to follow the natural contours of the underfoot for maximum coverage. It also complements the shock absorption of the midsole.

The upper of the Nike Free TR Flyknit 3 is made of the Flyknit, a proprietary fabric engineered to fit like a sock. In this model, a combination of stretchy and tight yarns is used. The stretchy component is placed on the vamp and the tongue to facilitate flexibility. The tighter material is utilized around the perimeter of the upper and the heel to add structure, durability, and support.

The lacing system integrates with the Flywire technology. These thin yet strong cables amplify the support needed for side-to-side movements. The eyelets on this model are set wider apart for a more tuned-in fit when the laces are cinched.

Another popular women’s trainer which employs a combination of the Flyknit material and the Flywire cables is the Nike Air Zoom Fearless Flyknit 2.

Rankings

How Nike Free TR Flyknit 3 ranks compared to all other shoes
Top 33% workout training shoes
All workout training shoes
Top 40% Nike training shoes
All Nike training shoes
Top 36% cross-training training shoes
All cross-training training shoes

Popularity

The current trend of Nike Free TR Flyknit 3.
Compare to another shoe:
Author
Nicholas Rizzo
Nicholas Rizzo

Nick combines 10+ years of experience in the health and fitness industry and a background in the sciences in his role as the Fitness Research Director. During his competitive powerlifting years his PRs have him sitting in the top 2% of bench presses (395 lbs), top 3% of squats (485 lbs) and top 6% of deadlifts (515 lbs) for his weight and age. His work has been featured on Bodybuilding.com, LiveStrong, Healthline, WebMD, WashingtonPost, and many more. Along the way, collaborating with industry leaders like Michael Yessis, Mark Rippetoe, Carlo Buzzichelli, Dave Tate, Ray Williams, and Joel Seedman.