Our verdict

Nike took a step towards versatility in the Metcon 10, making it one of the series's most successful iterations yet! Our lab tests confirmed the brand's promises of increased energy return and mobility, and the trainer felt more at home during agile and high-impact exercises. We also discovered that the Nike Metcon 10 boasts a significantly lighter, more streamlined silhouette without losing stability points at all! With its sturdy build and Hyperlift insert, it remains dedicated to strength training but becomes a touch more well-rounded.

Pros

  • More versatile Metcon overall
  • One of the lightest Metcons ever!
  • ReactX adds shock absorption and energy return
  • Increased forefoot flexibility
  • Still amazingly stable for weightlifting
  • Fantastic upper durability (even for rope climbs)
  • Great grip on gym floors
  • Highly secure foot lockdown
  • Accommodating fit and toebox
  • Handy Lace Tuck

Cons

  • Outsole could be more durable
  • Upper lacks breathability

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet
  • Top 10% most popular training shoes

Who should buy

As Nike's flagship cross-training shoe, we believe that the Metcon 10 can be a perfect match for athletes who:

  • are devoted to the Nike Metcon shoe series but wished for a lighter and more flexible option
  • build their workouts around lifting and strength training, but also include some cardio and agility
  • look for a durable trainer because they burn through gym shoes very quickly, or do rope climbs regularly

Nike Metcon 10 review

Who should NOT buy

If you don't lift 220 lbs (100 kg) or more in squats regularly, you may not need as much stability as the Nike Metcon 10 provides. The Nike Free Metcon 6 is a lighter, cheaper, and more breathable option that is better equipped for a little bit of everything at the gym.

Another excellent cross-trainer to consider if versatility is high up your priority list is the Reebok Nano X4.

Nike Metcon 10 lab test and review

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

If you've always wished for a touch more cushioning in a Nike Metcon, this iteration will answer your prayers! Introducing a new ReactX foam in the Metcon 10, Nike increased the shoe's shock absorption over the previous version quite tangibly.

Our machine recorded 76 SA in the heel and 60 SA in the forefoot, which are respectively higher than the 69 SA and 51 SA of the Metcon 9.

But please note that both measurements are still below the average, and we wouldn't recommend using this Nike trainer for an entire cardio session, running more than a mile, or long bouts of walking. With its overall sturdy build and a rigid Hyperlift plate in the heel, the Metcon 10 stays true to its lifting-biased design.

Nike Metcon 10 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Metcon 10 76 SA
Average 84 SA
Compared to 21 training shoes
Number of shoes
36 SA
Shock absorption
109 SA

Energy return

New

We are also pleased to confirm the brand's promise of 'increased energy return' with the introduction of the new ReactX foam.

The Metcon 10 got more responsive with a rebound of 63% in the heel and 61.2% in the forefoot, making jumps and agility drills more fun and effortless.

But please take it with a grain of salt as well, because it's not a proper cardio shoe.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Metcon 10 63.0%
Average 55.6%
Compared to 21 training shoes
Number of shoes
40.0%
Energy return
65.0%

Heel stack

Measuring the shoe's platform thickness, we didn't notice any major differences compared to the previous Metcon. It is an equally low-profile and grounded cross-trainer.

Our caliper recorded a heel stack height of 22.8 mm, which is on the lower side of the training shoe spectrum.

Nike Metcon 10 Heel stack
Test results
Metcon 10 22.8 mm
Average 24.8 mm
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Heel stack
36.2 mm

Forefoot stack

And with a forefoot stack of 16.2 mm, the Metcon 10 keeps the toes close to the floor as well.

Pretty amazing how Nike managed to pack more impact protection into the new version without adding more millimeters to its stack height.

Nike Metcon 10 Forefoot stack
Test results
Metcon 10 16.2 mm
Average 18.3 mm
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
10.6 mm
Forefoot stack
27.7 mm

Drop

At 6.6 mm, the shoe's heel-to-toe drop got a tad higher compared to the previous Metcons. But it is still on par with the current average of cross-strainers and feels like a grounded, low-drop trainer.

Nike Metcon 10 Drop
Test results
Metcon 10 6.6 mm
Average 6.4 mm
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.8 mm
Drop
13.4 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The Metcon 10 sees a huge drop in midsole firmness thanks to the ReactX foam.

Pressing our Shore A durometer against it, we recorded an exceptionally low reading of 19.5 HA, which is very unusual for this historically firm shoe series!

Nike Metcon 10 Midsole softness
Test results
Metcon 10 19.5 HA
Average 27.6 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
17.4 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
41.0 HA

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

But don't worry about the wobbles because the soft compound is caged inside a firm carrier foam (29.5 HA) and is further stabilized by a stiff Hyperlift in the heel.

Nike Metcon 10 Secondary foam softness
Test results
Metcon 10 29.5 HA
Average 37.2 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Size and fit

Size

Nike Metcon 10 fits slightly small (34 votes).

Small
True to size
Large

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

According to Nike, the Metcon 10 is supposed to have a wider toebox than its predecessor. But we weren't so sure about that, considering how much more streamlined the 10's upper looked visually.

That's where our gel molding process comes in handy.

Once the mold of the shoe's interiors solidified, we measured its widest part with a digital caliper. At 99.4 mm in the ball of the foot area, the Metcon 10 turned out to be just as wide as the 9. There is no added space here, but let's take a look at the front of the toebox.

Nike Metcon 10 Width / Fit
Test results
Metcon 10 99.4 mm
Average 97.2 mm
Compared to 14 training shoes
Number of shoes
92.8 mm
Width / Fit
101.4 mm

Toebox width

Measuring the shoe's big toe area, we got just a standard width of 73.4 mm.

This means that the shoe is no wider than the Metcon 9 (74.4 mm) and is on par with the category average. It's not even in the wide range by our standards.

But on the bright side, athletes with medium-width feet are going to feel right at home in this Nike trainer. It provides sufficient room for toe splay, but if you need all the toe room you can get, try the Inov8 F-Lite Max.

Nike Metcon 10 Toebox width
Test results
Metcon 10 73.4 mm
Average 73.1 mm
Compared to 14 training shoes
Number of shoes
65.1 mm
Toebox width
81.0 mm

Toebox height

There is no lack of vertical space in the Metcon 10 either.

Nike Metcon 10 toe space

Measuring its toebox height, we got a solid reading of 27.1 mm, which is equal to the Metcon 9 and the category average. No potential danger for toes and toenails.

Nike Metcon 10 Toebox height
Test results
Metcon 10 27.1 mm
Average 26.9 mm
Compared to 14 training shoes
Number of shoes
22.1 mm
Toebox height
34.0 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

New

Nike employs two types of rubber for the Metcon 10's outsole: the grippier 004 Stick Rubber in the heel and forefoot, and the harder rubber blend in the midfoot for abrasion resistance during rope climbs.

Nike Metcon 10 004 Sticky Rubber

We focus on the forefoot traction when testing cross-training shoes, as that's where surefootedness matters the most in this type of exercise.

Sliding the Metcon 10's forefoot rubber against a wet surface at a consistent angle and force, we recorded an above-average friction coefficient of 0.38. This is a good result for a cross-trainer, even though we have tested even grippier trainers (Inov8 in particular).

Test results
Metcon 10 0.38
Average 0.34
Compared to 20 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.18
Forefoot traction
0.53

Outsole design

New

Nike made a complete outsole redesign for the Metcon 10, introducing two rubber blends and a triangular tread pattern. There is also a large triangular cutout under the Hyperlift in the heel.

The brand also added deep flex grooves in the forefoot, resulting in a significant increase in flexibility (one of the shoe's major updates).

Nike Metcon 10 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

New

We've come to associate Nike Metcons with a highly stiff and unforgiving construction, which often gets in the way of performing non-lifting exercises that require foot bending (jumps, lunges, planks, agility, etc.). But this time around, it's not a traditional Metcon!

Measuring the amount of force it takes to bend the shoe by 30 degrees, we got a stunningly low reading of 9.2N! Believe it or not, but that's the flexibility level of the Nike Free Metcon 6 (9.0N)!

Nike Metcon 10 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Metcon 10 9.2N
Average 10.6N
Compared to 21 training shoes
Number of shoes
6.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
19.3N

Weight

But increased flexibility is not the only surprise that Nike throws at us in the new Metcon...The brand just slashed 2.3 oz off the past version!

The Metcon 10's weight clocks in at only 11.0 oz (312g) in a men's US size 9, making it lighter than the Reebok Nanos! Gone are the burly rubber wraps and the clunky TPU heel design. It looks like Nike has fine-tuned each component to make the overall construction as light as possible without compromising performance.

Nike Metcon 10 Weight
Test results
Metcon 10 11.0 oz (312g)
Average 10.8 oz (305g)
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
6.4 oz (181g)
Weight
13.8 oz (392g)

Breathability

Even though it seems like the shoe's upper is entirely made of mesh, an upclose examination revealed that the textile is fused with rubber in the strategic areas for durability.

This makes some areas thicker than others, resulting in a somewhat zonal breathability.

You can see how the more aerated mesh zone meets the reinforced rubberized one in our microscope shot below.

Nike Metcon 10 Breathability Microscope test

Unfortunately, the shoe's overall airflow left us wishing for more, even compared to the previous version. That's why we had to lower our breathability score to only 2 out of 5. Not the best option for sweltering gyms.

Test results
Metcon 10 2
Average 3.5
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

The Nike Metcon's signature stability continues to run the show in the v10. Sturdy, planted, and rigid in the right places, the shoe allows no wobbling at all.

From the ground up, it's packed with stabilizing features, offering the best possible power transfer for lifting and strength training in a cross-trainer.

The Metcon 10 inherits the stiff TPU Hyperlift insert we've seen in the previous versions, but it's been reduced to the smallest possible size without affecting stability.

Nike Metcon 10 side

The polarizing rubber wraps of the v9 have been replaced with rubberized mesh, an internal midfoot band, and a strong pair of synthetic eyelets, all of which work together for a locked-in fit.

The midfoot rubber also remained on both sides of the shoe's midsole, but it received a more streamlined and aesthetic look.

Torsional rigidity

Fair enough, the Nike Metcon 10's torsional rigidity lost one point in our manual test, dropping down to 4 out of 5 on a stiffness scale.

But is that a problem? We don't think so because the shoe can still handle heavier loads without a problem, while the increased forefoot flexibility makes it more versatile for all-around use.

Test results
Metcon 10 4
Average 2.8
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

Another manual test confirmed that the shoe's heel counter remains rigid and solid, earning a high stiffness score of 4 out of 5.

There is just a tiny bit of give that prevents the heel area from feeling too harsh against the ankle and Achilles.

Test results
Metcon 10 4
Average 2.8
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Measuring the shoe's midsole dimensions, our caliper revealed that the Metcon 10 has undergone some changes in the heel but not in the forefoot.

The outrigger is still present here, resulting in a wide reading of 115.2 mm in the broadest area. Wider than average, it minimizes the risk of foot rolling during forceful lateral movements or when picking up heavier weight.

Nike Metcon 10 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Metcon 10 115.2 mm
Average 110.7 mm
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
101.0 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
117.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel, on the other hand, shrank by 4.2 mm, showing 90.8 mm in its broadest part.

We believe that it was a smart update as the shoe lost the unnecessary bulk while remaining adequately stable for a cross-training shoe. In fact, even advanced lifting shoes typically have a heel width of 85-90 mm.

Nike Metcon 10 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Metcon 10 90.8 mm
Average 87.4 mm
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
76.5 mm
Midsole width - heel
97.4 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

Rope climbs, contact with abrasive gym surfaces, and regular intense use of the shoe all put its upper durability to a serious test. But there is a good reason why the Metcon is Nike's flagship training shoe!

Even though it doesn't have any thick synthetic overlays, the Metcon 10's rubberized mesh resisted our Dremel test marvelously. The tool only damaged the shoe's topmost upper layer, while the rest of the material remained intact. This convinced us to rate its toebox durability with a high score of 4 out of 5.

Nike Metcon 9 vs 10 toe bumper

And if you loved the extended toe bumper of the Metcon 9, you will be treated to the same protection in the Metcon 10. Ideal for burpees!

Test results
Metcon 10 4
Average 2.5
Compared to 31 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

We were also pleased to find that Nike didn't skimp on the Metcon 10's interior durability.

The Dremel did very minor damage to the inner lining of the shoe's heel collar (aka heel padding), convincing us to rate its durability with a high score as well - 4 out of 5.

Test results
Metcon 10 4
Average 2.6
Compared to 29 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

Because the Nike Metcon 10 employs two types of outsole rubber, we repeated the Dremel test for each blend as well.

First, the midfoot (blue) rubber.

Because it is expected to get damaged by rope climbs the most, we were hoping for a solid abrasion resistance here. But the tool bit rather deeply into the material, and the dent turned out to be 1.22 mm deep. While it's not a bad result per se, it proved to be no better than the average either.

Second, the heel and forefoot (black) Sticky Rubber.

Our test showed that this compound wasn't much better than the other one, developing a dent of 1.12 mm. This is, again, on par with the category average, and we expected stronger results from Nike's best training shoe.

We highly recommend limiting the shoe's use to the gym/indoor venues if you hope to get as much lifespan from it as possible.

Test results
Metcon 10 1.2 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 27 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

At least the shoe packs a decent amount of outsole rubber with a thickness of 2.9 mm, which also promises an average lifespan.

Nike Metcon 10 Outsole thickness
Test results
Metcon 10 2.9 mm
Average 3.6 mm
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
2.1 mm
Outsole thickness
5.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The Nike Metcon 10 is equipped with a standard amount of insole padding. Our caliper measured its thickness at 3.6 mm.

Nike Metcon 10 Insole thickness
Test results
Metcon 10 3.6 mm
Average 3.9 mm
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.7 mm
Insole thickness
7.2 mm

Removable insole

The shoe's insole is easily removable in case you want to dial up or down on underfoot padding or arch support.

Nike Metcon 10 Removable insole
Test results
Metcon 10 Yes

Tongue padding

The shoe's interiors are lined with a decent amount of foam padding, which is neither too thin nor excessive.

Nike Metcon 10 Tongue padding
Test results
Metcon 10 5.6 mm
Average 5.4 mm
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Tongue padding
10.4 mm

Heel tab

The Metcon 10 is easy to get on and off, even without a finger loop. This is thanks to its stiff and structured heel counter, which is also slightly lower set compared to the v9.

But the shoe offers another bonus in the form of a stiff plastic heel clip, which accommodates handstand push-ups against the wall.

Nike Metcon 10 Heel tab
Test results
Metcon 10 None

Tongue: gusset type

Just like the previous Metcon, this version has a semi-gusseted tongue, which keeps it attached to the rest of the upper. Tongue shifting is thus eliminated, and the lockdown feels more secure.

Nike Metcon 10 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Metcon 10 Both sides (semi)

Price

Even though it's been two years since the previous iteration, we are glad that Nike only upped the MSRP by $5. Even though it's the brand's leading cross-trainer, its price remains competitive with similar models and relatively affordable for many gym goers and Crossfitters.

Nike Metcon 10 Price
Test results
Metcon 10 $155
Average $122
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$155

Lace tuck

The new Lace Tuck feature replaced the earlier Lace Lock in the new Metcon 10. We found it more handy and neat because excess laces are no longer left dangling on the sides.

Nike Metcon 10 lace tuck