Facts

  • Terrain

    Road

    Shoes best for road, track and light gravel. See the best road shoes.

    Trail

    Shoes best for trail, off road, mountains and other unstable surfaces. See the best trail shoes.

    Good to know

    As long as you stick to the road or path, and if you want just one running shoe, buy a road running shoe.

  • Arch support

    Neutral / cushion / high arch

    Shoes for runners who do not need any additional arch support (Around 50% of runners). Best for people with normal, high or medium high arches. See the best neutral shoes.

    Stability / overpronation / normal arch

    Shoes for runners who need mild to moderate arch support (Around 45% of runners). Best for runners with a low arch. See the best stability shoes.

    Motion control / severe overpronation / flat feet

    Shoes for runners who needs a lot of arch support. Best for runners with flat feet. See the best motion control shoes.

    Good to know

    - Rule of thumb: If in doubt, buy neutral shoes to avoid injuries.
    - More about arch support in this video.
    - Find your arch type by following steps from this video.

  • Use

    Daily running

    Cushioned shoes for your daily easy running. Great comfort. See best shoes for daily running.

    Competition

    Lightweight shoes good for races, interval training, tempo runs and fartlek. Here are the best competition running shoes.

    Good to know

    If you want just one pair of shoes, buy a shoe for daily running.

  • Price
    $130
  • Weight
    Men: 8.7oz
    Women: 7.1oz
  • Heel to toe drop
    Men: 8mm
    Women: 8mm

    The height difference from the heel to the forefoot, also known as heel drop, toe spring, heel to toe spring or simply drop.

    There are many opinions about what a good heel drop is. We do not recommend any in particular. Lean more in this video.

  • Heel height
    Men: 17mm
    Women: 17mm
  • Forefoot height
    Men: 9mm
    Women: 9mm
  • Width
    Men: Narrow, Standard
    Women: Narrow, Standard
  • Release date
    Unknown
Show more facts

Rankings

Expert Reviews

Experts are runners, who post reviews at youtube, directly at RunRepeat or at their own websites. Each expert is categorized from level 1 to level 5 based on expertise. See stats on expert reviews and how we calculate scores here.

Are you an expert? Apply to contribute here.

87 / 100 based on 10 expert reviews

  • 78 / 100 | Joseph Arellano

    Asics GEL-DS Trainer 24: Moving ahead or running in place?

    According to Running Warehouse, “If you’re looking for a lightweight running shoe with a touch of stability, add the Asics Gel DS Trainer to your rotation.”

    And Road Runner Sports notes, “Now with a knit upper for improved aesthetic and fit, this may be the most propulsive and stable lightweight trainer.”

    Do we agree with these statements? See the verdict below.

     

    The backstory

    When I first encountered the Asics GEL-DS Trainer, it was quite a positive experience. That’s because up until that time I had run in shoes that only offered cushioning in the heels. I remember excitedly reading about the gel cushioning sitting under both the heel and forefoot.

    This seemed to promise that the shoe could be used for long training runs. Asics delivered on that promise, and the GEL-DS Trainer became my favorite half-marathon shoe.

    It’s been a while since I’ve purchased an Asics shoe, so I was quite interested in giving the twenty-fourth version of the GEL-DS Trainer shoe a spin.

     

    The shoe

    The current edition of the Asics GEL-DS Trainer feels quite low to the ground when you first walk and run in it. Initially, it feels more like a racing flat than a performance trainer. The shoe has an 8mm drop and weighs 9.0 ounces, an increase in weight from version 23 (8.6 ounces).

    By comparison, the now discontinued Asics Gel-DS Racer weighed just 6.6 ounces and also had an 8mm drop. That was a true racing flat.

    The fit of the GEL-DS Trainer is perfect, but only if you size up a half size above your normal running shoe size. The shoe is quite attractive – at least in the Illusion Blue/Black colorway and with a multi-part knit upper. The upper hugs the foot until foot strike when it “gives” and expands.

    The insole is pretty much perfect in cut and weight and provides a good measure of support under the arch. Remove the insole and you’ll see that Asics did a beautiful job on the full slip-lasting. No corners were cut here.

    The tongue on the shoe is comfortable, unobtrusive and stays centered. The heel counter is firm and the cut of the upper around the ankles is neither too high or too low.

    The midsole contains FlyteFoam cushioning and there’s GEL cushioning in the rearfoot.

    According to Asics, the GEL-DS Trainer 24 uses “cleverly designed EVA TRUSTICC SYSTEM technology (which) supports your movements by stabilizing the center sole, meaning there’s less chance of the shoe twisting” and causing injury.

     

    Stability?

    There’s some confusion over whether the GEL-DS Trainer 24 is or is not a stability shoe. Some retailers, like Running Warehouse, view it as a mild stability shoe but the Asics website is explicit: this is a neutral shoe.

    There’s a light, hard plastic brace under the arch and midfoot; however, it’s not a true support shank like you would find in a Mizuno shoe.

    Confusion remains as the midsole on the medial side contains the label Duomax, something traditionally found on Asics stability models. It seems that there is a bit of a medial post – one that’s very difficult to see without color differentiation, that extends from in front of the arch on the medial side to just before the heel area.

    This medial post joins with the plastic brace. It makes me wonder whether there was a conflict between someone who wanted to design the shoe as a neutral FlyteFoam-based trainer and someone who wanted to preserve the shoe as a Duomax light stability shoe. Was the shoe designed by committee?

    In the words of Stephen Stills, “Confusion has its cost.” We’ll try to provide clarification on the shoe’s actual nature as we proceed.

     

    On the road

    One does not feel any noticeable responsiveness while walking in the GEL-DS Trainer 24. It feels like you’re walking in a basic, inexpensive trainer from the 90s.

    During my first run in the shoe, my mind wanted to compare it to a Zoot Sports shoe (the company sadly no longer produces running shoes). However, in order for that comparison to be apt, the GEL-DS Trainer would have to be less firm and more flexible. The more time I spent in this Asics shoe, the more it reminded me – truly reminded me, of another shoe.

    A comparison

    The more time that I spent jogging in the GEL-DS Trainer the more I realized that it explicitly reminds me of a shoe from 361 Degrees, the Chaser 2. The two shoes are similar in looks and in concept. But the Gel-DS Trainer is not as well executed as the Chaser 2 performance trainer.

    Both the GEL-DS Trainer and the Chaser 2 have a low to the ground feel and share an 8mm drop. The Chaser 2 is lighter at 8.2 ounces. Both have a moderately wide cut forefoot. (The similarities between Asics and 361 Degrees products have been pointed out by many reviewers.)

    One of the best features of the Chaser 2 is its carbon fiber shank, which – as I earlier noted in a review, “adds integrity to the midfoot and an overall feeling of solid presence.” And the Chaser 2’s list price is a full $30 less than that of the GEL-DS Trainer.

    While the GEL-DS Trainer and the Chaser 2 share some similarities, there’s one key difference.

    The Gel-DS Trainer comes off as a utilitarian shoe. It gets the job done but without sparkle and personality. I often felt like there was no “there” in the shoe. If I were to compare the GEL-DS Trainer to an automobile, it would be the Chevrolet Malibu. The Malibu will get you to your destination but put aside any notion of excitement.

    As for the Chaser 2, well, it’s like traveling in a Mazda Miata. You don’t just move forward in it. It comes with a sense of youthful adventure included at no charge.

     

    Pluses and minuses

    The GEL-DS Trainer delivers good cushioning on asphalt, which makes for relaxing training runs. The shoe feels more responsive the faster you run in it, and the shoe digs in and grips well on uphill and downhill runs.

    The GEL-DS Trainer, in fact, comes to life on non-flat roads and surfaces. I suspect it would be a very good shoe to run in on unchallenging trails, although I refrained from testing it on such surfaces.

    No doubt, the GEL-DS Trainer would be a good shoe for fast-paced training runs on high school and college tracks. However, it’s unlikely that this shoe would out-perform the highly-rated New Balance 1400 v6 lightweight trainer/racer.

    The GEL-DS Trainer feels somewhat bland on concrete. And the shoe’s level of responsiveness is underwhelming.

    Asics used to boast that their shoes needed no break-in period. This shoe does. To be fair, the shoe may feel more lively and responsive with age, but I have no idea how many miles it would take to get to that point.

    The price point is high for the GEL-DS Trainer, especially for a shoe that provides an indistinct, numb-feeling heel strike. There’s minimal padding in the heel area – it looks like it was taken from a racing flat, which is simply insufficient for a supposed long-mileage performance trainer.

    The padding on the outsole is pretty meager, especially for a shoe that lists for $130. The outsole cushioning would be fine on a flat, but it’s unlikely to provide the durability desired of a high-mileage trainer.

    The forefoot of the GEL-DS Trainer is a mixed bag. Fast and fleet runners will no doubt like the firm cushioning upfront, but I suspect that a high percentage of general runners would appreciate added flexibility under their toes. The shoe has just one forefoot flex groove and could use at least two more.

    The stability issue

    I think the GEL-DS Trainer 24 is a very light stability trainer and not a pure neutral shoe. It does, to a limited degree, attempt to limit roll-in, but not to the extent that it interferes with the natural foot strike of a non-pronator.

    My concern is that those who ran in earlier models of the GEL-DS Trainer, when it was promoted as a light stability trainer, will be disappointed that this version is more neutral. I would encourage these individuals to take version 24 for a test run before electing to purchase it.

    I will say that this is a much different shoe than the GEL-DS Trainer that I first became acquainted with.  That shoe was somewhat heavy but highly protective and durable with Gel cushioning pads front and rear - designed for long, punishing training and race miles. 

     

    The best-intended uses

    I think most potential users of the GEL-DS Trainer 24 could beneficially use it for short to medium training runs, and for races from 5K to a half-marathon. Faster, lightweight runners would probably do better to use a racing flat.

     

    The verdict

    Yes, the Asics GEL-DS Trainer 24 is a lightweight running shoe with just a touch of stability.

    But, no, it’s not an impressively propulsive and stable trainer. In fact, the lack of energy return on this premium – and premium-priced – performance trainer is puzzling.

    The Gel-DS Trainer 24 is a beautiful-looking shoe for someone who does not mind paying $130. It will get the job done under most conditions. The shoe is likely to satisfy the expectations of new runners who run in one shoe at a time.

    The problem with the shoe is that it feels retro and not in a positive way. It runs like an old technology shoe but with a current technology price tag.

    I would love to see Asics take what was best about the Asics GEL-DS Racer 11 – a fast feeling, comfortable fitting, flexible and responsive shoe hampered by minimal forefoot cushioning - and combine it with this trainer to produce something new and exciting.

    Perhaps the Asics GEL-DS Fast Trainer? The GEL-DS Racer 2020?

    C’mon, Asics, you can do it!

    This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.

  • 89 / 100 | Brendan Sullivan

    On and Off-Road with the Asics Gel DS Trainer 24

    TLDR: These lightweight, cool-looking street racers make you feel like you’re flying while still providing Asics signature support.

    Fit

    The knit uppers are stretchy but snug, with an almost slipper-like quality. They stay very breathable even on hot road runs.

     

     

    The mid and outsoles are feather-light yet somehow still offering a good amount of cushion for pavement pounding runs.

    Support

    Asics billed Gel DS Trainer 24 as a neutral shoe fit for overpronators. This shoe offers pleasant cushioning without ever approaching the clunkiness of Asics classics such as the GT-2000.

    The result is a really fun and fast run without giving up the support that you need.

    Looks

    Cool throwback colorways plus a slim-fitting stitched upper are a refreshing counterpoint to some of Asics chunkier, more supportive shoes.

    Test Run

    Distance: Six Miles | Terrain: Paved Roads + Dirt/Sand Trails

     

     

    Location: New Jersey | Season: Summer | Conditions: Hot and sunny

    Warming Up

    It’s 8:30 AM, and it's already 90 degrees out. I lace up the Asics Gel DS Trainer 24 and am pleased by the flexible, stretchy material of the upper.

    The laces have an almost spandex-quality. This is great if you like your shoes snug without cutting off circulation.

    Despite the mid and outsoles being relatively thin, I get a pleasant cushioned bounce when I walk in these shoes. It is as if they’re begging you to spring into a jog.

    I head out for a medium intensity workout, aiming for 7:20 miles. This course will be very flat. So, the biggest challenge will be the heat.

    First Impressions

    Compared to my Asics GT-2000s these trainers feel incredibly light and fast. It feels similar to the way that compression tights might feel compared to running in sweatpants.

    That said, they don’t skimp on support. They cushion well against the hot pavement and keep me gliding for the first 5K.

    They’re snug but comfortable, with the stretchy fabric allowing my foot to strike naturally. Three miles, down 7:15 pace.

    Off-Roading

    As the sidewalk ends, I continue onto a sandy trail out to a bird conservation area. Despite being billed as road shoes, I am curious to see how they perform off-road.

    Traction is good on a thin layer of sand. But as I approach some patches a few inches thick, they start to show their limitations away from the pavement.

    Not only does traction give out, but the mesh knit uppers let fine grains of sand through, creating an unpleasant sensation in my shoes. I head back to the road, stop for a stretch, and empty them out.

    One positive note is that the stretchy material of these shoes makes it easy to slip them on and off while remaining snug on your feet. I love that.

    The Home Stretch

    On the return loop home in the scorching sun, the shoes remain light and breathable. The knit fabric keeps my feet cool and comfortable, a huge plus in this weather.

    I wonder how well they’d hold up in cold or wet conditions. But, maybe it’s not realistic for it to do everything well.

    This run was about as hot as they come. Being on the coast, I had very little protection from the sun.

    When I took my shoes off after my run, they were a bit damp with sweat. The knit uppers definitely absorbed more water than shoes with other materials.

    Conclusion

    All in all, I really enjoy running in these shoes. I plan to keep them in my regular road running rotation.

    The combination of their lightweight and low profile, medium level cushioning and support are just right for medium-distance paved road runs.

    This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.

  • 93 / 100 | Sportitude

    ...inside this shoe, [running] felt right. It's nice and breathable. I didn't, by any means, feel compromised.

  • 91 / 100 | The Active Guy

    The Asics Gel-DS Trainer 24 continues to be a great shoe for tempo runs, speed work, and racing.

Show moreless reviews
Apply to become an expert

Updates to Asics Gel DS Trainer 24

  • The Asics Gel DS Trainer 24 is a road running shoe that has a light and uncluttered construction. It is built for the consumer who desires a free and flexible experience on the asphalt. The façade is made up of knitted fabric for breathable support and a set of thin prints for security and durability. A smooth interior sleeve facilitates the foot and hugs it in place. The overall construction looks and feels simple, yet this shoe is also a testament to Asics’ quality designs and sound service.
  • Flytefoam® Lyte serves as the main cushioning unit of this Asics running shoe. It is accompanied by a GEL® piece in the heel for extra shock attenuation, as well as the DuoMax® and Trusstic System® for mild support against overpronation. The DS Trainer series is known for providing slight stability while also catering to the neutrally pronating foot.

Asics Gel DS Trainer 24 size and fit

Standard sizing schemes were used in the making of the Asics Gel DS Trainer 24. Runners are welcome to get a pair using their usual sizing expectations. Widthwise, the available option for men is D – Medium; for women, the variant is B – Medium. This product’s semi-curved shape accommodates the natural curvature of the human foot.

Outsole

The outsole unit of the Asics Gel DS Trainer 24 is composed of AHAR® or Asics High Abrasion Rubber. This compound protects the midsole foam from the damaging effects of surface contact and continued use. It is also generously layered, allowing it to have better longevity. It grippy nature lets the runner take control of the movement on the ground, ensuring precise steps, swerves and brakes.

Midsole

The Flytefoam® Lyte makes up the bulk of the Asics Gel DS Trainer 24’s midsole unit. This platform technology offers a lightweight yet springy ride. It is made of environmentally friendly materials (organic nanofibers), yet it is touted to last as long as the industry-standard counterparts. The Asics Gel Kayano 25 is an example of a product that also uses this feature.

The back part of the midsole is graced with the GEL®, a silicon-based piece that’s made to absorb impact shock during the landing phase, dispersing the potential for discomfort due to the forces generated by the foot-strike.

A dual-density DuoMax® unit placed in the medial side of the platform is meant to buttress the arch and prevent it from collapsing during the running session (known as overpronation). It is not very obvious as it doesn’t have a raised top or an exaggerated construction, so it permits neutral pronators to feel supported, as well.

The Trusstic System® is a thermoplastic layer between the midsole and outsole. Its purpose is to reinforce the platform and to act as a proxy for the muscles and tendons of the foot, seizing much of the effort of transitioning through the gait without sacrificing the quality of the performance.

Upper

The Asics Gel DS Trainer 24 is comprised of a performance knit exterior, a stretchy and seamless material that welcomes the foot and accommodates its capacity to move. It has ventilation pores that permit air into the foot-chamber, thereby ensuring a cool and dry running session.

Thin prints adorn the sides and the instep. These seemingly inconsequential layers are meant to support the foot and keep it in place. They also make sure to bolster and maintain the structural integrity of the façade.

The traditional lacing system helps the rest of the upper in locking the foot in the interior chamber and preventing it from quivering during the run.

The lightly padded tongue and collar work together to cushion the heel, the ankles and the bridge of the foot. These parts of the façade are also tasked with averting any accidental shoe removals.

A velvety fabric is used for the internal sleeve of the Gel DS Trainer 24, its seamless configuration serving as an assurance of freedom from skin irritation.


Comparison