Facts
-
DiscontinuedUpdate: Asics Gel Contend 4 -
TerrainRoad
Shoes best for road, track and light gravel. See the best road shoes.
Trail
Shoes best for trail, off road, mountains and other unstable surfaces. See the best trail shoes.
Good to know
As long as you stick to the road or path, and if you want just one running shoe, buy a road running shoe.
-
Arch supportNeutral / cushion / high arch
Shoes for runners who do not need any additional arch support (Around 50% of runners). Best for people with normal, high or medium high arches. See the best neutral shoes.
Stability / overpronation / normal arch
Shoes for runners who need mild to moderate arch support (Around 45% of runners). Best for runners with a low arch. See the best stability shoes.
Motion control / severe overpronation / flat feet
Shoes for runners who needs a lot of arch support. Best for runners with flat feet. See the best motion control shoes.
Good to know
- Rule of thumb: If in doubt, buy neutral shoes to avoid injuries.
- More about arch support in this video.
- Find your arch type by following steps from this video. -
UseDaily running
Cushioned shoes for your daily easy running. Great comfort. See best shoes for daily running.
Competition
Lightweight shoes good for races, interval training, tempo runs and fartlek. Here are the best competition running shoes.
Good to know
If you want just one pair of shoes, buy a shoe for daily running.
-
Price$65 -
WeightMen: 10.5ozWomen: 8.5oz -
Heel to toe dropMen: 10mmWomen: 10mmThe height difference from the heel to the forefoot, also known as heel drop, toe spring, heel to toe spring or simply drop.
There are many opinions about what a good heel drop is. We do not recommend any in particular. Lean more in this video.
-
Heel heightMen: 25mmWomen: 22mm -
Forefoot heightMen: 15mmWomen: 12mm -
WidthMen: normal, wideWomen: normal, wide -
Release dateUnknown
Summary
We spent 7.4 hours reading reviews from experts and users. In summary, this is what runners think:
8 reasons to buy
- A tester wrote that they preferred the color schemes of the Gel Contend 3, which stood apart from the overly vibrant neon hues of most Asics shoes.
- There were runners who thought that the fit was adequate, that the shoe didn’t feel too tight.
- Runners generally appreciated the lightly padded tongue and collar.
- One runner who weighed 265lbs felt that the Asics Gel Contend 3 was able to handle their body weight, even after continued use.
- The mid-sole unit became a highlight for runners because many of them were able to stay comfortable and well-cushioned throughout their activities.
- The insole garnered recognition because it delivered contoured support to the curves of the underfoot.
- Consumers were in agreement when they stated that this shoe had an affordable price.
- Some runners wrote that it didn’t easily get dirty.
3 reasons not to buy
- The toe box was a bit narrow for a tester.
- Others noticed that it was half a size smaller than what they were used to.
- The rear section of the upper unit was a bit high for some testers and it rubbed uncomfortably against the Achilles tendon.
Bottom line
The Asics Gel Contend 3 received positive feedback from runners who enjoyed its agreeable underfoot experience, as well as its clean and comfortable upper. It felt strong and it didn’t break down easily for many of those who tried it. On the other hand, some consumers felt that it was a bit narrow and small. Such concerns can be addressed easily, though. This road shoe quickly became a trusted model for a lot of neutral runners.
Rankings
Expert Reviews
Experts are runners, who post reviews at youtube, directly at RunRepeat or at their own websites. Each expert is categorized from level 1 to level 5 based on expertise. See stats on expert reviews and how we calculate scores here.
Are you an expert? Apply to contribute here.
78 / 100 based on 3 expert reviews
-
A Case for Contend!
The Asics Contend 3 is a neutral running shoe that might have you wondering (after a little while) why you paid three times as much for the more lavish models.
This shoe could be greatly improved by upgrading the sock liner.
A good shoe
Well done, a bit dated but well put together with tried and true materials and techniques, with no high-tech printed overlays and none of the latest state-of-the-art cushioning materials such as DNA or FlyteFoam.
This shoe performs well in all areas except one, cushioning!
Good Looking
Asics design. The heel counter and midfoot-uppers use some fine web material, very nice looking.
Durability
With just under 70 miles of easy running, I see no more wear on the outer soles of the Contend than with the Asics GT-2000, as a mid-foot striker.
The Asics GT series has AHAR (Asics High Abrasive Rubber) in the heel, the Contend does not, so some runners will see faster heel wear without this model.
White Arrows show that the Asics GT 2000 has an additional layer of density foam and added gel in the heel, the Contend has only simple white EVA and far less gel.
Weight is 348 grams for size 44.
![]()
Safety
Not a great deal of after dark reflectors except on the rear.
These shoes are a candidate for reflective laces or some reflective material, however, the fact is that even if you had 20 reflectors and a big flashing light on your hat, it might not help at all because many drivers are simply not looking!
Bring your reflective laces just in case, they are moving as you run and this motion helps. And remember you simply must be ready to jump out of the way!
![]()
Not for the Novice
This is not a shoe for the beginner, a novice runner should be running in a more substantial shoe, such as the Asics GT, Cumulus or something like the Brooks Ghost to avoid injuries so common in the early years of running.
Once a runner has built up some miles and has become stronger and more durable, their shoe choices increase.
Conclusion
This shoe is best suited for a very lightweight, experienced runner on a tight budget, as an every other day trainer, leaving the Nike Pegasus or Asics GT for longer runs.
With that said, there seems to be no substitute for quality, we get what we pay for and after adding in the cost of upgrades it might be better to wait for a sale on a better shoe.
Run Happy. Run Safe!
This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.
Frank DuCett
Level 4 expert (15-30 reviews)
My name is Frank DuCett, living and running in the Heartland of America. My love is the long lonesome road half marathons of Indiana, Kentucky and Illinois. My training of 20 - 30 miles weekly is dedicated to staying under 2 1/2 hours for the 13.1 mile distance into my 70s and beyond. I run alone and without earbuds, enjoying the solitude and true sensations of the act.
29 reviews - average score 90/100
-
Brooks Glycerin 1694 -
Adidas Solar Boost96 -
Nike Air Zoom Structure 2196 -
Adidas Solar Boost97
-
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 1897 -
Asics GT 2000 690 -
Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 3496 -
Brooks Ravenna 889 -
Inov-8 Parkclaw 27596 -
Brooks Ghost 1082 -
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 1894
-
Asics GT 2000 594 -
Brooks Launch 394 -
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 1797 -
Asics Gel Kayano 2497 -
Brooks Launch 396
-
Brooks Revel92 -
Asics Gel Flux 476 -
Brooks Ghost 984 -
Brooks Ghost 980
-
Asics Gel Contend 376 -
Brooks Launch 484 -
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 1796
-
Asics GT 2000 594
-
Asics GT 1000 493 -
Asics Gel Kayano 2355 -
Asics Gel Kayano 2189 -
Asics GT 2000 492 -
Asics Gel Flux 380
-
-
The heel counter is extremely rigid. It really feels quite solid.
LaMontage Photography
Level 2 expert (3-5 reviews)
3 reviews - average score 84/100
-
You’re not getting the lightest ride, nor the newest tech, but you are getting a reliable shoe with a well-tested heritage.
Frank May
Level 4 expert (15-30 reviews)
25 reviews - average score 84/100
-
Asics Gel Cumulus 2090 -
Reebok Floatride Run70 -
Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 3490
-
New Balance FuelCell80 -
Mizuno Wave Shadow60 -
Skechers GOmeb Speed 490 -
Skechers GOmeb Razor90 -
Saucony Freedom ISO100 -
Saucony Ride 990 -
Saucony Triumph ISO 370 -
Saucony Zealot ISO 290 -
Nike LunarGlide 880 -
Nike LunarGlide 880
-
Brooks Hyperion70 -
New Balance 880 v480 -
Saucony Mirage 490 -
Adidas Ultra Boost ST90 -
Nike LunarTempo 280 -
Skechers GOmeb Speed 380 -
Saucony Breakthru 290 -
Asics Gel Contend 380
-
Saucony Hurricane ISO 280 -
Asics Gel Nimbus 18100 -
Saucony Ride 890 -
Adidas Duramo 780
-
Updates to Asics Gel Contend 3
- Asics gives a few slight changes to a shoe designed for entry level runners in the Contend 3. What is most significant in the changes is the use of overlays that are not as rigid and as stiff as before. One update that really sticks to the theme of removing the very stiff overlays of the past version is the new single rand that holds effectively the heel from any movements without being very stiff. Protection at the toes is not as substantial as before courtesy of the more flexible forefoot overlay. The overall fit is more forgiving and adapts rather nicely to the foot.
- The outsole gets a slight reboot as well. There is now a new decoupled heel that helps with the shock-absorbing features of the shoe. Runners will also find more grooves for better flexibility and enhanced transition.
Asics Gel Contend 3 size and fit
A medium-sized heel and forefoot are the main characteristics of the Gel Contend 3. It has good space in the toe box and a snug midfoot. This is a fit that is very similar to the previous model. Available widths are D and B. Sizes are on point featuring 7 to 14 for the men’s and 5 to 11 for the women’s.
Outsole
A textured outsole provides decent grip and durability on the road and track. Flex grooves are located near the forefoot for better flexibility and smoother transitions.
Midsole
A single layer of standard EVA acts as the main midsole cushioning component. Asics’ patented gel cushioning, which is a silicon-based material, is placed in the heel for proven shock-absorbing features.
Upper
Asics uses regular mesh for adequate breathability while synthetic overlays provide added support and structure. A contoured and removable sockliner offers enhanced comfort and arch support.
