Our verdict

84
Great
  • Cross-training/HIIT 86
  • Cardio 78
  • Weightlifting 80
The Nike MC Trainer 4 remains one of the most affordable yet fully functional cross-training shoes on the market. True to the brand's product description, this iteration is notably more grounded and flexible in the forefoot to accommodate strength training and versatile gym use. However, our lab tests revealed both significant improvements and compromises that are worth weighing up before adding this trainer to your cart, no matter how tempting its low price may be.

Pros

  • Great value for money
  • Lower platform adds stability
  • Good outsole traction on gym floors
  • Flexible forefoot allows foot bending
  • Excellent heel and midfoot lockdown
  • Hard-wearing upper materials
  • Slightly softer midsole adds comfort

Cons

  • Restrictingly shallow toebox
  • Poor breathability
  • Subpar outsole durability

Who should buy

We believe the Nike MC Trainer 4 could be a solid match for people who:

  • want a cheap but capable entry-level gym shoe
  • prefer a low-drop platform with a grounded feel

Nike MC Trainer 4 review

Who should NOT buy

Its shallow toebox and lack of breathability can ruin the MC Trainer 4 for many gym goers, so you might as well consider the Nike Flex Train as an alternative. It also proved to be lighter and more flexible than the MC Trainer.

And if you can catch a discount on the Nike Free Metcon 7, you will get next-level comfort, stability, and gym versatility for the same cost!

Nike MC Trainer 4 lab test

Cushioning

Shock absorption

Going for a more grounded platform in the MC Trainer 4, Nike also reduced the trainer's shock absorption to 82 SA in the heel and 63 SA in the forefoot.

But on a positive note, this is still on par with the training shoe average, offering good impact protection for general gym training.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
MC Trainer 4 82 SA
Average 83 SA
Compared to 39 training shoes
Number of shoes
12 SA
Shock absorption
133 SA

Energy return

We didn't experience any tangible springback in this Nike trainer, which is no surprise given its below-average energy return of 50.9% in the heel and 49.5% in the forefoot.

You can expect plantedness and control, but not a bouncy ride, in the MC Trainer 4.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
MC Trainer 4 49.5%
Average 55.3%
Compared to 39 training shoes
Number of shoes
32.0%
Energy return
80.0%

Heel stack

The brand shaved as much as 8 mm off the previous MC Trainer's heel stack height, reducing it from 30.6 to 22.6 mm in the new iteration!

Nike MC Trainer 4 Heel stack
Test results
MC Trainer 4 22.6 mm
Average 24.2 mm
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
6.9 mm
Heel stack
36.2 mm

Forefoot stack

The shoe's forefoot stack also lost 3.1 mm, going from 21.8 mm to 18.7 mm, and putting the ball of the foot much closer to the ground.

This helped the MC Trainer 4 earn some stability points but detracted from the cushioning it provided for high-impact cardio sessions.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Forefoot stack
Test results
MC Trainer 4 18.7 mm
Average 17.8 mm
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
6.8 mm
Forefoot stack
25.0 mm

Drop

We also registered a significant reduction in the shoe's heel-to-toe drop. With 3.9 mm instead of 8.8 mm, the 4th edition puts the foot in a flatter, almost parallel position to the ground.

On the one hand, this update made the shoe's platform even more grounded, but on the other hand, it may pose a challenge for people with tight Achilles and calves, especially during squats and lunges.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Drop
Test results
MC Trainer 4 3.9 mm
Average 6.4 mm
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Drop
12.6 mm

Midsole softness

Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

The shoe's product description also promised 'a softer foam midsole' for improved comfort, so we used the same Shore A durometer to measure the foam softness of both trainers.

At 40.8 AC, the MC Trainer 4's midsole is indeed 8.3% softer than the MC Trainer 3 (44.5 AC), and it is also 17% softer than the category average. But please note that it's not plush cushioning by any means!

There is just enough give to keep this Nike trainer comfortable for walking, running, and jumping, but that compression is rather moderate and controlled.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Midsole softness
Test results
MC Trainer 4 40.8 AC
Average 48.9 AC
Compared to 32 training shoes
Number of shoes
33.3 AC
Soft ←→ Firm
94.1 AC

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
Nike MC Trainer 4 Internal length
Test results
MC Trainer 4 270.5 mm
Average 268.9 mm
Compared to 37 training shoes
Number of shoes
252.8 mm
Internal length
276.3 mm

Width / Fit

Looking at the Nike MC Trainer 4's one-to-one gel cast, we can clearly see the generous horizontal space it provides in the forefoot.

In the ball-of-the-foot area, we recorded an above-average reading of 99.8 mm, which is fairly accommodating for a training shoe.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Width / Fit
Test results
MC Trainer 4 99.8 mm
Average 96.4 mm
Compared to 32 training shoes
Number of shoes
90.0 mm
Width / Fit
101.4 mm

Toebox width

Despite its slightly tapered shape, this trainer's toebox doesn't get too narrow towards the toes. Our caliper measured its width at a standard 72.9 mm in the big toe area.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Toebox width
Test results
MC Trainer 4 72.9 mm
Average 73.3 mm
Compared to 32 training shoes
Number of shoes
65.1 mm
Toebox width
81.0 mm

Toebox height

But despite the shoe's relatively average toebox dimensions, its shallow vertical space made the fit quite restrictive around the toes.

So much so that it showed the absolute lowest toebox height of 21.5 mm on our caliper! While it gives the MC Trainer 4 a sleeker, more glove-like fit, it can easily cause pressure points or even aggravate black toenails and other toe-related issues.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Toebox height
Test results
MC Trainer 4 21.5 mm
Average 27.0 mm
Compared to 32 training shoes
Number of shoes
21.5 mm
Toebox height
34.0 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

We are happy to report that the MC Trainer 4 can accommodate some intense action on rubber, hardwood, artificial turf, and other common gym surfaces thanks to its dependable outsole traction.

With a solid friction coefficient of 0.36, it provides a strong, confidence-inspiring bite on the floor.

Test results
MC Trainer 4 0.36
Average 0.34
Compared to 37 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.18
Forefoot traction
0.53

Outsole design

The shoe features a straightforward outsole design with triangular lugs that are raised in the forefoot to provide a stronger bite where it's most needed (i.e., during sled pushes, jumps, and lunges) and recessed in the midfoot and heel for improved stability and connection with the floor.

The MC Trainer 4 also retained the same three flex grooves in the forefoot, which enhance the shoe's pliability there.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

With less material underfoot, the new MC Trainer can bend much more freely.

Nike MC Trainer 4 forefoot flex

Measuring the force it takes to bend this Nike trainer by 30 degrees at 10.5N, we found that it is a good 15% more flexible than its predecessor.

Bending our feet during lunges, planks, burpees, and other exercises felt natural and unhindered.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
MC Trainer 4 10.5N
Average 10.3N
Compared to 38 training shoes
Number of shoes
2.5N
Flexible ←→ Stiff
19.3N

Weight

We expected its reduced stack height to shave some ounces off the Nike MC Trainer 4, but, unfortunately, that was not the case.

Despite the lower stack, its reinforced midsole tooling and stronger upper material kept the shoe at the same weight of 10.7 oz (303g). But the good news is that it's not heavy per se, falling squarely within the average.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Weight
Test results
MC Trainer 4 10.7 oz (303g)
Average 10.7 oz (302g)
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
7.7 oz (218g)
Weight
13.8 oz (392g)

Stability

Lateral stability test

Its lowered stack, redesigned midsole, added heel clip, and other smaller updates all helped strengthen the MC Trainer 4's stability.

Of course, they didn't turn the shoe into a Nike Metcon, but we felt we could trust this budget-friendly trainer for light-to-moderate lifting exercises with machines and dumbbells, as well as slightly heavier barbell work up to 265 lbs (120 kg).

Torsional rigidity

With its lower-sitting platform, the MC Trainer 4 no longer relies on the pronounced midfoot sidewalls and rubber lips as much as the previous version did.

Nike MC Trainer 3 vs 4

That's why its torsional rigidity measured a moderate 13.2 Nm, putting it on par with the category average. It has enough structure to resist lateral pressure to keep the foot in place for general training.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Torsional rigidity
Test results
MC Trainer 4 13.2 Nm
Average 13.8 Nm
Compared to 21 training shoes
Number of shoes
5.1 Nm
Flexible ←→ Rigid
18.8 Nm

Heel counter stiffness

However, the heel of the new MC trainer got significantly more supportive thanks to a stiffer heel counter inside it and a rubberized heel clip on the outside.

Both raised the shoe's stiffness score to the maximum 5 out of 5, locking the rearfoot securely in place.

Test results
MC Trainer 4 5
Average 2.9
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The lower stack allowed Nike to trim the MC Trainer 4's midsole width slightly without compromising stability. We measured the widest point of the shoe's platform at a standard 112.6 mm.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
MC Trainer 4 112.6 mm
Average 112.2 mm
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
103.8 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
118.2 mm

Midsole width - heel

The shoe's heel width also measured a narrower 85.8 mm, making it a bit more streamlined than the previous version.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Midsole width - heel
Test results
MC Trainer 4 85.8 mm
Average 86.9 mm
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
71.1 mm
Midsole width - heel
95.9 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

Another welcome update to the MC Trainer 4 is its sturdier, more tightly woven upper fabric. Unlike the previous version's open mesh, it proved impressively wear-resistant, showing minimal wear and tear in our Dremel test.

An excellent result for a budget-friendly shoe, it earned a high toebox durability score of 4 out of 5.

Test results
MC Trainer 4 4
Average 2.7
Compared to 45 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The shoe's interior lining also improved its durability in the new iteration, landing a more solid heel padding durability score of 3 out of 5.

Test results
MC Trainer 4 3
Average 3
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

Sadly, the shoe's outsole rubber didn't see any improvement in the MC Trainer 4. Our Dremel ground away a substantial 1.4 mm of material, but perhaps that's not too surprising for a training shoe priced under $100.

Test results
MC Trainer 4 1.4 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear (Good ←→ Bad)
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

At least Nike made sure there was a good amount of rubber on this MC Trainer to avoid its premature outsole wear.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Outsole thickness
Test results
MC Trainer 4 3.8 mm
Average 3.5 mm
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
5.1 mm

Comfort

Breathability

What's the downside of a more hard-wearing upper material? Ventilation took a major hit in the MC Trainer 4.

Not allowing a tiny hint of smoke to pass through its toebox, this trainer can get sweaty and stuffy pretty quickly in a hot indoor gym. Thus, we couldn't rate its breathability any higher than 1 out of 5.

Nike MC Trainer 4 mesh under microscope
Test results
MC Trainer 4 1
Average 3.5
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Tongue padding

We also noticed a slight reduction in interior padding, particularly around the collar and in the tongue. The latter showed a moderate thickness of 5.1 mm, which is just enough to protect the instep from lace pressure but not plush enough to make the step-in feel particularly cozy.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Tongue padding
Test results
MC Trainer 4 5.1 mm
Average 5.9 mm
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.2 mm
Tongue padding
15.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue stays non-gusseted in the new MC Trainer, which can cause it to shift and bunch during intense training sessions with lots of side-to-side movement.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
MC Trainer 4 None

Insole thickness

Underfoot, a 3.9 mm foam insole adds a touch of padding to soften the contact between the foot and the platform. Not too cushy, it is on par with the typical training shoe insole.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Insole thickness
Test results
MC Trainer 4 3.9 mm
Average 4.0 mm
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Insole thickness
7.2 mm

Removable insole

The insole is removable in case you want to go for a more raw underfoot experience or get a little more vertical space in the toebox.

We wouldn't recommend inserting an alternative insole into this Nike trainer due to its unusually shallow toebox.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Removable insole
Test results
MC Trainer 4 Yes

Heel tab

There is no pull tab or finger loop on the MC Trainer 4, but its stiff heel counter and wide shoe mouth make it easy enough to slide inside.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Heel tab
Test results
MC Trainer 4 None

Misc

Reflective elements

None of the shoe's components reflected light in this Nike trainer.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Reflective elements
Test results
MC Trainer 4 No

Price

The Nike MC Trainer 4 remains one of the cheapest training shoe options from Nike. And we are happy to see some quality updates in this iteration with just a minor $5 price hike.

Nike MC Trainer 4 Price
Test results
MC Trainer 4 $85
Average $128
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
$65
Price
$170