Our verdict

Even though HOKA toned down the Solimar 2's cushioning to make it a bit more gym-ready, the shoe still remains better suited for cardio, general gym use, and walking. Jumping and running felt particularly good thanks to the trainer's high shock absorption and lightweight build. As long as you steer clear of any serious strength training in this HOKA shoe, you can expect a very comfortable gym-to-street companion.

Pros

  • Well-cushioned for high-impact workouts
  • Exceptionally lightweight
  • Stable for cardio and bodyweight training
  • True medium-width fit with wide options
  • Generously padded interiors
  • Durable for indoor use
  • Good grip for gym surfaces

Cons

  • Not for weightlifting
  • Limited forefoot flexibility

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

Having measured each and every parameter of the HOKA Solimar 2 in our lab, we can recommend it to people who:

  • want one affordable option for day-to-day use, casual runs, and the gym
  • need a lightweight and cushioned trainer for aerobics, cardio, and treadmill
  • engage in easy-to-moderate strength training without lifting heavy

HOKA Solimar 2 review

Who should NOT buy

If you intend to do strength training with weights up to 225 lbs (100 kg) or engage in tougher functional fitness routines, we recommend the Nike Free Metcon 7 instead. It offers much better cross-training versatility at the same price.

And if you are a beginner gym-goer who wants even greater cross-training versatility at the lowest possible price, the Nike MC Trainer 3 is a standout option.

HOKA Solimar 2 lab test

Cushioning

Shock absorption

Bridging the gap between running, walking, and training shoes, the HOKA Solimar 2 clearly leans toward cushioning more than the other cross-trainers in our lab.

And that reflects in its higher shock absorption measurements of 108 SA in the heel and 90 SA in the forefoot. This is a little less than the original Solimar offered (116/96 SA), but the difference is not critical.

This makes the Solimar 2 a better option for high-impact workouts like cardio, aerobics, treadmill runs, elliptical sessions, and even day-to-day use.

HOKA Solimar 2 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Solimar 2 108 SA
Average 82 SA
Compared to 34 training shoes
Number of shoes
12 SA
Shock absorption
118 SA

Energy return

The new version's energy return remained on par with its predecessor's and the category average. It is moderately responsive at 52.9% in the heel and 55.4% in the forefoot, making the ride slightly springier for general fitness, agility work, jumps, and short runs.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Solimar 2 52.9%
Average 53.7%
Compared to 34 training shoes
Number of shoes
32.0%
Energy return
72.0%

Heel stack

HOKA describes the Solimar 2's stack height as 'approachable,' and we assume that's because its platform is not as towering as that of a typical HOKA shoe, like the Bondi 9 (41.3 mm) or the Clifton 10 (44.4 mm).

Our digital caliper showed that this trainer has a more moderate heel stack height of 28.9 mm. And while it is above average for the training shoe category, it is on par with some popular cross-trainers, such as the Nike Free Metcon 7 (28.4 mm).

HOKA Solimar 2 Heel stack
Test results
Solimar 2 28.9 mm
Average 24.6 mm
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 mm
Heel stack
36.2 mm

Forefoot stack

At 23.9 mm, the Solimar 2's forefoot stack is also taller than average, offering better impact protection for the ball of the foot and the toe joints, but also detracting from ground feel and proprioception.

HOKA Solimar 2 Forefoot stack
Test results
Solimar 2 23.9 mm
Average 18.1 mm
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
6.8 mm
Forefoot stack
27.7 mm

Drop

Our measured heel-to-toe drop (5.0 mm) comes close to the stated 4.0 mm, confirming that the heel sits almost parallel to the toes inside the Solimar 2. It is an optimal setup for cross-training as it promotes balance.

HOKA Solimar 2 Drop
Test results
Solimar 2 5.0 mm
Average 6.5 mm
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Drop
13.4 mm

Midsole softness

Updated
Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

As promised in its product description, the shoe's midsole is neither too plush nor too unforgivingly firm.

With a durometer measurement of 41.8 AC, its foam sits right at the edge of balanced and firm. This makes the Solimar 2's platform more compressible than that of a typical trainer, so we wouldn't recommend lifting heavier loads in this HOKA shoe.

HOKA Solimar 2 Midsole softness
Test results
Solimar 2 41.8 AC
Average 49.0 AC
Compared to 27 training shoes
Number of shoes
33.3 AC
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
70.5 AC

Size and fit

Size

HOKA Solimar 2 fits true to size (23 votes).

Small
True to size
Large

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
HOKA Solimar 2 Internal length
Test results
Solimar 2 270.4 mm
Average 269.1 mm
Compared to 32 training shoes
Number of shoes
260.0 mm
Internal length
276.3 mm

Width / Fit

The brand promises a more accommodating fit in the HOKA Solimar 2, and we created a gel cast to see how it compares to other cross-trainers.

Measuring its dimensions with a digital caliper, we recorded 95.5 mm at the widest point of the cast, confirming that the shoe is on par with the category average.

But if you need more space, some color options are also available in a wide width option.

HOKA Solimar 2 Width / Fit
Test results
Solimar 2 95.5 mm
Average 96.4 mm
Compared to 27 training shoes
Number of shoes
90.0 mm
Width / Fit
101.4 mm

Toebox width

The shoe's toebox shape is fairly rounded and shows no pronounced tapering, with a moderate width of 72.3 mm in the big toe area.

HOKA Solimar 2 Toebox width
Test results
Solimar 2 72.3 mm
Average 73.2 mm
Compared to 27 training shoes
Number of shoes
65.1 mm
Toebox width
81.0 mm

Toebox height

We experienced no pressure on the top of our toes either.

The shoe's toebox offers adequate vertical space, measuring 28.4 mm.

HOKA Solimar 2 Toebox height
Test results
Solimar 2 28.4 mm
Average 27.2 mm
Compared to 27 training shoes
Number of shoes
22.1 mm
Toebox height
34.0 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

Despite the Solimar 2's limited rubber coverage, its friction coefficient of 0.38 ensures reliable grip on gym surfaces and dry concrete.

But because it also doubles as a walking shoe, we would be wary of wet pavement and other slick urban surfaces.

Test results
Solimar 2 0.38
Average 0.33
Compared to 32 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.18
Forefoot traction
0.53

Outsole design

Opting for zonal rubber outsole pods rather than a full-length rubber outsole, HOKA sacrifices some grip and durability to reduce the Solimar 2's weight.

HOKA Solimar 2 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

The higher stack height of this HOKA shoe naturally limits its forefoot bending angle, making it less flexible for planks, lunges, and agility work.

HOKA Solimar 2 fleixble forefoot

Even though flex grooves help with pliability a little, the Solimar 2 still required an above-average force of 13.3N to bend by 30 degrees in our lab test.

HOKA Solimar 2 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Solimar 2 13.3N
Average 10.5N
Compared to 33 training shoes
Number of shoes
2.5N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
19.3N

Weight

Built as a cross-category shoe that leans more towards cushioning than lifting, the HOKA Solimar 2 is rather lightweight.

At only 8.0 oz (227g), it is, in fact, the lightest training shoe in our roster, minimalist shoes excluded!

HOKA Solimar 2 Weight
Test results
Solimar 2 8.0 oz (227g)
Average 10.7 oz (304g)
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
6.4 oz (181g)
Weight
13.8 oz (392g)

Breathability

The HOKA Solimar 2 features a thin mesh upper with no internal padding in the toebox and vamp areas.

However, our smoke test shows that its ventilation capacity is not as high as it may seem at first. The smoke billows are steady, but not thick enough to rate the shoe's breathability any higher than 3 out of 5.

Our transparency test also showed thick padding beneeath the mesh in the tongue and collar areas.

HOKA Solimar 2 Breathability Microscope test

Looking at the fabric through our microscope showed that its chainlinking is similar to jacquard, more tightly woven in some areas and more open in others.

HOKA Solimar 2 Breathability under microscope

Test results
Solimar 2 3
Average 3.5
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

The HOKA Solimar 2 is surprisingly stable for its kind, but it's surely not comparable with lifting-oriented trainers like Nike Metcons or adidas Dropsets.

Its higher-stacked, rockered, and softer platform makes the Solimar 2 a better choice for cardio-focused workouts, treadmills, ellipticals, and very light strength training (think bodyweight and light dumbbells).

Torsional rigidity

Updated

With weightlifting out of the picture, we can say that this HOKA shoe's stability is quite good for general gym use, aerobics/cardio classes, and the like.

Its torsional rigidity was on par with the category average, requiring a torque of 14.4 Nm to twist in both directions. That's about the same as it takes the Reebok Nano X5 (14.8 Nm)!

HOKA Solimar 2 Torsional rigidity
Test results
Solimar 2 14.4 Nm
Average 14.2 Nm
Compared to 16 training shoes
Number of shoes
5.1 Nm
Torsional rigidity
18.8 Nm

Heel counter stiffness

HOKA has completely reworked the Solimar 2's heel design, making it much beefier and more structured.

HOKA Solimar 1 vs 2 heel design

Performing the same manual test on both shoes' heel counters, we immediately noticed how much stiffer the new version got! On a 1-5 stiffness scale, it went from 2 to 4!

Not to mention the generous foam padding added to the v2's collar, which contributes to a much more secure heel lockdown.

Test results
Solimar 2 4
Average 2.8
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

A broad base is yet another important stability component of the HOKA Solimar 2. Our caliper recorded one of the widest readings in the shoe's forefoot at 116.3 mm!

HOKA Solimar 2 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Solimar 2 116.3 mm
Average 111.3 mm
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
101.0 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
117.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The shoe's heel also showed an above-average width of 91.7 mm in the widest point, and an 'extended crash pad' at the back of the shoe makes heel strikes a bit smoother on runs and walks.

HOKA Solimar 2 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Solimar 2 91.7 mm
Average 87.4 mm
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
71.1 mm
Midsole width - heel
97.4 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

As our Dremel test showed, the Solimar 2's soft, unprotected mesh isn't the most durable material. Completely torn in a matter of seconds, it scored the minimum 1 out of 5 in our toebox durability test.

Test results
Solimar 2 1
Average 2.7
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The interior mesh, on the other hand, proved to be much more resistant to scuffing and tearing. With practically no trace of damage, the Solimar 2 walked away with a proud heel padding durability score of 4 out of 5.

Test results
Solimar 2 4
Average 3
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

While the shoe's largely exposed foam raises concerns about its long-term durability, the areas protected by rubber pods look much more reassuring.

Taking a heel rubber pod through a rigorous 18-second drilling test, we were pleasantly surprised by its wear resistance! The dent was as shallow as 0.6 mm, which is an excellent result for a training shoe outsole!

Test results
Solimar 2 0.6 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 39 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

At only 2.3 mm thick, the Solimar 2 relies on thin yet highly durable rubber pods for its outsole.

HOKA Solimar 2 Outsole thickness
Test results
Solimar 2 2.3 mm
Average 3.5 mm
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
2.1 mm
Outsole thickness
5.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The shoe's insole thickness proved to be standard at 4.2 mm in the heel.

HOKA Solimar 2 Insole thickness
Test results
Solimar 2 4.2 mm
Average 4.0 mm
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.7 mm
Insole thickness
7.2 mm

Removable insole

We had no trouble removing the Solimar 2's insole, and its overall fit allows for a custom insert if needed.

HOKA Solimar 2 Removable insole
Test results
Solimar 2 Yes

Tongue padding

HOKA doubled down on internal padding for the Solimar 2's tongue and collar, which showed in its above-average tongue thickness of 8.9 mm as well!

HOKA Solimar 2 Tongue padding
Test results
Solimar 2 8.9 mm
Average 5.9 mm
Compared to 51 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Tongue padding
11.3 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The shoe's tongue is non-gusseted, but the padding helps keep it in place throughout the movement.

HOKA Solimar 2 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Solimar 2 None

Heel tab

No pull tabs on the HOKA Solimar 2, but its low and structured heel counter makes shoe entry quite easy.

HOKA Solimar 2 Heel tab
Test results
Solimar 2 None

Price

The comfort and cushioning of this HOKA shoe offer good value for money , but it falls short in cross-training versatility.

HOKA Solimar 2 Price
Test results
Solimar 2 $125
Average $127
Compared to 50 training shoes
Number of shoes
$65
Price
$170