Our verdict

The Salomon Ultra Glide 4 stands out as one of the most unusual trail shoes we’ve tested lately. We found that the combination of the towering stack height, plush foam, and aggressive rocker delivers a smooth and protective ride that performs especially well on easier trails and long-distance runs. We also really liked the premium upper and secure foothold. However, the low energy return, above-average weight, and sharp toebox make this a niche-focused shoe rather than a broadly appealing trail option.

Pros

  • Stable for a max-stack trail shoe
  • Smooth, rockered ride
  • Excellent comfort
  • Premium upper
  • Solid traction results
  • Versatile lug design for mixed terrain
  • Easy-to-adjust Quicklace system
  • High forefoot shock absorption
  • Unique aesthetics

Cons

  • Low energy return dulls the ride
  • Pointy toebox
  • Slightly heavy versus modern rivals

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

In our view, the Salomon Ultra Glide 4 is a great choice for:

  • Forefoot strikers looking for a max-cushioned trail shoe with a bold design and enough versatility for mixed terrain.
  • Those with narrow feet who want a secure fit and a comfortable ride for long trail runs.
  • Trail runners who enjoy bold, standout designs that look completely different from most shoes on the market.
  • Salomon fans searching for a high-stack model that keeps the brand’s signature Quicklace system.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4

Who should NOT buy

Runners chasing a fast ride may end up disappointed with the Ultra Glide 4. We found in the lab that its Energy Foam midsole lacks rebound, so we believe better choices exist for a similar price—like the KIPRUN Kipsummit Max or Salomon Aero Glide 4 GRVL.

We also think this shoe favors runners with narrow feet due to its sharply-tapered forefoot shape. In our experience, those needing extra toe splay will likely feel restricted, and we recommend considering the Altra Olympus 6 or Nike Zegama 2 instead.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

Here in the lab, we usually find noticeably higher shock absorption in the heel than in the forefoot, but the Ultra Glide 4 completely breaks that pattern. We measured 122 SA in the heel, which sits around our current average, while the forefoot reached an impressive 121 SA.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 122 SA
Average 123 SA
Compared to 96 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
62 SA
Shock absorption
160 SA

Energy return

Where we found truly disappointing results was in energy return. In fact, the numbers were quite poor, as the Ultra Glide 4 managed only 47.6% in the heel and 51.6% in the forefoot during our testing.

Those figures point to one clear issue: the Energy Foam midsole feels outdated and needs to be replaced with a more modern, higher-rebound compound.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 47.6%
Average 56.2%
Compared to 96 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
42.0%
Energy return
76.0%

Heel stack

In our photo, you can clearly spot Salomon’s relieveSPHERE geometry, visible through the wave-like curves sculpted into the midsole. And we also proved that the Ultra Glide 4 reaches a towering 38.6 mm in the heel, confirming its max-stack design for a trail shoe.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Heel stack
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 38.6 mm
Average 33.0 mm
Compared to 170 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
19.5 mm
Heel stack
47.3 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot is also impressively tall for a trail shoe, reaching 31.1 mm in our measurements and creating a highly-protective ride for runners who enjoy feeling isolated from the terrain. However, those seeking a more ground-connected experience should definitely look elsewhere.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Forefoot stack
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 31.1 mm
Average 25.4 mm
Compared to 170 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
13.4 mm
Forefoot stack
36.7 mm

Drop

Salomon states a 6 mm drop, and during our test runs we had no reason to seriously question that claim. However, once we sliced the shoe in half and measured it in the lab, we recorded an actual drop of 7.5 mm.

That difference is simply too small to notice while running, and if you doubt it, grab a measuring tape and see just how tiny 1.5 mm really is.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Drop
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 7.5 mm
Average 7.6 mm
Compared to 169 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.1 mm
Drop
17.3 mm

Midsole softness

Updated
Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

The Salomon Ultra Glide 4 clearly targets runners who dislike classic, old-school trail shoes. Its aggressively-rockered midsole with unusual shapes pairs with a softer-than-average foam that scored 33.1 AC in our lab.

The ride is heavily comfort-focused, and the plush Energy Foam further highlights the lack of rebound. However, if speed is not a priority for you, this setup may still feel quite enjoyable.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Midsole softness
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 33.1 AC
Average 36.8 AC
Compared to 49 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
26.5 AC
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
46.8 AC

Rocker

Salomon equipped the Ultra Glide 4 with its distinctive relieveSPHERE technology, pairing a deeply-rockered platform with wave-like sculpting along the lower section of the midsole where it merges with the outsole.

The brand claims that this unusual design helps reduce fatigue-related hot spots during long runs. It may offer some benefit, but we wouldn’t expect dramatic results, and in our view, a better foam with improved shock absorption would have made a far bigger difference.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Internal length
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 272.0 mm
Average 269.1 mm
Compared to 91 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
262.2 mm
Internal length
277.4 mm

Width / Fit

Anyone who has tried Salomon shoes before already knows that the brand usually favors snug, narrow-fitting designs, making them a strong choice for runners with slim feet.

With the Ultra Glide 4, we found that Salomon stayed very close to that formula, offering limited room for toe splay alongside a highly-secure wrap around the arch and first MTP joint. In our first measurement, we found 94.0 mm.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Width / Fit
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 94.0 mm
Average 95.6 mm
Compared to 107 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
89.8 mm
Width / Fit
100.4 mm

Toebox width

However, the second toebox measurement is the one that truly reveals the shape of the forefoot. At just 71.4 mm, the Ultra Glide 4 features an unmistakably pointy design, so you really need to be comfortable with that fit, especially for long-distance runs or ultras.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Toebox width
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 71.4 mm
Average 74.3 mm
Compared to 107 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
67.1 mm
Toebox width
85.3 mm

Toebox height

Where we found absolutely no restrictions was in toebox height.

The Ultra Glide 4 offers a massively-generous 28.8 mm of vertical clearance, a sky-high result that should create comfort issues for virtually no one.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Toebox height
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 28.8 mm
Average 26.9 mm
Compared to 107 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
21.5 mm
Toebox height
31.8 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

Salomon remains one of the major brands that prefer to avoid partnering with Vibram and relying on the Italian brand’s Megagrip rubber. That decision likely helps reduce costs, although the final performance still falls short of Vibram’s top-tier compounds.

Even so, the contaGRIP outsole used in the Ultra Glide 4 delivered respectable results in our SATRA TM144 wet-traction test over concrete, scoring 0.63. It’s far from class-leading, but still good enough to comfortably pass our benchmark.

Test results
Ultra Glide 4 0.63
Average 0.64
Compared to 42 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
0.35
Forefoot traction
0.85

Lug depth

We measured a lug depth of 3.9 mm, clearly showing that Salomon aimed for a highly-versatile setup capable of handling a wide range of terrain types.

It won’t feel as smooth as a gravel-focused shoe on easier surfaces or as confidence-inspiring as more aggressive options in technical terrain, but this lug depth strikes an excellent middle ground for runners seeking one shoe that can do a bit of everything.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Lug depth
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 3.9 mm
Average 3.5 mm
Compared to 169 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Lug depth
5.5 mm

Outsole design

Another detail that reinforces the versatile nature of the Ultra Glide 4 is the aggressive spacing between the lugs. As this photo clearly shows, Salomon left large open areas throughout the outsole, a design choice that helps shed mud and maintain traction on wet terrain.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 outsole

It’s also fascinating to see how the outsole integrates the relieveSPHERE concept, with those distinctive concave cavities spread across the platform. We’ve never seen anything quite like this from another trail shoe brand, but as we said before, we're unsure if it's actually a gimmick or a feature that brings real benefits...

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

The towering stack height of the Ultra Glide 4 already made us expect above-average longitudinal stiffness, and our lab tests fully confirmed that suspicion. Even without any kind of plate, the shoe reached a substantial 19.7N in our custom-built machine that bends shoes to 30 degrees.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 19.7N
Average 14.7N
Compared to 96 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
3.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
26.4N

Weight

The Salomon Ultra Glide 4 is definitely not a lightweight shoe, tipping our scale at 10.4 oz or 295g.

However, once we consider the full-length outsole coverage and the massive amount of cushioning underfoot, we think that this result feels fairly reasonable and far from being a major drawback.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Weight
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 10.4 oz (295g)
Average 10.2 oz (288g)
Compared to 170 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
7.5 oz (213g)
Weight
12.7 oz (359g)

Breathability

The upper immediately impressed us with its cozy and comfort-focused feel, which naturally made us curious about breathability. So, it was time to head into the lab and see how it actually performed.

After running our smoke test, we decided to give the Ultra Glide 4 a 3/5 for breathability. Airflow was noticeably better than in the Salomon Speedcross 6, although it still stopped short of reaching truly top-tier ventilation levels.

Most of the airflow comes through the toebox, with some additional ventilation around the midfoot. That area also showcases one of the most visually-interesting parts of the shoe, featuring honeycomb-style panels that nicely reinforce the relieveSPHERE design language.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 microscope

Under the microscope, the engineered mesh looked premium and highly-detailed, making it clear to us that Salomon invested far more effort into the upper than into the midsole foam.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 mesh

We also enjoyed the step-in comfort, especially around the heel, where Salomon added generously-plush padding that creates an exceptionally soft and secure feel around the rearfoot.

Test results
Ultra Glide 4 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 158 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

In terms of stability, the Ultra Glide 4 feels somewhat unusual for a trail shoe. It borrows several ideas more commonly seen in road models, including massive midsole sidewalls and a highly-pronounced heel-to-toe rocker, and together they help create a surprisingly stable ride.

However, we still can’t ignore the plush foam and towering stack height, which is why we believe this shoe works best for runners with neutral mechanics.

Torsional rigidity

Updated

We found that the Ultra Glide 4 delivers moderate torsional rigidity at 15.6N, a result that helps enhance stability and reduce excessive lateral collapse during uneven trail landings.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Torsional rigidity
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 15.6 Nm
Average 16.2 Nm
Compared to 31 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 Nm
Torsional rigidity
25.9 Nm

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter also adds more support than we usually find in this category, earning a firm 4/5 in our assessment. Thankfully, Salomon balanced that rigidity with a generous amount of foam around the heel to keep comfort levels high.

Test results
Ultra Glide 4 4
Average 3
Compared to 166 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Where the Salomon Ultra Glide 4 may leave stability-focused runners wanting more is in the platform dimensions, as the midsole remains fairly average for a trail shoe and the midfoot stays relatively narrow, preserving a more classic and agile geometry.

In our first midsole measurement, we recorded a width of 112.9 mm.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 112.9 mm
Average 113.5 mm
Compared to 170 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
102.1 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.0 mm

Midsole width - heel

The second measurement, taken in the heel, came in at 93.8 mm. That’s slightly above average, but as we mentioned earlier, we still believe this shoe is best suited for neutral runners regardless of their footstrike pattern.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 93.8 mm
Average 90.4 mm
Compared to 170 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
72.0 mm
Midsole width - heel
109.3 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

The upper is easily one of the standout features of this shoe, combining an elegant design with solid trail-ready breathability and an impressively strong 4/5 durability score in our testing.

Test results
Ultra Glide 4 4
Average 3
Compared to 143 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

On the other hand, the ultra-plush heel padding struggled badly against our Dremel test and earned just 2/5 for durability. This area clearly needs some reinforcement in the next Ultra Glide update.

Test results
Ultra Glide 4 2
Average 3.1
Compared to 142 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

Returning to the positive results, we found excellent durability from the contaGRIP outsole.

Our Dremel created only a tiny 0.7 mm dent, a result that strongly suggests long-lasting rubber performance, especially important here since the shoe uses fewer lugs than some competitors and therefore has less rubber in contact with the ground.

Test results
Ultra Glide 4 0.7 mm
Average 0.9 mm
Compared to 136 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

The outsole measured 1.5 mm in thickness, which sits below our current average. However, that was probably the smarter choice for a shoe that already leans toward the heavier side.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Outsole thickness
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 1.5 mm
Average 2.1 mm
Compared to 170 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
0.9 mm
Outsole thickness
4.3 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The insole came in slightly thinner than our current lab average, measuring 3.7 mm in thickness.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Insole thickness
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 3.7 mm
Average 4.7 mm
Compared to 167 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
2.1 mm
Insole thickness
7.9 mm

Removable insole

Salomon partnered with Ortholite for the insole, and the branding is impossible to miss. Still, if you prefer using your own aftermarket insole, swapping it out should be easy.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Removable insole
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

The midsole became 14% firmer after spending 20 minutes inside our freezer, which is actually a fairly solid result. Since this shoe already leans toward a plush underfoot feel, maintaining most of that softness in cold conditions is definitely a positive outcome.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 14%
Average 24%
Compared to 157 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
2%
Midsole softness in cold
61%

Reflective elements

We found absolutely no reflective elements anywhere on the shoe, and that feels like a clear oversight. Adding one or two reflective details on the sides or heel would have been incredibly easy and inexpensive.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Reflective elements
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 No

Tongue padding

The Salomon Ultra Glide 4 ditches traditional laces in favor of the brand’s signature Quicklace system, making adjustments incredibly fast and effortless. We also appreciated the lace garage placement on the top of the tongue, which keeps everything easy to access while maintaining a clean overall design.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 lace garage

We found the tongue exceptionally comfortable too, packing a generous 7.8 mm of padding. To us, that makes it obvious that Salomon prioritized long-distance comfort far more than any kind of lightweight or performance-focused setup here.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Tongue padding
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 7.8 mm
Average 6.5 mm
Compared to 170 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
0.8 mm
Tongue padding
12.3 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue uses a semi-gusseted construction clearly inspired by modern road running shoes, connected through a thin and highly-breathable fabric panel.

It’s not the ideal setup for technical terrain or dusty environments where a tighter seal helps prevent debris from entering the toebox, but in most other situations it works extremely well.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 Both sides (semi)

Heel tab

Salomon kept the heel design clean and straightforward, skipping any finger-loop tab and instead relying on a small TPU overlay to cover the upper stitching while maintaining a sleek look.

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 Heel tab
Test results
Ultra Glide 4 None

Price

There’s a small price increase here that doesn’t really feel supported by a meaningful technology upgrade, although we also can’t pretend this comes as a surprise given how aggressively most brands have been raising prices lately. Even so, from a value standpoint, we believe this shoe needs a modern foam update to truly stand out.

Test results
Ultra Glide 4 $160
Average $154
Compared to 170 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$260