Our verdict

We found that the HOKA Challenger 8 moves the series forward with extra cushioning, a higher drop, and a more accommodating fit that benefits a wider audience. Its redesigned lugs provide excellent grip on mixed terrain, and the upper impressed us with its combination of breathability and protection. The CMEVA foam remains the same and the shoe has gained a bit of weight, but we believe this update still represents real progress, especially for heel strikers and runners who found the previous toebox too narrow.

Pros

  • Excellent cushioning with improved SA
  • Flexible for a max-stack trail shoe
  • Roomier than before
  • Impressive durability
  • Fantastic airflow for summer adventures
  • Better suited for heel strikers
  • Great stability for heel strikers
  • Redesigned lugs for better grip
  • Ideal for gravel

Cons

  • Outdated CMEVA foam
  • Slightly heavier than version 7
  • Price increase
  • Non-gusseted tongue

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

After our lab testing, we believe the HOKA Challenger 8 is a strong pick for:

  • Runners looking for a versatile road-to-trail shoe that handles various terrains and even works for casual wear.
  • Trail enthusiasts who stay away from highly technical paths and value long-lasting durability.
  • Heel strikers who previously avoided HOKA’s lower drops.
  • Fans of the Clifton who want a tougher, trail-ready version that feels very similar underfoot.

HOKA Challenger 8

Who should NOT buy

We believe the HOKA Challenger 8 is not be the best pick for those after energy return. During our testing, we found that its compression-molded EVA foam feels outdated and lacks the energetic bounce found in newer foams. For a more dynamic experience, we think options like the Nike Wildhorse 10 or New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro v9 deliver better results in a similar price range.

Additionally, we think the Challenger 8’s maximalist midsole may not please runners who value a terrain-connected feel. From our perspective, the Brooks Cascadia 18 or the Nike Pegasus Trail 5 offer a more natural experience while keeping reasonable impact protection.

HOKA Challenger 8 parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

HOKA is going full maximalist with its running shoes, and the Challenger 8 fully embraces that trend. It features added foam for improved shock absorption and a more cushy feel.

Version 7 scored 131 SA / 101 SA in the heel and forefoot, while version 8 shows clear progress with 152 SA / 116 SA in our lab test. Because of this, we found the Challenger 8 to be more suitable for longer runs or runners who need extra impact-softening protection from the ground.

HOKA Challenger 8 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Challenger 8 152 SA
Average 122 SA
Compared to 65 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
62 SA
Shock absorption
160 SA

Energy return

New

The Challenger 8 is essentially a door-to-trail adaptation of the Clifton 10, so it’s no surprise that it uses the same CMEVA foam, which offers a ride that's not especially springy.

In our lab tests, it delivered 52.7% energy return in the heel and a slightly higher 58.1% in the forefoot. Both figures are below our average, as expected for this type of foam. And yes, we have to admit it’s a bit disappointing that both the Clifton and Challenger still lack a supercritical EVA foam for a more energetic ride.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Challenger 8 52.7%
Average 55.7%
Compared to 65 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
44.0%
Energy return
76.0%

Heel stack

If you loved the Challenger 7, the new version might bring mixed feelings, as it’s completely transformed in stack height. HOKA went full maximalist with this update, pushing the heel to a towering 40.2 mm. 

This design might surprise some for a hybrid shoe that aims to handle everything, yet it clearly reflects the market’s growing demand for extra-cushioned shoes where impact protection takes center stage.

HOKA Challenger 8 Heel stack
Test results
Challenger 8 40.2 mm
Average 32.4 mm
Compared to 155 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
19.5 mm
Heel stack
44.7 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot is also generously stacked at 30.1 mm, and we think that many runners may struggle to feel the ground, losing the connected, terrain-sensing ride of earlier Challengers.

Whether this new setup feels right or not will ultimately depend on your preferences, and we already mentioned in the "Who should NOT buy" section a few lower-stack alternatives for those seeking a more classic feel underfoot in a hybrid shoe.

HOKA Challenger 8 Forefoot stack
Test results
Challenger 8 30.1 mm
Average 24.8 mm
Compared to 155 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
13.4 mm
Forefoot stack
34.4 mm

Drop

Another major shift HOKA has been rolling out since 2024 across its running lineup is the new drop geometry. 

Most previous HOKAs featured a 5 mm drop, but that’s now history. The brand finally aligned with market demand for higher heel-to-toe offsets that better serve rearfoot strikers, and that’s why the Challenger 8 now offers an official 8 mm drop, which we measured at an even higher 10.1 mm in our lab.

HOKA Challenger 8 Drop
Test results
Challenger 8 10.1 mm
Average 7.6 mm
Compared to 154 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.1 mm
Drop
17.3 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

One aspect that HOKA hasn’t updated (and we truly hoped they would) is the foam. We discovered the same compression-molded EVA compound with modest energy return. However, they refined its softness, giving it a more plush feel underfoot, registering 14.1 HA in our durometer. In version 7, it was 18.8 HA.

From our perspective, this decision likely stems from two reasons: CMEVA remains cost-efficient compared to more advanced foams, and it’s also more durable—a crucial trait for a hybrid, mixed-terrain shoe that lacks full rubber coverage in the outsole.

HOKA Challenger 8 Midsole softness
Test results
Challenger 8 14.1 HA
Average 22.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
9.1 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
39.0 HA

Rocker

The Challenger 8 has a more aggressive rocker compared to its predecessor. This stems from its higher stack, which forces a more pronounced curve to balance the added stiffness of the thicker midsole.

As seen in our image, the heel now features a more dramatic upward sweep, creating a smoother, curved entry. Interestingly, when the shoe is standing still, only the midfoot touches the ground and the forefoot and heel already hover slightly, emphasizing its aggressive rocker geometry.

HOKA Challenger 8 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

HOKA is shaking things up with higher stack heights and increased heel-to-toe drops, and now, finally, a noticeably roomier fit. We immediately felt the difference compared to version 7, and it’s a welcome one for many runners.

After our gel mold of the interior solidified in the refrigerator, we measured a width of 96.5 mm. While that’s around average, it feels refreshingly spacious for a HOKA!

HOKA Challenger 8 Width / Fit
Test results
Challenger 8 96.5 mm
Average 95.5 mm
Compared to 76 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
89.8 mm
Width / Fit
99.9 mm

Toebox width

The toebox is no longer ultra-tapered, now offering an average width of 72.8 mm that feels far more comfortable for long mountain adventures. It even works great for everyday wear... because, why not?

HOKA Challenger 8 Toebox width
Test results
Challenger 8 72.8 mm
Average 74.4 mm
Compared to 76 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
67.1 mm
Toebox width
85.3 mm

Toebox height

We also measured excellent vertical space in the toebox at 28.4 mm.

For us, all of this marks a real game-changer for the Challenger 8. Earlier versions felt restrictive even in wide sizes, but now the fit feels far more universal and accommodating.

HOKA Challenger 8 Toebox height
Test results
Challenger 8 28.4 mm
Average 27.2 mm
Compared to 76 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
21.5 mm
Toebox height
31.8 mm

Traction / Grip

Lug depth

The Challenger 8 comes with 3.7 mm lugs, giving it impressive versatility across different terrains. In our view, it excels on easier routes like coastal or river trails and gravel roads, while still handling short pavement sections and moderate off-road terrain with ease.

HOKA Challenger 8 Lug depth
Test results
Challenger 8 3.7 mm
Average 3.5 mm
Compared to 154 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Lug depth
5.4 mm

Outsole design

New

The new lugs are far superior. The previous design worked well on easy trails but struggled on tougher terrain, limiting its use. Now, the Challenger 8 keeps a similar lug layout but introduces smaller, more aggressive shapes that grip the ground far better on turns, climbs and descents.

HOKA kept the same low rubber coverage found in the Challenger 7. Since the CMEVA foam is highly durable, the brand only placed Durabrasion rubber to protect the lugs, leaving the rest exposed. That said, this is a common approach in hybrid road-to-trail shoes to enhance comfort on pavement and reduce weight.

HOKA Challenger 8 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

The HOKA Challenger 8 impressed us in the lab with a 12.0N result in our 30-degree bend test. Achieving this level of flexibility with a +40 mm stack is remarkable.

It's clear to us that HOKA’s choice to keep the CMEVA foam made possible an outsole without full rubber coverage, and that was key to preserving its smooth, natural bend.

HOKA Challenger 8 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Challenger 8 12.0N
Average 14.5N
Compared to 65 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
3.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
26.4N

Weight

One of the few downgrades in the Challenger 8 compared to its predecessor is its weight. It now comes in at 9.50 oz or 269g, marking an 8% increase over version 7.

This difference is modest, and we believe most runners will find it a fair trade-off, as the extra grams come from the added foam and improved cushioning. Still, one of the Challenger’s biggest strengths has always been its lightweight feel, so we hope HOKA doesn’t push it any further.

HOKA Challenger 8 Weight
Test results
Challenger 8 9.5 oz (269g)
Average 10.2 oz (289g)
Compared to 155 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
7.5 oz (213g)
Weight
12.7 oz (359g)

Breathability

The Challenger 8 features a jacquard mesh upper made from rPET (recycled polyethylene terephthalate), and it turned out to be one of the shoe’s biggest surprises.

Although the material feels thick and durable to the touch, we discovered that it delivers excellent airflow—among the best we’ve tested in trail shoes this year! In our lab tests, it earned a flawless 5/5 score for ventilation.

When we directed a strong light through the upper, we noticed how well-planned the ventilation system is. Instead of being limited to the toebox, the breathability extends across the midfoot too.

HOKA Challenger 8 microscope

Under the microscope, the rPET fabric looks rather standard, with a basic woven pattern that’s common in this price range. 

HOKA Challenger 8 Jacquard Mesh

That’s not a drawback—materials like MATRYX are reserved for higher-end models, and this one performs exactly as it should.

Overall, we found the upper to be one of the highlights of the Challenger 8. It features thick heel and tongue padding for added comfort, exceptional airflow for warm conditions, and a single-layer structure that keeps the shoe light and easy to wear over long distances.

Test results
Challenger 8 5
Average 3.3
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

The Challenger series has always provided solid stability for neutral runners, and we found that HOKA managed to preserve that feel despite the increased stack height. However, we wouldn’t recommend it for those who need strong support, it’s best suited for neutral runners or mild pronators.

Torsional rigidity

A 4/5 score in our torsional rigidity test is quite common for trail shoes, as their thicker rubber and deeper lugs generally make them more rigid than road running models.

Test results
Challenger 8 4
Average 3.6
Compared to 149 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter provides solid support with a 4/5 score, making it slightly firmer than average. However, this shouldn’t be an issue, as HOKA balanced it with generous foam padding for added comfort.

Test results
Challenger 8 4
Average 3
Compared to 147 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The Challenger 8 feels substantial underfoot due to its increased height, yet its forefoot remains reasonably proportioned at 115.3 mm. That's wide enough for solid landings, but far from overly broad.

HOKA Challenger 8 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Challenger 8 115.3 mm
Average 112.5 mm
Compared to 155 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
102.1 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
124.3 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel design has been completely reworked, and we measured an impressive 99.6 mm of width, which is truly massive for this category.

This is fully intentional, as the Challenger 8 targets beginner trail runners and heel strikers, especially now that it has a higher drop. By widening the rear platform, they achieved a more stable feel that complements the added foam in this version.

HOKA Challenger 8 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Challenger 8 99.6 mm
Average 89.6 mm
Compared to 155 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
72.0 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.0 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

We already confirmed that the upper is impressively well-ventilated, but in many running shoes, that means reduced durability. However, the rPET-based fabric delivered an unexpectedly strong performance, resisting abrasion superbly and earning a 4/5 score.

That’s truly remarkable and points to excellent longevity, especially since the toe cap is reinforced with an impact-ready bumper.

Test results
Challenger 8 4
Average 3.1
Compared to 112 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding earned another perfect 5/5, confirming that the Challenger 8 is an outstanding choice for runners who prioritize a long-lasting upper above everything else.

Test results
Challenger 8 5
Average 3
Compared to 111 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

It’s a hat trick for the Challenger 8! Durability impressed once again, with just 0.6 mm of rubber worn off in our Dremel test. That's well below average and perfect for those that really value durability in a trail running shoe.

Honestly, it’s been a while since we’ve seen a shoe ace all three durability tests like this!

Test results
Challenger 8 0.6 mm
Average 0.9 mm
Compared to 105 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

The outsole adds 2.2 mm of extra protection between the foam and the lugs. It might be a bit excessive, given how much exposed foam the Challenger 8 already has and its proven durability, and some weight could’ve been saved here.

HOKA Challenger 8 Outsole thickness
Test results
Challenger 8 2.2 mm
Average 2.3 mm
Compared to 155 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
0.9 mm
Outsole thickness
5.5 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The insole is the same one found in many other HOKA models, measuring 4.5 mm thick. It’s a very common thickness and same EVA material, with nothing else particularly unique compared to most other shoes.

HOKA Challenger 8 Insole thickness
Test results
Challenger 8 4.5 mm
Average 4.7 mm
Compared to 152 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
2.1 mm
Insole thickness
7.9 mm

Removable insole

If you want to swap the insole, no worries—it’s fully removable and features a standard shape.

HOKA Challenger 8 Removable insole
Test results
Challenger 8 Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

As expected from an EVA foam, the Challenger 8 didn’t deliver any miracles in our 20-minute freezer test. Still, a 28% decrease in softness is not a bad result for this material.

HOKA Challenger 8 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Challenger 8 28%
Average 26%
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
5%
Midsole softness in cold
64%

Reflective elements

Kudos to HOKA for adding reflective details to the heel of the Challenger 8!

Test results
Challenger 8 Yes

Tongue padding

We found that the Challenger 8 sticks to a simple, no-nonsense lacing system with flat laces and classic punched eyelets, a setup that fits a hybrid shoe perfectly. 

HOKA Challenger 8 tongue

The tongue padding remains mostly unchanged from version 7, retaining its plush 8.0-mm thickness. It’s great for long-distance comfort and provides excellent protection across the instep.

A meaningful update is that the tongue now includes two loops (like the Clifton 10) to help keep it securely in place, a design feature we’ve seen before in some Topo Athletic models.

HOKA Challenger 8 Tongue padding
Test results
Challenger 8 8.0 mm
Average 6.4 mm
Compared to 155 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1.3 mm
Tongue padding
12.3 mm

Tongue: gusset type

Just like with the Mafate 5, we faced another major disappointment here, and we now get why the tongue features two loops. It’s hard to understand why HOKA released yet another trail shoe without a gusseted tongue, especially considering its price tag.

HOKA Challenger 8 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Challenger 8 None

Price

The HOKA Challenger 8 arrives with a $10 price increase over its predecessor. Is it justified? Probably, as two years have passed, and the shoe brings real upgrades. Still, higher prices are never welcome news for runners!

Test results
Challenger 8 $155
Average $152
Compared to 155 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$275

Heel tab

The HOKA Challenger 8 features a horizontal heel tab designed for easy on-and-off use. We liked how it integrates seamlessly into the padded collar.

HOKA Challenger 8 Heel tab
Test results
Challenger 8 Finger loop