Our verdict

The Skechers Aero Tempo makes it clear that the brand wants to play in the big leagues, and after testing it, we can see why. We really enjoyed the fast, lively feel, the low weight, and the razor-thin upper that stood out in our lab tests. The shoe feels quick and modern, and we liked its futuristic design. Still, we think the narrow fit, high stiffness, and aggressive rocker will make it a poor match for many runners.

Pros

  • Aggressive rocker geometry
  • GoodYear outsole rubber
  • Agile and fun ride
  • Eye-catching design
  • Low weight
  • Solid energy return in the forefoot
  • Amazing race-inspired upper
  • Performs well in cold conditions
  • Ideal for midfoot strikers

Cons

  • Narrow fit won't work for everyone
  • Heel energy return is underwhelming
  • High stiffness limits versatility
  • Limited stability

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

In our view, the Skechers Aero Tempo is ideal for:

  • Runners who enjoy a strong rocker and like a rolling, forward-assisted ride during faster runs and workouts.
  • Skechers fans who have been waiting for a serious, speed-focused shoe for tempo sessions.
  • Midfoot strikers who prefer a narrow, agile platform and do not like the bulky feel of most super trainers.

Skechers Aero Tempo

Who should NOT buy

Based on our lab data, we think the Aero Tempo is not the best pick if energy return is your top priority. We found it falls short of truly fast-paced trainers, so we believe there are better choices like the Adidas Adizero EVO SL or the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5.

We also do not recommend it for runners who want a more stable ride. From our perspective, the narrow midsole could be a problem for certain runners, and we think shoes like the ASICS Superblast 2 or the Adidas Adizero Boston 13 deliver a more supportive feel while staying quick for tempo runs.

Skechers Aero Tempo part

Cushioning

Shock absorption

The Skechers Aero Tempo may have a very specific name, but do not be misled. Despite being marketed as a tempo shoe, it can also handle long runs thanks to its solid shock absorption.

Using the ASTM F1976 method, we measured 134 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot.

Skechers Aero Tempo Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Aero Tempo 134 SA
Average 129 SA
Compared to 308 running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
173 SA

Energy return

In terms of energy return, our lab results had a bittersweet taste. We measured 66.4% in the forefoot, which feels solid and fair, while 57.9% in the heel came across as underwhelming for this model.

The gap is easy to explain: the Aero Tempo uses two foams, HyperBurst and HyperBurst Pro, and the forefoot contains a higher share of the Pro.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Aero Tempo 57.9%
Average 58.5%
Compared to 305 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
83.0%

Heel stack

The Aero Tempo may seem to have a non-maximalist stack height, but there is an important caveat to keep in mind.

While we measured 35.5 mm in the heel using the World Athletics methodology, the shoe’s massive rocker changes everything. Because of this shape, the midfoot rises above 40 mm, something that is very easy to notice on the run.

Skechers Aero Tempo Heel stack
Test results
Aero Tempo 35.5 mm
Average 34.8 mm
Compared to 500 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

What we observed in the heel also applies to the forefoot, as the shoe uses the same curved geometry at both ends. We measured 27.1 mm here, but on the run it feels closer to 30 mm, except for very aggressive forefoot strikers.

Skechers Aero Tempo Forefoot stack
Test results
Aero Tempo 27.1 mm
Average 26.2 mm
Compared to 500 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
38.5 mm

Drop

Using World Athletics guidelines, we measured an 8.4 mm drop. However, Skechers lists 4 mm, which is more than double the stated figure.

That said, we must confess that there is no single number that fully explains the drop with this shoe. It depends heavily on how you land, as midfoot strikers experience a much flatter feel, while heel strikers roll forward as if the drop were closer to 10 mm.

Skechers Aero Tempo Drop
Test results
Aero Tempo 8.4 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 500 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.1 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

As we already noted, this shoe uses a dual-foam setup, with the main layer being a supercritical EVA foam called HyperBurst. And this is a good moment to remember that Skechers was the first brand to bring supercritical foam to running shoes and even patented the process, which is why other brands use nitrogen instead of CO₂.

The foam feel leans clearly toward the firm side rather than soft, something confirmed by our Shore A durometer reading of 24.0 HA. Runners who prefer a plush ride may find it less appealing.

Skechers Aero Tempo Midsole softness
Test results
Aero Tempo 24.0 HA
Average 20.4 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 426 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
36.1 HA

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The secondary layer is the HyperBurst Pro insole. Yes, you read that right, as this shoe uses a rare setup where the secondary midsole layer also works as the insole, and is made from TPU-based HyperBurst Pro.

In terms of softness, it is close to the main layer at 22.0 HA, but it feels clearly more energetic underfoot, and we honestly wished Skechers had used more of this compound throughout the shoe.

Skechers Aero Tempo Secondary foam softness
Test results
Aero Tempo 22.0 HA
Average 22.7 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Rocker

If you enjoy rockered running shoes, you'll love this one. The Skechers Aero Tempo shows how much shoe design has changed in recent years, marking a clear break from older, flatter models.

The aggressive curve in both the forefoot and heel is impossible to miss on the run, so you really need to like that assisted, roll-forward sensation to fully enjoy it.

Skechers Aero Tempo Rocker

Plate

Instead of a single plate, we found that Skechers uses a carbon-infused, H-shaped plate that is effectively split into two sections, with full-length side rails and four crossbars connecting the forefoot and heel for added structure and stability.

Skechers Aero Tempo Plate

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
Skechers Aero Tempo Internal length
Test results
Aero Tempo 258.4 mm
Average 269.4 mm
Compared to 244 running shoes
Number of shoes
259.9 mm
Internal length
277.6 mm

Width / Fit

Right from the first try, we felt that the Aero Tempo was not a roomy shoe. Quite the opposite, in fact. To be sure, we compared it against every other model that has gone through our lab.

Our first measurement came in at 92.1 mm, which confirmed our initial impression and clearly shows that runners with wide feet are unlikely to enjoy the Aero Tempo.

Skechers Aero Tempo Width / Fit
Test results
Aero Tempo 92.1 mm
Average 95.1 mm
Compared to 255 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
101.1 mm

Toebox width

We followed up with a second measurement in the toebox, and once again it came in below the average running shoe. 

At 70.1 mm, there is very limited room for toe splay. That said, this does not mean it is a bad fit, as many runners prefer this kind of secure lockdown especially for faster running.

Skechers Aero Tempo Toebox width
Test results
Aero Tempo 70.1 mm
Average 73.3 mm
Compared to 255 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
82.6 mm

Toebox height

The pattern of below-average measurements continued with the third test, this time focusing on toebox height.

At 22.8 mm, the Aero Tempo clearly favors low-volume feet and it is far away from a universal fit.

Skechers Aero Tempo Toebox height
Test results
Aero Tempo 22.8 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 255 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.0 mm
Toebox height
34.1 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

Skechers has a partnership with GoodYear, similar in spirit to the well-known collaboration between Adidas and Continental. To see how it compares, we tested the Aero Tempo using the SATRA TM144 method on wet concrete.

Skechers Aero Tempo GoodYear

The result was solid, though clearly behind what we usually see from Continental rubber. The 0.55 score still delivers reliable grip in most situations, and we were satisfied with the outcome.

Test results
Aero Tempo 0.55
Average 0.49
Compared to 299 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.85

Outsole design

The outsole combines exposed foam with three rubber pieces, two in the heel and a big one in the front of the Aero Tempo.

It’s clear to us that Skechers refined this layout through multiple iterations, trimming as much weight as possible until they reached a limit.

Skechers Aero Tempo Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

We found that the Aero Tempo will only suit runners who are comfortable with a very stiff ride, as it reached a massive 24.8N in our test.

Those are clear super shoe numbers and not a surprise, given the carbon-infused plate inside the midsole. Either way, it's clear flexibility is not part of the Aero Tempo experience.

Skechers Aero Tempo Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Aero Tempo 24.8N
Average 15.3N
Compared to 302 running shoes
Number of shoes
3.9N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

One of the biggest strengths of the Aero Tempo is its low weight. At just 8.5 oz (242g), it feels quick and agile underfoot. And after analyzing the shoe in the lab, it is clear to us that Skechers made weight a top priority, sacrificing other areas like upper comfort.

Skechers Aero Tempo Weight
Test results
Aero Tempo 8.5 oz (242g)
Average 9.3 oz (264g)
Compared to 501 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.3 oz (149g)
Weight
12.9 oz (366g)

Breathability

One thing that stands out right away when holding the Aero Tempo, and even more while running in it, is how incredibly light the upper feels. It almost looks like the shoe should weigh more, but the ultra-light TPU mesh keeps everything surprisingly minimal.

Ventilation is excellent. In our breathability test, smoke moved out of the upper with almost no resistance and escaped instantly, earning a perfect 5 out of 5 score.

The razor-thin construction became even more obvious during our light test. We could clearly see targeted reinforcements around the heel, along with the tongue gusset, all placed with clear intent.

Skechers Aero Tempo upper mesh

Looking at the upper under our digital microscope was impressive. The level of precision and detail is something we usually expect from super shoes, not from a model in this price range.

Skechers Aero Tempo microscope

We really liked the upper, but it won’t suit everyone. It works best for runners who prefer a stripped-down feel with minimal padding, where low weight and maximum airflow clearly take priority over plush comfort.

Test results
Aero Tempo 5
Average 3.7
Compared to 430 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

The Aero Tempo is a bit of a paradox when it comes to stability. At first glance, its narrow midsole and tall stack suggest a shaky ride, but on the run the firm foam, H-shaped plate, and huge midsole sidewalls work together to deliver more support and control than expected.

Torsional rigidity

Despite having carbon fiber inside the midsole, the plate’s split design allows some torsional movement. As a result, the Aero Tempo earned a 4 out of 5 in this test.

Test results
Aero Tempo 4
Average 3.5
Compared to 479 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

By this point in the review, it is clear that the upper is highly minimalist and built with weight savings in mind. That approach showed up again in the heel counter stiffness test, where it scored just 2 out of 5, offering very little structure and a feel closer to a pure racing shoe.

Test results
Aero Tempo 2
Average 2.9
Compared to 463 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The main reason the Aero Tempo does not suit runners looking for stability is its compact platform. Skechers clearly goes against current trends here, using just 104.4 mm in forefoot width at a time when most tempo shoes rely on much wider midsoles for added support.

Skechers Aero Tempo Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Aero Tempo 104.4 mm
Average 114.3 mm
Compared to 501 running shoes
Number of shoes
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel is also quite narrow at 81.0 mm, which leads to two clear outcomes. The shoe feels very agile and sharp when cornering, but it can feel a bit wobbly for some heel strikers.

Skechers Aero Tempo Midsole width - heel
Test results
Aero Tempo 81.0 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 501 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

Ultra-thin mesh uppers usually struggle in our Dremel test, so this result was not surprising. Even so, the Aero Tempo held up reasonably well, earning a 2 out of 5, which is below average but still respectable given how thin and lightweight the material is.

Test results
Aero Tempo 2
Average 2.6
Compared to 364 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel counter performed much better, earning a 4 out of 5. This strong result confirms good durability in this area and helps reduce the risk of early wear.

Test results
Aero Tempo 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 358 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

The GoodYear outsole also held up well in our durability test. While it is not outstanding, a wear result of 1.0 mm is solid and reassuring for runners planning to put several hundred kilometers into the shoe.

Test results
Aero Tempo 1.0 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 342 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Runners worried about early outsole wear can relax here, as the Aero Tempo uses a thick 3.4 mm layer of GoodYear rubber that promises a long lifespan.

Skechers Aero Tempo rubber

We were actually a bit surprised Skechers went this far, since that much rubber also adds noticeable weight.

Skechers Aero Tempo Outsole thickness
Test results
Aero Tempo 3.4 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 497 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

When we measured the HyperBurst Pro insole with our calipers, we found a huge 8.8 mm thickness, nearly double the lab average. But remember that this is not a regular insole as we explained before!

Skechers Aero Tempo Insole thickness
Test results
Aero Tempo 8.8 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 495 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.8 mm

Removable insole

Even though it is removable, we strongly advise against taking it out. You would lose the bounciest part of the midsole (HyperBurst Pro) and a large amount of cushioning, which would seriously undermine the whole point of buying this shoe.

Skechers Aero Tempo Removable insole
Test results
Aero Tempo Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

The Aero Tempo performed very well in our cold-temperature test, losing just 13% of its softness after 20 minutes in the freezer, which is a solid and reassuring result.

Skechers Aero Tempo Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Aero Tempo 13%
Average 24%
Compared to 425 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Reflective elements

Skechers had a clear chance to score a win by making the S logo reflective, but it seems they did not see it as appealing as we do.

Skechers Aero Tempo Reflective elements
Test results
Aero Tempo No

Tongue padding

Skechers took a few risks with the Aero Tempo, but kept the lacing setup simple. It uses six punched eyelets plus an extra one for a runner’s knot, paired with very thin laces.

Skechers Aero Tempo laces

The tongue follows the same stripped-down philosophy as the rest of the shoe. With just 1.7 mm of padding, it keeps things light, making it clear that speed takes priority over step-in comfort here.

Skechers Aero Tempo Tongue padding
Test results
Aero Tempo 1.7 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 498 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The snug fit of the Aero Tempo is reinforced by its semi-gusseted tongue, which locks the foot in place while still allowing airflow. It's nice to see Skechers offering ventilation here, something that most brands tend to overlook.

Skechers Aero Tempo Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Aero Tempo Both sides (semi)

Price

We believe that the Skechers Aero Tempo is not overpriced in most markets, but it only makes sense if it matches your needs and running style. Otherwise, we believe there are more interesting options on the market for a similar price.

Test results
Aero Tempo $160
Average $152
Compared to 501 running shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$300

Heel tab

The heel design may look unusual at first, but it does a solid job of locking the foot in place. We also think skipping a finger-loop tab was the right call, as it fits better with the clean, performance-focused design.

Skechers Aero Tempo Heel tab
Test results
Aero Tempo None