Neutral / cushion / high arch
Shoes for runners who do not need any additional arch support (Around 50% of runners). Best for people with normal, high or medium high arches. See the best neutral shoes.
Stability / overpronation / normal arch
Shoes for runners who need mild to moderate arch support (Around 45% of runners). Best for runners with a low arch. See the best stability shoes.
Motion control / severe overpronation / flat feet
Shoes for runners who needs a lot of arch support. Best for runners with flat feet. See the best motion control shoes.
Good to know
WidthMen: NormalWomen: Normal, Wide
Experts are runners, who post reviews at youtube, directly at RunRepeat or at their own websites. Each expert is categorized from level 1 to level 5 based on expertise. See stats on expert reviews and how we calculate scores here.
Are you an expert? Apply to contribute here.
63 / 100 based on 1 expert reviews
Puma Battle: Carson 2 versus Carson Runner – Lookalikes but quite different
Being a cheapskate, I love good inexpensive running shoes. Taken from personal experience, I don’t find a strong resemblance between price and quality. It simply boils down to what you need and your personal preferences and running patterns.
So how do two inexpensive running shoes from the same company stand out?
I first bought PUMA Carson 2 as a backup pair. Looking similar, right?
What I wasn’t aware of, was the differences - apparently subtle, but in real life substantial. Let’s start with some of the similarities.
- These shoes are lightweight. Carson Runner ticks in at 204 grams, Carson 2 at 198 grams (size 44, 9.5 UK, 10.5 US). Pretty light for running shoes.
- The soles of these shoes are flexible length-wise – which I kind of like. I really feel in contact with the ground, no bulkiness here.
- These shoes are true to size and very comfortable.
- There is not much support in the upper, which BTW has a sock-like fit and feel – heel support is fine, but there’s not really anything in the forefoot. But that makes room for a fine toe spread.
- 8 mm heel to toe drop.
- Basically, the look of the shoes is quite similar – nice mesh upper, no separate toe-box, and white EVA-foam midsoles.
- What immediately set these shoes apart spec-wise, is the outsole – the PUMA Carson 2 is equipped with a pure EVA-sole, the PUMA Carson Runner is a combination of EverRide rubber material for extra cushioning and EverTrack red rubber pieces for added durability.
So far so good – let’s get our hands on (or feet in) for further investigation.
Further investigation - one of each
Trying one of each at the same time reveals quite a few things - they feel different!
- The Carson 2 is wider than Carson Runner, despite both being the same size and same length. Shoe lacing experiments didn’t alter this. While Carson Runner is for moderate-to-narrow feet, Carson 2 is for moderate-to-slightly wide feet.
- The mesh is woven in smaller patterns in the Carson Runner – could that in some way explain the different widths?
- The Carson Runner is way bouncier than Carson 2 while walking – and still feeling very comfortable. Carson 2 is on the other hand way softer when walking, and absolutely a thrill.
Enough walk and talk - let's run
I must confess I instantly fell in love with the PUMA Carson Runner when I bought it. Marketed as a comfortable competition shoe with a very generous price tag – that’s exactly what they are. They are springy, bouncy and very enjoyable for speedwork and competitions. You feel fast and alert – and you are running just that way!
These are simply “my new best friends” for fast road running or treadmills. They have been in action on several 5 and 10 km’s and are simply cut for the purpose: fun and speed – and no sore legs, hips or back afterward.
And the PUMA Carson 2 – How about them? The softer midsole is also present when running.
Despite being a midfoot-runner, these shoes are recommended for neither training nor competition – they are simply too soft. My knees and back didn’t appreciate the running and I was desperately struggling after the first mile. This wasn’t fun at all. Not recommended.
One for running and one for walking
I must confess that I’m surprised that two almost similar shoes can turn out to be so dramatically different – and can hardly understand why the PUMA Carson Runner is being discontinued. It’s a very, very good and lightweight competition shoe – flexible, with enough cushioning, lots of response – and with a very small price tag.
On the other hand, there’s the Carson 2 – same price and great for walking. But not useful at all for running (even on treadmills). They should be branded as very comfortable sneakers for moderate-to-slightly wide feet.
Final words - about buying running shoes
The battle above reveals another thing – you cannot judge a shoe by simply walking around in a shop.
Yes, you can feel the comfort, but the sole interaction when running is another beast. Even treadmill testing isn’t fair – the surface is usually too soft.
If possible, try out shoes on hard, concrete surfaces, so you really can feel the interaction. See you running!
This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.
- The Puma Carson 2 showcases a new silhouette that is more modern than its predecessor, while still packing the dependable features of a classic road-running shoe. It is designed for runners who are neutral pronators.
- The upper of this running shoe from Puma has been updated to include a midfoot panel that creates a faster profile sans an internal toe box. It still makes use of a breathable mesh.
- With a streamlined midsole design, the shoe provides a lightweight cushioning and comfort. The Softfoam sock liner promotes a soft and plush feel for the underfoot. Meanwhile, the outsole aims to deliver a light grip with its ground-contact EVA.
The Carson 2 has a standard running shoe length, with standard size options available. The shoe’s construction is best for runners with narrow to moderate foot volumes; it comes in width profiles of D – Medium for men and B – Medium for women.
The Puma Carson 2 has a ground-contact EVA as its outsole for optimal traction and underfoot feel. Because it is lightweight, this material promotes a relaxed ride while still retaining the same grip and flexibility as the usual running shoe. This foam is abrasion-resistant; thus, it is sturdy and has a high shock-absorption capability.
With an injection-molded EVA foam, the midsole of the Carson 2 is lightweight, yet it doesn’t sacrifice cushioning and comfort. The foam also claims to have a shock-reducing property that helps with producing an energized toe-off.
The signature Softfoam sock liner enhances the underfoot feel by offering comfort while the runner is wearing the shoe.
The Puma Carson 2 has a mesh upper and lining which offer a snug, sock-like fit. The material is made durable, so it withstands the various stresses from running.
It has a panel on the midfoot area to support the foot in place as well as maintain the structure of the shoe.
The 2nd version of the Carson has no internal toe box, which was done to reduce weight, promote flexibility, and deliver more speed.
The tongue and the heel both have pull tabs that allow the runner to put on and take off the shoe with ease, permitting a convenient way to wear.