Our verdict
Pros
- Amazing build quality
- Excellent stability
- Remarkably lightweight
- Cheaper than most On models
- Reliable lockdown
- Great for forefoot strikers
- Amazing for winter!
Cons
- Heel padding may wear quickly
- Needs better breathability
- Likely too firm for most
Audience verdict
- Top 18% in road running shoes
- Top 17% in On running shoes
Comparison
The most similar running shoes compared
+ + Add a shoe | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audience score | 90 Great! | 85 Good! | 87 Great! | 94 Superb! | |
Price | $150 | $110 | $160 | $125 | |
Pace | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running | Daily runningSpeed training | |
Arch-support | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | |
Weight lab Weight brand | 9.3 oz / 264g 9.4 oz / 266g | 9.2 oz / 262g 9.3 oz / 264g | 9.5 oz / 269g 9.9 oz / 282g | 10.1 oz / 285g 9.7 oz / 275g | |
Drop lab Drop brand | 4.5 mm 6.0 mm | 6.4 mm 8.0 mm | 8.6 mm 8.0 mm | 6.5 mm 6.0 mm | |
Strike pattern | Mid/forefoot | Mid/forefoot | HeelMid/forefoot | Mid/forefoot | |
Midsole softness | Firm | Balanced | Firm | Soft | |
Difference in midsole softness in cold | Small | Small | Small | SmallNormal | |
Toebox durability | Decent | Good | Decent | Decent | |
Heel padding durability | Bad | Good | Bad | Bad | |
Outsole durability | Decent | Good | Decent | Good | |
Breathability | Warm | Warm | Moderate | Moderate | |
Toebox width at the widest part | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | |
Toebox width at the big toe | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | |
Stiffness | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
Difference in stiffness in cold | Small | Small | Big | Normal | |
Torsional rigidity | Stiff | Moderate | Stiff | Stiff | |
Heel counter stiffness | Moderate | Stiff | Flexible | Moderate | |
Heel lab Heel brand | 33.8 mm 37.0 mm | 32.6 mm 34.0 mm | 34.6 mm 34.0 mm | 34.1 mm 38.0 mm | |
Forefoot lab Forefoot brand | 29.3 mm 31.0 mm | 26.2 mm 26.0 mm | 26.0 mm 26.0 mm | 27.6 mm 32.0 mm | |
Widths available | NormalWide | Normal | Normal | Normal | |
Orthotic-friendly | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Season | All seasons | Winter | All seasons | All seasons | |
Removable-insole | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Ranking | #45 Top 17% | #172 Bottom 37% | #132 Top 48% | #3 Top 2% | |
Popularity | #103 Top 38% | #172 Bottom 37% | #203 Bottom 26% | #237 Bottom 13% |
Who should buy
We believe the On Cloudsurfer Next is an appealing choice for:
- Runners who appreciate the Cloudmonster 2 but crave a more dynamic ride.
- Those seeking a narrow, sleek daily trainer with high-quality materials and top-notch build quality.
- Anyone preferring firmer, stable cushioning over a plush feel in their daily trainer.
Who should NOT buy
We believe heel strikers may find the Cloudsurfer Next less enjoyable due to its narrow heel and low heel-to-toe drop, making it more suitable for midfoot and forefoot strikers. In our view, better options exist for this group of runners, like the Nike Pegasus 41 or ASICS Novablast 4.
Additionally, those preferring a softer running experience may struggle with the Cloudsurfer Next’s firmer midsole, even with the addition of CloudTec Phase. We suggest considering the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 or New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14, both offering a plush alternative for daily runs at a similar price point.
Cushioning
Heel stack
In our tests, we discovered a slight discrepancy in the heel stack height stated by On. While the Cloudsurfer Next is listed at a 37 mm rearfoot stack, our caliper measured it at 33.8 mm—falling short by 3.2 mm.
This minor reduction in height does bring a subtle decrease in cushioning, but it also enhances stability, creating a more grounded ride.
Cloudsurfer Next | 33.8 mm |
Average | 34.0 mm |
Forefoot stack
We measured the midsole thickness at 29.3 mm in the forefoot, confirming our initial impression during testing—this model has significantly more cushioning than its sibling, the Cloudsurfer 7.
It’s a bit confusing to navigate On’s lineup with these names. It may seem to you like the Next replaces the 7, but we can confirm that both models will coexist in the lineup.
Cloudsurfer Next | 29.3 mm |
Average | 25.4 mm |
Drop
On has a reputation for low-to-moderate heel-to-toe drops, and the Cloudsurfer Next stayed true to that trend. Our measurements revealed a 4.5 mm offset—ideal for forefoot and midfoot strikers!
Cloudsurfer Next | 4.5 mm |
Average | 8.6 mm |
Midsole softness
Many still believe that On shoes lean toward softness, but in our experience here in the lab, they usually land on the firmer side. The CloudTec Phase technology helps by compressing with each stride, yet the ride is still notably firm.
The Cloudsurfer Next embodies this quality well. We measured a softness of 31.8 HA on our durometer, making it one of the firmest daily trainers we’ve tested.
While this feel may not suit every runner, those who enjoy a more stable ride will likely appreciate this midsole.
And what about the foam itself? Well, On’s Helion combines EVA and Olefin Block Co-Polymers, offering a denser, more structured feel than ASICS’ FF Blast+. It doesn’t deliver a huge energy return, but for a training foam, it holds up well, especially with the new CloudTec Phase inclined pods that provide a more dynamic feel.
Cloudsurfer Next | 31.8 HA |
Average | 21.0 HA |
Midsole softness in cold (%)
After placing the Cloudsurfer 7’s midsole in the freezer for 20 minutes to simulate cold weather, we re-tested its softness, yielding a 22% increase. This resilience of Helion outperforms most EVA-based foams, reinforcing the advantage of adding Olefin to the formulation.
Cloudsurfer Next | 22% |
Average | 25.5% |
Insole thickness
In our tests, the Cloudsurfer Next's insole measured 4.7 mm on our caliper—definitely within the average range for road running shoes.
Cloudsurfer Next | 4.7 mm |
Average | 4.5 mm |
Rocker
The Cloudsurfer Next features a gentle rockered profile from heel to toe, a helpful addition given its firmer-than-average midsole and slightly stiffer structure compared to typical daily trainers.
We also believe a slightly more pronounced heel bevel could enhance the shoe’s flow, especially with its low drop—as this design that may not suit extreme heel strikers.
Size and fit
Size
On Cloudsurfer Next is true to size (20 votes).
Toebox width - widest part
In our experience, while the midsole is narrower than most shoes, the toebox felt mostly average. Our digital caliper measured it at 97.3 mm, making this model slightly narrower than the norm, though differences under 2–3 mm are virtually undetectable while running.
For volume, the upper offers minimal stretch, and the toebox height was moderate—adequate for most runners but potentially a touch low for those who need extra room.
Cloudsurfer Next | 97.3 mm |
Average | 98.4 mm |
Toebox width - big toe
In our testing, the big toe area follows a standard taper, coming in at 77.2 mm—suitable for most runners. This measurement aligns well with a design that meets general foot shapes comfortably.
However, for those who prefer a roomier toebox, the On Cloudmonster Hyper could be an appealing choice. We found its wider toebox offers additional space, making it a solid upgrade for extra toe comfort—and it comes with the side benefit of improved energy return.
Cloudsurfer Next | 77.2 mm |
Average | 78.3 mm |
Stability
Lateral stability test
A firmer ride might not suit everyone, but it brings clear advantages—especially in stability. A solid landing platform minimizes wobble, and the Cloudsurfer Next exemplifies this benefit beautifully.
Torsional rigidity
The impressive stability of this shoe isn’t just due to its firm foam. We found that its high torsional rigidity—rated at 4/5 from our team in the lab—adds significantly to the supportive feel it provides.
Cloudsurfer Next | 4 |
Average | 3.3 |
Heel counter stiffness
In our testing, we found that the Cloudmonster Next’s heel counter is crafted to suit most runners, featuring a moderate stiffness level we rated at 3/5. This design tries to strike a balance providing enough support without being too rigid or uncomfortable.
Cloudsurfer Next | 3 |
Average | 2.9 |
Midsole width - forefoot
We discovered that one reason On managed to keep this shoe lightweight—despite the substantial rubber coverage and dense midsole—is its skinny profile. Measuring 111.6 mm, it’s significantly narrower than most running shoes we test in the lab today.
This streamlined design appeals to those who favor a sleeker build and want to avoid the maximalist, ultra-wide models currently popular. We also understood why On used a firmer midsole, as it pairs well with the narrow platform. A softer foam would likely feel unstable on such a slim base.
Cloudsurfer Next | 111.6 mm |
Average | 114.1 mm |
Midsole width - heel
In our experience, if the forefoot seems narrow, the heel takes it further. Measuring just 84.5 mm, it’s more reminiscent of a race-day shoe—adding to why we think this model isn’t ideal for most heel strikers, particularly those who need extra stability.
Cloudsurfer Next | 84.5 mm |
Average | 90.8 mm |
Flexibility
Stiffness
With its firmer midsole, we anticipated a bit more longitudinal stiffness but tested it to confirm.
Our 90-degree test showed a 30.3N result, reinforcing that this shoe might not be flexible enough for daily walks or gym sessions. If that’s a concern, we recommend the On Cloudrunner 2 (21.1N) instead.
Cloudsurfer Next | 30.3N |
Average | 28.5N |
Weight
At 9.3 oz or 264g, the Cloudsurfer Next delivers a lightweight ride, and we believe it holds up well in its category. While there are some shoes that feature a similar weight with higher stack like the ASICS Superblast 2, these remain rare in the market.
For us, the Cloudsurfer Next passes this test comfortably. Its padded, cozy upper is a nice bonus without tipping the scales, making it a great balance of comfort and weight for everyday runs.
Cloudsurfer Next | 9.31 oz (264g) |
Average | 9.38 oz (266g) |
Breathability
At our lab, we always insist on digging deep to get precise results, and the Cloudsurfer Next showcases this approach when it comes to breathability.
After purchasing the shoe and unboxing it, we expected the toebox to ventilate exceptionally well. However, our smoke-pumping test, conducted under the usual conditions, revealed a different story, delivering a disappointing 2/5 score.
Next, we used an LED flashlight and found that very little light passed through—ventilation in this shoe seems minimal! On the plus side, this design likely adds warmth for colder conditions.
But this is where things get interesting.
Under the microscope, the upper’s design appeared packed with ventilation holes, suggesting great airflow. But the black fabric that adds comfort and durability blocks these pathways. Had we only used the microscope, we would’ve been misled for sure.
As expected from On—a brand known for quality—the construction of the upper is flawless. We found no glue marks; everything is neatly crafted, and the padding is impressive, maintaining high standards of execution and manufacture.
Cloudsurfer Next | 2 |
Average | 3.8 |
Durability
Toebox durability
Although it earned a fair 3/5 score, we believe the result should have been stronger.
Cloudsurfer Next | 3 |
Average | 2.5 |
Heel padding durability
When we reached the heel counter, the results took a sharp downturn. Disaster.
We had to give the Cloudsurfer Next a disappointing 1/5. In our view, this is a glaring red flag for those who often wear out shoes in this area.
Cloudsurfer Next | 1 |
Average | 3.2 |
Outsole hardness
After less-than-ideal results in the first three tests, we hoped for some redemption in another crucial area of any running shoe—the outsole.
Before firing up the Dremel for a final test, we measured the rubber’s hardness at a fairly average 84.5 HC.
We believe this should offer decent durability, which is a good thing, as traction felt fine but not particularly impressive. And yes, we are pretty sure that the central groove in the outsole will get a few pebbles on gravel roads.
Cloudsurfer Next | 84.5 HC |
Average | 80.1 HC |
Outsole durability
As we hinted earlier, we fired up the Dremel for a final test on the Cloudsurfer Next, hoping to see a stronger result.
The outcome was good, but not great. We observed a 1.1 mm dent in the rubber—enough to suggest the Cloudsurfer Next can handle regular wear but won’t be the kind of shoe that boasts legendary rubber longevity.
Cloudsurfer Next | 1.1 mm |
Average | 1.0 mm |
Outsole thickness
We found that 2.5 mm of rubber, though thinner than the average daily trainer, is sufficient for this outsole based on our previous findings. Using a thicker layer would likely have made the ride even firmer, and that would have been a disaster in this shoe.
Cloudsurfer Next | 2.5 mm |
Average | 3.2 mm |
Misc
Price
Many On shoes tend to feel slightly overpriced—but the Cloudsurfer Next offers a more reasonable price tag, aligning closely with other daily trainers on the market. And to be honest, the build quality is one of the best we've ever seen at this price point.
Cloudsurfer Next | $150 |
Average | $146 |
Reflective elements
In our view, reflective elements should be part of every daily trainer released to the market. And indeed, they’re a regular feature in many On shoes adding safety at night—but surprisingly, they’re missing in the Cloudsurfer Next.
Cloudsurfer Next | No |
Tongue padding
With a generous 10.7 mm of foam, On prioritized plush comfort over weight reduction in the Cloudsurfer Next’s tongue, creating a pillow-like cushion that spans the entire length of it, delivering amazing instep comfort.
And though we usually favor punched eyelets over wire loops, the lockdown felt secure, and the tongue loop effectively kept the tongue centered, especially during faster paces.
Cloudsurfer Next | 10.7 mm |
Average | 5.8 mm |
Tongue: gusset type
Engineered with Swiss precision, we found that the Cloudsurfer Next’s tongue stays securely in place thanks to its semi-gusseted design. No disappointments here!
Cloudsurfer Next | Both sides (semi) |
Heel tab
True to the design of the Cloudsurfer series—and in line with most of On’s road shoes—the Next lacks a heel tab. We found that, like other On models, it sticks to a minimalist design.
Cloudsurfer Next | None |
Removable insole
The stock insole in the Cloudsurfer Next is easily replaceable and, aside from a slight heel flare, doesn’t offer anything distinctive. Therefore, we believe this shoe it’s perfectly compatible with a third-party footbed, allowing for easy customization without issue.
Cloudsurfer Next | Yes |