Our verdict

ASICS brings the Magic Speed 5 back to its roots, and we found that the lighter, more agile setup feels much closer to the older versions we enjoyed. We really liked the FF Leap top layer for its energetic touch, even if the FF Blast+ base keeps the ride from feeling truly top-tier. From our perspective, this shoe hits a sweet spot for beginners and value hunters who want a carbon-plated trainer for tempo days and occasional racing, without paying premium super shoe money.

Pros

  • Feels like a Magic Speed again!
  • Full-length FF Leap foam
  • Excellent ASICSGRIP traction score
  • Outstanding breathability
  • Nimble, race-inspired geometry
  • Reasonable price
  • Solid competition shoe for beginners
  • More flexible than super shoes
  • Excellent lacing system

Cons

  • Energy return limited by FF Blast+
  • Maybe too extreme for heel strikers
  • Not appealing for serious runners

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

The ASICS Magic Speed 5 is a full reset that now suits:

  • Beginners who want their first carbon-plated shoe that also works well for intervals and faster training days.
  • Runners looking for a lightweight, agile, and fun shoe at a more approachable price than most competition shoes.
  • Fans of the Magic Speed 3 who were let down by version 4 and want a clear return to a lighter, more responsive feel. It's back... and better!

ASICS Magic Speed 5

Who should NOT buy

While the lower price of the Magic Speed 5 may look appealing, we think it’s not the best option for serious racers. If you care about the clock, going all in makes more sense, and ASICS offers three excellent super shoes: Metaspeed Edge Tokyo, Metaspeed Sky Tokyo, and Metaspeed Ray.

We also believe runners who enjoy a sky-high, maximalist feel may feel underwhelmed here. The reduced stack height clearly changes the experience, and from our perspective, those craving a max-stack shoe should look at the ASICS Sonicblast instead, which we see as the spiritual successor to the Magic Speed 4.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

We found very good shock absorption in the Magic Speed 5, measuring 149 SA in the heel and 112 SA in the forefoot. It is not an eye-popping result, but it makes sense given the lower stack height and still provides enough protection for long runs, especially for heel strikers.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Magic Speed 5 149 SA
Average 130 SA
Compared to 314 running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
173 SA

Energy return

The ASICS Magic Speed 5 uses an interesting foam mix, pairing a top layer of the excellent FF Leap with a lower layer of the far less energetic FF Blast+. It feels like mixing gold with tin, resulting in a decent energy return of 64.6% in the heel and 62.6% in the forefoot.

That is not bad (and surpasses the disappointing Magic Speed 4) but still feels a bit low for serious racing. For us, this looks like a missed opportunity, as simply using FF Blast Max instead of FF Blast+ would likely have pushed bounce closer to the 70% mark.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Magic Speed 5 64.6%
Average 58.6%
Compared to 311 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
83.0%

Heel stack

The Magic Speed 4 moved far away from the original idea behind the Magic Speed line. Judging by ASICS’ response, it appears that approach did not resonate strongly from a sales point of view.

With the Magic Speed 5, the brand clearly steps back from that maximalist direction. Heel stack drops to 35.3 mm from the huge 42.5 mm of the previous model, and we really think that it's a smart and welcome correction. The Magic Speed feels agile and nimble again.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Heel stack
Test results
Magic Speed 5 35.3 mm
Average 34.8 mm
Compared to 506 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot is also noticeably slimmer and now sits close to the average stack height, with 26.6 mm of cushioning. Because of this, we found a more direct ride with better ground feel and a stronger connection to the road, making it a better match for faster running.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Forefoot stack
Test results
Magic Speed 5 26.6 mm
Average 26.2 mm
Compared to 506 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
38.5 mm

Drop

ASICS lists an 7 mm drop, and we measured 8.7 mm, which is close and matches the expected feel. That result did not surprise us, although we briefly thought ASICS might aim for a lower offset inspired by the Metaspeed line.

That said, for a shoe meant to work as a more beginner-friendly take on the Metaspeed concept, the higher heel-to-toe drop makes sense and should feel more approachable for a wider range of runners.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Drop
Test results
Magic Speed 5 8.7 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 506 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.1 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The running shoe industry is quickly moving toward A-TPU foams, and FF Leap is one of the best examples of how good this material can be. It feels bouncy, fun, and plush at 11.0 HA. The Magic Speed line gets this foam too, and it is a very welcome upgrade.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 FF Leap

It is also important that FF Leap is used as a real, full-length layer this time. When we cut the Magic Speed 4 in half, FF Turbo appeared only as a small forefoot puck, which felt misleading. Here, ASICS applies FF Leap properly, and that change matters.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Midsole softness
Test results
Magic Speed 5 11.0 HA
Average 20.3 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 432 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
36.1 HA

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The midsole of the Magic Speed 5 feels like a real mixed bag. FF Leap is excellent, but FF Blast+ underneath is a letdown. We understand the durability and cost logic, yet its low energy return limits a shoe clearly aimed at performance.

This bottom layer is also firmer at 20.5 HA, which makes sense from a stability angle. Still, we hope the next version switches to FF Blast Max as the carrier foam to unlock even more bounce and value in the Magic Speed.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Secondary foam softness
Test results
Magic Speed 5 20.5 HA
Average 22.6 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Rocker

By stepping away from the massive stack height of the previous version, ASICS also softened the rocker. Still, the forefoot keeps an aggressive curve inspired by the Metaspeed series.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Rocker

Plate

The plate in the Magic Speed 5 is another big departure from earlier versions. We found a carbon plate that runs from the end of the heel into the start of the forefoot, covering roughly 70% of the midsole.

It feels closer to the Edge than the Sky due to its shape, but it is more compliant and flexible, and clearly tuned to be more forgiving and beginner-friendly rather than delivering a full super shoe, ultra-stiff sensation.

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
ASICS Magic Speed 5 Internal length
Test results
Magic Speed 5 259.5 mm
Average 269.4 mm
Compared to 250 running shoes
Number of shoes
259.5 mm
Internal length
277.6 mm

Width / Fit

During our test runs, the fit of the Magic Speed 5 matched its intent: reasonably comfortable, yet clearly race-oriented, with a snug feel as the foot moves toward the toe cap.

That said, fit is highly subjective, so we prefer to rely on hard, lab-based data. Starting with our first internal measurement, we recorded an average width of 95.1 mm.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Width / Fit
Test results
Magic Speed 5 95.1 mm
Average 95.1 mm
Compared to 261 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
101.1 mm

Toebox width

The toebox shows a mild taper at 71.9 mm, which should work for most runners. However, those with very wide feet may feel extra pressure, especially during longer runs.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Toebox width
Test results
Magic Speed 5 71.9 mm
Average 73.2 mm
Compared to 261 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
82.6 mm

Toebox height

Our third measurement focuses on toebox height, a detail that often gets overlooked but not in our lab.

We measured 25.7 mm, which is a bit lower than most shoes. However, the engineered mesh offers some stretch, reinforcing that this model sits between a training shoe and a racer.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Toebox height
Test results
Magic Speed 5 25.7 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 261 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.0 mm
Toebox height
34.1 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

ASICS clearly struck gold with the ASICSGRIP rubber, matching or even surpassing some of the best outsoles on the market. This compound carries over to the Magic Speed 5, offering excellent traction on both dry and wet surfaces.

In our SATRA TM144 test, it posted a strong 0.79 score, which speaks for itself.

Test results
Magic Speed 5 0.79
Average 0.49
Compared to 305 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.85

Outsole design

The outsole clearly takes inspiration from the Metaspeed series, but here ASICS adds slightly more rubber coverage and thickness. That choice makes sense, as this shoe is designed as a super trainer rather than a pure super shoe.

Even with the extra rubber, the shoe does not feel bulky at all. From our point of view, we think ASICS made the right call by aiming for better durability while keeping the overall feel light and efficient.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

Another result that clearly shows the Magic Speed 5 has toned-down stiffness is our 30-degree bend test—we measured just 13.1N. For context, the Metaspeed Sky Tokyo scored 21.1N in the same test, which is 61% higher.

That's another reason why this can be a solid competition shoe for those new to the sport. It delivers sensations similar to a super shoe, but in a more forgiving version.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Magic Speed 5 13.1N
Average 15.4N
Compared to 308 running shoes
Number of shoes
3.9N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

Another area where the Magic Speed 5 returns to its roots is weight.

This shoe has always aimed for a nimble, barely-there feel, and that sensation is back. It now weighs just 7.1 oz or 201g, lighter than versions 3 and 4, and on par with super shoes like the Nike Alphafly 3.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Weight
Test results
Magic Speed 5 7.1 oz (201g)
Average 9.3 oz (264g)
Compared to 507 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.3 oz (149g)
Weight
12.9 oz (366g)

Breathability

The Magic Speed 5 comes in with a serious discount compared to ASICS’ top-tier racers, so some compromises are expected. One of them is the absence of the MOTIONWRAP upper found in the Metaspeed line, replaced here by a new engineered mesh.

That said, the upper is excellent. It delivers outstanding breathability, earning a perfect 5/5 score in our lab, while staying extremely light to keep overall weight very low.

When we moved the upper over a light source, the airflow advantage became obvious, especially in the forefoot. The single-layer construction allows air to pass through with almost no resistance.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 microscope

We also checked the material closely using our digital microscope.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 mesh

The mesh quality proved to be very solid, with clean construction and no obvious weak points.

Despite being a more affordable take on the Metaspeed upper, it outperforms many rivals in this price range and clearly shows why ASICS is one of the strongest brands right now.

Test results
Magic Speed 5 5
Average 3.7
Compared to 436 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

Lowering the stack height from the more maximal design of its predecessor brings a small stability gain. Still, the Magic Speed 5 remains a fully neutral shoe due to its compact, race-inspired shape and the absence of dedicated stability features.

Torsional rigidity

Here again, we found that the carbon plate in the Magic Speed 5 is less rigid than those used in super shoes. Instead of a typical 5, we rated it a 4 due to the added flex.

Test results
Magic Speed 5 4
Average 3.5
Compared to 485 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

ASICS also moved away from the ultra-flexible heel counter used in the Metaspeed line and opted for a more trainer-like design here, scoring 3/5. This adds a bit more support for heel strikers and helps maintain form during the final stretch of long, demanding Sunday runs.

Test results
Magic Speed 5 3
Average 2.9
Compared to 469 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

We mentioned earlier the compact build of the Magic Speed 5, but we wanted to back that up with numbers from our digital caliper. Starting at the forefoot, we recorded 110.1 mm, which is clearly below our current lab average.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Magic Speed 5 110.1 mm
Average 114.4 mm
Compared to 507 running shoes
Number of shoes
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
127.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

However, the heel is where ASICS truly commits to a more aggressive design.

Our digital caliper measured just 78.1 mm, so keep that in mind if you prefer a super trainer with a broader landing area, such as the Superblast 2.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Magic Speed 5 78.1 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 507 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

It is rare to find an upper that balances high breathability and low weight with strong durability, and that trade-off shows here. The engineered mesh failed right away, leaving us no choice but to give the Magic Speed 5 a 1/5 score.

Test results
Magic Speed 5 1
Average 2.6
Compared to 370 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Luckily, ASICS makes up for that with the heel padding. We pushed it hard in our durability test, and this time it delivered an excellent 5/5 score.

Test results
Magic Speed 5 5
Average 3.4
Compared to 364 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

ASICSGRIP continues to stand out for balancing grip and durability better than most rubbers on the market. After confirming strong traction earlier, durability also impressed us here, as the Dremel test left only 0.8 mm of wear.

Test results
Magic Speed 5 0.8 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 348 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

It is impressive to see 1.9 mm of rubber on such a lightweight shoe. Because of that, we expect a solid lifespan, which helps position the Magic Speed 5 as a versatile option for both training and workouts.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Outsole thickness
Test results
Magic Speed 5 1.9 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 503 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

Throughout this lab review, we have seen how the Magic Speed 5 sits between training and racing. The insole, with its paper-thin 2.5 mm thickness, clearly leans toward a race-focused setup.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Insole thickness
Test results
Magic Speed 5 2.5 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 501 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.9 mm

Removable insole

We liked that the insole is removable, and the full-length perforations help further improve airflow inside the shoe.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Removable insole
Test results
Magic Speed 5 Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

After 20 minutes in our freezer, the Magic Speed 5 midsole became 14% firmer. It is not especially impressive, but it is good enough to pass the test.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Magic Speed 5 14%
Average 24%
Compared to 431 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Reflective elements

The lack of reflective elements is not a major concern for this type of shoe. While it would be nice to have them, we are fine with their absence.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Reflective elements
Test results
Magic Speed 5 No

Tongue padding

When Nike introduced serrated laces with the Vaporfly, they quickly became a big hit in the running shoe world. ASICS followed with the Metaspeed series, which was a smart move at the time. Now, these excellent laces make their way (for the first time) into the Magic Speed line.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 laces

The tongue clearly takes inspiration from the Metaspeed in its overall design. We measured a very similar thickness of just 0.8 mm, leaving little room for padding, so keeping lace pressure in check is important here.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Tongue padding
Test results
Magic Speed 5 0.8 mm
Average 5.7 mm
Compared to 504 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

Another clear nod to the Metaspeed is the absence of tongue gusseting, allowing the tongue to move freely. This may not be ideal for daily training, but it fits the goal of keeping the Magic Speed 5 as an affordable racing option.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Magic Speed 5 None

Price

We believe the Magic Speed 5 offers solid value given its features. Using FF Blast Max instead of FF Blast+ would have made it even more compelling, but even as it stands, pricing is good. It sits below many super trainers while delivering an appealing mix of low weight and speed.

Test results
Magic Speed 5 $180
Average $153
Compared to 507 running shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$300

Heel tab

The heel of the Magic Speed 5 is another clear nod to the Metaspeed line. It skips a pull tab entirely and opts for a clean, minimalist design focused on saving weight.

ASICS Magic Speed 5 Heel tab
Test results
Magic Speed 5 None