7 Best Running Shoes For Walking in 2025

Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen on
7 Best Running Shoes For Walking in 2025

We buy shoes ourselves. We earn commissions when you buy through us, at no extra cost. Why trust us

Running shoes have the best cushioning that works wonderfully not just for marathons but also for your daily casual walks. If you want to have just one shoe to rock your daily jogs and stay comfortable all day long, there are a lot of running shoe options that can double as your pair of walking shoes.

In this list, we are giving you the cream of the crop in terms of cushion. We also test the shoes' support, stability, durability, breathability, and other features. Now it's on you to choose a shoe that matches your preferences!

How we test running shoes

There are a lot of things we should consider before choosing the best running shoes for walking. And to make sure we end up with the finest, we put them through a series of tests in our lab. Here, we do the following: 

  • Use a durometer, force gauge, smoke machine, dremel, tyre tread gauge, and other tools to measure 20+ parameters
  • Cut the shoes in half and into pieces to perform more tests that could be done accurately only on shoes cut in half

We also run 30-50 miles in each pair to be able to combine first-hand experience with the shoe with our lab data. We buy all the running shoes that we test with our own money to avoid brand bias.

Best running shoes for walking overall

What makes it the best?

The Adidas Ultraboost Light provides the ultimate overall walking experience from a running shoe. That’s because of its cloud-like comfort and cushioning, sock-like fit, and terrific durability, which set it apart from other running shoes when it comes to walking.

As great as the Ultraboost Light's boost midsole is for running, it might be even better for walking. With a softness of 15.5 HA, which is 36.7% softer than the average road running shoe, the Ultraboost Light delivered serious comfort during our casual strolls, not to mention a good amount of responsiveness. Moreover, the midsole is sufficiently cushioned in the heel. We measured its heel stack height at 30.1 mm, and it kept our feet well-protected with each step.

Meanwhile, the sock-like upper held our feet perfectly in place for the duration of our walks. And that upper can also withstand the wear and tear from miles of walking. It did brilliantly in our toebox and heel padding durability tests, scoring 4 and 5 out of 5, respectively, with 5 being the most durable.

However, the Ultraboost Light's traction is suspect on wet surfaces. We found the grip to be lacking on a damp patch of cobblestone, so be cautious while walking on wet spots.

Pros

  • Cushy and responsive ride
  • Good for easy runs and long distances
  • Ideal for heel strikers
  • Suitable for wide feet
  • Effective stability elements for mild pronation
  • Snug and secure lockdown
  • Durable toebox and heel
  • Outsole built to last
  • Ready for winter runs
  • Works as a comfy walking shoe
  • Sustainably designed upper

Cons

  • Thin forefoot cushioning
  • Could be lighter
  • Slippery on wet surfaces
  • Not for speedwork
  • Average at best breathability
Full review of Adidas Ultraboost Light

Running shoes for walking with the best comfort

Brooks Ghost 16
82
Good!

What makes it the best?

The Brooks Ghost series is known for being a daily trainer and its 16th version is our top pick for comfort in the walking-running category. Numbers checked in the lab, it delivers a forgiving and long-lasting ride with its cushioned platform, flexible nature, and robust outsole.

Built for comfort, it hugs our feet with pillowy padding. The 10.4 mm tongue is 85.7% thicker than average, avoiding lace bite. Meanwhile, the foam below feels soft yet springy— especially in the 35.1 mm heel. Paired with a modest forefoot, the resulting heel drop is a steep 12.4 mm, optimised for heel-striking, which is usually the first to land when walking.

Given the soft foam, we expect it to be less stable. Yet to our surprise, the shoe feels steady with its reinforced sidewalls and structured heel. Each step moved effortlessly as the midsole flowed freely with our feet. Our flex test validates this, measuring 53.3% more flexible than average.

We expect the outsole to last long since we barely damaged the rubber after outdoor use. Our Dremel test backs up our observation since Ghost 16 showed less wear vs. average (0.7 mm vs. 0.9 mm).

While accommodating to most foot types, we found that the upper sits lower than most shoes, leading to low toebox volume. Those who experience unwanted pressure in this area should go for higher-volume uppers.

Pros

  • Fiables
  • Ideales para los talonadores
  • Suela exterior hecha para durar
  • Muy estables
  • Retorno de energía mejorado
  • Versátiles para varias actividades
  • Mantienen un precio asequible
  • Mantienen un precio asequible

Cons

  • Lengüeta sin refuerzo
  • Contrafuerte del talón rígido
  • Parte delantera con poco volumen
Full review of Brooks Ghost 16

Running shoes for walking with the best cushioning

What makes it the best?

Through runs and lab tests, our search for the best cushioned walking-running shoe came to a close after we discovered the ASICS Gel Nimbus 27. This shoe perfectly captures maximalism with its gigantic stack, while offering a luxurious embrace with its soft and breathable upper.

The gentle touch of the jacquard mesh upper is unlike anything we've experienced before. Testing the shoe was a delight because we had zero instances of overheating. Our breathability tests confirm its exceptional ventilation, earning a commendable 4/5 rating. 

The shoe has the visual bulk yet we’re blown away with the amount of foam it has. Our measurements with the calliper unveiled a towering stack height of 42.7 mm, boldly surpassing race limits. On top of this, the heel includes the PureGEL technology to facilitate gentler landings. Even the forefoot won’t have much ground feel with its above-average 34.4 mm stack. Our durometer readings reaffirm its commitment to comfort, registering a balanced reading of 21.0 HA.

What we noticed is that the shoe lacks the natural feel needed to enjoy long hours of walking. Our bend test confirms it’s even 23.1% stiffer than the average running shoe. Those who prefer more flexible shoes should check alternatives.

Pros

  • Even more foam underfoot!
  • Premium-feel, breathable upper
  • Fantastic stability
  • Excels at long distance training
  • Improved toebox with extra wiggle room
  • Flexible knit tongue
  • True maximalist comfort for recovery runs
  • Amazing heel lockdown

Cons

  • Feels bulky and heavy
  • Minor price increase
  • Grip could be better
  • Minimal outsole coverage
Full review of ASICS Gel Nimbus 27

Best stability running shoes for walking

What makes it the best?

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is our clear top pick for the best stability shoe for walking. It has an impressive level of cushioning, comfort, and breathability, which other stability shoes just can't compete with.

Rock-solid stability is the Adrenaline GTS 23’s big claim to fame, and with good reason. Its guide rails on both sides of the shoe did a fantastic job of helping prevent our feet from making excess movements. And the wide landing platform provided additional stability and gives us more confidence on each step. We measured the forefoot midsole's forefoot and heel width to be 4.5 mm and 7 mm wider than average.

The Adrenaline GTS 23 shoe doesn't sacrifice stability for comfort, though. We felt the shoe had a good blend of softness and stability during extended walks. And our durometer confirmed the midsole foam was indeed nicely balanced with a softness of 19.5 HA, which is 20% softer than the average running shoe. 

But perhaps the Adrenaline GTS 23’s standout feature is its exceptional breathability. We gave it a perfect 5 out of 5 in our breathability test as the smoke we pumped in almost instantly escaped through the large ventilation holes in the upper. And our feet were kept capably cool on our walks thanks to that breathable upper.

Unfortunately, that upper lacks durability, particularly in the toebox. The mesh material was significantly damaged we put a Dremel to it, which is why it scored a lowly 1 out of 5. So for those looking for a walking shoe that has more durability, look elsewhere.

Pros

  • Excellent stability without being intrusive
  • Ideal for easy miles
  • Specifically designed for heel strikers
  • Outstanding breathability
  • Comfortable and cushioned
  • Availability in narrow and wide sizes
  • Capable of handling tempo paces
  • Not expensive at all

Cons

  • The engineered mesh upper lacks durability
  • Lacks cushion for forefoot strikers
Full review of Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23

Best lightweight running shoes for walking

Hoka Clifton 9
86
Good!

What makes it the best?

Among all the daily trainers out there, the Hoka Clifton 9 is clearly the best choice for walking. That’s because of its light weight, soft and energetic midsole cushioning, and great fit, which other daily trainers just can’t compete with.

The Clifton 9 is among the lighter daily trainers around at just 8.78 oz (249g). That's a good 1.3 oz (38g) lighter than the average daily trainer, and it sure felt that way as we hardly had to exert much effort lifting our feet while walking.

And the overall walking experience is made all the more enjoyable by its fantastic midsole foam. Not only is it 16.7% softer than the average road running shoe, but it is also more responsive. There is also a good amount of cushioning, especially in the forefoot, which has 2.4 mm more stack height.

The fit of the upper is excellent, with the semi-gusseted tongue providing a secure lockdown. The tongue, which we measured to be 0.8 mm thicker, and the heel collar are also generously padded and add to the comfortably snug fit.

But the Clifton 9 is not quite wide-foot friendly as its toebox width at the widest part and at the big toe are 2.1 mm and 1.8 mm narrower than average, respectively. However, Hoka does offer a wider option of the shoe.

Pros

  • Thicker and more energetic midsole cushioning
  • Lighter than the v8
  • Easy on the knees
  • Durable upper
  • Available in wide
  • Good traction on roads and mild trails
  • Mild, unobtrusive stability elements
  • Can handle faster paces better than previous editions
  • Best for easy days and long runs

Cons

  • Snug fit
  • Upper needs some time to break in
  • Average breathability
Full review of Hoka Clifton 9

Best road-to-trail running shoes for walking

What makes it the best?

Among the walking-running shoes we tested on foot and in the lab, the Nike Pegasus Trail 5 is our top road-to-trail shoe. Its flexible midsole and ideal lug depth make it highly versatile for mixed terrains, while its plush yet energetic ReactX foam leads to an effortless ride.

Starting with traction, the outsole gave us the confidence to run through asphalt, loose soil, and gravel. Our durometer shows that its 87.9 HC rubber is slightly above average, protecting us from sharp rocks and roots. Meanwhile, the 3.2 mm lugs held their ground firmly on the trails without being overkill on the road.

The midsole is made of a comfortable and bouncy ReactX foam, which our durometer proves is 51.1% softer than average. Our heel-to-toe transitions felt smooth thanks to the rocker structure, while a cosy cushion welcomed each landing.

Despite its thick stack, PT5 retains its flexibility through its outsole cutouts. This enhances our comfort and agility since the shoe doesn’t resist our strides. Our bend test shows this trail shoe is 31.3% more adaptive than average, making it a great walking and cross-training shoe.

However, while the dense and multi-layered upper boosts durability, it sacrifices a well-ventilated experience. Scoring only 2/5, we cannot recommend this pair in warmer seasons.

Pros

  • Fully gusseted tongue
  • Reflective elements
  • Durable upper construction
  • New rockered sole
  • Great for heel strikers
  • Reasonably priced
  • All-around comfort
  • All-around comfort

Cons

  • Weight increase
  • Possibly too plush for trails
  • Still lacks traction
Full review of Nike Pegasus Trail 5

Best budget running shoes for walking

Nike Winflo 11
87
Great!

What makes it the best?

After intensive testing in and out of the lab, we found the Winflo 11 from Nike to be the ideal budget shoe for both walking and running, with a £110 price tag vs. the £140 average. What a steal for all that it offers: a full-length Air unit and plush cushioning, a premium-like upper, and a long-lasting outsole.

Underfoot is a plush and gentle sensation throughout. We weren’t surprised when our durometer revealed it was 35.0% softer than average. It effectively protected us from landing impact most especially in the 37.6 mm heel, babying our legs for long days on foot. Meanwhile, the Air unit adds a bit of spring to our step so that we don’t sink into the foam.

Even the upper feels soft to the touch, embracing us comfortably. Surprisingly, its thick material didn’t block airflow and our feet felt fresh throughout the day. Our smoke test confirms its breathability with an impressive 4/5 rating.

Winflo 11 withstood countless miles with barely any scratches. Our lab results indicate a durable outsole boasting harder and thicker rubber than average, measuring 93.0 HC and 3.6 mm, respectively.

However, its focus on comfort and durability tipped the scales to a heavy 10.4 oz (295g). Runners who prefer lightweight shoes are better off elsewhere.

Pros

  • Comfortable engineered mesh
  • Exceptional durability
  • Excellent value for price
  • Gusseted tongue
  • Ideal for heel strikers
  • Plush foam cushioning
  • Perfect for beginners
  • Full-length Air unit
  • Full-length Air unit

Cons

  • Small price increase from v10
  • Notable weight gain
  • Lacks stability
  • Low-volume toebox
Full review of Nike Winflo 11

Unsurprisingly, the best running shoes are also excellent walking shoes. Many essential shoe features remain unchanged, no matter your speed.

running-shoes-for-walking-cut-into-pieces.jpg
We dissect running shoes in our lab and double-check how good/bad they are for walking after testing them on the test walks as well

However, that doesn’t mean all running shoes are suitable for more pedestrian pursuits. And running shoes are increasingly designed around performance-oriented features, sometimes at the expense of their walking versatility.

Here is how to identify and choose among the best running shoes that are still fit for walking.

4 features that make running shoes good for walking

Whether you’re walking or running, the best shoes do the same things well: they are comfortable, durable, supportive and stable, and (hopefully) stylish enough to be more versatile than your typical pair of running shoes. Let's explain all of these features in greater detail now. 

1. Finding comfortable running shoes for walking: stack height and midsole softness

Adequate midsole cushioning, flexible and breathable upper construction, and ergonomic footbed design are nearly universal qualities of every great running shoe. These qualities make for the best walking shoes, too. When talking about the cushioning, we refer to the stack height or how high off the ground we walk, and the softness of the footbed. 

The most comfortable running shoes for walking tend to have average-to-high stack heights (midsole thickness). A comfortable walking shoe's optimal heel stack height ranges from 30 to 40 mm. Low-stack (minimally cushioned) shoes provide ground contact and feel light and nimble, but are not very comfortable for walking or working on your feet, especially if you're not already used to them.

hoka-clifton-9-stack-heel.JPG
We measure both heel stack height and forefoot stack height in our lab according to the WorldAthletic guidelines. This means we cut the shoes in half and then measure the heel stack height at 12% of the inner shoe length and the forefoot stack height at the 75% of the inner shoe length
high-stack-vs-low-stack-running-shoes-for-walking.jpg
Stack height can indeed vary from maximal to minimal

midsole-softness-running-shoes-for-walking.jpg
Measuring the softness of the midsole with a shore A durometer: the lower the number on the display, the softer the midsole

In most cases, people will say soft shoes are the most comfortable ones. However, some running shoes are so soft they bottom out and cause premature fatigue. On the other hand, shoes can be so firm they start hurting our feet. So, it's about finding the right balance between responsiveness and support. 

Even when the midsole is firmer than the average, walkers love a thick, cushioned insole! Another thing you can always check in our reviews is the thickness of the insole. 

insole-thickness-running-shoes-for-walking.jpg
Measuring the thickness of the insole using a digital calliper 

If you have a favourite set of insoles and always use them in whichever footwear you wear, we've got that covered as well because we always note whether the insole is removable or not. 

2. Durability of running shoes for walking

Durable running shoes are often even more durable when used as walking shoes. This is because walking creates significantly smaller impact forces than running, so it takes longer to compromise the material integrity of a shoe’s midsole foam and outsole. Compressed midsoles typically spell the end of a running shoe’s useful lifespan, as they will no longer absorb and distribute shocks effectively.

High-quality and durable running shoes last for at least 500 miles. If you use them mostly for walking, it is possible to double that mileage. However, you may not see any signs of wear and tear but if you start experiencing premature fatigue or discomfort in your feet and legs, it's best to try a new pair of shoes as well and experience a new foam. The old one might be done even though it looks good!
standard-vs-premium-foam.jpg
In most cases, just by looking at the foams, it's impossible to tell whether they are premium or standard

If you care about midsole durability the most, we suggest looking for daily trainers with standard foams. There are pros and cons here though: standard foams are more durable but less responsive. Premium foams, on the other hand, offer more energy return and leg-saving features, but they are more expensive and less durable. 

We've written the most extensive running-shoe-foam guide in the world, so if you want to dig deep, we could not recommend The ultimate guide to running shoe foams more! 

In our lab, we test the durability of 3 different parts of the shoe: toebox, heel padding, and the outsole. We use a Dremel and we've standardised all these tests so that each shoe gets treated evenly: the same pressure, RPMs and time duration!

Toebox durability test performed in RunRepeat lab 

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 Toebox durability
Based on the damage that we can see, we assess the durability of the toebox on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is the most durable. In the image above, we see uppers that scored 1/5 (left) and 5/5 (right)

On our website, you can find dozens of running shoes for walking that scored the highest (5/5) for toebox durability and heel padding durability.

Then, we test the durability of the heel padding. The durability of this part of the shoe depends on the material and shoe build quality, but also on a) the frequency of the shoe use, b) how you put them on - with a shoe horn or without, c) whether there's any heel slipping while walking. 

Testing the durability of the heel padding using a Dremel 

Just like in the toebox durability test, here we assess the durability on the 1-5 scale and assign 1/5 rating for the least durable heel area and 5/5 for the most durable one. 

heel-padding-durability-running-shoes-for-walking.jpg
Great vs bad durability of the heel padding

Last but not least is the durability of the outsole. Again, we use our Dremel to simulate the wear and tear. 

Testing the durability of the outsole in RunRepeat lab 

outsole-durability-test-results-running-shoes-for-walking.jpg
Very bad durability, given the depth of the dent!

In this case, we're able to precisely measure the depth of the dent instead of assessing it. The material of the outsole allows us to do that, so we use a tyre tread gauge and have accurate numbers on the display. The lower the number, the more durable the outsole! 

3. Support and stability of running shoes for walking

The support features you need depend on personal preferences and your unique biomechanics. Fortunately, the shape of your foot remains the same—whether you’re running or walking. If you need extra arch support or stability features to correct overpronation, you will benefit from wearing those supportive shoes called stability shoes for both running and walking.

arches-flat-regular-high-running-shoes-for-walking.jpg
People with low arches or flat feet usually wear stability running shoes 
overpronation-illustration-runrepeat.jpg
Having flat feet means overpronating in most cases. This means that the ankle rolls inwards more so some stabilisation is needed. This stabilisation is found in stability running shoes

What makes these running shoes different is the overall design: they have specific, often trademarked technologies that stabilise the heel and prevent the arch from collapsing inwards (to a certain degree).

stability-technologies-running-shoes-for-walking.jpg
Different stabilising technologies found in stability shoes: 1) Mizuno wave plate that makes the ankle roll inwards less, 2) dual density midsole which offers firmer foam at the heel for extra support and stability, 3) HOKA's H frame is visible in blue, which is a firmer foam that cradles the foot to sit on the softer foam (white), 4) Brooks Guidelrails and large sidewalls that cradle the heel and stabilise it 
If you're not sure about arch support, whether you needed it or how much, we recommend reading our in-depth guide Arch Support for Runners: What, How and Why

One of the features of stability running shoes for walking are known for is the wide platform. This is something we can also find in neutral running shoes for walking that are simply stable! No extra stabilising technologies for fallen/flat arches, but simply stable on varying terrain. 

heel-platform-width-running-shoes-for-walking.jpg
Using a digital calliper to measure the width of the platform at the heel 

If you want extra stable running shoes for walking, we suggest looking for those with very weight platforms. However, avoid the extra chunk, so consult the weight column as well! 

4. Style: colours, materials, and design

Neon green and orange running shoes look slick if they’re paired with split shorts and a race bib. But they’re a little more conspicuous than desired for a casual weekend stroll through town. The best running shoes for walking tend to reign in the bright colorways in favour of more versatile styles.

Adidas Ultraboost Light tie

Running shoes for walking for women, obviously, often have more variations in pink, red, orange, and similar colours. Some look more casual, but it's all up to a personal preference. 

2 features to avoid in running shoes for walking

Although similar in many ways, the biomechanics of a walking and running stride still have some remarkable differences. With innovations in shoe technology, designers are increasingly targeting the biomechanics of running specifically. As a result, many modern running shoes do have features that make them super-optimised for running but not ideal for walking. 

Some features to avoid when choosing running shoes for walking include carbon plates and advanced PEBA-based foams. 

Carbon plates

High-end performance-oriented running shoes feature a thin carbon plate above the midsole. These ultralight plates maximise stride efficiency and encourage a quick heel-to-toe-off. It makes them a game-changing innovation for uptempo running, but the propulsive effects are actually a bad thing for walking due to the biomechanical movement changes they encourage.

Saucony Endorphin Elite Drop
The black piece inside the white foam is the carbon plate

If this topic interests you though, we've covered it in great detail in our guide Carbon-Plated Shoes Cut In Half, Explained and Lab-Tested

Advanced PEBA-based foams

PEBA (polyether block amide)-based foams are used in many running shoes marketed for race day or uptempo training sessions. They are light, stiff, and bouncy to encourage optimal running efficiency. While helpful for chasing a marathon PR, this efficiency is unnecessary for walking. Stiff foam midsoles like this create greater instability and are less suitable for slower paces and walking gaits.

We covered PEBA foams in great detail in our comprehensive guide on foams

Breathability of running shoes for walking

Breathability varies just like the weather conditions and the level of feet sweatiness. So, if your feet sweat a lot and/or you live in a hot climate, we recommend finding the most breathable shoes out there. If, on the other hand, you need more warmth, look for less breathable shoes that trap heat. 

Testing the breathability in RunRepeat lab using a smoke machine and a 3d printed cast 

Based on how much smoke comes out of the shoe and at which pace, we assign a breathability rating on a 1-5 scale, where 1 stands for the least breathable and 5 for the most breathable. 

uppers-microscope-runrepeat.jpg
Looking at the uppers under the microscope: very breathable one (scored 5/5 on our test) on the left and a very warm one (scored 1/5 on our test) on the right

We also examine the uppers in the most incredible detail under our microscope. This allows us to understand the smoke test results better; sometimes, ventilation holes are not visible to the naked eye, and sometimes, we don't see that there are many layers present, which is why the shoes trap heat. 

Wide or narrow toebox? 

We've already covered the topic of comfort. A perfect fit is a part of that story, although it's one we often overlook as most people already know how to nail the size. When it comes to the width, some people struggle because they have differently shaped feet, too wide forefoot, or too narrow forefoot. We're here to explain our measurements and how you can use them to filter the shoes that would work for you! 

toebox-volume-measurement-running-shoes.jpg
We use a special gel that is poured into the shoes, frozen, and then measured in 2 places - around the big toe and where the shoe is the widest 

Knowing both measurements matters a lot because of the different shapes of the feet. 

different shapes of toes

To nail the fit, you may need a shoe with a tapered (pointy) toebox, one that's more foot-shaped (looks squared a bit), or something plain narrow. 

pointy-vs-footshaped-running-shoes-for-walking.jpg
Very tapered (pointy) toebox vs. a very wide one

We also measure the height of the toebox in our tests. This is especially important if you have a big toe pointing up or shoes often squish your toes and you get black toenails. If that's the case, look for higher toeboxes! 

toebox-height-runners-for-walking.jpg
Using a digital calliper to measure the height of the toebox in RunRepeat lab

Here's a selection of running shoes for walking if you need the most room at the ball of the foot (usually around the pinkie toe):

These running shoes offer the most room at the big toe, which means they are not pointy but more square-ish: 

However, these shoes often feature a low or a zero drop, which usually asks for an adjustment period if you're new to that low drop. Caution is needed if the heel drop is 4 mm or lower! To learn more, read our guide on Heel to toe drop

In case you have narrow feet, here are the narrowest running shoes for walking: 

Rockered running shoes for walking

Running shoes can have a rockered shape to encourage an efficient and propulsive stride. Rockered footbeds that are particularly stiff and aggressive may feel awkward while walking.

aggressive-rocker-running-shoes-for-walking.jpg
Less and more aggressive rocker

But there are rockered shoes that feel great. Keep in mind you might need time to get used to rockered running shoes. 

Rockered running shoes can work great for those who are dealing with forefoot or toe pain, plantar fasciitis or heel pain, issues with Achilles tendon or limited ankle movement. Those who struggle with knee or hip pain tend to avoid rockered shoes. 

If you want to learn more (all) about rockered running shoes, we highly recommend reading our guide All you need to know about rockered running shoes.

FAQs

Can I use trail running shoes for walking?

Trail running shoes can make for excellent walking shoes, especially if you are walking primarily on natural surfaces. Indeed, many hikers and backpackers now prefer the comfort, breathability, and traction of trail running shoes over heavy and clumsy hiking boots. 

In case you want to enter this world, we'd recommend hiking shoes with shallow lugs (up to 3mm). The shallower the lugs, the less you'll feel them if you plan to walk on hard surfaces like asphalt and concrete. Also, keep in mind that these shoes will last shorter if you wear them on hard surfaces because it's not the terrain their were made for.

Are low-drop running shoes appropriate for walking?

Low-drop running shoes can be good for walking, but like most things, it depends on your stride and personal preferences. Higher drop (10-12mm) shoes encourage heel striking, which puts more strain on the thighs and hips, but less on the calves and feet muscles. Low-drop (0-5mm) shoes do the opposite. Low-drop running shoes often feature a wider toebox as well. 

If you want to give these running shoes a try, we recommend reading our guide on heel to toe drop first! 

Author
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob is a fan of short distances with a 5K PR at 15:58 minutes. Based on 35 million race results, he's among the fastest 0.2% runners. Jens Jakob previously owned a running store, when he was also a competitive runner. His work is regularly featured in The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC and the likes as well as peer-reviewed journals. Finally, he has been a guest on +30 podcasts on running.