Black Friday - best deals from 52 stores 7 Best Stability Running Shoes in 2024
We buy shoes ourselves. We earn commissions when you buy through us, at no extra cost. Why trust us
Stability running shoes are helpful in providing runners with additional arch support, especially if they feel that the lack thereof is preventing a natural and comfortable movement. As a beginner, it could be a worthy investment for you, but make sure to identify first if the features are truly beneficial to your run.
In this guide, we define stability shoes and the top-rated stability running shoes to help you narrow down your choices.
We have tested stability running shoes in our lab and on the test runs, and all our test results, impressions, and insights are summarised in in-depth reviews. Because of such an approach, we're able to highlight the best models in several categories here.
How we test running shoes
It is our mission to save you time in picking the best shoe out of 100+ stability running shoes on the market. Here is how:
- We research hundreds of studies on foot biomechanics and running footwear to understand what a good stability shoe is.
- We purchase all the shoes with our own money to prevent bias and brand loyalty.
- We test run at least 30-50 miles in each pair before we deliver our feedback.
- With our RunRepeat lab, we cut each shoe into pieces and measure 30+ different parameters that contribute to its performance - from cushioning softness to lace slippage.
And the best stability running shoes make it here.
Best stability running shoes overall
What makes it the best?
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is a versatile workhorse with plush cushioning that tackles all of our daily runs with ease and a level of comfort not often associated with stability shoes.
The GuideRails technology provides the shoe with an above-average level of torsional rigidity that we scored 4 out of 5 in our manual assessment. This provides us with support for overpronation by subtly curtailing excessive lateral movements, thus keeping our base nice and level from landing to toe-off. On the other hand, our longitudinal stiffness test shows that the shoe is actually 41.6% more flexible than the average shoe. This means that the shoe is easily able to conform with the bending of our foot during test runs, keeping us comfy for miles on end.
The Adrenaline GTS 23’s midsole strikes a perfect balance between softness and stability that suits any type of run, whether short and speedy or long and drawn out. The DNA Loft v2 foam is 19% softer than average, according to our durometer, with a ride that feels nice and plush underfoot with a good level of energy return. Meanwhile, the width of the midsole offsets how soft it is and provides us with a robust and stable platform, measuring 117.3 mm at the forefoot and 96.9 mm at the heel versus their respective averages of 113.2 mm and 90.1 mm.
With a steep 12.6 mm heel drop, the Adrenaline GTS 23 is definitely more suited to heel-striking runners than their forefoot-striking counterparts, for whom we recommend looking for shoes with a low to medium drop height of up to 8 mm for more comfort and less risk of injury.
Pros
- Excellent stability without being intrusive
- Ideal for easy miles
- Specifically designed for heel strikers
- Outstanding breathability
- Comfortable and cushioned
- Availability in narrow and wide sizes
- Capable of handling tempo paces
- Not expensive at all
Cons
- The engineered mesh upper lacks durability
- Lacks cushion for forefoot strikers
Best stability running shoes for speed training
What makes it the best?
Saucony Tempus redefines stability shoes with its cushion striking the balance between comfort and responsiveness. It allows us to go insanely fast and far in a sure-footed manner without being too disruptive. Our lab and run tests show it’s the best speed trainer among stability shoes.
The springy cushion is a game-changer, proving not all stability shoes are dull. Its energy and rocker geometry make forward strides more effortless. This pair can take endurance runs with its plush foam that’s 23.0% softer than average.
Its wide base and stiff heel counter serve as guides to subtly keep our feet in place. In our lab test, the heel counter’s rigidity stands at 4/5, while the average is 2.7. The higher the number, the stiffer it is. Meanwhile, the midsole measures 4.3 and 4.4 mm wider than average in the forefoot and heel area — giving our feet more room to land steadily.
Gone are the days when a stable shoe is automatically heavy. At 9.4 oz (266 g), this trainer is even lighter than the 9.5 oz (268g) average of road running shoes. It’s also way lighter than the 10.5 oz (298.3g) average of stability shoes.
Unfortunately, the rigid heel counter lacks padding and may cause heel rubs to other athletes.
Pros
- Stable but not aggressive
- Responsive ride
- Smooth transitions
- Outsole is super solid
- Bites on wet roads
- Snug and secure fit
- Breathable on warm days
- Roomy toe box
- Not heavy
Cons
- Causes heel rubs
- Expensive
Best cushioned running shoes for stability
What makes it the best?
Among stability running shoes we tested on foot and in the lab, the ASICS Gel Kayano 31 offered top-tier cushioning. The unusual combination of soft, flexible yet steady midsole is tough to match given its excellent impact protection, high level of comfort, and reliable support.
The GK31 has a crazy heel height of 39.3 mm, much higher than the 33.7 mm average. Not only that, it’s made of the luxuriously plush FF Blast+ foam, which our durometer confirms is 27.1% softer than average. The heel includes the PureGEL technology for gentler landings and less stress on the legs.
Given its maximalist nature, it’s expected to be wobbly. Yet the GK31 stands out with its subtle yet effective support features such as the 4D Guidance System, the rigid heel, and the wide platform. The heel counter held our ankles with the right amount of stiffness and we rated it with a 4/5 torsional rigidity score. What also kept each landing safe was the spacious 122.1/97.6 mm base.
What we also found amazing is GK31’s natural feel despite being a stability shoe. It barely resisted our movements! Our 90-degree test confirms it’s 14.4% more flexible than average.
However, the comfort and support packed into Kayano 31 become apparent on the scale. At 10.4 oz (295g), it’s 10.6% heavier than average.
Pros
- Excellent stability
- Ideal for heel strikers
- Good breathability
- Comfortable and roomy upper
- Great for easy paces
- Maximalist cushioning
- A bit lighter than v30
- Plush FF Blast+ foam
Cons
- Big and clunky
- Not versatile at all
- Outsole needs improvements
Best lightweight stability running shoes
What makes it the best?
Based on our lab and run tests, Hoka Arahi 7 is the best lightweight option among stability running shoes. Why? The shoe blends subtle support with generous cushioning all in a lightweight package.
The Arahi 7 deviates from the standard stability shoe by maintaining an airy build. While the average stability shoe in our lab weighs 10.3 oz (293g), this Hoka is significantly lighter at 9.4 oz (266g). It kept our feet and ankles free from the heavy load.
That lightness is also amazing considering the shoe's substantial stack of 34.2/27.9 mm. While it’s not a maximalist, we felt it was generous enough for comfort and protection during long runs.
To ensure stability, our lab results reveal Arahi 7's three main pillars: 1) the firm 26.6 HA midsole, 2) the wider-than-average landing base, and 3) Hoka’s J-Frame technology. All these elements work together to guide our foot alignment without being too intrusive.
Because of the midsole’s firmness, runners seeking a dynamic ride may find Arahi 7 dull. Those who prefer more bounce should look elsewhere.
Pros
- Premium and comfy upper
- Still surprisingly light
- Subtle yet effective stability features
- Versatile for all footstrikes
- Reasonably priced
- Excellent fit and security
- Plush tongue
- Cushioned
Cons
- Limited breathability
- Low energy return
- Slightly snug fit
Best stability shoes for daily running
What makes it the best?
Guide 17 blends traditional stability with innovation, serving as a subtle guide without compromising our natural stride. Departing from the conventional stability shoe, our lab shows it offers generous cushioning and flexibility in a lightweight build, earning the best daily trainer title in the stability category.
A stable shoe doesn’t have to be a burden to lift and bend, as proven by Guide 17. At 9.7 oz (275g), it’s lighter than the 10.4 oz (296g) average. Its manoeuvrable midsole, validated by our bend test to be 24.5% more flexible than average, allows for smoother toe-offs, complemented by the rocker design for forward propulsion.
A stark contrast from the usual grounded and firm stability shoes, our calliper reveals an above-average 34.9/27.9 mm, while our durometer reveals a 22.3 HA reading that’s almost as soft as the average. The midsole feels comfortable for any footstrike and distance.
To boost stability, it has midsole sidewalls and sole flares that guide our feet so that we don’t move excessively. The landing base is exceptionally spacious, allowing us to find our footing during off-balance strides. Our calliper shows an extra 7.5/14.3 mm width vs. the average forefoot and heel.
Guide 17 balanced support and comfort well but missed the energy return needed for speed running. We recommend checking alternatives for runners who prefer a faster shoe.
Pros
- Enhanced stability features
- Improved stack height
- Spacious upper
- Lightweight
- Fairly priced
- Smoother transitions with new rocker
- Premium PWRRUN+ sockliner
Cons
- Grip could be better
- Less agile than before
- Exposed midsole
Best stability running shoes for long distance
What makes it the best?
Hoka Gaviota’s 5th version exceeds the traditional stability shoe by providing incredibly plush cushioning. It seamlessly blends comfort with stability features to ensure a steady and fun ride. Our lab numbers tell the story but our runs cemented Gaviota 5 as our top long-distance stability shoe.
The highlight goes to the balanced midsole, with its luxurious foam that’s 46.5% softer than average as per our durometer. It’s one of the softest we’ve tested and is effective in muting ground feel. What’s surprising is how it doesn’t feel wobbly at all. The midsole feels so supportive because of the firmer secondary foam that’s integrated into high-impact areas — the arch, heel, and tip — to improve balance.
Further enhancing a steady ride is the extremely wide base. Its 125.1/106.6 mm forefoot and heel measures 11.9/16.5 mm wider than average. That’s more than enough room for stable landings! Its H-Frame helps keep us centred as well, improving lateral stability.
With a 3.8 mm thick and tough outsole, Hoka smartly extends the shoe’s life. Our durometer measures the rubber at 83.1 HC (vs. the 80.2 HC average). This means it's harder and more durable.
With a low 2.2 mm heel drop, we don’t recommend Gaviota 5 to extreme heel-strikers and athletes with lower-leg problems.
Pros
- Remarkably stable
- Breathable and comfortable upper
- Lightweight for its size
- Plushier than ever
- Good stability option for forefoot strikers
- Ideal for wide feet
- Excellent for long runs
Cons
- Low drop might pose issues for heel strikers
- Performs poorly in colder conditions
- Not for narrow feet
Best budget running shoes for stability
What makes it the best?
Asics GT 1000 12 defies the old-school stability shoe, focusing on comfort and flexibility. It offers a premium upper and outsole for the affordable price of £100 vs. the £140 average of its counterparts — making it our top pick for the best budget stability shoe.
Each footfall lands on the buttery Flytefoam. Our durometer shows it’s 46.9% softer than average. Any wobble is offset by ASICS' GEL which is integrated into the outer heel for support. This inspires a securely planted sensation in a very natural way thanks to its loose build. It boldly exceeds the average by 60.4% in our flex test, making it one of the most flexible shoes we tested.
The outsole strikes the perfect balance between grip and durability. Its 74.8 HC rubber is softer than average (for more traction) but makes up for durability through its thicker material (4.8 mm).
Gone are the days when stability shoes are heavy since this pair boasts a light 9.6 oz (271g). Its upper is immensely breathable, with holes even in the medial section, which is quite rare. We’re not surprised it scored the highest rating on our breathability test.
With its focus on comfort, the midsole lacks energy return for faster paces. We recommend looking elsewhere if speed is a priority.
Pros
- Incredible value for the price
- Cushioned and soft midsole
- Offers great stability
- GEL technology in the heel
- Perfectly comfortable for cross-training or walking
- Built to endure long-distance runs
- Offers exceptional breathability
- Durable outsole with a long lifespan
Cons
- Flytefoam could offer better energy return
- Upper lacks durability
This guide is here to educate and explain shoe design, not give medical advice. If you’re injured, experiencing any pain, or not sure whether overpronation is the cause of the pain, we recommend visiting a specialist.
Who stability shoes are for?
During running, when we land on the surface, our arch collapses to absorb the shock, and the rearfoot rolls inward at the ankle. This is pronation and it’s completely normal and necessary when running.
However, some ankles roll far too inward. This is overpronation and the majority of runners overpronate.
Stability running shoes are made for overpronators because they use different technologies to help with overpronation. This means they stabilise the landing and correct the movement (to a certain degree) so that the excessive inward movement is stopped and the heels get the necessary support.
There are different levels of overpronation, mild, moderate, and severe, and the more runners overpronate, the more stability is needed. In some cases, when overpronation is severe, runners use orthotics and motion-control shoes.
With the rise of new technologies, we’re seeing fewer motion-control shoes and more modern stability running shoes.
It’s also important to note that race shoes rarely offer any stability elements. They can have a very tall and narrow base, ridiculously thin heel counters, etc. This is because, at faster workouts, runners usually require less stability.
1. soft sock-like heel vs a stiff and padded heel counter
2. no side walls vs. GuideRails present
3. no heel flare vs. a present heel flare
4. less ground contact vs. more ground-contact in the outsole
However, when doing longer runs, our feet get tired, and we tend to land harder and even change our strike (from forefoot to heel). It’s when we need more stability, and that’s why we have more stability shoes in the realm of daily trainers.
| If you’re new to this topic of pronation, we wholeheartedly recommend our in-depth guide Pronation 101: Running Shoe Choices, DIY Analysis, Injuries. |
How to recognise stability shoes
Stability shoes implement some trademarked technologies developed by different brands and they implement different geometry elements (not trademarked).
2) dual density midsole (softer above the firmer) 3) heel bevel 4) side walls
5) stiff and wide base 6) forefoot sole flare 7) heel sole flare
But, when it comes to visual inspection, there are quite a few things you can pay attention to to understand whether the shoe is neutral or a stability one. Stability shoes often feature 2 or more of the following geometry elements listed below.
Medial post
Medial post is a piece of firmer foam or plastic located on the medial (inner) side of the shoe and its role is to prevent the excessive inward roll of the ankle and collapsing of the arch. It can also be somewhat longer and look like a frame.
Dual-density midsole
It can appear as a firmer foam on the inside or under the arch, in the form of trademarked technologies like Hoka’s J-frame or H-frame, or brands simply get creative and combine different midsole densities to increase the stability.
In our lab, we measure the softness of both midsoles present (explained more below).
Stiff and padded heel counters
The stiffness of the heel counter allows for a heel to stay put and not to wobble. The more stability, the merrier! And padding usually helps with the lockdown. Usually only race shoes have no padding and insanely soft heel area.
In our lab, we assess the stiffness of the heel counter by pushing it and squeezing it. We rate it on a 1-5 scale, where 5 is the stiffest.
Guide 16 scored 5/5 (the stiffest) on our heel counter stiffness test
These heel counters are not just stiff but also padded. They cradle the heel nicely to make it super locked in and stable.
| If this topic is of interest to you, we’ve put together an in-depth guide on heel counters: The role of heel counters in running shoes. |
Stiffer base
The base often has plates or rods in the midsole or is simply stiffer, thanks to the amount of rubber in the outsole and the density of the foam in the midsole. In RunRepeat shoe lab, we test a) longitudinal stiffness and b) torsional stiffness.
Testing longitudinal stiffness with a digital force gauge
The higher the number on our digital force gauge, the more force we needed to bend the shoe to 90 degrees, which means it is stiffer. Lower numbers indicate more flexible shoes.
Assessing torsional rigidity in RunRepeat lab
When it comes to torsional rigidity, we assign each shoe a rating on a 1-5 scale, where 5 is the stiffest.
Wide base
This is needed because extra width ensures planted landings. Basically, we’re avoiding narrow and high platforms, as you’d see in some race shoes. The wider, the better!
While the width of the base is more important in stability running shoes because overpronators usually land on the heel, in our lab we actually measure the width of the base in 2 places: at the forefoot and at the heel.
Full-ground contact outsole
It helps a lot when it comes to that secure feel. Some shoes have cutouts in the outsole to lose weight or to improve flexibility. That is, of course, not a bad thing, but when it comes to stability, more ground contact is better.
Side walls
The midsole is extended upward to create a “wall” which provides more structure and keeps the foot locked in.
These sidewalls can create the illusion that the heel drop is smaller. But, no need to worry because we cut shoes in half and follow WorldAthletics guidelines when it comes to measuring stack heights. No sidewalls are tricking us!
Heel bevel
Heel bevel is a curved back of the heel that reduces the amount of stress in the tibialis anterior muscle, and it improves the transition for heel strikers. The more it’s bevelled, the faster the forefoot hits the ground.
Sole flare
This is a protrusion that can appear on the medial and lateral sides. For heel strikers, it’s important that it’s present at the heel. This means that the protrusion (midsole) becomes wider than the upper.
Those who pronate at the heel should look for a medial heel flare. Those who pronate at the forefoot can look for medial forefoot flare.
Structural upper overlays
These overlays help with support and stability by ensuring a superb lockdown, especially around the midfoot. They are present on the upper and can have different shapes and stiffness levels and usually feel extra secure.
Brands' trademarked technologies found in stability shoes
There are many technologies used to help overpronators run better and we will mention more popular ones below.
1) heel bevel 2) sculpted midsole 3) wider base 4) medial post
Weight of the stability running shoes
Because of all the technologies implemented in stability running shoes, they tend to weigh more than neutral running shoes. Some, much more. See a few examples:
- Average weight of a neutral running shoe: 262.9g or 9.3 oz
- Average weight of a stability running shoe: 285.0g or 10.0 oz
- Lightest neutral shoe: 149g or 5.2 oz
- Lightest stability shoe: 228g or 8.0 oz
We always weigh every shoe that comes into our lab, and we don’t always get the same or even similar numbers as the brands advertised. We measure shoes in men’s US 9.
For context, here are the weights of the best-rated stability shoes:
And, if you want the lightest stability shoes possible, here’s the list:
How soft are stability running shoes?
Depends on the technologies and geometry. If more stability is given by a firmer midsole, then the midsole is firmer. If there are external stability elements, like a stiff heel counter, then the midsoles can be softer.
Regardless of the technology and geometry, we measure the softness of the midsole on every shoe. We cut it in half and stick the needle of the durometer in the foam. The number on the durometer tells us how soft or firm the midsole is: lower numbers mean softer, and higher numbers mean firmer.
In case we notice it’s a dual-density midsole, we take both measurements.
If you prefer softer running shoes, here are the softest ones we’ve tested (these tables are automatically updated with every review we do):
In case you prefer firmer midsoles, this selection is for you:
Durability of stability running shoes
When durability is discussed, most often, it’s the outsole durability that is mentioned. And, fair enough, it’s important to know how durable the outsole is, especially for overpronators who don’t land evenly on the heel and who see signs of wear and tear sooner because of it.
Using a Dremel to test the durability of the outsole
For the outsole durability test, we press our Dremel against the outsole (always the same pressure, RPMs, and duration) and then measure the depth of the damage using a tyre tread gauge.
The deeper the dent, the less durable the outsole.
Of course, we don’t stop here. Using the Dremel again, we test the durability of the toebox and the heel padding.
Testing the durability of the toebox using a Dremel in RunRepeat lab
Testing the durability of the heel padding
But, in these 2 cases, we can’t measure the dent because the materials are soft. So, we assess the damage on a 1-5 scale, where 1 is the least durable.
Stable running shoes vs. stability running shoes
Stability running shoes are not the same as stable neutral shoes. Neutral shoes can be stable on their own, but stability shoes have the technologies to help overpronators specifically.
Stable neutral shoes are still neutral, which means they have some geometrical stability elements, but would most likely not be enough for overpronators, except very mild ones.
|
Stability shoes |
Stable neutral shoes |
|
Both can have a wider base, heel flare, … |
|
|
Only stability shoes have GuideRails, GuideRail, J frame, H frame, etc. |
|
|
Both can work for mild pronation, depending on how mild. |
|
|
Best for moderate overpronation. |
Best for neutral pronation. |
|
Usually stiffer than neutral running shoes |
Usually more flexible and softer than stability shoes |
Similar buying guides
