Our verdict

We found the ASICS GT 1000 14 to be a great all-around choice for runners wanting dependable support at a fair price. It delivers a steady ride that feels great for everyday use. We think the new materials give it a slightly more premium touch. In our lab tests, the thick tongue and well-built heel added to its cosy feel. That said, we found that the engineered mesh runs warm, so it might not be the best choice for those running in hot weather.

Pros

  • Supercharged stability
  • Ideal for heel strikers
  • Still offers amazing value
  • Fuss-free, durable design
  • Improved outsole traction
  • Comfortable for everyday wear
  • Great step-in feel
  • Improved foam from v13

Cons

  • Bad breathability
  • Still lacks energy return
  • Boring ride

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

The ASICS GT 1000 14 is a solid pick for runners who:

  • Want a no-fuss stability daily trainer with top durability and an affordable price.
  • Upgrade their GT 1000 every one or two years. This version keeps the same feel with thoughtful improvements like better shock absorption.
  • Like the GT 2000 but prefer a more budget-friendly option. Well, thanks to the foam update, the GT 1000 it’s closer than ever.

ASICS GT 1000 14

Who should NOT buy

The engineered mesh upper doesn’t meet the needs of runners training in warm climates, as we found that it lacks proper airflow and traps heat during runs. In our tests, the Saucony Guide 18 and the ASICS Gel Kayano 31 felt cooler and more breathable, although they also will hit harder on your wallet.

We also found in the lab that the GT 1000 14 also falls short in energy return. Its EVA-based FF Blast midsole lacks responsiveness. If you're after a bounce-filled ride, we suggest the Adidas Supernova Solution, because its PEBA foam is much better in terms of performance.

ASICS GT 1000 14 parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

This isn't a max-stack running shoe, so the 122 SA shock absorption result makes perfect sense. It's right around the average and should suit anyone looking for a shoe to handle short and moderate distances, up to 10 miles or so.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
GT 1000 14 122 SA
Average 127 SA
Compared to 240 running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
170 SA

Energy return

New

With a 54.4% energy return, it lands on the lower end of our lab results. Since ASICS has often lagged in delivering top-tier cushioning in many daily trainers, we weren’t surprised by this outcome.

Still, it marks a clear improvement over its predecessor, which didn’t even reach the 50% mark in the same test.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
GT 1000 14 54.4%
Average 58.3%
Compared to 237 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
82.0%

Heel stack

Sure, it's not a max-stack shoe as mentioned earlier, but the GT 1000 keeps gaining height. Version 12 sat at 30.2 mm, while version 13 reached 33.7 mm in the heel. We measured 35.4 mm this time, which definitely makes a difference for heel strikers.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Heel stack
Test results
GT 1000 14 35.4 mm
Average 34.4 mm
Compared to 432 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot came in at 25.8 mm, which makes this model a solid pick for runners seeking a balanced and beginner-friendly stability shoe.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Forefoot stack
Test results
GT 1000 14 25.8 mm
Average 25.8 mm
Compared to 432 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.5 mm

Drop

The GT 1000 14 is listed with an 8 mm drop, but we measured 9.6 mm.

That’s nearly a full centimetre of added foam in the heel compared with the forefoot, making this shoe better suited for beginners and heel strikers.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Drop
Test results
GT 1000 14 9.6 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 432 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.2 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

One of the key updates in the GT 1000 14 is the switch to FF Blast in the midsole. It’s not a premium foam reserved for top-tier models, but it clearly outperforms the older FlyteFoam across the board and puts this model closer to the GT 2000 13.

We measured 19.4 HA on our durometer, a middle-of-the-road softness that matches the shoe’s overall no-surprises approach.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Midsole softness
Test results
GT 1000 14 19.4 HA
Average 20.7 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 358 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
35.0 HA

Rocker

Rockered shoes are everywhere these days, but it seems that there’s still room for more traditional designs. The GT 1000 14 sticks to that formula, with only a slight curve in the heel and forefoot. We think that’s great news for fans of the GT 1000.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Rocker

PureGEL

Although the GT 1000 doesn’t carry the “Gel” label like the Gel Nimbus 27 or Gel Cumulus 27, ASICS has still embedded a PureGEL unit in the heel to soften landings and boost comfort. But that comes with a trade-off, as this jelly-like material offers very little bounce and reduces energy return.

ASICS GT 1000 14 PureGEL

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

We found the fit to be nearly identical to previous versions, though this update offers a touch more room across the upper.

When we tested it in the lab, we measured 97.5 mm at its widest point. That's ideal for runners with average or even slightly wide feet. And for those needing even more space, there's also a Wide version available in most markets.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Width / Fit
Test results
GT 1000 14 97.5 mm
Average 95.4 mm
Compared to 187 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
102.4 mm

Toebox width

The toebox width also stays in line with previous versions. We measured 74.1 mm, which offers enough space to avoid toe squeeze, though it’s far from the roomy, foot-shaped design you’d find in an Altra or Topo.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Toebox width
Test results
GT 1000 14 74.1 mm
Average 73.5 mm
Compared to 187 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
82.4 mm

Toebox height

If there's a slightly snugger area, it's the toebox height, which measured about 1 mm below average.

But during our test runs, we didn’t experience any discomfort or unwanted pressure in this zone.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Toebox height
Test results
GT 1000 14 26.2 mm
Average 27.3 mm
Compared to 186 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.4 mm
Toebox height
33.9 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

New

We’re glad to report that the GT 1000 14 comes with a grip-ready outsole scoring 0.50, a major upgrade from the GT 1000 13 (0.35). Whether you're running in the rain or on dry roads, version 14 confirms reliable, all-season traction.

Test results
GT 1000 14 0.50
Average 0.46
Compared to 231 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.83

Outsole design

New

The GT 1000 14 outsole features segmented AHAR (ASICS High Abrasion Rubber) in high-wear zones like the heel, forefoot, and outer edge. The lugs feature deep flex grooves, helping the shoe bend more naturally. The rubber areas are separated by exposed EVA foam, which is visible through several midfoot cutouts and central channels.

The rubber coverage is generous overall and protects the midfoot area well, but strategic cutouts help reduce weight and allow the foam to compress more freely.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

New

We tested the GT 1000 14 flexibility in our lab and found it reached the 30-degree bend point with just 12.3N of force. That result confirms what we expected from a shoe meant to feel more natural underfoot than the average modern, thickly-stacked trainer.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
GT 1000 14 12.3N
Average 15.0N
Compared to 234 running shoes
Number of shoes
4.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

We put the GT 1000 14 on our scale and discovered it weighs nearly the same as its predecessor, with a barely noticeable 1.5% drop. The final reading was 9.6 oz or 272g, right around average and fully within a reasonable range.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Weight
Test results
GT 1000 14 9.6 oz (272g)
Average 9.3 oz (265g)
Compared to 433 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.6 oz (159g)
Weight
12.6 oz (357g)

Breathability

Running shoes in the budget-friendly category often come with trade-offs in energy return, weight, grip, or breathability. In our testing, we found that airflow is one of the weakest aspects of the GT 1000 14.

Using our smoke machine, we saw that the engineered mesh held back nearly everything, scoring just 2/5. For runners in hot climates, that could make summer sessions uncomfortable.

To double-check, we moved the upper across a strong light source and clearly saw the lack of ventilation holes. That limited airflow is what makes the shoe feel warmer than expected.

ASICS GT 1000 14 mesh microscope

Under our digital microscope, the tight weave of the mesh confirmed it: there’s very little room for air to pass through.

ASICS GT 1000 14 mesh

From a comfort perspective, the upper feels good, especially around the heel, as ASICS added thick foam padding back there. And while low breathability it’s not a dealbreaker at this price for most runners, we think the upper could definitely benefit from improved ventilation for version 15.

Test results
GT 1000 14 2
Average 3.8
Compared to 362 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

We tested the GT 1000 14 and found it's purpose-built to deliver reliable stability. In fact, we think it's an ideal daily trainer for runners who need more support than an average neutral model like the Versablast 4.

ASICS GT 1000 14 3D

ASICS delivers this through a mix of smart design choices: a 3D Guidance System with stiffer arch structure, high-rising midsole walls, and a a broad heel.

Torsional rigidity

This shoe is also more rigid than the average running model, so don’t expect it to flex like your yoga teacher. We tested its flexibility and had a tough time bending it, which led us to rate it 4/5.

Test results
GT 1000 14 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 411 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter feels similar to what we’ve seen in other daily trainers, earning a 3/5 for offering a fair balance between support and comfort. We were actually a bit surprised it’s not ultra-rigid, especially considering the generous heel foam.

Test results
GT 1000 14 3
Average 2.9
Compared to 395 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Despite being a stability shoe at heart, ASICS kept the forefoot width at 113.6 mm. For us, that's a clear sign that the design favours heel strikers more than midfoot or forefoot runners.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
GT 1000 14 113.6 mm
Average 114.3 mm
Compared to 433 running shoes
Number of shoes
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

Especially because the heel is noticeably wider than the average at 94.8 mm, giving a clear stability boost in that zone. Like other recent ASICS support-focused models, the midfoot is also extra-wide and creates a boxy-looking midsole platform.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Midsole width - heel
Test results
GT 1000 14 94.8 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 433 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

While the missing ventilation holes hurt breathability, they do bring a side benefit: enhanced toebox durability. We gave it a 3/5 in our lab test, which suggests early wear and tear is not something most runners will deal with.

Test results
GT 1000 14 3
Average 2.6
Compared to 296 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding ticks the box with a top-tier 5/5 score, which ensures that even runners who often wear holes in this area won’t be able to drill through this ultra-resilient setup.

Test results
GT 1000 14 5
Average 3.3
Compared to 291 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

We’ve got good news from the outsole too, as our Dremel only managed to shave off 0.7 mm from the AHAR rubber. That’s an impressive result that clearly outperforms the average in our lab, confirming this outsole as both grippy and abrasion-resistant.

Test results
GT 1000 14 0.7 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 274 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

In fact, we believe the 4.5 mm outsole might be unnecessarily thick considering the solid durability of the AHAR rubber. Reducing it could lead to a more enjoyable ride and shave off some extra weight.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Outsole thickness
Test results
GT 1000 14 4.5 mm
Average 3.3 mm
Compared to 429 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The insole is thicker than average at 5.2 mm, adding a touch more underfoot cushioning than what we usually see in other daily trainers.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Insole thickness
Test results
GT 1000 14 5.2 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 428 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Midsole softness in cold (%)

Despite being a step up from the previous foam, FF Blast is still an EVA-based. In our test, it got 39% firmer, which is quite noticeable.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
GT 1000 14 39%
Average 25%
Compared to 357 running shoes
Number of shoes
1%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Removable insole

If you want to use a thinner insole or swap in your custom orthotics, there's no problem at all.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Removable insole
Test results
GT 1000 14 Yes

Reflective elements

The ASICS GT 1000 14 skips reflective elements entirely, a frequent omission in budget-friendly shoes.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Reflective elements
Test results
GT 1000 14 No

Tongue padding

We noticed in the last two years that ASICS keeps thick tongues on budget-friendly shoes while going ultra-thin on higher-end models.

ASICS GT 1000 14 lacing system

This version sticks with the same chunky 8.1 mm tongue from its predecessor, a weight-adding yet comfort-boosting choice that enhances the plush step-in feel. We also tested the lacing system, which uses basic punched eyelets without any fancy or overengineered solutions.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Tongue padding
Test results
GT 1000 14 8.1 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 430 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

Another common omission in budget-conscious shoes is the gusseted tongue, often reserved for higher-tier models. The GT 1000 14 still doesn't feature a tongue stitched to the sides... maybe that's something we'll see in the v15.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
GT 1000 14 None

Price

One of the main draws of the GT 1000 14 is its wallet-friendly price, sitting below the rest of ASICS' stability lineup. For runners who don't need premium materials or peak performance, it's a solid bang-for-your-buck option.

Test results
GT 1000 14 $110
Compared to 433 running shoes
Number of shoes
£45
Price
£270

Heel tab

One of the small design tweaks from v13 is the addition of a heel tab that improves both functionality and aesthetics.

ASICS GT 1000 14 Heel tab
Test results
GT 1000 14 Finger loop