7 Best Trail Running Shoes in 2026

Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen on
7 Best Trail Running Shoes in 2026

We buy shoes ourselves. We earn commissions when you buy through us, at no extra cost. Why trust us

Some trail shoes are created for the harshest off-road challenges, like rocks, mud, snow, and branches. They keep you protected and surefooted. Others are made for the more urban-ready conditions and are comfortable enough to switch from roads to trails.

After rigorously testing the shoes on the trails and in our lab, we have listed our top recommendations in several categories.

And if you want to dive into the nitty-gritty of selecting the best pair for your needs, skip right to our guide on trail shoes.

How we test trail running shoes


To save you time, we spend hours scrutinising every single shoe release. As an independent shoe testing lab, we purchase all trail shoes with our own money to stay unbiased.

  • We cut shoes into pieces so we can observe and test the shoes and their components in a more in-depth manner
  • We take these shoes on trails, gravel roads, single tracks, mud, rocks and slippery slopes while covering numerous uphills and downhills 
  • We measure over 30 different parameters far beyond weight and stack height, such as traction, flexibility, and shock absorption

Instead of “durable” or “comfortable,” we give you concrete data that puts each trail shoe up against hundreds of others. The best trail shoes make it here.

Best trail running shoes overall

What makes it the best?

We ran effortlessly along beaten paths in the Adidas Terrex Agravic 4. It ticks all the boxes of a reliable trail shoe with its steady ride, reliable traction, and protective full-length Continental rubber. This shoe allows us to conquer the wilderness confidently—cementing its position as our ultimate trail running shoe.

Terrex Agravic 4 aced its Continental outsole with 3.1 mm lugs that bite through various surface conditions—dirt, gravel, and wet pavements. Testing for the rubber’s traction in our wet-condition test, it scored an impressive 0.70 result, making it 12.9% grippier than average.

Moreover, what makes the outsole so impressive is its resistance to abrasions. With only a tiny 0.5 mm dent in our Dremel test, it emerged 44.4% tougher than average, erasing our worries about sharp rocks or roots puncturing the outsole.

What also contributed to our surefootedness is the midsole sidewalls, which generated high torsional rigidity (5/5). It offers strong side-to-side support, especially as we tackle uneven terrain. Plus, the extra-wide 119.4 mm forefoot allows us to plant our feet well on the ground.

However, its surprisingly dull LIGHTSTRIKE foam may limit its appeal to runners seeking strong responsiveness. If this is the case, we suggest exploring other pairs.

Pros

  • Solid shock absorption for stack
  • Softer LIGHTSTRIKE foam
  • Full-length Continental outsole
  • Ideal for beginners to trail running
  • Stable ride for neutral runners
  • Versatile for trail running and hiking
  • Fair price
  • High-quality laces
  • Fantastic as a gravel shoe

Cons

  • Energy return is below average
  • Disappointing upper durability
  • Not breathable at all
  • Only for easy trails
Full review of Adidas Terrex Agravic 4

Trail running shoes with the best shock absorption

What makes it the best?

Our outdoor excursions felt divine with the ASICS Metafuji Trail delivering the best shock absorption among trail running shoes we tested in and out of the lab. It delivers enhanced joint protection through its maximum cushioning and offers a surprisingly lightweight ride that makes any terrain feel effortless, all while providing the reliable grip we need to stay secure.

We measured the behemoth stack height at a limitless 44.7/34.4 mm, leaving no traces of harsh debris underfoot. Not only that, the Metafuji Trail reduces the forces of landing because its cushion can absorb impact much better than average. We recorded high shock absorption scores of 153 SA in the heel and 122 SA in the forefoot, which are 25.4% and 20.8% above average, respectively. On foot, we melted away in its plush sensation.

What’s impressive is how this maximalist showed up with a 9.1 oz (258g) figure on our scale. Weighing 10.7% below average, it delivers an incredibly speedy and agile ride. 

In order to maintain our footing during descents and steep turns, the ASICSGRIP does its job of standing its ground well. In our traction test, we recorded an unbelievably high 0.80 rating, making it 33.3% grippier than average. It has shallow 2.7 mm lugs that shine best in well-maintained trails and gravel roads.

Unfortunately, the toebox has a tight fit, which may restrict runners planning to use the Metafuji Trail for ultras. We recommend those with wide or swollen feet to find a more accommodating shoe.

Pros

  • Exceptional shock absorption
  • Amazing ASICSGRIP outsole
  • High-end build quality
  • Ideal for narrow feet
  • Lightweight for a trail shoe
  • Fast-rolling forefoot rocker
  • Ideal for easy, flat-ish ultras
  • Outstanding upper with top ventilation
  • Record-breaking stack height

Cons

  • FF Blast+ foam limits energy return
  • Expensive
  • Minimal stability
  • Delicate upper prone to tearing
Full review of ASICS Metafuji Trail

Trail running shoes with the best energy return

HOKA Tecton X 3
84
Good!

What makes it the best?

We tested trail running shoes in and out of the lab and found HOKA’s Tecton X 3 has the best energy return. It satisfies the trail runner’s craving for adrenaline and speed while ensuring a highly cushioned ride. It incorporates a parallel dual-plate design—giving a dynamic experience in a lightweight package.

Designed to be an explosive shoe that keeps us on edge, it feels natural to go all out. We recorded massive energy return scores of 69.9% and 70.2% in the heel and forefoot, respectively, which explains why the midsole kept propelling us forward.

The parallel dual-plate design also contributes to Tecton X 3’s snappiness. It offers the rigidity we want to keep us fast! Our flex test confirms it’s 30% stiffer than average, sustaining our speed and quick turnover.

At just 9.7 oz (275g), Tecton X 3 is surprisingly light for a cushioned shoe. Its above-average 37.8/30.9 mm stack ensures comfort for any footstriker. Our shock absorption test validates its impact protection further with high 139/120 SA scores. This exceptional combination mutes out the ground and preserves our legs.

However, this superior performance shoe may burn a hole in the wallet with its £250 cost. Not all runners need to spend this much to enjoy running outdoors.

Pros

  • A true supershoe for trails
  • Ultra-grippy and durable Vibram outsole
  • Fantastic energy return from PEBA foam
  • Versatile for both long runs and ultra races
  • Stability improvements
  • Shields from debris effectively
  • Premium MATRYX upper
  • Designed to dominate ultra-distance events
  • Secure fit

Cons

  • Sky-high price tag
  • Heavier than the Tecton X 2
  • Absolutely not for wide feet
  • New ankle gaiter may not work for everyone
Full review of HOKA Tecton X 3

Best trail running shoes for racing

Nike Ultrafly
88
Great!

What makes it the best?

After extensive testing both in the lab and on the trails, we've determined that Nike’s Ultrafly reigns as the top racer among trail running shoes. It not only satisfies the speedster's thirst for adrenaline but also guarantees a stable and cushioned ride. Offering a Vaporfly-like experience tailored for trails, its world-class energy return and leg-saving platform ensure comfort and speed over any distance.

Ultrafly’s driving force comes from its high level of stiffness. It includes a full-length carbon plate, a rare feature for trail shoes, which our bend test reveals is about 40% stiffer than average. This translates to energetic toe-offs and insane responsiveness.

What makes Ultrafly a go-to option even for endurance runs is its towering 36.6 mm heel and plush feel. Pressing our durometer against the Pebax foam reveals one of the lowest lab readings we’ve seen—at 9.8 HA, it’s 62.7% softer than average!

Despite its stack, Ultrafly offers a stable ride through its rigidity, wide base, and solid traction. This combination allows for adept navigation of easy-to-moderate trails, ensuring safety and sure-footedness. Our calliper reveals an extra width of 10.3/3.8 mm in the forefoot and heel, while the sticky lugs are 3.0 mm deep. We tackled various terrains with balance and control. 

This racer’s steep £240 price tag isn’t so appealing given that the average trail runner costs only £130.

Pros

  • Optimised for trail races
  • Accommodates wide feet with ease
  • Full-length, responsive Pebax midsole
  • Equipped with a Vibram Megagrip outsole
  • Ideal for heel strikers
  • Offers outstanding comfort
  • Remarkably stable
  • Suitable for 100-mile races

Cons

  • The Vaporweave upper could be more durable and breathable
  • Heavier than expected even for a trail racing shoe
  • The $260 price tag might be steep for some
  • Limited toebox height
Full review of Nike Ultrafly

Best trail running shoes for technical terrain

What makes it the best?

One shoe that proved to be ideal for stepping off the beaten path and paving our own way on off-camber terrain is the Merrell Agility Peak 6. Its aggressive Vibram Megagrip outsole with deep 5-mm Traction Lugs makes it our top pick for technical terrain!

The shoe’s rounded chevron and butterfly lugs work with the FlexConnect grooves to wrap around obstacles, helping us stay surefooted on loose rock and soft terrain. By the way, the new outsole design improved the Agility Peak 6’s flexibility by 15%!

Rain or shine, we don’t have to worry about slipping on wet rocks thanks to the shoe’s high friction coefficient of 0.64!

Meanwhile, a long rock plate stretches from the midfoot to the toes to guard our feet from jarring impact with sharp rocks and debris.

Inheriting its predecessor's stability, this Merrell shoe never makes us feel off-balance. Its high torsional rigidity (4/5) and broad base (115.5 mm in the forefoot and 97.7 mm in the heel) keep our foot placement confident, minimising the risk of ankle rolls and reducing fatigue on long runs and hikes.

Although its EVA-based FloatPro cushioning is not very inspiring, it keeps the ride grounded and predictable on tricky terrain.

Pros

  • Excellent Vibram outsole with Traction Lug tech
  • Dependable for technical terrain
  • Improved flexibility
  • Secure fit
  • Lighter than v5
  • Good arch support
  • Stable ride
  • Upper mixes durability and ventilation
  • Ideal for heel strikers

Cons

  • FloatPro foam lacks energy return
  • Narrow toebox limits toe splay
  • Low shock absorption
  • Misleading drop
Full review of Merrell Agility Peak 6

Best super shoe for trail running

What makes it the best?

After extensive testing both in the lab and on the trails, we've determined that the Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed Ultra reigns as the best trail super shoe. It not only satisfies the speedster's thirst for adrenaline but also guarantees a stable and well-cushioned ride in a light package. Offering a thrilling experience tailored for trails, its world-class energy return and leg-saving platform ensure comfort and speed over any distance.

This shoe’s driving force comes from its Lightstrike Pro midsole, returning massive energy scores of 66.8% in the heel and 70.5% in the forefoot. It includes EnergyRods that add snappiness without the stiffness, creating energetic toe-offs and strong momentum. Plus, it weighs lighter than average at 9.2 oz (259g)!

What makes this super shoe a go-to option even for endurance runs is its strong impact protection, despite its moderate height. We measured a beefy 127 SA up front, making it long-distance ready. Note how we focus on the forefoot cushioning, since this shoe features a low 0.3 mm drop.

This offset naturally enhances stability and a well-planted feel. Moreover, surefootedness is enhanced through its rigidity and wide base. This combination allows for adept navigation of easy-to-moderate trails, ensuring safety and sure-footedness. We measured a massive 120.4 mm forefoot, allowing us to tackle various terrains with balance and control. 

This racer’s steep £200 price tag isn’t so appealing given that the average trail runner costs only £140.

Pros

  • Premium Continental rubber
  • Explosive energy return
  • Breathable race-ready upper
  • Propulsive EnergyRods and rocker combo
  • Perfect for midfoot strikers
  • Explosive toe-off with extreme rocker
  • Built to conquer ultra distances
  • Excellent implementation of Lightstrike Pro
  • Durable materials
  • Excellent laces

Cons

  • Unstable on technical terrain
  • Heel collar design needs improvements
  • Not a good pick for rearfoot strikers
  • Not for wide feet
Full review of Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed Ultra

Best budget trail running shoes

What makes it the best?

After cross-checking our wear test observations in the lab, we chose ASICS Gel Venture 10 as our best budget trail running shoe. Its fluid midsole and unhampered ventilation show its focus on comfort, wrapped in durable materials for added protection. Priced at a remarkable £80—a 45.9% discount vs. the average trail shoe—it’s hard to beat in terms of value.

GV10 creates an effortless ride through its malleable midsole, which our bend test confirms is 16% more flexible than average. We found it easy to manoeuvre and comfortable even for hikes.

The shoe features a well-ventilated mesh upper that keeps sunlight out and allows the cool breeze in. The material effortlessly allowed smoke to pass through in our lab test, earning a commendable 4/5 rating. This makes it an all-weather friend, even on warmer days.

Contrary to what we expected, the upper also resisted our Dremel bravely, earning a solid 4/5 toebox durability score. Even underfoot, the outsole only shaved off 0.6 mm of rubber, beating the average in terms of wear resistance.

However, given the budget limitations, shock absorption falls short for those seeking a joint-protected and highly cushioned ride. Those seeking maximum comfort can try another pair.

Pros

  • Fantastic durability
  • Amazing value
  • Ideal for beginners
  • Softer Amplifoam midsole
  • Versatile for trail, travel, casual wear...
  • Improved upper
  • Plush tongue with pressure-free lacing
  • Trail-inspired details at budget price

Cons

  • Only for narrow feet
  • Heavy
  • Low shock absorption and energy return
Full review of ASICS Gel Venture 10

lug-thickness-trail-shoes.JPG

How to choose trail running shoes

There is no one BEST trail running shoe for everybody. To find the one that’s fine-tuned to your specific needs, you should consider:

  • how rugged/technical your typical running terrain is?
  • how light, stable, or protective do you want your trail shoe to feel?
  • what type of cushioning do you need?
  • do you need waterproofing?

We will help you answer these and more questions in this detailed guide on trail running shoes.

nike-pegasus-trail-4-outdoor_002.JPG

Traction for different surfaces [lab data]

Trail shoes vary in protection, cushioning, and grip depending on the type of terrain they are meant for. In this chapter, we'll focus on the grip. 

1-9-mm-2-7-mm-lugs-trail-shoes.jpg
These shoes are equipped with lugs for easy trails. They are 1.9 mm and 2.7 mm deep, respectively. The shoe on the right has lugs that are placed further apart, but that won't help with grip on muddy trails because lugs for mud need to be twice as deep
5-4mm-and-5-mm-lugs-trail-shoes.jpg
These trail shoes are made for technical terrain. Their lugs are 5.4 mm and 5.0 mm deep, respectively. While lugs have different shapes and orientations, the outsole on the right has fewer lugs (at the heel: only 12, compared to 16 lugs that we see on the black outsole), which is preferred for mud shedding

Imagine the terrain you plan to run on most of the time. What does it look like?

  • mostly hard-packed and includes pavements
  • moderately rugged with some rocks and roots
  • highly technical (rocky/rooty), hilly, or soft (muddy) terrain
Example of a light, hard-packed trail
Example of a moderately-rugged trail
Example of a technical trail

Now you can narrow down your footwear options based on the type of terrain:

Light terrain

Moderate terrain

Technical terrain

shallow lugs (<3 mm)

lighter weight

less reinforced upper

more like road shoes*

average lugs (3-4 mm)

larger toe bumpers

thicker uppers

some have rock plates

deep lugs (>4 mm)

most reinforced

highly durable and protective

often with rock plates

*You can actually use some road shoes for running on hard-packed and well-maintained trails, as long as they have a thick and durable outsole and a stable, wide platform (avoid race shoes with tall and soft platforms!).

different-lug-depths-trail-running-shoes.jpg
Variations of trail shoe lugs from shallow to deep 
Salomon Speedcross 6 Lug depth
We use a calliper to measure the depth of the lugs on every trail shoe that goes through our lab

When running on trails, good traction is everything. Traction is more important in trail running than in road running, because of the varying terrain, both in terms of the surface type and inclination (uphills and downhills). Fortunately, we perform a traction test in our lab. 


We press a shoe with a 500N force against the wet surface and do so at a 7-degree angle to replicate the real-life conditions. The result we get is a dynamic coefficient of traction and, the higher it is, the better! Anything above 0.45 is considered great, and 0.25-0.45 is moderate traction. 

We explained how big of a role the thickness of the lugs plays when it comes to traction but it's also important to know how long those lugs will last. Deep lugs are often made of softer rubber because it's stickier and grips better. That also means less durability. To test this, we introduce our Dremel to every shoe that goes through our lab. 


The deeper the hole in the outsole, the less durable it is. And, premature wear on trail running shoes means basically ending up with flat outsoles in the most important areas, instead of lug-packed ones. 

outsole-durability-trail-running-shoes.jpg
Tyre tread gauge tells us precisely how deep the dent is. Deeper dents = lugs will last shorter

Cushioning in trail shoes: minimalist or max-cushioned

The amount of foam underfoot varies greatly in trail running shoes. The heel stack height can be anywhere from 16 mm to 40 mm, averaging 32 mm. Trail shoes with less cushioning offer better ground contact, while more cushioning means better impact protection and more comfortable running.

It's also not just about how thick a slab of foam is below your feet, but how protective (shock absorbing) and lively (responsive) it is. 

I want to feel barefoot!

Heel stack: <25 mm

Minimalist and barefoot trail shoes offer the most sensitive ground feel, but you must be careful on rugged terrain, as there is very little foot protection. These shoes are also the lightest, but require an adaptation period.

minimalist trail shoe

Enough cushion to feel comfortable and protected

Heel stack: 25 - 35 mm

Shoes in this range are considered the best for beginners and most trail runners. Even if there is no rock plate inside, thicker midsoles will protect your feet from impact just fine. Depending on your preference, you can choose between softer and firmer types of foams (read more on that in a section below).

trail shoe with moderate cushioning

See our full catalogue of cushioned trail shoes here.

Tonnes of foam underfoot!

Heel stack: >35 mm

These trail shoes offer the best impact protection out there but can feel clunky on the foot. When there's extra chunk at the heel, the shoes are not agile enough for quick work on technical terrain. Many trail runners enjoy a super comfortable shoe for easy miles, recovery runs, and ultra distances.

high stacked trail running shoe

Shock absorption and softness of trail running shoes

Soft cushioning is usually the first thing that runners think of when discussing comfort. However, softness on its own has performance pros and cons. While it may feel more comfortable, it may also mean less stability and protection.

Example of super soft cushioning (16% softer than average)

Firmer trail shoes are better at providing stability on technical terrain. They also do a better job protecting the foot from rocks, roots, and other sharp debris.

Example of extra firm cushioning (43% harder than average)
Measuring the softness of a trail running shoe with an Asker C durometer. The higher the number on the display, the firmer the foam 

However, cushioning can't be explained by softness only, which is why we test shock absorption in our lab. To do this, we follow the golden standard: ASTM F1976 13. This test tells us which shoes are better at reducing the load on the body.


Midsoles with high shock absorption (they score 130 SA or more at the heel on our lab test) are great at dampening the impact at every landing, which is why we call them protective midsoles. It's not about sharp rocks, debris, or snow; it is protection from impact forces that inevitably stress the body, which results in (premature) foot and leg fatigue.

As you can see, we test shock absorption both at the heel and the forefoot. This allows you to find the best shock absorption for you, exactly where you need it (depending on your foot strike). Shock absorption at the forefoot is always lower than at the heel, which makes sense given that impact forces at the forefoot are lower than at the heel.

shock-absorption-trail-running-shoes.jpg
Marking the location where shock absorption and energy return are tested at the heel

If your feet often feel beaten up after the trail run, it may be because the lugs are too deep for the (hard) surface. This often happens when using aggressive lugs on longer road patches. Or, there's not enough cushioning, or even if the shoe is cushioned, its shock absorption is too low for your needs. We recommend learning more about shock absorption here Shock absorption in running shoes

Energy return in trail running shoes

While energy return is not directly related to shock absorption, we have to talk about these 2 features at the same time. First, we use the same test to measure both. Second, some shoes can be very protective but not that propulsive. And moderate ranges are OK for shorter and slower distances. The moment you decide to start building up the mileage (which also means a lot of recovery runs) or doing races, you may want to look for higher shock absorption and energy return.


These are so-called leg-saving features. If you're a beginner, no need to overinvest in running shoes before figuring out what your legs really need and which goals you are working (running) towards. Energy return is most often a priority in road race shoes, but if you're also keen on learning more about responsiveness, we recommend moving to: Energy return in running shoes explained

Heel-to-toe drop is important to consider

Drop is the difference in height between the heel and forefoot stack. In trail shoes, it can range from 0 to 15 mm, averaging at 8 mm.

contrast-heel-drop-trail-shoes.jpg
Example of 2 wildly different heel drops in trail running shoes (0.1 mm and 14.6 mm)

Here are some general recommendations on choosing the right drop for you:

  • beginner runners should choose between 6 and 10 mm
  • heel strikers (about 90% of runners) should get at least 8 mm of drop
  • forefoot/midfoot strikers are better off with 4 to 8 mm
  • more advanced forefoot/midfoot strikers prefer 0 to 4 mm for the extra muscle activation and more natural running gait.

Avoid drastic changes (4 mm or more) in your running shoes’ drop as your feet and body need some time to adjust. To learn more about the effects of different drops on running performance, see our in-depth research.

altra-lone-peak-7-heel-stack.JPG

We take our own stack measurements that comply with the rules set by World Athletics

Stability in trail shoes

Runners with flat feet and pronation issues must never ignore this aspect of trail shoes. Not only does it feel uncomfortable when your feet spill over the edge of the shoe but it is also dangerous and is fraught in injury. 

Let’s compare two shoes. Can you see the difference in stability between them?


These are extreme cases of stability level in trail shoes.


Unlike road shoes, trail footwear has no categorization based on arch support (neutral or stability). But there are a few parameters that can help determine a trail shoe’s stability level:

  1. torsional rigidity (how stiff the shoe is when you try to twist it)
  2. heel counter stiffness (how firm the shoe’s heel hold is)
  3. midsole (platform) width (how broad the widest areas of the shoe’s midsole are).

In our lab, we measure each of these parameters for every trail shoe. Our measurements and conclusions are all listed in the Stability section of the lab reviews. For both torsional rigidity and heel counter stiffness, we assign a 1-5 rating, where 5/5 is the stiffest. 


As a rule, more stable shoes have higher scores for torsional and heel counter stiffness as well as wider platform widths.

Salomon Speedcross 6 Midsole width in the heel

Not sure if you need this kind of stability in trail running shoes? Check our guide on pronation.

Lightweight trail running shoes: pros and cons

The average weight of trail running shoes comes in at 10.4 oz (295g). And over 70% of trail shoes tip the scale at 10 oz (282g) or more. 

Hoka Zinal 2
Example of a lightweight trail running shoe

Lighter shoes help you feel more nimble on the trail and more manoeuvrable with your steps. They also don’t hold you back from picking up the pace. Here is the list of top-rated lightweight trail shoes as of today:

But lighter doesn’t always mean better. These shoes save weight by cutting corners on some other important aspects. They could be less wear-resistant, offer less underfoot protection, or feel less stable.

toebox-durability-lightweight-vs-heavy-trail-shoes.jpg
The difference in upper durability in a lightweight shoe (left) and a heavy trail shoe (right). The heavy shoe got a perfect 5/5 because the Dremel barely touched it, while the Dremel easily went through the upper on the lightweight shoe

As you can see, the shoe on the left sacrificed upper durability to save weight. However, this is not necessarily the case for all lightweight trail shoes.

Waterproofing in trail shoes

In most cases, waterproofing is NOT necessary in trail running shoes. You should only consider it if you run in rainy, snowy, and soggy conditions regularly. Otherwise, it is going to feel like overkill.

salomon-xa-pro-3d-gtx-waterproofing.JPG

And that’s because a waterproofing membrane makes shoes:

  • less airy or not breathable at all
  • overly warm and stuffy
  • a bit heavier than average
  • wet inside! (if the water gets inside)
Our smoke-pumping machine test shows the difference in ventilation between a waterproof and a non-waterproof shoe

If you feel like a waterproof membrane would be right up your alley, look at the top-rated shoes below: 

Trail running shoes for summer

If, on the other hand, you mostly run in warm temperatures, you will appreciate a highly breathable running shoe. After doing the smoke test, we also perform the light test, where we look at the upper against a flash light, and we analzye the upper under the microscope. 


This light test allows us to see where the upper is made of double layers and where exactly they overlap. 

trail running shoes microscope test

Microscope shots are where the magic happens! We love seeing how tight the knit is, how big the ventilation holes are (and whether they are real or fake), whether some threads are loose, what makes mesh uppers more or less breathable design-wise, etc. 

breathability-upper-2-5-trail-running-sheos.jpg
Here, we see trail running shoe uppers under the microscope: the one on the left scored 2/5 on the breathability test, while the one on the right scored 5/5

Winter trail running shoes (warm)

If you need trail running shoes for cold weather, you may want to check out our guide on winter running shoes. Winter running shoes meet most or all of the following criteria:

  • warm upper: lowest score on our smoke-pumping breathability test (1 out of 5)
  • waterproofing membrane (most of the time, it’s Gore-Tex)
  • deep lugs (at least 4 mm) and excellent grip on slick and wet terrain
  • they don’t get too firm in low temperatures. 

salomon-xa-pro-3d-gtx-review.JPG

To learn about how they behave in cold weather, or how much their midsoles firm up, we freeze the shoes and repeat the test. 

Hoka Tecton X 2 Midsole softness in cold

Finding the best fit and sizing in trail shoes

A poor-fitting shoe is not only painful but it can even lead to foot deformities like bunions, calluses, and more. But luckily, there is a wide range of toebox shapes and widths to choose from.

hoka-speedgoat-5-fit

To provide more accurate dimensions of a shoe’s width, we create a gel mould of the shoe's interiors and then measure its overall width (where the shoe is the widest) and its toebox width (at the big toe). 

toebox gel measurements trail running shoes
Using a digital calliper to measure the toebox width and shoe width in RunRepeat lab 

Knowing your feet' shape and where you need more/less room, whether where the shoe is the widest or at the big toe, you can look for trail running shoes that fit your criteria:

A wide toebox is good if you have wide feet, bunions, or if your feet tend to swell a lot. Altra shoes, for example, are known for their very accommodating toeboxes.

altra-lone-peak-7-fit.JPG

But a toebox that's too wide isn't good either. An extra-wide fit will cause slipping and/or sliding within the shoe if you're running on steep terrain. A snug fit is better for races and fartlek runs.

wear testing trail runners

Here are a few tips to help you get the right fit in trail shoes:

  • Make sure your toes are not cramped. Your feet swell as you run. Make sure to have enough space to prevent blisters or black toenails. 
  • Sock thickness can affect shoe fit; try the trail shoes with the socks you plan to wear.
  • Foot size may change over time, so it is recommended to measure your feet when you shop for new shoes.
  • Your regular shoe size in one brand may not be the same in another. Do check with size charts before ordering.

Extra tip: to avoid black toenails that happen due to a very low toebox, look for trail running shoes with enough vertical clearance. 

toebox height in trail running shoes

We, of course, measure this in the lab, so you can look for trail shoes with the highest toeboxes. The average toebox height of trail shoes (at the moment of writing this guide) sits at 26.9 mm.

Price

The average price of trail running shoes hovers around £140. Not a cheap buy!

trail running shoes wear testing

But here are a few tips that could help you save money:

  • no need to be loyal to an expensive brand just because it’s “cool”
  • no need to get a waterproof (GTX) shoe if you don’t run in wet conditions regularly
  • check out the shoe’s previous versions (sometimes changes are minor)
  • check current deals and discounts on RunRepeat

Below, we list the cheapest trail running shoes based on their MSRP (manufacturer's suggested retail price). MSRP is the cost of the shoe when it's released, no discounts applied. 

Author
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob is a fan of short distances with a 5K PR at 15:58 minutes. Based on 35 million race results, he's among the fastest 0.2% runners. Jens Jakob previously owned a running store, when he was also a competitive runner. His work is regularly featured in The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC and the likes as well as peer-reviewed journals. Finally, he has been a guest on +30 podcasts on running.