7 Best Half Marathon Running Shoes in 2024

Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic on
7 Best Half Marathon Running Shoes in 2024

We buy shoes ourselves. We earn commissions when you buy through us, at no extra cost. Why trust us

From short distances to 42k, there's quite a lot of wiggle room feature-wise. Thinking about foams, shoe weight, stack height, and all the other factors can be overwhelming. Here, we break down the key features needed in half-marathon running shoes and why they matter. 

If you want a short answer, look at our selection of top picks. We picked those shoes after thoroughly testing them in and outside of the lab. And, for more nerdy details and data points, read our guide section. 

How we test running shoes

We test running shoes on our test runs and in our lab. During the test runs, we take notes of everything, from comfort and energy return to outsole durability and breathability. We then cut the shoes in half and test them in our lab. We end up with more than 20 points that usually confirm our experience with the shoe. The best thing about lab tests is that we get to quantitatively describe the shoe. 

All these data points allow us to compare the running shoes and better understand each one's performance.

Best half-marathon running shoes overall

Nike Alphafly 3
86
Good!

What makes it the best?

The Nike Alphafly 3 is the cream of the crop among half-marathon running shoes we tested on foot and in the lab because of its exceptionally responsive ride and weightlessness. With top-notch features like the FlyPlate, Air Pods, and the ZoomX cushioning, it ensures a comfortable ride even at high speeds.

Made for competitive paces, Alphafly 3 helped us fly to the finish line. Our scales confirm the airiness we felt as it weighs 7.1 oz (201g), 24.2% below average. Its massive energy return adds to its effortless feel. Our lab analysis reveals the stiff FlyPlate and Air Pods that make it consistently responsive. As proved by our bend test, it’s 150.7% more rigid than average.

The ZoomX cushioning is also a star, exhibiting both a soothing and electrifying aura. It measures a tall 38.1/33.7 mm for impact protection and is made of two foam densities for specific reasons: the top is a firmer 29.3 HA for support while the bottom is a plush 18.1 HA. Altogether, the ride feels very bouncy and aggressive.

This shoe is made for runners seeking peak performance and we think its £280 price tag is worth it. However, those on a budget can find more affordable options.

Pros

  • Remarkably lightweight despite its broad size
  • Best-in-class breathability
  • Excels in the marathon distance
  • Repositioned Air Pods offer a better ride than the v2
  • ZoomX foam delivers massive energy return
  • Aids in forward momentum, especially when legs begin to fatigue
  • Better than ever for 5K/10K racing
  • Finally smooth transitions!

Cons

  • Heel strikers might wear down the outsole quickly
  • The arch could still be a challenge for some
  • The sock-like tongue might not suit everyone
Full review of Nike Alphafly 3

Best half-marathon running shoes for midfoot/forefoot strikers

What makes it the best?

The lab reflected what our feet experienced: ASICS Metaspeed Sky Paris is the ultimate half-marathon running shoe for midfoot and forefoot strikers. Running with this racer made the mile markers melt away through its delightful lightness, impact protection, and energetic responsiveness.

Metaspeed Sky Paris is a force to be reckoned with and it truly comes alive for non-heel strikers. We sliced the midsole in half and uncovered why: the carbon plate has a flat shape and launches us best when landing in the mid-to-front areas of the base.

The carbon plate is sandwiched between two FF Turbo+ layers, creating powerful strides when compressed altogether. The cushioning feels so comfortable because of the generous amount of foam beneath our feet, confirmed by our calliper with a 39.1/32.6 mm measurement. Our muscles felt protected even until mile 13 and we felt like we could still run some more!

Despite its height, we find it amazing that the shoe feels weightless. Our scales verified this with a 6.5 oz (183g) racer, 30.9% below average.

However, the shoe lacks the supportive elements that some people need. We recommend runners who need extra guidance to check stability shoes.

Pros

  • Exceptionally lightweight design
  • World-class energy return
  • Versatile for distances from 5K to marathon
  • All-weather grippy outsole
  • Redesigned, improved upper
  • Incredibly cushioned
  • Perfect for midfoot and forefoot strikers
  • Fantastic durability

Cons

  • Narrow fit
  • Not suitable for heel strikers
  • Less stable than Sky+
Full review of ASICS Metaspeed Sky Paris

Best half-marathon running shoes for heel strikers

What makes it the best?

The Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 proves a competitive shoe can be comfortable and durable. It exhibited pure speed in our runs through its vibrant midsole, complemented by the Speedroll technology. Analysing our cut-in-half shoe in the lab further proves it’s the best half-marathon shoe for heel strikers.

EP4 is undeniably a powerhouse thanks to its rigid S-shaped carbon plate that promotes silky smooth turnover and strong momentum. Our bend test verifies the midsole is 141.6% stiffer than average, translating to massive energy output.

The carbon plate lies between two distinct foams: a plush and bouncy 18.5 HA top layer and a balanced 22.0 HA base layer for enhanced stability, both features we truly appreciated in the latter miles of our Half Mary. Additionally, the 38.1 mm heel cushioning erases any ground impact. Paired with a modest forefoot, the 9.5 mm drop feels more natural for rear strikers.

Underfoot, the XT-900 rubber surprised us with its robust nature. At 85.3 HC, it’s tougher than most racers and even our 80.1 HC lab average! We tested its strength further in our abrasion test and it emerged victorious with a minimal scuff, making it highly resistant to wear.

The shoe feels light at 7.8 oz (220g), yet in this era of weightless shoes, other elite racers will feel even faster.

Pros

  • Durable upper and outsole
  • Spacious upper fit
  • Enhanced midsole comfort
  • Great value at $225 for a supershoe
  • Versatile across all paces
  • Ideal for heel strikers
  • More stable than ever

Cons

  • Slightly heavier than v3
  • Less suited for forefoot strikers
  • Competitors may feel quicker
Full review of Saucony Endorphin Pro 4

Half-marathon running shoes with the best stability

What makes it the best?

It’s tough to find a supershoe that matches the exceptional support the Adidas Adizero Pro 3 brought in our runs. Numbers checked, it’s our best stability half-marathon shoe because it delivers solid energy return while ensuring controlled strides. Not only is it fast, but it’s extra grippy too!

Most racers have a streamlined build yet what sets AP3 apart is its massive forefoot, verified by our calliper with a 119.4 mm measurement vs. the 114.0 mm average. This gives us enough room to find our footing despite the tall 37.8/33.7 mm stack. 

Additionally, the Continental outsole delivers the extra bite needed to speed through fast corners or wet roads confidently. Our durometer confirms this with a reading 30.7% softer than average.

The AP3 has a rigid build and a balanced foam that makes the midsole highly responsive. Every stride we made is infused with power and our bend test confirms it’s 59.4% stiffer than average—a result that clearly backs up the propulsion we experienced.

Unfortunately, AP3 won’t be stable enough for rear strikers because of its narrow heel. These types of runners need a wider landing base in the rear.

Pros

  • Supreme stability... in a supershoe!
  • World-class energy return and cushioning
  • Feather-light and agile
  • A dream come true for marathoners
  • Wonderful breathability
  • Top-notch grip, even in wet conditions
  • Outstanding outsole durability
  • Accommodates wide feet

Cons

  • Risk of heel slippage
  • Lacing can be tricky
  • Not suited for heel strikers
Full review of Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3

Half-marathon running shoes with the best comfort

What makes it the best?

The New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 marries speed and cushioning in our runs, making it ideal for long-distance racing. Our lab verifies its soothing yet explosive nature through its plush midsole and responsive Energy ARC carbon plate without too much rigidity. Therefore, it’s our most comfortable running shoe for half marathons.

We had so much foam beneath our feet that we didn’t feel the ground even as we approached mile 13. Our calliper shows a massive 38.2/28.9 mm, proving its impact protection for any footstrike and runner. The cushioning made the miles melt away with its bouncy and plush personality, confirmed by our 15.0 HA durometer reading.

The shoe features the highly responsive Energy ARC carbon plate, complemented by the midsole’s rocker that creates smooth forward strides. What we found amazing is how the shoe didn’t feel overly stiff, adding to its comfort. Our bend test shows it’s only 34.3% more rigid than average, while supershoes tend to score much higher.

At 8.2 oz (232g), the shoe unfortunately feels bottom-heavy, which may disappoint runners prioritising weight savings. Those who prefer lighter shoes should explore alternatives.

Pros

  • Incredibly comfortable ride
  • Ideal for fast-paced long runs
  • Finally features a Pebax midsole
  • Marathon-ready performance
  • Exceptional leg-saving cushioning
  • Premium upper material
  • Amazing for forefoot strikers
  • Roomy upper

Cons

  • Needs to lose weight
  • Subpar tongue
  • Feels bottom-heavy
Full review of New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4

Half-marathon running shoes with the best durability

What makes it the best?

The ASICS Metaspeed Edge+ honours its name by delivering speed through its carbon plate that pushes us to our best pace. The energy return is out of this world, complemented by its light build offering smooth strides. The robust outsole displays one-of-a-kind wear resistance in our lab, making it our top durable half-marathon running shoe.

Starting from the bottom, we pushed our durometer against the outsole and got a 65.0 HC reading, 18.9% softer than average. This figure translated to enhanced grip during testing, but what surprised us was its like-new appearance after testing despite its softer rubber. It also has a thickness of 2.1 mm, enough to last long compared to sub-2.0 mm racers.

Our lab results speak for the responsiveness we experienced. Metaspeed Edge+ stood its ground on our bend test until our force gauge showed a whopping 63.0N, 120.3% stiffer than average!

This racer is all about agility, carrying a moderate stack and a streamlined build. It weighed light as a feather at 7.3 oz (208 g) while other running shoes averaged 21.5% heavier. 

We couldn’t help but notice the shoe’s firm ride, verified by our durometer with a rating 45.0% firmer than average. Runners seeking impact protection and plush cushioning are better off with other pairs.

Pros

  • Speedy all the way!
  • More cushioned for long miles
  • Buttery smooth transitions
  • Protective underfoot
  • Hell of a snappy toe-off
  • Super light
  • Very breathable
  • Nails the race-ready fit
  • Slip-free lockdown
  • More durable than most racers
  • Grips on dirt roads

Cons

  • Scratchy upper
  • Not for short runs
  • Expensive
Full review of ASICS Metaspeed Edge+

Half-marathon running shoes with the best value for money

What makes it the best?

The PUMA Deviate Nitro Elite 3 proves through runs and lab tests that it’s the best value shoe for half-marathon running, priced at £230. It offers lightning-fast strides and extra sticky traction for better control at a more accessible price point vs. other supershoes. Its outsole can handle occasional speed training sessions too!

Weighing only 7.2 oz (240g), lifting each stride feels easy since it’s 23.0% lighter than the average running shoe. The stiff carbon plate launches us back with every landing with the rocker creating smooth turnovers, all enhancing the feeling of weightlessness. Our bend test verifies DNE 3 is 79.7% stiffer than average.

The Nitro Elite foam offers undeniable responsiveness, complemented by a soft 15.1 HA foam for impact protection and another balanced 18.3 HA base layer for stability. It ensures our muscles are protected and supported, especially as we approach the 13-mile mark.

The PumaGrip displays exceptional adhesion to the ground with its soft 72.6 HC nature. While this may make it more prone to wear, DNE 3 measures a thick 2.6 mm to prolong its lifespan. This is much thicker than typical sub-2 mm outsoles of racers.

With its focus on agility, the shoe’s narrow build demands good form. Those who need more guided strides should find more supportive shoes.

Pros

  • Superb Nitro Elite foam
  • Breathable, lightweight upper
  • Extremely responsive
  • More affordable than most supershoes
  • Outstanding grip
  • Great comfort for a racer
  • Major improvements from v2
  • Fast, agile, race-ready performance
  • Fantastic tongue

Cons

  • Not the best for heel strikers
  • Durability concerns
  • Lacks stability for some runners
Full review of Puma Deviate Nitro Elite 3

In this guide, we talk about running shoes for half marathons. Specifically, shoes for running the actual half marathon, as in, racing! This means that the shoes covered here belong to the category of tempo shoes or competition shoes. If you’re looking for a daily trainer (to train for a marathon), consider reading our guide Best daily running shoes

5 things to look for in half-marathon running shoes

Running a half marathon means you have to run for at least 60-90mins (depending on your form), maybe even 2 hours. That means that the shoes you’re running in have to be: 

  1. Comfortable so that you don’t end up with blisters or other injuries. Discomfort is out of the picture!
  2. Responsive so that they actually propel you forward instead of making your feet work more and causing premature fatigue. Premium foams are much better than standard foams at this!
  3. Breathable, especially if you’re running a half marathon in hot weather. 
  4. Cushioned so that they are able to absorb all the impact. We recommend at least 30mm in the heel. 
  5. Light so that they don’t weigh you down! We recommend looking for shoes that weigh less than 270g or 9.5oz. 

There are other features you might be curious about and we will cover them all below. 

4 tips for the best comfort 

Here’s what we recommend checking when buying half-marathon shoes to ensure they are as comfortable as possible: 

  1. Perfect lockdown. Your feet should not be sliding within the shoe (from left to right, or back-forward), and your heel must not be slipping. 
  2. You should be able to tighten the laces as needed but without feeling a lace bite. If a tongue is too thin and tightening the laces causes discomfort on your instep, consider thicker socks or different shoes. 
  3. There should be no hot spots. Make sure to check for pressure points. The toebox should also not press your toes from the top, as this can create black toenails (to start with). 
  4. There should be enough room for your toes. While the tight and aggressive toebox design is bearable for short distances (in track and field), for 21 kilometres your toes should not be cramped. If it means looking for a wider toebox, so be it! 

Toebox height test 

toebox-height-half-marathon-shoes.jpg
Different toebox heights in half-marathon running shoes: very high (left) vs very low (right)

thin-vs-thick-tongue-half-marathon-running-shoes.jpg

Tongues of different thicknesses: thin (left) which might cause a lace bite vs. very thick (right)

Wide toebox in half-marathon running shoes

Feet come in different sizes and shapes. Toes especially. 

different-shapes-of-toes-5.jpg

Because of this, it can be tricky to nail the toebox in running shoes. Whatever the shape of toes you have, it’s important to allow your toes to sit in the toebox naturally, with no cramping. Maybe you need more room around the ball of the foot (where the toebox is the widest), or maybe you need more space at the big toe? 

toebox-width-running-shoes-for-half-marathons.jpg
Using a digital calliper to measure the width of the toebox: at the big toe and where it's the widest 

Fortunately, we measure both widths in our lab. This allows us to understand the general width of the toebox and also how much it tapers (how pointy the toebox is). 

pointy-vs-wide-toebox-half-marathon-shoes.jpg
Toebox shapes in half-marathon running shoes: very pointy, tapered (left) vs. very wide, foot-shaped (right)

Depending on where you need more room in the toebox, we list both options, prioritising the numbers where the toebox is the widest and at the big toe: 

Pep, response, bounce! Premium foams at their best 

The main difference between daily trainers and race (and tempo) shoes lies in responsiveness. And the key to responsiveness is found in the foam. We have 2 types of foams, standard and premium. 

Standard foams

Premium foams

More often found in daily trainers

More often found in tempo and race shoes

Less responsive

Much more responsive 

No leg-saving features 

Leg-saving features

Affordable

Pricey

More durable

Less durable

Given the features listed in the table above, it’s easy to understand why we recommend half-marathon running shoes with premium foams. 

standard-vs-premium-foam-cut-in-half.jpg
Even when cut in half, it's difficult (to almost impossible in some cases) to tell the difference between a standard (left) and a premium foam (right)

If you’re in doubt whether the foam present in your running shoes is standard or premium, we recommend consulting these lists of foams with their major pros and cons: 

Overview of premium foams 

Brand Foam Top feature Major drawback
Nike ZoomX (Pebax) Energy return Durability
ASICS FF Turbo (Nylon) Durability Weight
ASICS FF Turbo+ (PEBA) Performance Stability
Adidas Lightstrike Pro (TPEE) Super-durable all-rounder Break-in needed
Saucony PWRRUN PB (Pebax) Comfort Energy return
Saucony PWRRUN HG (Pebax) Performance Maybe too firm for some
Saucony IncrediRUN (TPEE) Energy Return Excessive softness
Puma Nitro Elite (PEBA + EVA / A-TPU) Durability Energy return
Hoka Unnamed (PEBA) Responsive Impact protection
Decathlon VFOAM (Pebax) / VFOAM PLUS (Pebax + EVA) Affordable Performance
Mizuno Enerzy Lite+ (PEBA) Bounce Stability
Reebok Floatride (Pebax) Low price Energy return
Li-Ning BOOM (Pebax) Bounce Hard to find
On Helion HF (Pebax) Energy return Durability
New Balance FuelCell (Pebax) Softness Weight
Brooks DNA Gold (PEBA) Lightweight Maybe too late!

Overview of standard foams

Brand Foam Top Feature Major drawback
New Balance FuelCell (TPU / EVA)  Cloud-like feel Stability
Skechers HyperBurst (EVA) Lightweight Energy return
Skechers HyperBurst Pro (TPU) Responsive Heavy
Nike React / ReactX (TPE + EVA) Versatile Dull
Nike Phylon / Cushlon / ComfiRide (EVA) All-rounder Energy Return
Adidas Boost (TPU) Comfortable Heavy
Adidas Light Boost (TPU) Weight Boring
Adidas Lightstrike (EVA / TPU) Stability Too firm
Adidas Dreamstrike+ (Bio-based PEBA) Versatile Weight
ASICS FF Blast / FF Blast+ (EVA + OBC) Bounce Durability
ASICS FlyteFoam (EVA) Lightweight Energy return
Brooks DNA Tuned (EVA) Versatile Energy return
Brooks DNA Loft (EVA) / DNA Flash (EVA) Lightweight Dull
Brooks DNA Amp (TPU) Energy return Heavy
Brooks BioMoGo DNA (EVA) Comfort Energy return
New Balance Fresh Foam / Fresh Foam X (EVA / EVA + PEBA) Softness Mushy
Merrell Super Rebound Compound (EVA) Durable Energy return
Saucony PWRRUN (EVA + TPU) Versatile Boring
Saucony PWRRUN+ (TPU) Energy return Weight
Hoka ProFly (EVA) Comfortable Energy return
Hoka ProFly+ (EVA) Responsive Durability
On Helion (EVA + OBC) Unique Firm
Altra Ego (EVA) Fun Energy return
Altra Ego Pro (TPE) Bouncy Cushion
Puma Nitro (TPEE / PEBA) Responsive Durability
Puma Profoam / Profoam Lite (EVA) Durability Cushion
Under Armour HOVR (EVA + OBC) Stability Firm
Mizuno Enerzy (TPE) All-rounder Bounce
Mizuno Enerzy Core (TPE) Softness Durability
Mizuno Enerzy Lite (Nylon) Lightweight Cushion
Mizuno Enerzy NXT (EVA) Soft Stability
NNormal EExpure (EVA) Durability Energy return
Salomon EnergyFoam (EVA + OBC) Stability Boring
Salomon EnergyCell / EnergyCell+ (EVA) Durability Firm
Reebok FloatRide Energy (TPU / TPE) Price Heavy
TOPO ZipFoam (EVA + TPU) Energy Return Heavy
Inov-8 Powerflow Pro (EVA) Comfort Bounce

 

We covered the topic of foams in the greatest detail in the most comprehensive foam guide in the world: The ultimate guide to running shoe foams. The foam overviews listed above were taken from this guide which is why we highly recommend reading it for more geeky details and lab data.

Soft and stable platforms in half-marathon running shoes 

Premium foams are often soft and sometimes made more stable with carbon-fibre plates. However, narrow platforms can make them unstable anyway, especially for heel strikers

Noticeable lateral instability

Very soft and unstable foam (for heel strikers)

When it comes to softness, we measure it after cutting the shoes in half. This allows us to take the proper measurements as doing it on a whole shoe by sticking the durometer needle on the outside leads to inaccurate measurements

midsole-softness-half-marathon-running-shoes.jpg
Measuring the softness of the foam with a shore A durometer in RunRepeat lab

If you prefer a softer ride, look for lower durometer readings. For a firmer ride, best to look for higher durometer readings! 

If you prioritise stability, especially when cornering or covering slightly uneven terrain, it’s best to check the width of the platform. 

midsole-width-measurements-half-marathon-shoes.jpg
Measuring the width of the platform at the forefoot and at the heel

The wider the midsole, the more stable the ride!

narrow-vs-wide-platforms-half-marathon-shoes.jpg
High and narrow platforms (up) vs. high and wide platforms (down) 

Warm vs. breathable running shoes for half marathons 

If you’re planning for a race in (very) cold weather, you should look for less breathable shoes as they trap the heat. More breathable running shoes are great for sweaty feet and hot weather. 

When assessing the breathability, we assign a 1-5 rating: 1 is not breathable and 5 is the most breathable. We also look at the uppers under the microscope. 

half-marathon-shoes-microscope.jpg

Very breathable running shoes often feature large ventilation holes or mesh uppers with a looser construction. Shoes that are not breathable have tightly packed threads that don’t allow the air to circulate. Sometimes they feature 2 layers, where the second one is often the waterproof membrane. 

breathable-vs-non-breathable-half-marathon-running-shoes.jpg
Very breathable uppers in half-marathon running shoes (up) vs. non-breathable ones (down) as seen under the microscope in RunRepeat lab

We don't see 1/5 and 2/5 often in half-marathon running shoes because running shoes for races have to be breathable and lightweight, so the upper is often very thin. The worst breathability ratings (1/5) that would imply the running shoes are great for cold weather are often found in daily trainers, especially the waterproof ones.

Minimal stack height for half marathons 

We recommend looking for shoes with at least 25mm at the heel. We do this with average runners in mind. 

Note: If, however, you’re an experienced runner with tonnes of miles covered in minimalist shoes under your belt, then you might enjoy running a half marathon in minimalist or even barefoot running shoes. 

Running 21km on hard surfaces (asphalt, concrete) requires a lot of effort, and the impact forces generated at each landing need some absorption. Midsole does that job well, but there has to be enough of it. In our experience, enough is at least 25mm. 

stack-height-measurements-half-marathon-running-shoes.jpg
Digital calliper measurements of a heel stack height and forefoot stack height done according to the WorldAthletics guidelines (measured at the 12% and 75% of the inner shoe length)

Of course, if you’re a forefoot striker, you will look for good cushioning at the forefoot. Given that the heel drop can’t be negative (we did measure a few negative ones but only slightly below zero), that means that the forefoot height will also be at least 25 mm. 

Weight of running shoes for half marathons 

Heavier shoes make us run slower. We recommend looking for shoes that weigh 270g (9.5 oz) or less

half-marathon-running-shoes-weight.jpg
Measuring the weight of the shoe in RunRepeat lab (always in men's US 9)

Of course, the lighter the shoe, the better. But, cutting the weight means you have to sacrifice some features of the shoes. Brands often remove the padding on the tongue and around the heel, or they make it much thinner. 

thin-vs-thick-heel-counter-running-shoes-for-halfmarathons.jpg
Very thin and soft heel counter (left) vs a very thick and stiff one (right)

Brands also cut out the midsole, which, on one hand, helps with flexibility but, on the other, reduces the weight. 

thick-vs-thin-outsoles-running-shoes-for-half-marathons.jpg
Thick vs thin rubber outsoles in running shoes for half marathons (more rubber=more weight)

Some shoes have thinner outsoles which also improves the weight but makes the durability of the outsole worse because there’s less material to go through before reaching the midsole. 

Shoe choices based on the foot strike

By now, you most likely know whether you’re a forefoot striker, a midfoot striker, or a heel striker. If not, please read our Ultimate guide on foot strike to find out and learn more about the foot strike. 

foot-strikes-half-marathon-running-shoes.jpg

Basically, you should look for cushioning where you need it = where you land. If you’re a forefoot/midfoot striker, you need a good amount of foam at the front and having chunky heels makes no sense as they simply add more weight that you should happily ditch. 

forefoot-strike-half-marathon-shoes.jpg
Outsoles made with forefoot strikers (first) in mind

However, the biggest takeaway here should be the rubber placement at the bottom. Some shoes have it only at the forefoot, meaning they are prioritising forefoot strikers. Other shoes have it along the whole surface, so they can be used by all runners, regardless of their foot strike. 

all-foot-strikes-half-marathon-shoes.jpg
Big and almost even rubber coverage: outsoles that are great for all foot strikes

If you’re a heel striker and you decide to run in a shoe that has no rubber at the heel, you might experience: 

  1. Serious instability when the foam is very soft and there’s nothing at the bottom giving it some structure
  2. Slipping on wet surfaces because the exposed midsole offers no grip, it just slides 
  3. Extreme premature wear because the durability of the exposed midsole is incomparable to the durability of the outsole. 
exposed-midsole-durability-half-marathon-running-shoes.jpg
Outsole durability test results: exposed midsole (left and centre) ends up with a very deep dent, proving it not durable, while the rubber (right) ends up with a shallow dent

Should you choose carbon-plated shoes? 

Depends on many things:

  1. Will you be able to make the best out of them? Many carbon-plated running shoes work best for fit runners (not too skinny, not overweight) who land on the forefoot/midfoot. 
  2. Are you a fast runner? Race shoes with a carbon-fibre plate shine at fast paces! Some carbon-plated shoes are unstable and uncomfortable at slow paces, especially when walking.
  3. Can you afford them? The average price of a carbon-plated shoe is £220, while the average price of a non-plated shoe is £130. 
carbon-plates-visible-in-running-shoes-for-half-marathons.jpg
Carbon-fibre plates visible in half-marathon running shoes cut in half 

It’s also worth noting that these shoes are stiffer than average thanks to the plate and they work wonders when combined with a premium foam. See us play around with them! On average, we needed 58N to bend carbon-plated shoes to 90 degrees, while we needed only 24N to bend non-plated shoes on average.

To learn more about this technology, we highly recommend reading our in-depth guide Carbon-Plated Shoes Cut In Half, Explained and Lab-Tested

Rocker: who it’s (not) good for

Many (new) shoes on the market today are rockered, some quite aggressively. It’s best to understand who rockered shoes are best for, so that you don’t end up buying something you don’t actually need. 

aggressive-vs-mild-rocker-half-marathon-shoes.jpg
Rocker geometry: aggressive rocker (left) vs a mild one (right)

Rocker basically represents a curved bottom of the shoe which looks a lot like a rocking chair. The idea behind this design is simple: just like a rocking chair, the rocker is there to make transitions from the heel to the toes easier and faster. 

Motion of a rockered and non-rockered shoe 

Many heel strikers enjoy a rocker because a curved heel imitates the shape of our heel, it’s not edgy like some running shoes, but quite curved. This lowers the impact at the (heel) landing and is appreciated by many runners. 

Rocker use

Could be good for

Might not be good for

Plantar fasciitis 

Forefoot strikers, especially those with normal big toe extension

Reduced big toe extension; toe or forefoot pain, like Morton’s neuroma

Knee issues (runner’s knee, ITBS, meniscus tears, patellar tendinitis)

Limited ankle movement

ITBS

Issues with Achilles tendons; calf or hamstring discomfort

Hip issues (flexor strain, bursitis, labrar tear)

Older (senior) runners

 

We wrote a lot more about the rocker technology in our guide All you need to know about rockered running shoes

Author
Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic
Whether it's a vertical kilometre or an ultra, climbing in the Alps or exploring local mountains, Jovana uses every opportunity to trade walls and concrete for forests and trails. She logs at least 10h/week on trails, with no off-season, and 4x more on research on running and running shoes. With a background in physics and engineering management, she prefers her running spiced with data.