7 Best Tempo Shoes in 2025

With energy in its DNA, the Adidas Adizero EVO SL takes the trophy as our top tempo trainer. Feeling extremely light in our runs, its Lightstrike Pro midsole took us fast while its shock-absorbing nature took us far. As our lab results reveal, its versatile nature makes it suitable across various run training.

EVO SL is the perfect high-performance trainer, sustaining our speed without the stiffness because it’s non-plated. Instead, it generates responsiveness through its midsole, which recorded high energy return scores of 74.3% in the heel and 70.3% in the forefoot.

With every powerful takeoff, a gentle cushion awaits. It took care of our feet no matter where we land, backed up by its high shock absorption scores of 147 SA in the heel and 126 SA in the forefoot.

Running in the EVO SL feels like we’re floating. Our scale reveals it’s a mere 7.9 oz (223g), 12.9% below average. Plus, it bends freely with our feet, confirmed by our 30-degree test with a 34.7% higher flexibility score than average.

However, we caution that the tongue isn’t gusseted. While it’s not a big issue, it may be an annoyance for some runners.

When it comes to tempo training, the Nike Streakfly 2 is the ultimate lightweight beast. Staying true to its name, we flew through the miles gracefully, with its exceptionally low weight and agile build. Proven by our lab results, this speedster is ready to support us through heated sessions with its comfortable ride and breezy upper.

Running with the Streakfly 2 feels like we’re barefoot! Our scales confirm a feathery 4.5 oz (128g) build, the lightest we’ve ever encountered in the lab. This airy build, plus the absence of a carbon plate, makes it highly agile, witnessed by the streets as we sprinted through turns effortlessly. Our lab confirms it’s 53.3% more flexible than average, making it comfortable even for relaxed runs.

What propels us aggressively is the ZoomX midsole, which we confirmed in our energy return test with solid scores of 76.3% in the heel and 77.9% in the forefoot. Sustaining heart-pumping paces feels more effortless with the dynamic ride the Streakfly 2 brings.

Further enhancing comfort is the ultra-breathable upper, as confirmed by our lab tests with a perfect score. We never felt our body heat trapped in, effectively preventing unwanted blisters and hotspots.

Due to its lack of structure, going beyond 10K distances feels uncomfortable because we’re working hard to stay stable.

The HOKA Cielo X1 2.0 is loaded with deep cushioning and powerful rebound, packed in an ultralight design. We enjoyed how it’s so easy on the feet yet heavy on performance, impressing us inside and outside of the lab with the best energy return for tempo running.

The midsole feels electric, and we wanted to quantify the responsiveness we felt. In our energy return test, we recorded a massive 75.9% in the heel and an even higher 78.4% in the forefoot. The midsole has a stiff carbon plate in between to further add vibrance to our strides, while the aggressive rocker drives us forward and improves turnover.

To soften the blow of landings, Cielo X1 2.0 has a luscious 38.8/28.1 mm stack. Not only is it tall, but it’s able to reduce impact better than average with its impressive shock absorption scores of 160 SA (heel) and 108 SA (forefoot).

Surprisingly, we maintained our agility and speed through its airy build. Our scale shows it’s only 7.3 oz (208g), 21.5% lighter than average.

Note that this shoe feels far from stable, so those seeking extra guidance should skip this pair.

The second Mizuno Neo Vista is living proof that speed and comfort can seamlessly blend. A remarkable foam and Wave Plate deliver energy beneath our feet while its cushioning and flexible build provide much-needed relief to ease out the most brutal speed sessions. Our lab results back up that the Neo Vista 2 is the best shock-absorbing tempo running shoe.

With every landing, the cushion dampens impact effectively, validated by impressive scores of 170 SA (heel) and 137 SA (forefoot). This indicates it’s able to lessen the load on our legs by 32.8% and 30.5% better than average, respectively.

Testing for the midsole’s energy return, the heel fared with a high 60.3% and the forefoot at 59.8%. This indicates peppy takeoffs, and our feet wholeheartedly agree.

What’s amazing is how the comfort and pop don’t fade away as we run longer miles, making the ride all the more enjoyable. The Wave Plate offers extra responsiveness without stiffening the shoe because it’s made of fibreglass. In our bend test, it even emerged 10.0% more flexible than average!

With its very tall and uber-plush nature, it may not suit runners needing mild support. This supertrainer demands good form.

We learned through our runs and lab tests that the Saucony Kinvara 15 achieves speed through its light and minimalist aura. It makes each stride feel effortless through its natural and steady ride, made possible by its flexible midsole and heightened ground feel. Among speed trainers, it’s our ultimate low-drop shoe.

We measured a subtle 4.4 mm heel drop in the sliced midsole, 48.8% lower than the average. This enhances a barefoot experience, allowing us to strengthen our legs without diving into harsh zero-drop shoes. The stack stays below average and is made of a balanced 23.8 HA cushion which naturally improves our stability.

Kinvara 15 maintains a malleable profile which makes it more comfortable for prolonged wear. The midsole barely resists our movements, confirmed by our bend test when it emerged 53.3% more flexible than average.

What cements Kinvara 15’s status as a speedster is its featherlight weight of 6.8 oz (194g), making it even lighter than other supershoes! Compared to our lab average, it’s a whopping 26.8% lighter!

However, it achieved its weightlessness by making its outsole softer and thinner than average, raising concerns regarding its durability. Those who prefer a long-lasting shoe should check alternatives.

The Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 feels good at any pace, with its sleek and flexible design enhancing comfort and agility. Lab tests confirm its responsive forefoot, yet it stands out for its GuideRails system, which offers gentle support without the bulk and stiffness. Therefore, it’s our best stability tempo running shoe.

The GuideRails doesn’t demand attention since it’s not intrusive, but it definitely does the job of guiding our feet. Mostly, it avoids excessive lateral movements, captured by its 4/5 torsional rigidity score in our manual assessment.

In terms of bending, it maintains freedom of movement and emerges 16.0% more flexible than average in our bend test. Together with its light 7.8 oz (220g) build, Hyperion GTS 2 feels comfortable at any pace.

When we want to speed up in the final miles of our workout, the forefoot springs to action immediately. In our energy test, we noted a significant score of 59.7% assisting our toe-offs.

However, its cushion is somewhat firm, so we can’t recommend this pair to long-distance runners seeking maximum joint protection.

With our grippy ground control and its exceptional performance in lab tests, we awarded the ASICS Magic Speed 4 as the tempo running shoe with the best traction. We felt prepared smashing our speed training regardless of the weather because of the shoes’ versatile outsole, responsive kick, and shock-absorbing cushioning.

Starting with the main highlight, the ASICSGRIP rubber reassures us it’s one of the most reliable compounds by smashing our wet-condition test with a 0.81 friction score. Only a few shoes can match this level of traction, since it’s a whopping 76.1% grippier than average! Even if we pass through sharp turns and slippery streets, we have full confidence in the shoe.

We measured the stack height at 42.5/32.9 mm using our calliper, showing it's comfortable enough for multi-hour runs. We further tested how it reduces the impact of landings on our muscles, and it received above-average shock absorption scores of 144/122 SA in the heel and forefoot, respectively.

Picking up the pace felt much easier in this shoe since the effort we put in is rebounded to our takeoffs. In our energy return test, the forefoot impressed with a 61.8% score. However, heel strikers won’t get the same experience and can only enjoy a 55.5% energy return score. If this is a dealbreaker, we recommend trying alternatives.