Our verdict

The ASICS Megablast is the new king of supertrainers. In our lab tests and runs, we found that it nails every key aspect: excellent energy return, incredible shock absorption, feather-light weight, solid breathability, and first-class grip. The ride feels energetic yet stable, ready to handle any workout or race you throw at it, no matter the distance. In our view, ASICS raised the bar in both design and performance, though it comes at a price point that flirts with supershoe territory.

Pros

  • Outstanding energy return
  • Exceptional impact protection
  • Durable, grippy outsole rubber
  • Astonishingly low weight
  • Performs at any pace and distance
  • Breathable, lightweight upper
  • High-quality materials from heel to toe
  • Suitable for all footstrikes
  • Top performance without a carbon plate

Cons

  • Extremely expensive for a training shoe
  • Limited outsole coverage
  • Poor toebox durability

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet
  • Top 13% most popular running shoes

Who should buy

Based on our lab tests, the ASICS Megablast is a great choice for:

  • Runners seeking one shoe that can handle everything from daily training to interval sessions and races.
  • Those who love the unique feel of supershoe foams but prefer a plate-free ride.
  • Fans of the Superblast series who wanted something even lighter and more responsive. The Megablast delivers exactly that.
  • Marathoners seeking a supertrainer built for long runs and tempo workouts that offers outstanding energy return and shock absorption.

ASICS Megablast

Who should NOT buy

We think the ASICS Megablast carries a sky-high price that’s hard to justify for many runners. You can get comparable performance for much less with the Adidas Adizero EVO SL, though with lower-quality materials. Or you can go for the ASICS Novablast 5 if energy return isn’t your main concern.

We also found that the Megablast’s stiffness might be a drawback for those who enjoy a more flexible, forgiving ride. In our view, the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 is a fantastic alternative, offering excellent energy return, better flexibility, and a cheaper price.

ASICS Megablast parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

Just by looking at the Megablast, it’s clear that it has a massive midsole. And when premium foam meets a high stack, the result is always outstanding impact protection.

In our lab, we measured an impressive 160 SA in the heel and a record-breaking 144 SA in the forefoot. With numbers like these, the Megablast can comfortably handle any runner, at any distance.

ASICS Megablast Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Megablast 160 SA
Average 129 SA
Compared to 269 running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
170 SA

Energy return

New

It can also handle any pace. This shoe was conceived by ASICS as the ultimate training shoe, but with 73.0% energy return in the heel and 73.8% in the forefoot, it’s perfectly suited for any workout your imagination creates. A long run finishing with 10K at marathon pace? It’s perfect for that. Two 5K tempo intervals? FF Turbo² absolutely shines.

Going even further, we think that it can serve as a racing shoe for a huge percentage of runners. If you dislike carbon plates or they tend to cause discomfort like Morton's neuroma, this is a fantastic pick. Of course, for those chasing the absolute top-tier performance, a supershoe like the ASICS Metaspeed Sky Tokyo remains a better pick... but the Megablast’s numbers are really good.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Megablast 73.0%
Average 58.4%
Compared to 266 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
82.0%

Heel stack

The sky-high numbers we recorded in our shock absorption test come from the Megablast’s maximalist stack height, as its name suggests. We measured 45.1 mm of material under the heel, making it one of the tallest shoes we’ve ever tested in the lab. 

However, this ultra-cushioned setup can also be a downside. Those who prefer a more natural, ground-sensitive ride will probably find it too elevated and disconnected from the surface.

ASICS Megablast Heel stack
Test results
Megablast 45.1 mm
Average 34.6 mm
Compared to 461 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot is also impressively stacked with 35.2 mm of foam. We’ve started to normalize these ultra-thick builds, but just a few years ago, such a measurement would’ve felt unreal.

We believe that midfoot and forefoot strikers will love this setup for recovery days or long runs. The FF Turbo² foam never fades, and there’s always that lively bounce waiting with every stride.

ASICS Megablast Forefoot stack
Test results
Megablast 35.2 mm
Average 26.0 mm
Compared to 461 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
38.5 mm

Drop

We discovered that the Megablast has a slightly higher drop than advertised. Instead of 8 mm, we measured 9.9 mm.

This makes it slightly more appealing for heel strikers, but with so much foam under the forefoot, forefoot and midfoot runners won’t experience any bottoming out despite the higher drop. Still, if you prefer a lower or mid-drop setup, the Megablast might not feel ideal for your stride and you should check the Saucony Endorphin Trainer instead.

ASICS Megablast Drop
Test results
Megablast 9.9 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 461 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.1 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The recipe behind this shoe is pretty simple: ASICS took the Superblast 2 and aimed to improve it in every possible way. The most logical first step was replacing the less responsive FF Blast+ layer and use a single slab of superfoam. But instead of going with FF Turbo+, ASICS surprised us with something new: FF Turbo².

Right now, the foam market is moving at lightning speed—check out our guide to stay up to date—and ASICS stands at the forefront of innovation right now. With FF Leap in the Metaspeed Ray and this FF Turbo², the brand added two A-TPU foams that deliver outstanding energy return.

ASICS Megablast FF Turbo 2 side

But, why not just use FF Leap? Because it’s too soft and less durable. FF Turbo² basically is a training-oriented version of FF Leap: slightly firmer, but still soft at 15.5 HA. And honestly, it’s so good that we can’t wait to see what ASICS brings next.

ASICS Megablast Midsole softness
Test results
Megablast 15.5 HA
Average 20.6 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 387 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
36.1 HA

Rocker

Any shoe with a towering, maximalist stack like the ASICS Megablast needs a rockered geometry to keep transitions fluid—otherwise, the forefoot becomes too stiff to roll naturally.

From our lab shot above, it’s clear that ASICS went for it with a late-stage rocker design. The heel and forefoot feature a dramatic upward curve for a smooth, fast-forward motion, while the midfoot stays completely flat for added stability, a small but crucial detail.

ASICS Megablast Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

At first, we noticed that the Megablast felt quite similar to the Superblast 2, though maybe a bit roomier thanks to its ultra-thin, minimalist upper. However, we trust data over feelings—and you should too! 

After our gel mold solidified in the fridge, we measured 93.7 mm of internal width. That's very close to the average but slightly on the snug side.

ASICS Megablast Width / Fit
Test results
Megablast 93.7 mm
Average 95.2 mm
Compared to 216 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
102.4 mm

Toebox width

Where the fit differs a bit from the Superblast 2 is in the toebox width.

ASICS Megablast fit

We measured a roomier 74.3 mm here, with a less tapered design that gives your pinky toe extra space. This is a key detail for any run lasting more than 90 minutes, although for those with wide feet, it’s likely still not enough, and sizing up would be the only option.

ASICS Megablast Toebox width
Test results
Megablast 74.3 mm
Average 73.3 mm
Compared to 216 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
82.4 mm

Toebox height

We measured the toebox volume at 24.2 mm, slightly below average, giving the shoe a more secure than roomy fit.

However, since the upper is ultra-light and very thin, it doesn’t create much pressure and remains comfortable. We believe ASICS aimed for a performance-focused yet still universal fit, which is not a coincidence since no wide version will be available.

ASICS Megablast Toebox height
Test results
Megablast 24.2 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 216 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.0 mm
Toebox height
34.1 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

New

After discovering that the Megablast uses ASICSGRIP rubber, we expected strong traction—and it delivered.

Scoring 0.80 in our test, it ranks among the best shoes we’ve evaluated in the lab. It performs confidently on both dry and wet roads, though we don’t recommend it for unpaved surfaces as it has too much exposed foam.

Test results
Megablast 0.80
Average 0.47
Compared to 260 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.84

Outsole design

New

The outsole of the Megablast mixes exposed foam with carefully positioned black rubber patches. As seen in our photo, coverage is really limited, and ASICS retained the signature forefoot pod design introduced in the Novablast series.

ASICS Megablast Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

One potential drawback of the Megablast is its high stiffness. If you’ve worn the Superblast 1 or 2, the feeling is familiar. Basically, a massive stack like this simply can’t bend easily, which our 30-degree bend test confirmed at 18.8N.

ASICS Megablast Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Megablast 18.8N
Average 15.1N
Compared to 263 running shoes
Number of shoes
4.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

The weight of the Megablast is almost unbelievable at just 7.75 oz or 218g. For such a huge shoe, ASICS clearly worked hard here, pushing every part of the shoe to the absolute limit.

This ultra-light construction also makes the Megablast incredibly versatile. Racing? Absolutely, it’s lighter than the HOKA Rocket X 3. Daily runs or interval workouts? It works beautifully too.

ASICS Megablast Weight
Test results
Megablast 7.7 oz (218g)
Average 9.3 oz (265g)
Compared to 462 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.3 oz (149g)
Weight
12.9 oz (366g)

Breathability

When you ask runners to pay such a high price for a training shoe, every component must use the best materials, and ASICS didn’t disappoint us. The Megablast feels premium from heel to toe, showing clear attention to detail and quality.

We gave it a 4/5 score for breathability, meaning it performs well year-round depending on your sock choice and the season.

When we moved the cut upper over a LED light, its construction became clear. ASICS reinforced the heel and midfoot to improve support, while keeping the toebox extremely thin to reduce weight and increase ventilation for those summer long runs.

ASICS Megablast Mesh

Under the microscope, the material looked incredibly well-crafted.

ASICS Megablast woven mesh microscope

It’s clear ASICS used a high-end manufacturing process with precise stitching and strong fibers, resulting in a woven mesh upper that's miles ahead of some of its main competitors.

Comfort-wise, this upper works better for runners who prefer a low-bulk feel around the instep, as there’s no padding in the tongue. Yet the heel area felt to us surprisingly plush and protective, far more comfortable than most supershoes on the market.

Test results
Megablast 4
Average 3.7
Compared to 391 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

We discovered that the ASICS Megablast offers a touch of stability thanks to its flat midfoot area, moderately raised sidewalls and high torsional rigidity. It performs well for neutral runners given its crazy-high stack, though it feels a bit less supportive than the Superblast due to its extra-bouncy foam.

For that reason, we recommend it only for neutral runners, as mild pronators may find that it lacks the necessary support.

Torsional rigidity

The Megablast doesn’t include a carbon plate, yet it performed here as if it did. It achieved a perfect 5/5 score in our test, a level of stiffness that contributes to maintain stability in such a tall shoe.

Test results
Megablast 5
Average 3.5
Compared to 440 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter feels very comfortable thanks to a thick foam pad inside, and its stiffness sits right at an average level at 3/5.

It’s a smart, safe design choice from ASICS, since a stiffer build could easily cause discomfort during long runs or fast races.

Test results
Megablast 3
Average 2.9
Compared to 424 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

One key factor for stability in modern supertrainers is the midsole flare in the forefoot and heel, where the foam extends outward to create a wider landing platform.

We discovered that the ASICS Megablast’s forefoot measures 117.9 mm. That's slightly wider than average, offering a stable yet sleek feel that avoids becoming too bulky or awkward at faster speeds.

ASICS Megablast Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Megablast 117.9 mm
Average 114.4 mm
Compared to 462 running shoes
Number of shoes
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
127.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel uses the same design strategy, measuring 95.4 mm, which is wider than average. We discovered that this broader base gives heel strikers extra support and confidence during landing.

However, for midfoot and forefoot strikers, this broader shape offers little benefit since they do not land on that area, and it simply adds a bit of unnecessary weight.

ASICS Megablast Midsole width - heel
Test results
Megablast 95.4 mm
Average 90.8 mm
Compared to 462 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

The price to pay for the ultra-lightweight upper isn’t just the premium cost, it’s also durability. In our Dremel test, it performed like most supershoes at 1/5, which came as no surprise to us.

Test results
Megablast 1
Average 2.6
Compared to 325 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Fortunately, the heel padding proved much more durable, earning a solid 4 out of 5 in our test. This means the Megablast should hold up well even for runners who tend to rub or wear down this area.

Test results
Megablast 4
Average 3.3
Compared to 319 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

ASICSGRIP rubber has been one of ASICS’ biggest advancements in recent years. It’s a premium compound that perfectly balances durability and grip while remaining lightweight.

After our Dremel test, we measured only 0.9 mm of wear, a good result that shows strong long-term durability.

Test results
Megablast 0.9 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 303 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

It’s impressive that ASICS managed to include 3.0 mm of rubber while keeping the weight remarkably low for such a max-stack shoe. The minimal outsole coverage helps, but it’s still an impressive achievement.

ASICS Megablast Outsole thickness
Test results
Megablast 3.0 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 458 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.9 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

One of the few areas where the Megablast doesn’t aim to outdo other daily trainers is the insole, which is fairly standard at 4.4 mm thick.

ASICS Megablast Insole thickness
Test results
Megablast 4.4 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 457 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.8 mm

Removable insole

Want to remove the insole? No problem, it’s not glued to the midsole. We also found that the shoe’s average fit makes it easy to swap in other insoles if needed.

ASICS Megablast Removable insole
Test results
Megablast Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

A-TPU is the latest breakthrough in midsole technology, surpassing PEBA while matching its impressive cold-weather performance. After keeping the Megablast in the freezer for 20 minutes, it became only 12% firmer, which is an outstanding result.

ASICS Megablast Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Megablast 12%
Average 25%
Compared to 386 running shoes
Number of shoes
1%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Reflective elements

The heel of the shoe features reflective details, a small but welcome addition. It’s not a deciding factor for most buyers, yet it’s another small touch that adds to the overall package.

Test results
Megablast Yes

Tongue padding

We truly appreciate when an expensive shoe delivers a secure lockdown with premium, well-crafted laces. That’s why we often criticized Adidas for their cheap ones in supershoes like the Adios Pro 4 and loved that ASICS included top-tier, textured laces in the Megablast.

ASICS Megablast tongue laces

The tongue, as we discovered, has zero almost zero padding (0.9 mm) and requires a careful setup to avoid too much pressure before a run. A small layer of foam could have helped, but ASICS has been consistent with this ultra-minimal approach, and it continues to work well for reducing weight and improve airflow.

ASICS Megablast Tongue padding
Test results
Megablast 0.9 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 459 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The excellent lockdown is one of those small details that, for many runners, makes this shoe worth the extra cost compared to the Adidas EVO SL. It’s fully gusseted and stays perfectly in place.

ASICS Megablast Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Megablast Both sides (full)

Price

Yes, the ASICS Megablast is undeniably expensive, but we believe that it justifies its price with exceptional performance. It’s remarkably light, super bouncy, and features a premium upper... along with plenty of other strengths. On top of that, it’s impressively versatile, handling daily runs, tempo sessions, and even races!

Don’t get us wrong, we’re not fans of high prices either. We’d love if the Megablast cost 20% or 30% less, and as you probably know, we buy every shoe we test in the lab. But maybe we should question less why state-of-the-art shoes like this are pricey and more why some £140 or £150 models with outdated tech or poor performance keep launching each year. Perhaps those are the truly expensive ones...

Test results
Megablast $225
Compared to 462 running shoes
Number of shoes
£45
Price
£280

Heel tab

The heel of the Megablast mirrors other ASICS designs, with a sturdy finger-loop seamlessly integrated into the upper that also neatly hides the back seam.

ASICS Megablast Heel tab
Test results
Megablast Finger loop