Our verdict

We believe the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo stands out for runners who want speed and a lightness in the same supershoe. We loved the new FF Leap foam, the curved plate that makes transitions smoother compared to the Sky, and the grippy outsole. On our runs, it definitely felt lighter and more cushioned than most rivals. While it's true that it’s not the most stable shoe and the price is higher than before, it's still one of the safest bets for anything from a 5K to a marathon.

Pros

  • Light as a feather
  • Excels at any distance, from 5K to the marathon
  • Elite-level traction
  • New FF Leap midsole is super responsive
  • More stable than the Metaspeed Sky Tokyo
  • Plush forefoot
  • Excellent upper
  • Classic rolling feel from curved plate
  • Better than Metaspeed Edge Paris in every way

Cons

  • Price increase
  • Narrow fit
  • Not stable

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

The ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo is a remarkable step forward and a smart choice for:

  • Heel strikers who find the Sky series unstable and want smoother heel-to-toe transitions.
  • Those seeking a more traditional supershoe with a curved carbon plate and excellent grip.
  • Vaporfly fans looking for even lighter weight, a better upper and more shock absorption.
  • Neutral-gait runners needing a versatile supershoe that's explosive for a 5K yet cushioned enough for a marathon.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo

Who should NOT buy

The Metaspeed Edge Tokyo is not built for everyone, and we think that it may feel too unstable for marathoners seeking control and an easy ride. For those runners, the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 or Nike Alphafly 3 are much better picks.

Another drawback is the rising price tag. This shoe is expensive, and the Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 offers a more affordable alternative without losing the essence of a fast supershoe.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

We discovered good cushioning results in the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo here in the lab: 146 SA in the heel and an impressive 132 SA in the forefoot.

These solid numbers sit far above our lab average, showing how much protection the shoe provides. They give runners extra support to handle not only the usual races but also gruelling endurance challenges, even up to a road ultramarathon.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 146 SA
Average 128 SA
Compared to 250 running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
170 SA

Energy return

New

In our lab tests, we discovered that this shoe delivers 78.3% energy return in the heel and 76.8% in the forefoot. That’s slightly lower than the Metaspeed Sky Tokyo in the front, but it makes sense, as the Sky is almost exclusively tailored for midfoot and forefoot strikers.

The introduction of FF Leap foam, crafted from A-TPU, is also a major upgrade. It dramatically boosts rebound compared to earlier Metaspeeds and elevates this shoe into the same league as today’s top-tier supershoes.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 78.3%
Average 58.4%
Compared to 247 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
82.0%

Heel stack

World Athletics sets the heel stack limit at 40 mm, and the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo comes in very close at 38.9 mm.

This figure matches what we expect from any modern supershoe built for the marathon, where superior impact absorption is a must-have feature.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Heel stack
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 38.9 mm
Average 34.4 mm
Compared to 442 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot also comes with a stack height above 30 mm, which is the threshold we now associate with maximalist running shoes. In fact, few supershoes exceed 32.0 mm as of today, so if forefoot cushioning matters to you, the Edge Tokyo delivers.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Forefoot stack
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 32.0 mm
Average 25.9 mm
Compared to 442 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.5 mm

Drop

ASICS lists the drop at 5 mm, the same as the Sky, but we discovered 6.9 mm after repeated measurements, which matched the ride we felt with the Edge.

This shoe rides more like a Vaporfly 4, offering that classic supershoe feel with a rolling transition from heel to toe.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Drop
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 6.9 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 442 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.2 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The new FF Leap foam measures ultra-soft at 11.5 HA in our durometer, marking a clear shift from the firmer FF Turbo+. While Turbo+ was also energetic, it felt much firmer underfoot and less plush overall.

In the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo, FF Leap sits above the plate to maximise its presence in the forefoot. Putting it below would reduce cushioning up front and compromise stability for heel strikers, which explains why this setup is inverted compared to the Sky Tokyo.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Foam Microscope

Under our microscope, a slice of FF Leap displayed a finer, tightly packed cell structure that explains its soft and plush character. FF Turbo+, on the other hand, showed larger and denser cells, revealing its firmer feel.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Midsole softness
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 11.5 HA
Average 20.7 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 368 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
36.1 HA

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

As you already know, the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo features a dual-foam design. Unlike the Sky, where FF Leap sits beneath the plate, the Edge places this ultra-soft and resilient compound above it.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo FF Leap
FF Turbo+ (beige), FF Leap (white)

Placing the firmer FF Turbo+ foam closer to the ground provides extra stability against the cloud-like softness of FF Leap, turning the Edge into a more stable supershoe for heel strikers.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Secondary foam softness
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 19.0 HA
Average 23.2 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Rocker

We found that the rocker in the Edge feels modest compared to other supershoes, with the forefoot curve starting quite late—especially noticeable when set against rivals like the Hoka Cielo X1 2.0.

At the heel, the curvature is very subtle, and we believe ASICS could have shaped it a bit more aggressively in the Edge, similar to what they did in the Paris series.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Rocker

Plate

New

Aside from the foam setup, the biggest difference in the Edge compared to the Sky is its carbon plate.

The design leans toward a classic layout with a curved forefoot, though it’s less dramatic and spoon-shaped than supershoes like the Vaporfly. Its inclined geometry strongly promotes a rolling-forward motion, especially for heel and midfoot strikers, and with FF Leap sitting on top of the plate, the response feels remarkably energetic when reaching the toe-off phase.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Plate

Edge vs. Sky

When ASICS introduced the Sky and Edge, it was a bold concept that offered two supershoes built for different running styles instead of a single option. The Sky was aimed at “stride” runners, while the Edge targeted those with a quicker cadence.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo versions

The outsole features small changes between the Edge (black) and Sky (red).

Still, we noticed certain overlap. Some Edge models suited stride runners who landed on the heel, while the Sky sometimes worked better for cadence runners striking midfoot. The distinction wasn’t always clear, but with this version ASICS has finally drawn the sharpest line between the two.

From our perspective, the simplest way to decide is this: heel strikers or those who enjoy a smooth heel-to-toe roll should pick the Edge, while runners who love smashing the forefoot and getting catapulted back—like with an Alphafly—will feel right at home in the Sky.

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

When we first tested its sibling, the Metaspeed Sky Paris, we described the fit as snug, just like stepping into a Ferrari. And the Edge Tokyo delivers a very similar feel.

Our replica of the interior confirmed only 89.4 mm of width. This creates a race-ready sensation and even enhances stability slightly, but it’s clearly not a good match for runners with wide feet.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Width / Fit
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 89.4 mm
Average 95.3 mm
Compared to 197 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
102.4 mm

Toebox width

The Edge sets itself apart from the Sky in the toebox area, measuring 73.0 mm in our callipers. This makes it a slightly roomier option, which comes as welcome news for tackling longer distances.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Toebox width
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 73.0 mm
Average 73.5 mm
Compared to 197 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
83.3 mm

Toebox height

With 28.1 mm of vertical space, the toebox height offers plenty of room.

This daily-trainer-like clearance helped us to avoid hotspots, and it reflects ASICS’ recent trend of designing shoes with generous vertical clearance to reduce unwanted pressure, like in the Noosa Tri 16.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Toebox height
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 28.1 mm
Average 27.3 mm
Compared to 196 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.4 mm
Toebox height
34.1 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

New

In the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo, ASICS retained their ASICSGRIP compound and extended rubber coverage along the lateral forefoot compared to the Sky, a detail we highlighted earlier in this lab review.

The result is an outsole that delivers exceptional traction on both dry and wet roads. When we tested it, we measured an impressive 0.74 score (well above the Sky’s 0.66) placing it among the rare supershoes with a truly world-class outsole.

Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 0.74
Average 0.46
Compared to 241 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.83

Outsole design

New

We found that the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo outsole combines a thin layer of ASICSGRIP rubber with exposed foam to reduce weight. The forefoot features a wide black rubber panel with oval-shaped cutouts arranged in a grid. As we noted, the lateral side has more rubber than the Sky, which is the key for its improved traction.

At the heel, most of the foam remains uncovered, except for a small strip of white rubber on the medial side for reinforcement, along with black rubber that extends into the midfoot and heel through the lateral side.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

New

One of the clearest differences between the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo and the Sky Tokyo is stiffness. We discovered in our lab tests that the Sky (21.1N) is 33% more rigid thanks to its flat carbon plate, which is harder to bend than the Edge’s curved plate, which delivered a 15.8N score. 

For runners looking for a more forgiving ride, the Edge feels better underfoot—and this is a good example of our lab testing standing out. Running with both shoes gives impressions, but precise numbers turn them into crystal-clear comparisons, and you get the full picture for better decisions.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 15.8N
Average 15.0N
Compared to 244 running shoes
Number of shoes
4.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

The ASICS Metaspeed Sky Tokyo comes in at an ultra-light 5.60 oz (159g), ranking among the lightest supershoes ever made... and it’s even slightly lighter than the Sky Tokyo! This weight reduction from its sibling comes mainly from a narrower forefoot area.

What makes this achievement so remarkable is the balance between its feather-light weight and massive 40 mm stack height. Three years ago, such a combination would have been unthinkable, yet here it is in a supershoe priced on par with its main competitors.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Weight
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 5.6 oz (159g)
Average 9.3 oz (265g)
Compared to 443 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.6 oz (159g)
Weight
12.6 oz (357g)

Breathability

The MOTIONWRAP 3.0 upper may seem like a small update from version 2.0, but we discovered it shaves a bit of weight while unlocking superb airflow across the entire shoe.

During our smoke test, the Edge Tokyo performed flawlessly. It secured a perfect 5/5, proving how effectively the upper manages extreme heat generated during high-intensity racing.

The construction is razor-thin, with ASICS adding perforations not only in the forefoot but also in the tongue and heel. This design channels airflow from multiple angles, unlike most competitors.

We also observed that ASICS extended these features to the insole. By drilling ventilation holes and reducing material, they managed to make it lighter and more airflow-ready than a standard one.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo microscope

Viewed under our digital microscope, the structure appeared really precise, with evenly distributed gaps that balance ventilation and strength. This meticulous attention to detail makes the high price point feel easier to digest.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo MOTIONWRAP 3.0

Finally, ASICS added some foam padding in the heel, which is cool.

Unlike stripped-down supershoes that sacrifice comfort in this area, this thoughtful touch provides a more comfortable fit without compromising weight.

Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 5
Average 3.8
Compared to 372 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

We believe the Edge Tokyo provides better stability than the Sky Tokyo for heel strikers, largely due to the increased use of firmer FF Turbo+ in that area, which enhances support. The heel also features a new flared design that differs a lot from the Paris version. While it may not look as sleek or refined from behind, it proves far more effective.

On the other hand, we found that the Sky’s wider forefoot and flat plate design could be more appealing for midfoot and forefoot strikers, as our lab data and running experience both suggest it delivers a more stable platform in that area.

Torsional rigidity

The carbon plate in the Edge Tokyo makes it slightly less stiff than the Sky, yet it still earned a perfect 5/5 in our torsional rigidity test after we completed our manual evaluation.

Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 5
Average 3.4
Compared to 421 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The rear of the shoe shows minimal structural support, scoring only 1/5 in our test. This result is consistent with most supershoes, where a firm heel counter is rarely part of the design.

Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 1
Average 2.9
Compared to 405 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The Edge delivers slightly less stability yet greater agility up front, thanks to its narrower forefoot measuring only 108.0 mm. In comparison, the Sky offered more room in this same test at 114.9 mm.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 108.0 mm
Average 114.3 mm
Compared to 443 running shoes
Number of shoes
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

ASICS gave both Metaspeed siblings the same ultra-narrow 75.0 mm heel. In the Edge, a touch more width could have helped rearfoot strikers, but instead they just kept it really focused on performance and weight savings above everything else.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Midsole width - heel
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 75.0 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 443 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

After checking the Dremel’s impact on the upper, we gave the Edge Tokyo a 1/5 score. No surprise here, considering the ultra-lightweight build of the upper. And while this outcome makes sense, it remains a poor result nonetheless.

Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 1
Average 2.6
Compared to 306 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding tells a very different story than the fragile toebox—it scored a perfect 5/5 for durability. This makes it a solid choice for triathletes who may go sockless without worrying about early wear from friction.

Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 5
Average 3.3
Compared to 300 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

We measured the damage from the Dremel tip at just 0.9 mm. The black ASICSGRIP rubber held up well in our Dremel test, proving it can deliver at least a decent lifespan. 

Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 0.9 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 284 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

With just 1.4 mm of rubber, the outsole is clearly thin and not built for maximum durability. But honestly, would either of us trade its super-low weight for extra grammes? Probably not.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Outsole thickness
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 1.4 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 439 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

We discovered that the insole reflects the shoe’s racing identity, offering a slim profile at only 3.4 mm.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Insole thickness
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 3.4 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 438 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.5 mm

Removable insole

We found that the insole is fully removable, which isn’t always the case with supershoes. Swapping it for a standard option from almost any other shoe, though, would immediately make the toebox feel even tighter.

Alternatively, runners needing more space can remove the insole. This frees up a few millimetres in the forefoot for a roomier fit, though it's a risky move that can lead to blisters or hotspots, so proceed with caution and do a lot of testing before any race.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Removable insole
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

When we tested the foam’s softness after leaving the Edge Tokyo in our freezer for 20 minutes, we found just a 9% increase in firmness. That highlights one of the main benefits of a premium compound like A-TPU compared to a standard foam like EVA.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 9%
Average 25%
Compared to 367 running shoes
Number of shoes
1%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Reflective elements

The ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo comes with no reflective elements at all.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Reflective elements
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo No

Tongue padding

We discovered that the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo pushes weight savings to the extreme, with its tongue measuring just 0.6 mm and being one of the thinnest ever recorded in our lab.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo eyelet

We also found that the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo uses a traditional lacing setup with evenly spaced eyelets. Its Vaporfly-style laces never slipped during our runs and are on par with the high price of the shoe.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Tongue padding
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo 0.6 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 440 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

In this shoe, the tongue isn’t gusseted, which may concern runners who often deal with unwanted tongue movement.

If you prefer zero risk of shifting, a supershoe with a sock-like design such as the Saucony Endorphin Elite 2 offers a much more secure fit.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo None

Price

The Sky Paris comes with a £20/€20 price bump compared to the previous Edge, and of course, that’s never the kind of update you want to hear. That said, with the introduction of FF Leap foam, a clear jump in energy return, and a lighter build, we believe that this time, the added cost feels completely justified.

Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo $270
Compared to 443 running shoes
Number of shoes
£45
Price
£280

Heel tab

ASICS went minimal in the heel, skipping the finger-loop tab to save weight and stripping back materials to keep the design as lightweight as possible.

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Heel tab
Test results
Metaspeed Edge Tokyo None