Our verdict

Crisp and clean style meets superior comfort in the Cloudtilt walking shoe from On (aka Zendaya sneaker because of the endorsement). We love that the brand keeps spilling its best cushioning practices from running footwear to the walking category and we could feel all the benefits of it in the Cloudtilt. However, Swiss Engineering comes with a Swiss price tag but if you can catch a discount, you are in for a real treat!

Pros

  • Plenty of cushioning for long hours on feet
  • Soft and smooth ride
  • Feels nice and light on foot
  • Abrasion-resistant upper and outsole
  • Wide and steady platform
  • Easy on-and-off with bungee laces
  • Upper made of recycled material

Cons

  • Not very breathable
  • Flimsy inner lining and insole
  • Not for wide feet

Audience verdict

89
Great!

Who should buy

We believe that the On Cloudtilt is a must to consider if you are after:

  • a well-cushioned but light shoe for long hours of walking and standing
  • a clean-looking shoe with icy/minty colorways to fuse comfort and style in urban settings
  • a shoe that's quick to get on and off thanks to bungee laces

On Cloudtilt review

Who should NOT buy

The Cloudtilt's lack of breathability can be a real problem for people who need an airy summer shoe (for heatwaves and all). In this case, we strongly recommend thinner uppers of the Cloud 5 Push or the Cloudrift instead.

Another reason to look away from the Cloudtilt is if you need more toebox space (be it for wide feet, toe splay, or bunions). Some On shoes like the Cloudgo and the Cloudrunner 2 are available in wide options.

On Cloudtilt lab test

Breathability

We are used to seeing ultra-thin and highly breathable uppers on walking shoes from On. However, the Cloudtilt changes this tendency with its notably thicker upper material. This, in turn, made the shoe less than ideal for hot weather.

Even though the shoe's toebox expelled smoke rather well, its ventilation level was lower than that of the On Cloud 5 Push and the On Cloudrift. These two shoes got the highest breathability score (5 out of 5) whereas the Cloudtilt earned only 2 out of 5.

Hovering the shoe's half-cut upper over the light, we didn't see a single transparent area. For comparison, this is how much light shines through the Cloud 5 Push.

We used a microscope to take an even closer look at the Cloudtilt's upper. Its fabric is so thoroughly engineered and tightly woven that we are not surprised that the shoe's airflow is so weak.

On Cloudtilt Breathability microscope test

Just look at the striking difference in mesh porosity in the comparison photo of the Cloudtilt and the Cloud 5 Push.

On Cloudtilt vs On Cloud 5 Push upper fabric comparison

Test results
Cloudtilt 2
Average 2.7
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

Just because it's made of recycled materials doesn't mean that the shoe is going to fall apart on your feet. The On brand proves this to be true with the Cloudtilt's recycled polyester upper.

We subjected the shoe's toebox to a demanding resistance test to check how it stacks up against other walking shoes in our lab. Using a Dremel, we drilled the same spot on top of the shoe's toebox at 5K RPM speed and 3.2N pressure for 12 seconds.

On Cloudtilt Toebox durability test

And that's where the thick and sturdy nature of the fabric paid off - the Dremel only fluffed up its topmost layer without tearing the material! We were excited to finally see a hard-wearing upper on a shoe from On! Why are we so surprised? Because we rated the Cloutilt's toebox durability as 4 out of 5 whereas the average of all previous On walking shoes sat at only 2 (with most scores being 1)!

On Cloudtilt toebox durability comparison
Here is what the same test did to the thin mesh of the Cloud 5 Push. Breathability often comes with a durability compromise.

Add to that a protective synthetic overlay all around the shoe's upper and you don't have to stop and check the integrity of your shoes each time you trip on concrete or slash your shoes against cobblestone.

On Cloudtilt toebox

Test results
Cloudtilt 4
Average 3.2
Compared to 25 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Sadly, the fabric inside the Cloudtilt failed to meet our high-set expectations. Did On choose to save on the inner lining in favor of other shoe parts?

It took as little as 4 seconds of drilling to rip out the shoe's heel padding. Even though this area tends to be weak in most waking shoes, the Cloudtilt got an even lower-than-average score of 1 for heel padding durability.

On Cloudtilt Heel padding durability

Test results
Cloudtilt 1
Average 2.3
Compared to 24 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

There is no full-length outsole on the Cloudtilt but it uses a fairly hard compound in the most critical areas (forefoot and heel).

On Cloudtilt outsole design

Pressing a Shore C durometer against the shoe's rubberized areas, we got a reading of 81.6 HC. This is 7% harder than the average we've measured among walking shoes.

On Cloudtilt Outsole hardness

Test results
Cloudtilt 81.6 HC
Average 76.3 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
50.1 HC
Outsole hardness
92.0 HC

Outsole durability

To make sure that rubber is not only hard but also abrasion-resistant, we challenged it to a 22-second drilling test at a 10K RPM speed.

And the compound proved to be steadfast! We could barely even see the damage from the sandpaper. Considering that our tread gauge measured as little as 0.6 mm of damage, this is not surprising!

On Cloudtilt Outsole durability test

Test results
Cloudtilt 0.6 mm
Average 1.5 mm
Compared to 24 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

It was also reassuring to find that the rubber layer is fairly thick on the Cloudtilt. According to our caliper, it comes in at 3.1 mm.

On Cloudtilt Outsole thickness

Even though exposed foam makes this On shoe more prone to abrasion, we believe that it is duly protected in the high-wear areas.

Test results
Cloudtilt 3.1 mm
Average 2.8 mm
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
7.0 mm

Weight

The Cloudtilt felt very nice and light on our feet and the scale reading confirmed it.

On Cloudtilt Weight

The shoe wasn't as weightless as some of the other On models we've tested (like the Cloud 5!) but its weight of 9.4 oz (266g) did clock in below the average for walking shoes.

On Cloudtilt logo

Test results
Cloudtilt 9.38 oz (266g)
Average 9.77 oz (277g)
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
6.17 oz (175g)
Weight
14.25 oz (404g)

Cushioning

Heel stack

Putting the Cloudtilt on for the first time, we could feel its rather abundant cushioning. It is also a bit of a height booster with a heel stack of 35.5 mm!

On Cloudtilt Heel stack

This caliper reading puts the Cloudtilt on the thicker end of On shoes. It is also a few millimeters thicker than the average of our lab-tested walking shoes.

The shoe treated our feet to generous cushioning as we clocked in long hours in our lab. Not to mention that it gave our tired feet all the impact protection they needed to reach that daily 10K-step walking goal!

Test results
Cloudtilt 35.5 mm
Average 32.3 mm
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
11.2 mm
Heel stack
45.7 mm

Forefoot stack

Quite expectedly, the forefoot stack of the Cloudtilt raises above most walking kicks as well. At 26.8 mm, it is a good 5 mm thicker than average!

On Cloudtilt Forefoot stack

This solid helping of foam worked in tune with the shoe's rockered shape to give us some wonderfully smooth heel-to-toe transitions.

Test results
Cloudtilt 26.8 mm
Average 21.9 mm
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
5.5 mm
Forefoot stack
31.2 mm

Drop

According to On's official specs, the heel-to-toe drop of the Cloudtilt comes in at 7 mm. However, our own caliper showed a 1.7 mm deviation from that number.

On Cloudtilt Drop

Based on our lab-measured stack heights, the difference between the shoe's heel and forefoot is slightly higher at 8.7 mm.

For most casual wearers, this doesn't change anything as the Cloudtilt still proved to be a well-cushioned companion with enough heel elevation to keep the rearfoot and the Achilles tendon supported. But we are obliged to point out all such inconsistencies, however minor.

Test results
Cloudtilt 8.7 mm
Average 10.4 mm
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.3 mm
Drop
21.4 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Now let's dive into what makes the Cloudtilt's underfoot experience feel so good...Meet the Helion foam!

On Cloudtilt Midsole softness

Showing a softer-than-average reading on our Shore A durometer (20.2 HA), this material indeed felt soft and responsive. But it's hard to talk about the Helion separately from the CloudTec Phase design in which it is incorporated. 

The latter refers to the large cutouts in the shoe's midsole. We found that their compression elevates impact protection and comfort quite a bit! This is a great example of how smart engineering can turn less into more!

Test results
Cloudtilt 20.2 HA
Average 24.6 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 30 walking shoes
Number of shoes
7.8 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
32.9 HA

Difference in midsole softness in cold

But if you are considering the Cloudtilt for the cooler season, be prepared for a moderate loss of midsole softness.

On Cloudtilt Difference in midsole softness in cold

Having exposed the shoe to low temperatures for 20 minutes, we found that its foam firmed up by 33.7%. But this is a normal change in softness for walking shoes.

Test results
Cloudtilt 33.7%
Average 33.6%
Compared to 30 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Difference in midsole softness in cold
100%

Insole thickness

Inspecting the shoe's insole, we once again felt as though the brand saved some money on the interior materials.

The footbed was notably thinner than average and felt like cardboard!

On Cloudtilt Insole thickness

Our caliper recorded only 3.5 mm of insole thickness whereas most walking shoes have at least 5-6 mm! Perhaps all of the brand's fancy tech went into the shoe's midsole...

Test results
Cloudtilt 3.5 mm
Average 6.0 mm
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
3.5 mm
Insole thickness
16.9 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

With no mention of arch support in the Cloudtilt's official specs, we believe that it was made with neutral pronation in mind.

You can see from our lateral stability test below that our ankles have a good deal of freedom in this shoe. This could be a problem for someone with overpronation, or excessive inwards rolling of the foot. But for most people, this should not result in discomfort or ankle rolls.

If you do need a more supportive shoe, we recommend looking into the Cloudnova Form or other stability walking shoes in our catalog. These shoes are designed to keep the foot and ankle aligned to avoid uncontrolled pronation.

Torsional rigidity

If you are worried about feeling unstable due to the squishy pods, let us assure you that the Cloudtilt has a good amount of structure to keep you steady.

Twisting the shoe in our manual test, we discovered that it takes some good force to do that. On a 1-5 scale, where 5 is the stiffest, we rated the shoe's torsional rigidity as 4 out of 5. Pretty sturdy!

Test results
Cloudtilt 4
Average 2.8
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

However, the shoe's flexible heel counter makes it less suitable for people who need extra support.

Bending and flexing in every direction, the heel counter offered a very minimal amount of heel hold. Again, enough for neutral pronation but not so much for excessive inward rolling of the foot.

Giving it a stiffness score from 1 to 5, we chose 2.

Test results
Cloudtilt 2
Average 2.3
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width in the forefoot

Gladly, the Cloudtilt offers enough platform to land on and feel surefooted.

On Cloudtilt Midsole width in the forefoot

Putting our caliper to the widest part of the shoe's midsole, we recorded as much as 117.7 mm. This is about 6 mm wider than average! Having extended contact points like this is a big bonus to the shoe's stability.

Test results
Cloudtilt 117.7 mm
Average 111.8 mm
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
98.8 mm
Midsole width in the forefoot
124.1 mm

Midsole width in the heel

In the widest part of the heel, the Cloudtilt also showed a greater-than-average reading of 96.7 mm.

On Cloudtilt Midsole width in the heel

Along with the Cloudnova Form, the Cloudtilt turns out to have the widest platform among our lab-tested On walking shoes!

On Cloudtilt wide platform

Test results
Cloudtilt 96.7 mm
Average 90.2 mm
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
75.6 mm
Midsole width in the heel
104.0 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

Despite its high-stacked midsole, the Cloudtilt still packs enough flexibility for comfortable transitions.

The shoe did not exceed the average measurement in our force gauge stiffness test. It took 20.5N to bend this On shoe to a 90-degree angle (just the same as it takes an average walking shoe.)

On Cloudtilt flexibility

The Cloudtilt got it right in the flexibility department - we have nothing else to add.

Test results
Cloudtilt 20.5N
Average 20.6N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1.1N
Stiffness
52.7N

Difference in stiffness in cold

But keep in mind that the Cloudtilt loses some of its flexibility in cold conditions too.

On Cloudtilt Difference in stiffness in cold

After 20 minutes of freezer time, the force gauge showed a 42.8% increase in stiffness.

Test results
Cloudtilt 42.8%
Average 47.5%
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Difference in stiffness in cold
139%

Size and fit

Internal length

We are happy to report that the On Cloudtilt runs precisely true to size in our regular men's US size 9.

On Cloudtilt Internal length

Our subjective experience was confirmed by a caliper measurement of 267.0 mm which corresponds to our tested size 9.

Test results
Cloudtilt 267.0 mm
Average 268.7 mm
Compared to 17 walking shoes
Number of shoes
264.5 mm
Internal length
275.9 mm

Toebox width at the widest part

We have no complaints regarding the shoe's toebox either.

On Cloudtilt Toebox width at the widest part

Measuring the widest part of its toebox with a caliper showed an average reading for a Medium D width.

Test results
Cloudtilt 99.2 mm
Average 99.2 mm
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
89.5 mm
Toebox width at the widest part
110.9 mm

Toebox width at the big toe

However, the Cloudtilt tapers towards the tip of the toebox slightly more than average. Checking its width near the big toe showed 74.7 mm which is slightly narrower than average.

On Cloudtilt Toebox width at the big toe

It was not a problem for our medium-width feet but it holds us back from recommending this On shoe to people with wide feet.

Test results
Cloudtilt 74.7 mm
Average 78.6 mm
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
73.7 mm
Toebox width at the big toe
94.3 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The shoe's midfoot fit is enhanced by a semi-gusseted tongue. We are glad to see this feature on the Cloudtilt as it creates a more secure foothold and prevents the tongue from shifting on the move.

On Cloudtilt Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Cloudtilt Both sides (semi)

Laces

The shoe's lockdown is complete with a speed lace setup, also known as bungee lacing.

On Cloudtilt laces

This design eliminates the need for fiddling with laces and turns the Cloudtilt into a slip-on of sorts.

However, people with narrower feet or higher insteps may not bode well with this stretchy lacing. These folks will have to cut off and replace the stock laces.

On Cloudtilt extra eyelet

Making use of the extra eyelet may prove to be helpful as well.

Comfort

Tongue padding

The tongue of the On Cloudtilt is sufficiently padded at 5.4 mm. This is a normal amount of tongue foam across walking shoes.

On Cloudtilt Tongue padding
Test results
Cloudtilt 5.4 mm
Average 5.2 mm
Compared to 31 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.3 mm
Tongue padding
11.5 mm

Heel tab

There are no finger loops on the Cloudtilt but its bungee lacing allows for a pretty easy on-and-off.

Test results
Cloudtilt None

Removable insole

If, like us, you are not happy with the shoe's standard insole, you can easily swap it. 

On Cloudtilt Removable insole
Test results
Cloudtilt Yes

Misc

Reflective elements

On made sure that others see you wearing their product even in the dark - all the On logos are made of reflective material.

Test results
Cloudtilt Yes

Sustainable materials

Unfortunately, we cannot test the sustainability of materials in our lab (yet). For now, we have to trust On when it claims that 100% of the Cloudtilt's upper is made of recycled polyester.

On Cloudtilt medial side

The brand also claims that the shoe is dope dyed - a process that uses 90% less water than the standard dying method.