Our verdict

We struggle to recommend the On Cloud X 4 as a dedicated gym trainer. Our lab tests showed that it is more of a comfortable walking shoe with great cushioning and flexibility for some fitness routines. But this is NOT the shoe you want to wear for strength training with weight. What's more, its above-average price point makes us think of much better-performing cross-trainers that this money can get.

Pros

  • Super airy and breathable upper
  • Feels very light, disappears on foot
  • Great cushioning for jumps and short runs
  • Highly flexible construction
  • Doubles as a comfy walking shoe
  • Comfortable step-in feel
  • Recycled upper materials

Cons

  • Awful durability
  • Seriously overpriced
  • Stability is almost non-existent

Audience verdict

89
Great!

Who should buy

Because of its glaring drawbacks, the Cloud X 4 has a rather narrow target audience. This shoe can work for you if:

  • you need a versatile pair for both casual and gym use (but light-to-moderate workouts only)
  • you want a very light, breathable, and flexible athletic shoe
  • you are a fan of On and its unique Cloudtec cushioning

On Cloud X 4 review

Who should NOT buy

If you are in search of a reliable workout shoe for gym use only, the On Cloudpulse proved to be a more stable and sturdy option.

And if you don't mind another brand, Nike has an excellent Free Metcon 6 cross-trainer which is also very comfortable and flexible but is significantly more stable for lifting.

On Cloud X 4 lab test

Cushioning

Heel stack

It is important to note that the On Cloud X 4 packs more cushioning than a typical cross-trainer. Depending on your fitness routine, that could be either a benefit or a nuisance.

On Cloud X 4 Heel stack

We believe that someone who primarily focuses on high-impact exercises, cardio, and short runs will be happy with this trainer's 30.4 mm heel stack height.

About 5 mm taller than average, this amount of cushioning provides walking comfort as well. Not many gym shoes can double as daily beaters.

And if you owned the Cloud X 3, so expect a more raised platform and a boost in cushioning. The previous iteration had a heel stack of 25.5 mm.

Test results
Cloud X 4 30.4 mm
Average 24.8 mm
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Heel stack
36.2 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot cushioning of the Cloud X 4 also raises slightly above the average at 21.5 mm

On Cloud X 4 Forefoot stack

It took really good care of the balls of our feet during cardio sessions where we stayed on our toes a lot. Rope jumping, step aerobics, box jumps and the like felt amazingly well-cushioned in the Cloud X 4.

Test results
Cloud X 4 21.5 mm
Average 18.4 mm
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
10.6 mm
Forefoot stack
27.7 mm

Drop

In its product specs for the Cloud X 4, On states that the heel-to-toe drop is 7 mm. That is only 1.9 mm away from our own measurements which came in at 8.9 mm. But in practice, the difference is not that great.

On Cloud X 4 Drop

Both 7 and 9 mm drops create a slight heel elevation which is conducive for exercises that require impact protection. At the same time, it is not too high to feel tippy or unstable.

Test results
Cloud X 4 8.9 mm
Average 6.4 mm
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.8 mm
Drop
13.4 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Just like any other shoe from On, the Cloud X 4 draws its cushioning from the Helion foam which is cast in the Cloudtec pods.

These hollow pods compress under pressure creating a moderately soft and protective underfoot experience. The Helion itself is not a very soft type of foam - our Shore A durometer showed a middle-ground reading of 25.6 HA (neither plush nor firm).

On Cloud X 4 Midsole softness

As a whole, the Cloud X 4 feels cushier than the average training shoe. This is good news for high-impact workouts but, unfortunately, it is too wobbly for lifting heavier weights. The midsole compression is just too much.

Test results
Cloud X 4 25.6 HA
Average 27.8 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
17.4 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
41.0 HA

Insole thickness

The cushioning is further enhanced with a generously padded insole which shows 5.0 mm of thickness in the heel.

On Cloud X 4 Insole thickness
Test results
Cloud X 4 5.0 mm
Average 3.9 mm
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.7 mm
Insole thickness
7.2 mm

Size and fit

Size

On Cloud X 4 is slightly small (34 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 28 training shoes
Number of shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Toebox width - widest part

The On Cloud X 4 offers sufficient in-shoe space for a D medium width.

On Cloud X 4 fit

Our caliper showed an expected reading of 98.7 mm in the widest area of the shoe's forefoot.

On Cloud X 4 Toebox width - widest part
Test results
Cloud X 4 98.7 mm
Average 100.4 mm
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
90.4 mm
Toebox width - widest part
108.5 mm

Toebox width - big toe

There is no aggressive tapering towards the toes either. We recorded a width of 79.4 mm in the area of the big toe.

On Cloud X 4 Toebox width - big toe
Test results
Cloud X 4 79.4 mm
Average 78.8 mm
Compared to 34 training shoes
Number of shoes
65.0 mm
Toebox width - big toe
89.4 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

Lateral stability is a total DISASTER in the Cloud X 4! It must be the wobbliest trainer we've ever tested!

Strength training did not feel surefooted at all, especially when we grabbed heavier weights or performed one-legged exercises. Even the previous Cloud X 3 felt more reliable.

On Cloud X 4 Heel tab

A special warning goes out to people with overpronation (excessive inward rolling of the foot) because this shoe is going to exaggerate this problem even more.

Lateral stability of the Nike Free Metcon 6

If you prioritize stability in your training footwear, the exact same retail price can get you the mighty stable Nike Metcon 9. Or the more versatile and flexible Nike Free Metcon 6 for even less!

Torsional rigidity

Assessing the shoe's overall construction, it seems like the Cloud X 4 was designed for freedom of movement as opposed to planted stability.

The X-shaped Speedboard inside the midsole hardly adds any stiffness to the shoe. Made of a pliable nylon blend, it allows the foot to bend in any direction.

Because of that, the Cloud X 4 gets the lowest torsional rigidity score of 1 out of 5.

Test results
Cloud X 4 1
Average 2.7
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

In its product description, the brand promises "excellent heel hold" but, unfortunately, we cannot subscribe to that statement.

Even though the X 4 added small TPU walls on the sides of the heel, they did not add much structure to the shoe's heel counter. It remains pretty forgiving and doesn't hold the rearfoot as firmly.

Rating the shoe's heel counter stiffness on a 1-5 scale, we gave it a lukewarm score of 3.

Test results
Cloud X 4 3
Average 2.7
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The platform of the Cloud X 4 is not particularly wide but it is on par with the average.

On Cloud X 4 Midsole width - forefoot

The widest part of the shoe's forefoot (where the lateral flange is) came in at a standard 112.5 mm.

Test results
Cloud X 4 112.5 mm
Average 110.6 mm
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
101.0 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
117.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel also showed a fairly standard measurement of 84.9 mm.

On Cloud X 4 Midsole width - heel

On a lighter note, these midsole dimensions still create a sufficiently wide base for light-to-moderate workouts.

Test results
Cloud X 4 84.9 mm
Average 87.3 mm
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
76.5 mm
Midsole width - heel
97.4 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

"Ultra-flexible" is how On positions the Cloud X 4. And that we can confirm.

According to our force gauge, it only took 10.5N to bend this trainer to a 90-degree angle. It is indeed one of the most flexible training shoes in our lab being 70% bendier than average.

It even got 46% more flexible than its predecessor!

On Cloud X 4 flexibility

Finally, we have something to praise the shoe for! It feels amazingly agreeable during lunges, mountain climbers, and planks.

Test results
Cloud X 4 10.5N
Average 17.8N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
4.3N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
37.9N

Weight

One thing you can't take away from On shoes - they are all light as clouds!

On Cloud X 4 Weight

Weighing the On Cloud X 4 in a men's US size 9, we were elated to see a whole ounce smaller than average at 9.5 oz (268g).

Paired with the shoe's highly flexible and breathable construction, it helps the Cloud X 4 disappear on the foot!

Test results
Cloud X 4 9.45 oz (268g)
Average 10.76 oz (305g)
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
6.38 oz (181g)
Weight
13.83 oz (392g)

Breathability

Stepping into the Cloud X 4, we were instantly pleased with the breezy sensation of its light and airy upper.

The shoe's fabric further amazed us in a smoke-pumping breathability test as it expelled all of the smoke in a matter of seconds!

We couldn't help but notice that the mesh received an update compared to the Cloud X 3 resulting in even better airflow.

On Cloud X 4 Breathability microscope test

We happily increased the breathability score of the X 4 to the maximum 5 out of 5.

On Cloud X 4 Breathability under microscope

Test results
Cloud X 4 5
Average 3.6
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

Like every On Cloud X shoe before it, the 4th iteration does not seem to add much upper protection.

In our 12-second Dremel test, the sandpaper tip ate through the toebox fabric nearly all the way through!

On Cloud X 4 Toebox durability test

Rating the shoe's toebox durability with a low score of 2, we wouldn't recommend wearing it for any sort of abrasive exercises like rope climbs.

Test results
Cloud X 4 2
Average 2.5
Compared to 30 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

We were also disappointed with the lack of wear resistance in the shoe's inner lining.

The fabric inside the shoe's heel counter was torn the very moment our Dremel touched it! And because it took less than 4 seconds to destroy it, we rated the heel padding durability with the lowest score of 1.

On Cloud X 4 Heel padding durability test
Test results
Cloud X 4 1
Average 2.5
Compared to 28 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

The high-wear areas of the On Cloud X 4 are lined with a fairly hard rubber compound.

On Cloud X 4 outsole

Measuring its hardness with a Shore C durometer, we got a standard reading of 80.0 HC. It is only slightly softer than average.

On Cloud X 4 Outsole hardness

Test results
Cloud X 4 80.0 HC
Average 83.0 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
71.0 HC
Outsole hardness
94.5 HC

Outsole durability

Unfortunately, the hardness of that rubber didn't help it sustain our 22-second Dremel test at 10K RPM speed.

The material started chipping off quickly like it was made of soft cheese! And we could already see that the dent was deeper than what we normally see in gym shoe outsoles.

On Cloud X 4 Outsole durability test

As the tread gauge showed 1.6 mm of damage, we had no doubt about it - the lifespan of this rubber outsole will be shorter than average.

Test results
Cloud X 4 1.6 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 26 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Even though the shoe's outsole is as thick as the average at 3.7 mm, it doesn't add much confidence because of how easily worn it is.

On Cloud X 4 Outsole thickness
Test results
Cloud X 4 3.7 mm
Average 3.6 mm
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
2.1 mm
Outsole thickness
5.1 mm

Misc

Price

Still overpriced...

Even considering all the benefits of this On Cloud shoe, we just can't recommend getting it at the full price knowing how many top-tier cross-trainers are offered at the same price point or even less!

On Cloud X 4 Price
Test results
Cloud X 4 $150
Average $122
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$150

Reflective elements

On made sure that others will see you wearing the Swiss shoe even in the dark.

The brand's logos on both the sides and the heels of the shoe are made of reflective material that shines in low-light conditions.

Test results
Cloud X 4 Yes

Tongue padding

The Cloud X 4 added more padding to the heel collar adding a touch of comfort in place of the previously thin and austere upper.

But the tongue of the X 4 remains just as minimally padded as its predecessor with only 4.1 mm of padding.

On Cloud X 4 Tongue padding
Test results
Cloud X 4 4.1 mm
Average 5.4 mm
Compared to 41 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Tongue padding
10.4 mm

Tongue: gusset type

Elastic gussets attach the shoe's tongue to the rest of the upper.

On Cloud X 4 Tongue: gusset type

They create a pretty secure foot containment together with the midfoot cage which is interconnected with the laces for a locked-in fit.

On Cloud X 4 midfoot cage

Test results
Cloud X 4 Both sides (semi)

Heel tab

There is no heel tab or finger loop at the back of the Cloud X 4.

On Cloud X 4 cloudtec

Test results
Cloud X 4 None

Removable insole

The shoe's stock insole is easy to remove but we didn't feel the need to swap it because of how padded and comfortably contoured it is.

On Cloud X 4 Removable insole
Test results
Cloud X 4 Yes

Sustainable materials

As part of the brand's sustainability commitment, the upper of the On Cloud X 4 is made with at least 90% recycled polyester.

On Cloud X 4 star lacing

Its yarn is also dope dyed which means that it's been colored through a process that requires 90% less water compared with standard dyeing techniques.