Our verdict

After a two-year gap filled with speculation that no update would appear, the HOKA Rocket X 3 finally launched. We tested it thoroughly and discovered a supershoe leaning heavily on durability and comfort, an unusual combo in this category. However, we believe the extra weight prevents it from delivering the max speed of today’s fastest racers, making it less ideal for those chasing every second.

Pros

  • Fantastic durability for being a supershoe
  • Responsive PEBA foam
  • Built to handle marathon distances
  • Rocker design promotes forward roll
  • Heel stack flirts with the 40-mm limit
  • Full-length, stiff carbon plate
  • Higher drop benefits heel strikers
  • Stable despite compact dimensions
  • Comfortable heel and tongue

Cons

  • Heavier than most competitors
  • Tight, tapered toebox
  • Aggressive rocker may not suit all runners
  • Doesn't feel as fast as we hoped

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

You’re the ideal runner for the HOKA Rocket X 3 if:

  • You’re a neutral runner seeking a dependable supershoe with standout durability.
  • Most supershoes feel too stripped down and you prefer added padding in the tongue and heel paired with a lively midsole.
  • You want a high-performing shoe for long runs and tempo workouts and don’t mind paying a bit extra compared to training-focused options.

HOKA Rocket X 3

Who should NOT buy

From our perspective, the main drawback of the Rocket X 3 is its weight. We believe lighter options such as the ASICS Metaspeed Sky Tokyo offer a faster racing experience. And for those who want the absolute lightest feel, the ASICS Metaspeed Ray is the perfect shoe.

We also think that the rocker geometry of the Rocket X 3 won’t suit everyone. After testing the shoe, we discovered that runners preferring a flatter midsole may struggle with its aggressive forward roll. For a more grounded and classic ride, the Nike Vaporfly 4 is much a safer bet. And it's way lighter too!

HOKA Rocket X 3 parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

This test is crucial to see if a shoe works well for half marathons, full marathons, and long runs.

Fortunately, the Rocket X 3 showed superior cushioning compared to the average, with 155 SA in the heel and 112 SA in the forefoot.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Rocket X 3 155 SA
Average 128 SA
Compared to 260 running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
170 SA

Energy return

New

It’s 2025 and HOKA still hasn’t given a flashy name to its PEBA foam. But that’s hardly the point, what matters is whether the foam has good energy return or not.

When we tested it with our machine, we discovered a strong showing with 73.9% rebound in the heel and 78.0% in the forefoot. The heel could be slightly springier, but the shoe still meets supershoe standards.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Rocket X 3 73.9%
Average 58.5%
Compared to 257 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
82.0%

Heel stack

The heel stack height nearly maxes out World Athletics regulations at 39.6 mm, standing just 0.4 mm under the limit required for a running shoe to be approved in official road races.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Heel stack
Test results
Rocket X 3 39.6 mm
Average 34.6 mm
Compared to 452 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

By contrast, the forefoot offers less cushioning, coming in just under the 30 mm mark at 29.6 mm. Still, that’s plenty for long distances and may even appeal to runners who prefer a more ground-connected ride.

This design also explains the significant gap in shock absorption we observed earlier between the heel and forefoot.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Forefoot stack
Test results
Rocket X 3 29.6 mm
Average 26.0 mm
Compared to 452 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
38.5 mm

Drop

It’s interesting to see HOKA shifting away from its usual low or medium drop designs. Traditionally, most of their shoes carried a 5 mm heel-to-toe offset, but the Rocket X 3 measures a true 10.0 mm (listed at 7 mm). Similarly, the Clifton 10 is now officially 8 mm, yet we measured 12.4 mm.

With this change, HOKA is clearly catering more to heel strikers than ever before, as well as to runners who simply prefer a midsole with greater incline.

Test results
Rocket X 3 10.0 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 452 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.2 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

This supershoe features a dual-density midsole made of two distinct layers of PEBA foam. The key layer, placed closer to the foot, measured 15.9 HA in our tests.

Because of this, the ride feels slightly softer than in the Rocket X 2, though the difference is subtle and noticeable only to very picky runners.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Midsole softness
Test results
Rocket X 3 15.9 HA
Average 20.6 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 378 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
36.1 HA

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The second layer measured nearly identical at 15.5 HA, meaning that even though it’s technically a dual-density midsole, it essentially feels like the same foam on both the top and bottom.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Secondary foam softness
Test results
Rocket X 3 15.5 HA
Average 23.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Rocker

Those who love rockered supershoes will be happy with the Rocket X 3. HOKA has built it with a highly-rockered geometry that helps you roll forward smoothly, making transitions easier and faster with less effort. But at the same time, this type of rocker is not for every runner.

While not as extreme as the Cielo X1 2.0, we found that the Rocket X 3 has a quick toe-off and the stride is really smooth.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Rocker

Plate

New

The Rocket X 3 carries over the design of its predecessor, featuring a full-length carbon plate with wings that add a touch of stability. This plate is sandwiched between the two aforementioned layers of responsive PEBA foam.

Its shape remains unchanged from the earlier version, keeping the familiar spoon design that begins in the midfoot and drives propulsion forward.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Plate

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

The Rocket X 2 had an extremely narrow fit that excluded many runners, and we hoped version 3 would feel more democratic in the toebox.

After we tested it, we discovered the Rocket X 3 is slightly more accommodating, yet still narrower than average. Its race-focused design gives a tight feel that some will enjoy, but others may find restrictive.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Width / Fit
Test results
Rocket X 3 92.0 mm
Average 95.2 mm
Compared to 207 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
102.4 mm

Toebox width

The taper is clear, with our measurements showing just 70.0 mm in the toebox. That’s even 0.8 mm less than in version 2, though this model maybe feels a hair wider.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Toebox width
Test results
Rocket X 3 70.0 mm
Average 73.4 mm
Compared to 207 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
82.4 mm

Toebox height

We tested the height of the toebox to complete the fit picture and discovered it measures 26.9 mm.

This number matches what many daily trainers deliver, offering a comfortable space.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Toebox height
Test results
Rocket X 3 26.9 mm
Average 27.2 mm
Compared to 206 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.4 mm
Toebox height
33.9 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

New

One of the standout features of the HOKA Rocket X 3 is its trustworthy grip, proven by a 0.57 score in our SATRA TM144 test. It provides top-tier traction in both dry and wet conditions with its new rubber compound.

Test results
Rocket X 3 0.57
Average 0.47
Compared to 251 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.83

Outsole design

New

The outsole of the Rocket X 3 stands out with a bit more rubber coverage than most supershoes. While this adds weight, runners using it mainly for training may value the durability and protection it provides.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

New

The Rocket X 3 shows significant longitudinal stiffness, measuring 21.3N at 30 degrees in our lab test. This results in a sharp, snappy ride that best suits runners who perform well with the strong presence of a carbon plate.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Rocket X 3 21.3N
Average 15.1N
Compared to 254 running shoes
Number of shoes
4.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

In our view, the weakest part of the Rocket X 3 is its heavy build. We understand it is a supershoe with extras like a padded tongue and thicker outsole rubber, yet the 7.75 oz (220g) weight feels excessive and clearly needs improvement.

The good part is that HOKA has time to address it, since the Rocket X 4 likely won’t appear until 2027 with their usual two-year cycle.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Weight
Test results
Rocket X 3 7.8 oz (220g)
Average 9.3 oz (265g)
Compared to 453 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.3 oz (149g)
Weight
12.6 oz (357g)

Breathability

When spending over 200 dollars on a shoe, we all expect a top-quality upper that delivers both performance and breathability. Fortunately, HOKA got it right with the Rocket X 3.

The engineered mesh upper is excellent. Ventilation is outstanding, earning a flawless 5 out of 5 in our test, which is impressive.

We also appreciated the clever design choices. Instead of relying on a single layer, HOKA placed reinforcements in key areas to balance stability, airflow, and lightweight construction.

HOKA Rocket X 3 mesh

Under our digital microscope, the upper impressed us even more. 

HOKA Rocket X 3 engineered mesh

It’s a paper-thin, precision-crafted material—exactly the kind of build we look for in a supershoe.

Inspecting the upper by hand, we discovered it has zero stretch. We also noticed generous heel padding—especially rare in a supershoe—adding an extra detail worth pointing out.

Test results
Rocket X 3 5
Average 3.7
Compared to 382 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

Despite its compact build, the Rocket X 3 stands out as one of the most stable supershoes available today. The carbon plate wings, raised midsole sidewalls, and reinforced upper combine to deliver a more supportive ride than most rivals.

Torsional rigidity

The plate of the Rocket X 3 isn’t forked like in other HOKA models, but it does have a forefoot gap that, together with the outsole cutout, gives it a 4/5 torsional rigidity—below the usual 5/5 for supershoes.

Test results
Rocket X 3 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 431 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

We also noticed that the heel counter stands out for runners who dislike ultra-pliable designs. Here, added structure and padding earn a 2/5 score, increasing weight but offering a trade-off some may appreciate.

Test results
Rocket X 3 2
Average 2.9
Compared to 415 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

We mentioned earlier the compact dimensions of this shoe, and the numbers back it up. At just 108.0 mm in the forefoot, it delivers sharp agility and gives you the sensation of having something truly fast on your feet.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Rocket X 3 108.0 mm
Average 114.4 mm
Compared to 453 running shoes
Number of shoes
100.8 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
127.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

Yet it's the heel which really made our eyebrows go as high as possible. We registered just 76.5 mm, which is really low and makes it one of the most aggressive heels we've measured in the lab. And while it does not make the shoe fully unusable for heel strikers due to the supportive features that it has, we really think that it's a shoe only meant for neutral runners.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Rocket X 3 76.5 mm
Average 90.8 mm
Compared to 453 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

The upper left us impressed. Paper-thin materials like this usually collapse instantly under our Dremel, but in this case, we measured a solid 3/5 score in our demanding durability test.

Test results
Rocket X 3 3
Average 2.6
Compared to 316 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding also delivered a strong result with a 4 out of 5. This is especially impressive given that it’s one of the few supershoes featuring thicker padding and added comfort in this area.

Test results
Rocket X 3 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 310 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

Moving to the outsole, the Rocket X 3 closed our durability tests on a high note with a solid 0.9 mm result. While close to the average and not record-breaking, it’s quite impressive for a supershoe with good traction.

Test results
Rocket X 3 0.9 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 294 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

To play it safe, HOKA added 2.4 mm of rubber thickness. That’s quite a lot—similar to many tempo shoes—and it fully explains why this model feels heavier than most of its competitors.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Outsole thickness
Test results
Rocket X 3 2.4 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 449 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.9 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

HOKA chose a slim 3.4 mm insole to maximize cushioning underfoot while still meeting World Athletics regulations.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Insole thickness
Test results
Rocket X 3 3.4 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 448 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.8 mm

Removable insole

The thin stock insole is removable, but be aware that the toebox isn’t very spacious. Swapping in a different insole could take up too much room and compromise comfort.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Removable insole
Test results
Rocket X 3 Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

In our lab tests, the PEBA foam managed cold conditions impressively. After a 20-minute stay in the freezer, it returned only 3% firmer.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Rocket X 3 3%
Average 25%
Compared to 377 running shoes
Number of shoes
1%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Reflective elements

The Rocket X 3 doesn’t include any reflective elements, and to be honest, that’s not surprising.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Reflective elements
Test results
Rocket X 3 No

Tongue padding

The Rocket X 3 uses a traditional lacing system with reinforced eyelets for durability and a secure lockdown. The flat laces feature a textured finish that helps them stay tied and add a premium touch to the shoe.

HOKA Rocket X 3 laces

Just like in the heel with its extra padding compared to other supershoes, we found the same approach here. Instead of the usual 1 or 1.5 mm from rivals like the Saucony Endorphin Elite 2, HOKA added 3.1 mm, boosting instep comfort significantly. It's perfect for those willing to trade a bit of weight for comfort.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Tongue padding
Test results
Rocket X 3 3.1 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 450 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue can shift slightly since it lacks a semi-gusseted or gusseted design. However, this isn’t a deal-breaker, especially as most supershoe rivals use a similar setup.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Rocket X 3 None

Price

The HOKA Rocket X 3 is not an exceptional bargain, but it's not overpriced against other supershoes. It’s nice to see no price hike too, though it's true that the shoe lacks major tech updates to justify one.

Test results
Rocket X 3 $250
Average $150
Compared to 453 running shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$290

Heel tab

The Rocket X 3 features HOKA’s signature extended heel collar, making it easy to grab and slip on.

HOKA Rocket X 3 Heel tab
Test results
Rocket X 3 Extended heel collar