Nuestra conclusión

The Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX holds a prominent place in our top picks as a comfort-oriented day hiking boot. We felt spoiled by its abundant cushioning and chunky platform which not only offered lasting support on the trail but also minimized leg fatigue post-hike. Not to mention the highly effective Gore-Tex waterproofing which makes the Anacapa a solid three-season boot. As long as you stick to the less technical trails, this Hoka boot will make the switchback feel like home.

Pros

  • Well-cushioned for long miles
  • Very comfortable step-in feel
  • Highly stable platform
  • Excellent waterproofing
  • Solid grip, even on wet terrain
  • More flexible than other boots
  • Decent durability for moderate hikes
  • A lot of sustainable components

Contras

  • Extended heel catches rocks
  • Not for technical terrain
  • Gained 2 ounces

Veredicto de los usuarios

N/A
Aún no hay suficientes opiniones

Who should buy

The Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX is a match made in shoe heaven if you are looking for the following:

  • a comfort-loaded and generously cushioned day hiking boot
  • a boot for maintained and moderately challenging trails
  • a waterproof three-season boot

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX review

Who should NOT buy

If you want a boot that can accompany you on an epic off-trail adventure, the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX is the wrong option. You will need a less cushy, more supportive, and more durable boot like the Salomon X Ultra 4 Mid GTX or the La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II Mid GTX.

The aforementioned boots also do better on technical terrain as they don't feel as cumbersome when the trail calls for precise foot placement. There are no extended SwallowTail heels which tend to get caught in between the rocks.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX lab test

Amortiguación

Altura de la suela en la zona del talón

The Anacapa 2 Mid GTX gave us that thick-foamed goodness we've come to expect from Hoka.

With a heel stack of 34.4 mm, we found the boot to be on par with the category average resulting in excellent impact protection on the trail. The foam muted out the small rocks and roots and left our feet fatigue-free even after several hours of hiking.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Heel stack

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 34.4 mm
Media 36.4 mm
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
26.2 mm
Altura de la suela en la zona del talón
46.9 mm

Altura de la suela en el antepié

The balls of our feet felt equally well-protected with a generous forefoot stack of 25.4 mm which actualy exceeds the average of hiking boots!

Covering long stretches of hard-packed terrain felt smooth and effortless thanks to all the foam provided by the Anacapa. The boot felt a lot like a mid-cut Hoka running shoe with a trail-adapted outsole.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Forefoot stack
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 25.4 mm
Media 22.6 mm
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
17.0 mm
Altura de la suela en el antepié
30.7 mm

Drop

The boot's heel-to-toe drop felt moderate and unintrusive. Even though our measurements showed 9 mm instead of the claimed 7 mm, we hardly felt any difference.

It is an optimal offset for both beginner and seasoned hikers with light-to-moderate backpack loads.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Drop
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 9.0 mm
Media 13.8 mm
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
2.6 mm
Drop
20.9 mm

Suavidad de la mediasuela

Hoka introduces a more environmentally-friendly sugarcane EVA foam in the Anacapa 2.

We couldn't help but notice that the new foam was notably firmer than the compound used in the original boot and our durometer measurements confirmed it!

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Midsole softness

The HA reading of 30.0 raised our eyebrows as the new EVA proved to be 33% firmer than the old blend! It should be noted, however, that the Anacapa 2 still offers a well-cushioned ride but it seems to have traded plushness for bounciness.

Even though Hoka marks the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX's cushioning as "balanced," it sits closer to the firm boots by our standards.

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 30.0 HA
Media 27.8 HA
Utilizamos la media de cuatro pruebas. La foto muestra una de esas pruebas.
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
15.4 HA
Suavidad de la mediasuela (de blanda a firme)
53.3 HA

Rigidez de la mediasuela en frío (%)

We also found that the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX gains some firmness in low temperatures.

After 20 mins of sitting in the freezer, the boot's midsole foam showed a 20% increase in firmness. So please keep in mind that this Hoka boot won't have the same level of underfoot compression first thing in the morning (if you take it on a multi-day trip) or after several hours of hiking in temperatures below 30°F (0°C).

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Midsole softness in cold (%)
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 20%
Media 18%
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
4%
Rigidez de la mediasuela en frío
50%

Grosor de la plantilla

Measuring the boot's insole thickness with a caliper, we found no deviations from the average. At 5.9 mm in the heel, it has the same thickness as most other hiking boot insoles which makes it much easier to swap for another one.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Insole thickness
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 5.9 mm
Media 6.2 mm
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
3.7 mm
Grosor de la plantilla
8.0 mm

SwallowTail heel

The Anacapa's midsole comfort is amplified by the brand's proprietary SwallowTail design. Acting as a heel bevel, it made our gait feel smooth and effortless by quiklcy turning cushioned landings into toe-offs.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX SwallowTail heel

The extended heel worked wonders on hard-packed terrain but it felt too exsessive on rock-heavy trails and descents. It repeatedly kept getting caught in between the rocks!

Tallaje y ajuste

Talla

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX tallan bien (24 votos).

Si tienes estas zapatillas, ¿qué opinas de su talla?

1 talla más pequeñas ½ talla más pequeñas Tallan bien ½ talla más grandes 1 talla más grandes
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
½ talla más pequeñas
Tallan un poquito pequeño
Tallan bien
Tallan un poquito grande
½ talla más grandes

Estabilidad

Prueba de estabilidad lateral

We experienced a decent level of lateral stability in the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX. But it was more thanks its wide and cradle-like midsole design and not so much because of the tall collar. So if you don't wannt to pay more for the added collar height (and extended wtaerproofing), you might as well get the low-cut Anacapa 2 version.

Sure, the boot's collar is very well-padded and feels cozy around the heel and ankle but it's not the same level of support as you would find in sturdier boots like the Salomon X Ultra 4 Mid GTX or Hoka's very own Kaha 2 GTX.

But we can't really complain as the Anacapa 2 has plenty of stability for light-to-moderate terrain and a mid-weight backpack (te type of hikes it was designed for in the first place).

Rigidez torsional

Hoka categorizes the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX as a neutral hiking boot which implies no added stability components to support a hiker with overpronation.

And yet, this Hoka boot has a good deal of inherent stability thanks to its wide and not-so-plush midsole, raised sidewalls, and thick leather overlays. Assessing it's torsional rigidity on a 1-5 scale (where 5 is the stiffest), we didn't hesistate to give it a high score of 4.

We believe that there is enough support for someone with mild overpronation.

What's more,​​ the Anacapa carries a Seal of Acceptance from the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) which aknowledges its design as beneficial to foot health.

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 4
Media 4.3
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
1
Rigidez torsional
5

Rigidez del contrafuerte del talón

Designing the rearfoot of the Anacapa 2 boot, Hoka clearly put comfort first. Its ankle collar is loaded with padding (aka Achilles heel comfort build) and the heel counter has a lot of give to it.

Pushing and squeezing the latter in our manual test, we couldn't rate the heel counter stiffness any higher than 3 out of 5. But even though its not as stiff as the average, it's not too forgiving to be floppy either.

Again, the stiffness is just enough to feel supportive on non-technical, mainly even terrain.

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 3
Media 3.6
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
1
Rigidez del contrafuerte del talón
5

Anchura de la mediasuela - antepié

It wouldn't be a Hoka boot if it wasn't wide and chunky!

Measuring the widest part of the Anacapa's midsole in the forefoot, our caliper showed an above-average reading of 115.9 mm. It is a few milimeters wider than the previous version and is also some of the widest in our hiking boot roster.

If you haven't tried any Hoka shoes before, expect to feel like you are sitting on a bigger platform in the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Midsole width - forefoot
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 115.9 mm
Media 111.9 mm
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
96.3 mm
Anchura de la mediasuela - antepié
124.6 mm

Anchura de la mediasuela - talón

Quite expectedly, the heel of the Anacapa also proved to be wider than the average at 93.4 in the widest part. With so much platform to land on, we felt immensely stable and surefooted on the hilly stretches.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Midsole width - heel

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 93.4 mm
Media 87.4 mm
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
71.7 mm
Anchura de la mediasuela - talón
97.5 mm

Flexibilidad / Rigidez

Considering the bulk and cushioning of this Hoka boot, we were surprised at how much flex we got out of it!

It took less force to bend the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX to a 90-degree angle than it normally takes a hiking boot. Our force gauge showed 35.4N which is in fact closer to the average of hiking shoes than boots.

The boot's flexibility was especially pronounced on steeper ascents when we had to tip-toe our way up.

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 35.4N
Media 44.1N
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
16.6N
Flexibilidad <> Rigidez
84.7N

Rigidez en frío (%)

But do expect a drop in flexibility once the temperatures fall to 30°F (0°C) and below.

When we repeated the force gauge measurement after our 20-minute freezer test, the boot required 30% more force to bend than it did at room temperature.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Stiffness in cold (%)
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 30%
Media 25%
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
3%
Rigidez en frío
81%

Peso

We expected the new edition of the Anacapa to be just as light as its predecessor but, to our surprise, the boy has put on some weight! Even the brand's official specs state 16 oz for the first iteration and 18 oz for the second one.

Our own scale confirmed this showing 17.4 oz (494g) for the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX which is exactly 2 oz heavier than the v1. And the trick is, we don't see any additional components that could contribute to the weight. Could it be the heavier nature of the new sustainable materials?

On a lighter note, the extra 2 oz only made the boot weigh more like an average hiking boot. We didn't really feel more fatigued or dragged down by the weight of the new iteration. 

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 17.43 oz (494g)
Media 18.87 oz (535g)
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
11.71 oz (332g)
Peso
28.29 oz (802g)

Transpirabilidad

Quite expectedly, the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX proved to be 100% airtight in our breathability tests. As a waterproof hiking boot with the most renowned Gore-Tex membrane, its toebox didn't let out even a tiny streak of vapor in our smoke-pumping machine test.

But please note that the synthetic fabric covering the upper of the Anacapa 2 is significantly less tightly woven than the textile on the v1. The difference is obvious to the naked eye but you can see it more clearly in our microscope shots below.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX vs 1 Mid GTX upper fabric

That's why you can see the light shining through the pores in our transparency test too. But don't worry, the water doesn't seep through these apertures because on the inside, the boot is still lined with the GTX membrane.

Despite the pores, the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX makes for a pretty toasty boot for temperatures above 70°F (20°C). In our opinion, this Hoka boot is most suitable for spring and fall weather.

For summertime, you can consider the Hoka Anacapa Breeze Mid - a non-waterproof version of the boot.

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 1
Media 1.4
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
1
Transpirabilidad
5

Waterproofing

Having tested the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX in puddles and forest streams, we are happy to confirm its excellent waterproofing. Gore-Tex never disappoints in that regard.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX waterproof

But here is the caveat - the membrane doesn't go all the way up the boot's collar so it's better to avoid hiking through water or snow that's deeper than your ankle. Because if the moisture spills over the collar, it's going to keep the interiors wet the entire hike. Especially given that the collar is cut very low at the back.

The green material on the inside is the GTX waterproofing.

Durabilidad

Durabilidad de la parte delantera

It was very smart of Hoka to enlarge the protective toebox overlay in the Anacapa 2. Covering a bigger area, it keeps the textile safe from sharp bushes and rocky ridges.

But even though the v2 saw an improvement in wear resistsnce, it still falls behind most hiking boots. Thus, we bumped up its toebox durability score to only 2 out of 5.

Luckily, it shouldn't be a problem if you stick to the more maintained trails (what the Anacapa is meant for in the first place).

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX vs 1 Mid GTX toebox durability

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 2
Media 4.3
En comparación con 28 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
1
Durabilidad de la parte delantera
5

Durabilidad del acolchado del talón

The boot's inner lining also received a step-up in quality which, in turn, showed better durability in our Dremel test.

In the first iteration of the Anacapa, our sandpaper left a masive hole in the heel padding in less than 4 seconds! Meanwhile, the v2 stood up to the challenge and showed only moderate damage.

Thus, the heel padding durability score jumped from 2 to 3 in the new Anacapa. It means that frequent on-and-offs won't destroy the boot's inner lining as quickly.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX vs, 1 Mid GTX heel padding durability

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 3
Media 3.8
En comparación con 28 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
1
Durabilidad del acolchado del talón
5

Dureza de la suela

Not much has changed in the outsole of the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX. The boot still employs Vibram rubber and it works.

Our durometer recorded no difference in hardness over the previous iteration. The HC measurement is still at 85.5 HC which is a tiny bit softer than average.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Outsole hardness
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 85.5 HC
Media 87.5 HC
Utilizamos la media de cuatro pruebas. La foto muestra una de esas pruebas.
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
81.0 HC
Dureza de la suela
92.1 HC

Durabilidad de la suela

Putting the boot's rubber through our most abrasive Dremel test (drilling at 10K RPM speed for 18 seconds), we took note of the compound's decent wear resistance.

Our tread gauge recorded 1.0 mm of damage which is just a little deeper than average. But that's not enough to call the Anacapa out for having a frail outsole.

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 1.0 mm
Media 0.8 mm
En comparación con 25 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
0.0 mm
Desgaste de la suela
2.0 mm

Grosor de la suela

To complete the picture, we also measured the boot's rubber thickness with a caliper (lugs excluded). At 2.8 mm, the base rubber layer turned out to be no thinner than the average which is a bonus point for durability.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Outsole thickness

Overall, we would describe the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX's outsole durability as good enough. It is not the most heavy-duty outdoor boot but it has solid longevity for less demanding hikes on manicured trails.

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 2.8 mm
Media 3.0 mm
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
1.8 mm
Grosor de la suela
5.6 mm

Varios

Profundidad del dibujo de la suela

Measuring the Anacapa 2's lug depth, Our caliper returned an above-average reading of 5.0. It is a pretty aggressive treading that offers some serious breaking and gripping power.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Lug depth

We also found the boot's Vibram Megagrip pattern to be confidence-inspiring on slippery descents, mossy ascents, and and wet rocks under the mountain stream!

But despite the lug depth, we wouldn't recommend this Hoka boot for extra muddy and boggy conditions because its max-cushioned midsole detracts from the ground feel and stability.

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 5.0 mm
Media 4.2 mm
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
3.0 mm
Profundidad del dibujo de la suela
5.8 mm

Precio

Even with a 5% price hike, the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX is still priced slightly below the average of hiking boots. But for its own kind, the boot might be a little too pricey because there are cheaper but equally well-cushioned day hiking boots for light-to-moderate terrain. Think Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX for example.

Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX $195
En comparación con 34 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
€120
Precio
€360

Elementos reflectantes

None of the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX's components are reflective.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Reflective elements
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX No

Acolchado de la lengüeta

The boot's shoestrings are rather stiff and thin but we never experienced lace bites thanks to the generously padded tongue. It packs as much as 11.3 mm of foam!

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Tongue padding
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX 11.3 mm
Media 10.9 mm
En comparación con 32 botas de senderismo
Número de zapatillas
5.9 mm
Acolchado de la lengüeta
15.0 mm

Lengüeta: tipo de refuerzo

The Anacapa features a fully-gusseted tongue which closes the side gaps preventing water and snow from seeping in. But in addition to waterproofing, these gussets also create a pretty secure lockdown.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Tongue: gusset type
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Ambos lados (completo)

Tirador del talón

A very large finger loop is connected to the lip on the boot's collar making the on-and-off action pretty quick and effortless.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Heel tab
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Tirador de dedo

Plantilla extraíble

The boot's insole is removable and can be replaced with an aftermarket insole or orthotic of your choice.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX Removable insole
Resultados de las pruebas
Anacapa 2 Mid GTX

Sustainable materials

Hoka earns karma points for moving away from the petroleum-based materials and introducing more sustainable components in its newer releases.

The first Anacapa Mid GTX already featured recycled polyester in its upper textile and soybean oil in its sockliner (50%). The second iteration, however, takes sustainability even further by using ethically-sourced materials in even more of its components:

  • EVA midsole: 30% sugarcane
  • Sockliner: 50% soybean-based
  • GTX bootie: 71% recycled polyester face fabric
  • Vamp and quarter mesh: 100% recycled polyester
  • Collar and tongue lining mesh: 100% recycled polyester
  • External collar and tongue mesh: 88% recycled polyester
  • Laces: 100% recycled polyester

What's more, the boot's upper overlays are made of Gold-Rated nubuck leather which is the Leather Working Group's top designation. 

Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX fit