Our verdict

The Brooks Ghost 16 marks a subtle yet positive evolution in the series—particularly beneficial for heel strikers seeking a reliable everyday shoe. We were impressed by the enhancements in cushioning and stability, and we really liked the spacious toebox and durable outsole, proving its value during our lab tests. Although there's still room for improvement on our list, we've determined that the Ghost continues to be one of the best value daily trainers on the market for yet another year.

Pros

  • Dependable
  • Spacious toebox
  • Optimal for heel strikers
  • Long-lasting outsole
  • Great stability
  • Improved energy return
  • Versatile for multiple activities
  • Maintains affordable price

Cons

  • Tongue not gusseted
  • Stiff heel counter
  • Low toebox volume

Audience verdict

85
Good!
  • Top 6% most popular running shoes

Who should buy

We've discovered in the lab that the Ghost 16 from Brooks is a fantastic choice. Here's why:

  • Loyal Ghost series enthusiasts who purchase the model every one or two years will find the v16 really familiar yet enhanced.
  • Heel strikers looking for a high-drop workhorse for daily runs and a variety of other activities will appreciate the design and flexibility of this model.
  • Runners who were not satisfied with the Ghost 15 due to lack of energy return will be pleased with the new DNA Loft v3 foam, which provides a significant boost in performance.

Brooks Ghost 16

Who should NOT buy

We've tested the Ghost 16 extensively in our lab and found that its substantial heel-to-toe drop may not suit everyone—especially forefoot strikers who might find it limiting during their runs.

From our perspective, midfoot strikers might also find themselves on the edge, as the design doesn't cater particularly well to their needs either. We believe both types of runners would benefit more from exploring mid-drop options like the Nike Vomero 17 or the Saucony Ride 17, which offer a more balanced experience.

Brooks Ghost 16 parts

Furthermore, while we love that the Ghost 16 is a remarkably reliable shoe, it lacks a bit of the excitement that some runners seek in a modern daily trainer. In our experience, if you're looking for a shoe that prioritizes fun over pure functionality, you might want to consider the ASICS Novablast 4 or the Hoka Mach 6.

Breathability

At first glance, the engineered mesh upper of the Brooks Ghost 16 appears highly breathable, featuring large ventilation holes throughout the toebox. To confirm its performance, we conducted many tests, starting with our smoke-pumping machine.

Our findings were positive, with the shoe scoring 4/5—our preferred rating for daily trainers. While those in extremely humid and hot climates—like the Philippines or Miami—may prefer a shoe with 5-out-of-5 ventilation, the Ghost 16's airflow makes it suitable for nearly all conditions.

Following the smoke test, we examined the structure of the upper with our light. The design strategy by Brooks is evident: a well-ventilated toebox combined with thicker sides to enhance both stability and ventilation.

Brooks Ghost 16 microscope 1

We then inspected the ventilation holes under a microscope, capturing stunning images as usual.

Brooks Ghost 16 microscope

We discovered a classic engineered mesh that allows air to flow every few millimeters. And although a secondary layer slightly restricts airflow, it enhances overall comfort and should boost durability.

Overall, we are pleased with this upper. It may not excel in any one area, but it's a great all-rounder and is free from any significant issues, aligning well with what we expect from the Ghost series.

Test results
Ghost 16 4
Average 3.8
Compared to 263 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

One concern with punched ventilation holes is their potential to compromise durability, and the Ghost 16 packs a bunch of them.

Despite our initial skepticism, when we tested the Ghost 16 with the Dremel, it performed well, earning a solid 3/5 in our assessment.

Brooks Ghost 16 Toebox durability
Test results
Ghost 16 3
Average 2.5
Compared to 197 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

A significant concern for many runners is the Achilles padding in their brand-new shoes.

In our lab, the Ghost 16's Achilles area underwent a second Dremel test and scored a nice 4/5. Based on our experience, it's highly unlikely that runners will experience premature wear in this regard.

Brooks Ghost 16 Heel padding durability
Test results
Ghost 16 4
Average 3.3
Compared to 193 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

We've already established that the upper is durable and well-ventilated, but for this shoe to truly be a workhorse, the outsole must also perform. Does it deliver?

Brooks Ghost 16 outsole
The updates to the outsole are subtle, maintaining extensive coverage and featuring multiple cutouts to enhance flexibility and water drainage. Brooks calls it Segmented Crash Pad.

To find out, we tested the hardness of the rubber. Unsurprisingly, the Ghost 16 is just average with a rating of 80.9 HC, demonstrating its straightforward, no-frills approach. And we also found traction to be adequate in both roads and dirt paths.

Brooks Ghost 16 Outsole hardness
Test results
Ghost 16 80.9 HC
Average 80.0 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 314 running shoes
Number of shoes
52.1 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

Eager to determine the resilience of this average rubber, we conducted a third Dremel test to assess its wear resistance.

We were pleased to find that the rubber used by Brooks held up exceptionally well, showing a minimal indentation of only 0.7 mm.

Brooks Ghost 16 Outsole durability
Test results
Ghost 16 0.7 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 175 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

To conclude our analysis of the outsole, we utilized our vernier caliper to measure the thickness of the rubber.

Brooks Ghost 16 outsole rubber

We discovered a thickness of 4.1 mm, which seems excessive to us. Even for those surpassing 600 or 700 miles in these shoes, we think there will be plenty of rubber left.

In fact, for the v17, we suggest that Brooks could reduce the thickness by at least 1 mm to make the Ghost lighter without any significant drawbacks.

Brooks Ghost 16 Outsole thickness
Test results
Ghost 16 4.1 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 333 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.6 mm

Weight

Fortunately, despite its thick outsole rubber, weight isn't an issue with this shoe. At just 9.4 oz or 266g, we consider it an ideal weight for a daily trainer. And it's 0.4 oz lighter than its predecessor.

On the other hand, less weight is always a plus if it doesn't compromise durability. And while we are quite pleased with this outcome, we think that a sub-9-oz Ghost would be simply amazing.

Brooks Ghost 16 Weight
Test results
Ghost 16 9.38 oz (266g)
Average 9.35 oz (265g)
Compared to 334 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.26 oz (149g)
Weight
12.56 oz (356g)

Cushioning

Heel stack

The Ghost 16 stands apart from the recent trend of maximalist running shoes and maintains a very similar stack height to the previous models.

Its 35.1 mm stack height provides ample cushioning for almost everyone, except perhaps those with a heavier build.

Brooks Ghost 16 Heel stack
Test results
Ghost 16 35.1 mm
Average 33.9 mm
Compared to 333 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

In the forefoot, our measurements revealed a modest 22.8 mm stack height, which provides substantial ground feel during runs—take it or leave it.

From our tests, the Ghost 16 performs well for midfoot and forefoot strikers on short and easy runs. However, during longer runs, the cushioning might prove insufficient for all but the lightest of runners.

For those concerned about forefoot cushioning, we recommend considering the Hoka Clifton 9, which offers an additional 4 mm in this area at a similar price point.

Brooks Ghost 16 Forefoot stack
Test results
Ghost 16 22.7 mm
Average 25.3 mm
Compared to 333 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

The Ghost has long been the go-to high-drop daily trainer, and Brooks has no plans to alter this, knowing well that a change would disappoint its legion of loyal customers.

We measured a 12.4 mm drop from heel to toe, which is significant. This design particularly benefits heel strikers and those who often have calf issues. However, we believe it may be excessive for runners who strike the ground more forward.

Brooks Ghost 16 Drop
Test results
Ghost 16 12.4 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 333 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.8 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Insole thickness

We measured the insole of the Ghost 16 and found it boasts a thickness of 5.0 mm, a minor increase from the previous model's 4.5 mm.

Brooks Ghost 16 Insole thickness
Test results
Ghost 16 5.0 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 329 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Last year, we expressed disappointment that Brooks continued using their older DNA Loft v2 in the Ghost series, despite having the more advanced DNA Loft v3 at their disposal, which offers enhanced bounce and responsiveness.

Fortunately, with the Ghost 16, Brooks has upgraded to the latest DNA Loft v3 foam. This new formulation, with its nitrogen-injected manufacturing process, delivers increased energy return and reduces weight compared to standard EVA.

Brooks Ghost 16 DNA Loft

We also put the midsole to the test using our Shore A durometer after cutting the shoe in half. The results showed a balanced 21.6 HA, which strikes a perfect middle ground—not too plush, yet not overly firm either.

Brooks Ghost 16 Midsole softness
Test results
Ghost 16 21.6 HA
Average 21.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 261 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
41.5 HA

Difference in midsole softness in cold

DNA Loft v3 offers several enhancements over DNA Loft v2, including significantly improved performance in cold temperatures. In our lab tests, the Ghost 16 only became 16.2% firmer after spending 20 minutes in the freezer, compared to the 54.4% hardening observed in the v15.

Brooks Ghost 16 Difference in midsole softness in cold
Test results
Ghost 16 16.2%
Average 25.2%
Compared to 260 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Difference in midsole softness in cold
100%

Stability

Lateral stability test

While it lacks specific support elements and it's a neutral shoe, Brooks has designed the Ghost 16 with some mild stability features such as reinforced sidewalls, a thin forefoot, and a stiff heel counter.

These additions make it suitable for light pronators who require just a hint of support, and that's why we believe Brooks is not offering a GTS version in this series like they do with the Glycerin or Adrenaline.

Torsional rigidity

We found that the Ghost 16 offers a balanced level of torsional rigidity. It's not ultra-flexible like a Vapor Glove 6, nor is it as stiff as an ASICS Superblast 2. This moderate flexibility aligns perfectly with its role as a daily trainer, providing just the right amount of support and adaptability for everyday use.

Test results
Ghost 16 3
Average 3.3
Compared to 312 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

We discovered that the stiffness of the heel counter is similar to those found in stability shoes with a 5/5, offering impressive firmness and better suited for heel strikers as it helps guide the feet straight.

Fortunately, Brooks has generously padded this area to prevent irritation commonly associated with ultra-rigid heel counters. Otherwise it would have been a real dealbreaker for us.

Test results
Ghost 16 5
Average 2.8
Compared to 296 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width in the forefoot

We used our calipers to measure the dimensions of the shoe, starting with the forefoot.

Our findings indicate that Brooks continues to embrace a conventional approach, keeping the Ghost firmly within the average range. The forefoot measures 115.0 mm at its widest point, exemplifying a classic, risk-averse strategy for a standard shoe like no other.

Brooks Ghost 16 Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
Ghost 16 115.0 mm
Average 113.9 mm
Compared to 334 running shoes
Number of shoes
100.5 mm
Midsole width in the forefoot
127.9 mm

Midsole width in the heel

We then measured the heel, and we found a width of 94.7 mm—quite wide and logically designed.

Considering the shoe's high drop and super-stiff heel counter, a wider rearfoot area makes sense. This design choice again benefits heel strikers, aligning well with the typical needs of a classic Ghost runner.

Brooks Ghost 16 Midsole width in the heel
Test results
Ghost 16 94.7 mm
Average 90.6 mm
Compared to 334 running shoes
Number of shoes
74.9 mm
Midsole width in the heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

During our testing in the lab, when we flexed the shoe up to 90 degrees, it showcased excellent flexibility, requiring just 13.6N to bend.

We found that this is perfect for those who value a natural foot feel and for everyday activities such as walking or hitting the gym. Additionally, the Ghost 16 excels as a travel companion, perfectly suited for both city tours and morning runs.

Test results
Ghost 16 13.6N
Average 28.8N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 316 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Stiffness
94.4N

Size and fit

Toebox width at the widest part

From our perspective, after testing many hundreds of shoes, we've noted a clear trend towards designing roomier running shoes—and we celebrate it. The Ghost 16 stands out as a superb example, measuring exactly 100.0 mm across the widest part of the upper, a noticeable increase from the 96.8 mm of its predecessor.

Brooks Ghost 16 wider

While a difference of 3.2 mm might not seem substantial, it can significantly enhance comfort especially during long runs. Yet we still need to conduct an additional measurement in the toebox to fully assess this improvement!

Brooks Ghost 16 Toebox width at the widest part
Test results
Ghost 16 100.0 mm
Average 98.4 mm
Compared to 334 running shoes
Number of shoes
89.5 mm
Toebox width at the widest part
109.1 mm

Toebox width at the big toe

Our second measurement is crucial for understanding the room inside the toebox, as a very tapered design can compromise comfort. Fortunately, this isn't an issue with the Ghost 16, which offers a generous 79.4 mm in the big toe area.

What we found slightly concerning is the toebox volume—the upper sits rather low, which might cause some pressure for certain runners. Although this shouldn't be a dealbreaker for most, those who frequently encounter this issue might want to consider a shoe with a higher volume upper, like the Adidas Supernova Rise.

Brooks Ghost 16 Toebox width at the big toe
Test results
Ghost 16 79.4 mm
Average 78.3 mm
Compared to 208 running shoes
Number of shoes
60.4 mm
Toebox width at the big toe
92.5 mm

Tongue: gusset type

In our Ghost 15 review, we expressed a strong desire for Brooks to integrate a gusseted tongue in the 16th edition, pinpointing it as one of the few shortcomings. Unfortunately, we will have to wait another year, as we discovered that the tongue in the Ghost 16 still moves freely.

Brooks Ghost 16 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Ghost 16 None

Comfort

Tongue padding

The tongue of the Ghost 16 is a dream come true for those who appreciate a fluffy, plush instep area. We measured a generous 10.4 mm of foam from a single slab, a feature more commonly found in pricier daily trainers than in a $140 workhorse.

Brooks Ghost 16 tongue area

We also discovered that Brooks embraced a no-risk strategy with the lacing system—simple punched eyelets. In our view, this is the ideal approach for a daily trainer, as it's straightforward and effective. There's no need to reinveint the wheel here!

Brooks Ghost 16 Tongue padding
Test results
Ghost 16 10.4 mm
Average 5.7 mm
Compared to 331 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Heel tab

If there were a heel-tab-to-shoe ratio, Brooks would score super low, as heel tabs are rare in their road training shoes—though it's true that their trail models, like the Cascadia 17, often include them.

True to its design, the Ghost 16 mirrors its predecessor with a simple heel area devoid of a finger loop tab. While not a major oversight, having one would certainly make it easier to slip the shoe on.

Brooks Ghost 16 Heel tab
Test results
Ghost 16 None

Removable insole

We found that the insole is pretty basic and not glued to the last, allowing you to easily swap it with aftermarket orthotics if necessary.

Brooks Ghost 16 Removable insole
Test results
Ghost 16 Yes

Misc

Reflective elements

We love running shoes with 360-reflectivity, but we admit that's rare. Because of that, we are usually happy if we get reflective elements on the heel. It's the main spot for increasing safety, allowing the shoes to glow in the dark to cars and motorbikes coming from behind.

The Ghost 16 ticks this box and earns our seal of approval for night runs.

Test results
Ghost 16 Yes