Our verdict

The Caldera 8 looks like a max-stack shoe, but it falls short of that promise. It offers only moderate cushioning, and we think it needs more foam underfoot to truly separate itself inside the Brooks lineup. On our runs, the shoe kept the same stable ride and excellent lockdown from previous versions, with dependable grip and a smooth feel, but it also remained heavy and bulky. Overall, it’s a small update from version 7 that works for now as it keeps the same price, but the next model really needs a full redesign rather than a handful of minor tweaks.

Pros

  • Outstanding stability
  • Comfortable, smooth ride
  • Versatile on easy and moderate terrain
  • Secure, reliable lockdown
  • Fair and reasonable price
  • Dependable traction
  • Cleaner, more refined look

Cons

  • Still heavy
  • Needs more cushioning
  • Bulky, overly wide heel
  • Only for slow paces

Who should buy

The Brooks Caldera 8 could be your next pick if you:

  • Are looking for a trail shoe with standout stability and a comfortable ride.
  • Enjoyed the Caldera 7 and want a familiar-feeling successor with only small, safe tweaks.
  • Need a versatile trail option with dependable traction for easy and moderate terrain.

Brooks Caldera 8

Who should NOT buy

We believe the Caldera 8 is not the best choice if you want a true max-cushion experience. We found in the lab that its shock absorption and stack height fall short, and from our data, options like the HOKA Mafate 5 or ASICS Trabuco Max 4 offer a more cushioned ride.

We also think it’s not ideal for runners with wide feet. After testing, we discovered that the toebox lacks the roomy space needed for natural toe splay, and we believe the Altra Olympus 6 or Topo Ultraventure 4 are better picks in that case.

Brooks Caldera 8 parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

The Caldera 8 takes a path we honestly didn’t expect. In the past few years, nearly every new running shoe has gained more cushioning, but this one doesn’t follow that trend at all. It actually moves farther away from it than the Caldera 7.

We tested it in our lab and found 129 SA in the heel and 111 SA in the forefoot, and those are numbers that feel underwhelming for a shoe marketed as ultra-cushioned. For us, it's clear that the Caldera 8 isn’t a max-cushioned option by any stretch.

Brooks Caldera 8 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Caldera 8 129 SA
Average 129 SA
Compared to 285 road running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
173 SA

Energy return

New

We tested the Caldera 8 and found that it uses the same DNA Loft v3 foam as its sibling, the Cascadia 19, so there’s no real upgrade here.

This supercritical EVA compound delivers a smooth, comfortable ride, though its energy return isn’t impressive, reaching only 56.9% in the heel and 58.7% in the forefoot. And while the Caldera 8 remains fairly priced, we’d gladly pay a bit more for a version that includes a bit of Brooks’ PEBA-based DNA Gold foam for an extra-responsive feel.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Caldera 8 56.9%
Average 58.6%
Compared to 282 road running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
83.0%

Heel stack

The Caldera 8 keeps the exact same heel stack height as the Caldera 7 at 36.7 mm.

Brooks Caldera 8 heel side

Once again, Brooks needs to take action if they want the Caldera line to stay in the max-stack category. With just 36.7 mm, it no longer qualifies, and pushing closer to—or even past—40 mm is now essential, especially since the Cascadia already covers the average-stack segment.

Brooks Caldera 8 Heel stack
Test results
Caldera 8 36.7 mm
Average 34.8 mm
Compared to 477 road running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot offers slightly more cushioning than average at 27.9 mm, yet it still falls short of today’s true maximalist standards. Nevertheless, it strikes a solid middle ground that should comfortably suit most runners.

Brooks Caldera 8 Forefoot stack
Test results
Caldera 8 27.9 mm
Average 26.1 mm
Compared to 477 road running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
38.5 mm

Drop

With an actual drop of 8.8 mm, the Caldera 8 sits noticeably higher than the 6 mm claimed by Brooks. Still, this isn’t a drawback, as the shoe’s geometry clearly favors heel strikers, and this measurement only reinforces that.

Brooks Caldera 8 Drop
Test results
Caldera 8 8.8 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 477 road running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.1 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

We tested the nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 foam and found it keeps a comfort-oriented, soft-ish feel, measuring 18.0 HA on our Shore A durometer.

However, that's 16% firmer than version 7, as Brooks slightly refined the formula for better trail stability. In our view, this adjustment feels smart, giving the shoe a more confidence-boosting ride on uneven ground while keeping its usual feel.

Brooks Caldera 8 Midsole softness
Test results
Caldera 8 18.0 HA
Average 20.4 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 403 road running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
36.1 HA

Rocker

The Caldera 8 features a moderate rocker that offers smooth transitions without feeling exaggerated. There’s no defined heel bevel, though the rear section curves slightly upward, helping heel strikers maintain a more fluid landing while keeping the shoe’s overall geometry natural and balanced on varied terrain.

Brooks Caldera 8 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Brooks Caldera 8 fits true to size (51 votes).

Small
True to size
Large

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

Since we first tested the new Caldera, we felt the fit should accommodate most runners. As always, we prepared a fresh gel mold to analyze the interior shape in detail.

Once it solidified, our first measurement showed 94.6 mm of width, which aligns well with a dependable, average fit. But let’s keep checking additional readings.

Brooks Caldera 8 Width / Fit
Test results
Caldera 8 94.6 mm
Average 95.1 mm
Compared to 232 road running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
101.1 mm

Toebox width

The toebox also lands near the average at 73.0 mm, offering a fit similar to many road daily trainers. Expect only decent space for your toes, as it’s not nearly as roomy as an Altra.

Brooks Caldera 8 Toebox width
Test results
Caldera 8 73.0 mm
Average 73.3 mm
Compared to 232 road running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
82.6 mm

Toebox height

Runners with high-volume feet or those who dislike toe pressure should be fine here.

At 26.4 mm, the toebox provides just enough vertical space for natural toe movement while still delivering a secure, reliable fit.

Brooks Caldera 8 Toebox height
Test results
Caldera 8 26.4 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 232 road running shoes
Number of shoes
22.0 mm
Toebox height
34.1 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

Traction is impressively solid at 0.59, a score that makes the shoe dependable even on tricky surfaces like wet rocks. It’s clear that Brooks continues to refine the TrailTack Green compound with great success.

Test results
Caldera 8 0.59
Average 0.47
Compared to 276 road running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.84

Outsole design

New

The Caldera 8’s outsole features the same multi-directional lug pattern of version 7, which was designed for confident grip on varied terrain.

We found that the large central cutout reduces weight and tries to boost flexibility, while the angled lugs deliver steady traction on climbs, descents, and loose ground thanks to their purposeful orientation.

Brooks Caldera 8 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

As the outsole is identical to v7 and the midsole remains largely unchanged, we measured a very similar, moderately high stiffness of 17.0N.

Brooks Caldera 8 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Caldera 8 17.0N
Average 15.2N
Compared to 279 road running shoes
Number of shoes
4.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

One thing that has always defined the Caldera is its high weight, and we discovered that it remains the same. At 10.9 oz (309g) on our scale, we think Brooks should explore lighter materials or even a new foam in the future.

Still, we doubt weight is a deciding factor for most runners considering the Caldera 8, though anyone chasing an light feel may find it a bit heavy.

Brooks Caldera 8 Weight
Test results
Caldera 8 10.9 oz (309g)
Average 9.3 oz (265g)
Compared to 478 road running shoes
Number of shoes
5.3 oz (149g)
Weight
12.9 oz (366g)

Breathability

The Caldera 8’s upper comes with a rugged design that reduces airflow compared to the average trail shoe. This tougher construction is clearly designed for protection first.

With help from our smoke-pumping machine, we measured a 3/5 score in breathability, which we consider perfectly acceptable for this category. Trail shoes rarely need the high-vent setups seen in road shoes.

Lower ventilation can actually be beneficial in cold conditions, giving runners a warmer and more secure feel during winter outings. In this case, the Caldera 8 fits that purpose well.

Brooks Caldera 8 microscope

The lack of large ventilation holes also contributed to the result.

Brooks Caldera 8 microscope

Under our digital microscope, we only found tiny, tightly-woven openings.

We also appreciated that the upper uses recycled materials and that the shoe carries a CarbonNeutral certification.

Test results
Caldera 8 3
Average 3.7
Compared to 407 road running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

One of the defining traits of the Caldera 8 is its outstanding stability, driven by a super-wide midsole and tall sidewalls that limit lateral movement—though they can feel slightly intrusive especially for midfoot strikers.

Still, for trail runners who prefer a centered, planted ride and don’t mind some extra bulk, this remains a very solid option.

Torsional rigidity

The Caldera 8 is nearly impossible to twist or bend, performing much like it had a full carbon plate inside the midsole and earning a 5/5 in our test.

Test results
Caldera 8 5
Average 3.5
Compared to 456 road running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter is also quite stiff at 4/5, yet Brooks added plenty of foam to balance it out, keeping the heel area surprisingly comfortable even during long outings.

Test results
Caldera 8 4
Average 2.9
Compared to 440 road running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The forefoot width isn’t extreme by any means, measuring 116.6 mm in our calipers. We think that’s actually good news, as going any wider would add little value.

Remember that most stability from a shoe’s dimensions comes from how the heel and midfoot transition into the forefoot, and in the Caldera 8 both those areas are already extremely wide as you'll see in our next test. Adding another 5 or 10 mm up front wouldn’t meaningfully change stability.

Brooks Caldera 8 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Caldera 8 116.6 mm
Average 114.3 mm
Compared to 478 road running shoes
Number of shoes
100.8 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
127.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel is extremely wide at 104.0 mm, placing the Caldera 8 right alongside the Caldera 6 and 7 as one of the broadest shoes we’ve ever measured, and just slightly narrower than the tank-like HOKA Stinson 7.

In our view, this oversized platform may feel excessive for runners who don’t rely on heel stability, especially midfoot and forefoot strikers. That’s why we think the Caldera 8 is best suited for heel strikers who can truly benefit from all that rearfoot width.

Brooks Caldera 8 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Caldera 8 104.0 mm
Average 90.8 mm
Compared to 478 road running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

We discovered an unconventional design in the Caldera 8’s toe bumper, using an asymmetric, highly-protective TPU layout that prioritizes the big toe while leaving more of the toebox exposed. This uneven setup proved a bit problematic when we tested it, earning only a 2/5 score.

Test results
Caldera 8 2
Average 2.6
Compared to 341 road running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding performed far better, earning a solid 4/5 and making it clear that this area won’t fall apart or develop a tear anytime soon.

Test results
Caldera 8 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 335 road running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

We also found solid durability from the TrailTack Green rubber. It’s not outstanding, but with only 1.0 mm of wear, the shoe should easily reach the usual lifespan expected from a trail running model.

Test results
Caldera 8 1.0 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 319 road running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

The outsole is noticeably thin at 1.9 mm, likely because the shoe is already quite heavy and the thick foam layer provides plenty of protection from small rocks and other trail hazards.

Brooks Caldera 8 Outsole thickness
Test results
Caldera 8 1.9 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 474 road running shoes
Number of shoes
0.9 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The insole contributes 4.9 mm of EVA foam to the shoe’s total stack height.

Brooks Caldera 8 Insole thickness
Test results
Caldera 8 4.9 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 473 road running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.8 mm

Removable insole

We found that you can swap the stock insole for a third-party option if you prefer, and we were also surprised to find a regular insole instead of a design with small perforations like in the Cascadia series.

Brooks Caldera 8 Removable insole
Test results
Caldera 8 Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

The DNA Loft v3 midsole is EVA-based, so we expected poor performance in cold conditions—and that’s exactly what we found. It became 42% firmer, so don’t expect the same soft feel in chilly weather.

Brooks Caldera 8 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Caldera 8 42%
Average 25%
Compared to 402 road running shoes
Number of shoes
1%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Reflective elements

Brooks has skipped reflective elements in its latest trail models, and we find that a bit disappointing.

Brooks Caldera 8 Reflective elements
Test results
Caldera 8 No

Tongue padding

The Caldera 8 features a mixed-loop lacing system that improves security and adjustability. The eyelets on the top and bottom use bright yellow external loops, while the rest switches to integrated loops that pull the midfoot snug and evenly. Oh, and we loved the elastic band as it keeps the laces perfectly in place and stops them from bouncing around or getting in the way.

Brooks Caldera 8 tongue

The tongue is another place where it's evident that this shoe has a weight issue going on, as it features just 5.0 mm of padding. It's enough for us, but compared to other models that are focused on comfort, it maybe falls a bit short.

Brooks Caldera 8 Tongue padding
Test results
Caldera 8 5.0 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 475 road running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue is semi-gusseted, which works fine, but for trail shoes, we believe a fully gusseted design extending to the end would offer better protection.

Brooks Caldera 8 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Caldera 8 Both sides (semi)

Price

The Brooks Caldera 8 maintains the same fair price as its predecessor, which feels justified. Still, we think it needs a technological leap to better stand apart from the Cascadia, even if that requires a small price bump. For once, we wouldn’t complain about paying a bit more!

Test results
Caldera 8 $150
Average $151
Compared to 478 road running shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$290

Heel tab

The Caldera 8 features a flat finger-loop heel tab that feels practical and easy to grab. We preferred it over the one in the Cascadia, as it feels sturdier and more durable, giving us confidence that it will hold up better over time.

Brooks Caldera 8 Heel tab
Test results
Caldera 8 Finger loop