Our verdict
- Urban 78
- Day hiking 88
- Water hiking 86
Pros
- Unmtached cushioning for long miles
- Can be used for trail running
- Amazingly stable for its high stack
- Impressive outsole durability
- Smooth heel-to-toe trasitions
- Foot-hugging knit sleeve
- Adjustable strapping system
Cons
- Overly steep drop
- Not for technical terrain
Comparison
The most similar hiking sandals compared
+ + Add a shoe | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our score | 90 Superb | 86 Great | 79 Good | 84 Great | |
| Price | $145 | $100 | $140 | $120 | |
| Trail terrain | Light terrainVersatile / Moderate terrain | Light terrain | Light terrainVersatile / Moderate terrain | Light terrain | |
| Shock absorption | High | High | Low | Moderate | |
| Energy return | High | Moderate | Moderate | High | |
| Weight lab Weight brand | 11.8 oz / 335g | 12.5 oz / 354g | 11.3 oz / 319g 11.5 oz / 325g | 11.4 oz / 323g | |
| Use | Day HikingMulti-sportUrban hikingWater hiking | Day HikingMulti-sportUrban hikingWater hiking | Day HikingMulti-sportUrban hikingWater hiking | Day HikingMulti-sportUrban hikingWater hiking | |
| Construction | Strappy | Strappy | Closed toe | Closed toe | |
| Drop lab | 16.4 mm | 11.9 mm | 8.7 mm | 10.7 mm | |
| Size | - | True to size | True to size | True to size | |
| Midsole softness | Balanced | Balanced | Firm | Firm | |
| Stiffness | Moderate | Flexible | Flexible | Moderate | |
| Outsole hardness | - | - | Average | - | |
| Outsole durability | Good | Good | Decent | Good | |
| Outsole thickness | Average | Average | Very thick | Average | |
| Lug depth | 3.6 mm | 3.7 mm | 3.3 mm | 2.6 mm | |
| Heel stack lab | 41.5 mm | 35.5 mm | 23.8 mm | 28.0 mm | |
| Forefoot | 25.1 mm | 23.6 mm | 15.1 mm | 17.3 mm | |
| Heel tab | Finger loop | None | Finger loop | Finger loop | |
| Midsole width - forefoot | Average | Very wide | Very narrow | Very narrow | |
| Midsole width - heel | Very wide | Average | Average | Average | |
| Widths available | Normal | NormalWide | Normal | NarrowNormal | |
| Ranking | #14 Bottom 6% | #5 Top 34% | #11 Bottom 26% | #7 Top 47% | |
| Popularity | #14 Bottom 6% | #2 Top 14% | #7 Top 47% | #9 Bottom 40% |
Who should buy
We found the Aventrail Sandal a standout option for outdoorsy people who:
- could use a shoe-sandal hybrid for summer trail runs, hikes, and near-water activities
- prioritizes cushioning and impact protection in trail footwear
- wants an open-toe sandal for all-day wear on a variety of surfaces

Who should NOT buy
Our caliper measurements revealed notable discrepancies in the sandal's stack and drop, with the measurements much higher than the stated specs. If you feel the Aventrail platform is too high for your liking, you might as well consider the slightly more grounded Aventrail R2T or the HOKA Infini Hike TC.
And if you are not so sure about tril running with a stripped-down upper, the Aventrail shoe offers the same platform but keeps your toes covered.

Cushioning
Shock absorption
If you've come to associate outdoor sandals with a bare-bones experience, expect to be blown away by the Aventrail Sandal's unmatched cushioning!
With a whopping shock absorption of 147 SA, this Teva offering set a new record in our lab! Its chunky platform devours long miles, leaving the wearer's feet fresh and free of fatigue, be it hiking or running.

| Aventrail Sandal | 147 SA |
| Average | 116 SA |
Energy return
In addition to absorbing continuous impact like a pro, the Aventrail's advanced HYPER-COMF foam also prevents the foot from sinking into it.
With a slightly above-average energy return of 57.7%, it has a pleasant bounce-back, making the ride feel a little livelier.
| Aventrail Sandal | 57.7% |
| Average | 54.7% |
Heel stack
With a towering heel stack of 41.5 mm, this Teva sandal is by far the most platformy we've tested. It is also significantly taller than the 35.5 mm listed in its specs!

| Aventrail Sandal | 41.5 mm |
| Average | 28.8 mm |
Forefoot stack
Its forefoot stack also exceeds the category average by a notable 25.1 mm. Curiously, it is a little lower than the stated 27 mm, but still substantial for a typical sandal.

| Aventrail Sandal | 25.1 mm |
| Average | 19.9 mm |
Drop
Along with its stack height discrepancies, the sandal's heel-to-toe drop also deviates from the specs by nearly half!
Instead of 8.5 mm, our measurements showed a steep 16.4 mm offset, elevating the heel high above the toes.
This can be a dealbreaker for some outdoor folks, as the foot ends up a bit too forward-pitched and less level with the ground. It can also feel awkward on steep descents.

| Aventrail Sandal | 16.4 mm |
| Average | 8.9 mm |
Midsole softness
UpdatedLike all the other Teva Aventrail variations, the Aventrail Sandal features a dual-density midsole, where the softer foam sits on top of the firmer one.
The softer HYPER-COMF foam is placed directly under the foot, offering the 'foot-on-foam' experience described by Teva. It's not mushy plush, though, showing a balanced reading of 36.2 AC on our durometer.

| Aventrail Sandal | 36.2 AC |
| Average | 45.4 AC |
Secondary foam
UpdatedA firmer EVA foam carrier further detracts from the sandal's overall softness with a higher durometer reading of 42.0 AC. It helps create a stable, predictable base to balance the sandal's high stack.

| Aventrail Sandal | 42.0 AC |
| Average | 40.8 AC |
Rocker
Essentially built like a max-cushioned trail running shoe, the Teva Aventrail Sandal also features a rockered sole geometry, which is common in these shoes.
Curved both at the front and at the heel, it prevents the tall platform from getting in the way of smooth heel-to-toe transitions.

Plate
Another standout feature that puts this Teva sandal closer to the trail-running category is a nylon shank. Thin and rigid, it stretches from midfoot to the forefoot, acting as a propulsion plate that makes toe-offs a bit sprightlier.
It's not as propulsive as carbon plates, but it still helps the Aventrail Sandal feel a little more charged, especially when you pick up the pace. And as a nice bonus, it adds a touch of protection from the occasional roots and rocks poking the foot on the trail.
Size and fit
Size
Internal length

| Aventrail Sandal | 267.9 mm |
| Average | 264.6 mm |
Width / Fit
Teva made the Aventrail Sandal a bit more enclosed and form-fitting than a typical sandal by adding a stretch-knit sleeve. On the one hand, it protects the skin from straps, but on the other hand, it also helps hold the foot a bit more securely in place.
The brand's traditional W Strapping System includes three adjustable straps, one in the forefoot and two around the ankle, that help regulate the fit as needed.
P.S. The knit webbing is made from REPREVE polyester yarn by Unifi, which is 100% recycled plastic.

| Aventrail Sandal |
Traction / Grip
Traction test
This section is a work in progress
| Aventrail Sandal | 0.67 |
| Average | 0.65 |
Lug depth
Contrary to the brand's official specs, our caliper measured the sandal's lug depth at 3.6 mm rather than the claimed 5.0 mm.
That makes the treads less aggressive than suggested and better suited to light-to-moderate terrain types. Pretty much on par with most other hiking sandals.

| Aventrail Sandal | 3.6 mm |
| Average | 3.0 mm |
Outsole design
Our wear tests showed that the Aventrail Sandal's lugs transition seamlessly from light to mixed terrain, thanks to their tiered design.

On the surface, the treads are wide and flat, which makes them comfortable enough for hard-packed surfaces and even concrete. But upon closer look, we can see that the lugs have layered, stair-like edges that help them bite onto dirt, grass, sand, and boulders when the trail becomes less straightforward.

Flexibility / Stiffness
An unusually high stack and the presence of a nylon plate inevitably make the Aventrail Sandal harder to flex compared to a regular sandal. That's why its rocker shape is so essential, allowing the foot to roll from heel to toe without bending in the forefoot.

Measuring the force it takes to bend this Teva sandal by 30 degrees, we got a fairly high reading of 14.6N. For context, this is right on par with the average for trail running shoes.

| Aventrail Sandal | 14.6N |
| Average | 10.9N |
Weight
You can't add a large foam slab and a nylon shank to a sandal without increasing its weight, so we weren't surprised to see a slightly above-average scale reading on the Teva Aventrail Sandal.
At 11.8 oz (335g), it is slightly heavier than average but still lighter than the seemingly more stripped-down Teva Hurricane XLT3 (12.5 oz/354g).
Yet if you want to feel as little weight as possible on your feet, the Aventrail R2T may be a more appealing option at only 8.7 oz (247g).

| Aventrail Sandal | 11.8 oz (335g) |
| Average | 11.1 oz (316g) |
Stability
Lateral stability test
Designing a high-stack platform without compromising stability is tricky, but Teva nailed it in the Aventrail Sandal.
Its thick-foamed base is balanced by the wide dimensions, raised midsole edges, a firm EVA foam carrier, and a stiff nylon shank. All of these features work together to maintain a stable ride and support the foot, even on hilly terrain.
Torsional rigidity
UpdatedOur torsional rigidity test confirmed that it takes a solid torque to twist the Aventrail sandal in either direction. At 16.0 Nm, it requires more than the average sandal and about as much as the average trail running shoe.

| Aventrail Sandal | 16.0 Nm |
| Average | 14.3 Nm |
Midsole width - forefoot
And when it comes to midsole dimensions, the Aventrail outperformed all the sandals in our lab, including HOKA.
Even though it's close to average in the widest part of the forefoot (120.9 mm), the sandal's blocky heel makes all the difference.

| Aventrail Sandal | 120.9 mm |
| Average | 119.1 mm |
Midsole width - heel
With a whopping 104.2 mm between its most extended points, this Teva silhouette offers a ton of landing area, making the rearfoot feel exceptionally stable.

| Aventrail Sandal | 104.2 mm |
| Average | 93.0 mm |
Durability
Outsole durability
We ramped up the speed on our Dremel to 10K RPM to test the potential wear resistance of this Teva sandal's outsole. And guess what? We were astonished by the results!
Its Spider Rubber Endure outsole held up against wear and tear like a pro, showing nearly invisible damage of 0.5 mm! That's one of the best results among hiking sandals!
| Aventrail Sandal | 0.5 mm |
| Average | 1.2 mm |
Outsole thickness
We were also pleased to see a solid layer of outsole rubber protecting the sandal's exposed foam from abrasion. Excluding the lug depth, it showed a standard thickness of 2.3 mm on our caliper.
That looks promising for the Aventrail Sandal's long-term outsole durability.

| Aventrail Sandal | 2.3 mm |
| Average | 2.4 mm |
Misc
Upper material thickness
The sandal's knit layer is not particularly thick at 4.0 mm, but it's enough to protect the skin from rubbing and chafing against the straps.

| Aventrail Sandal | 4.0 mm |
| Average | 4.0 mm |
Heel tab
Two large finger loops are a welcome add-on in this Teva sandal.

One in the front and one in the back, they allow for easy on-and-off without repeatedly fiddling with the Velcro.

| Aventrail Sandal | Finger loop |
Price
The Teva Aventrail is by far the most expensive outdoor sandal in our catalog, as it costs nearly as much as the average trail-running shoe.
And after testing and measuring all its parameters, we can confirm that the brand justifies its price point by using high-quality materials to offer something unique and niche.

| Aventrail Sandal | $145 |
| Average | $114 |































