Our verdict

Once again, New Balance doesn't disappoint. The 2010 is full of premium details for a... not so much of a premium price! Its incredibly comfortable structure features generously padded interiors and lots of reflective elements among its high-quality materials. But the best part is that we could wear this NB for hours and hours, as apart from being really comfortable, it also features an incredibly durable outsole. Still, even though we know it's pretty tempting, we believe it'd be wise not to wear these baddies when it's hot outside: their airflow is null!

Pros

  • Very comfortable
  • High-quality materials
  • Super durable outsole
  • Best impact protection for your feet
  • Incredibly high energy return for sneakers
  • Fairly stable
  • Authentic leather and suede
  • Cool retro style
  • Lots of reflective elements

Cons

  • Not breathable
  • Might be too narrow for some

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

Let the 2010 get a spot in both your heart and your wardrobe if:

  • You want a super comfortable shoe full of high-quality materials and reflective details to keep you safe at night.
  • You're looking for a pair of sneakers with a shock absorption and energy return proper from running shoes.
  • You'd love to show off your retro shoes all day long, so you need a very durable outsole.

New Balance 2010_profile

Who should NOT buy

You should totally forget about the NB 2010 during the summer. This shoe is not breathable at all! If you want to rock your sneakers when temperatures go up, we've got you covered: these are our casual shoes with the best airflow!

If you have wide feet, you should also skip this pair. Its structure might be a little bit too narrow for some sneakerheads, and that'd be a shame, as this New Balance's goal is to be comfortable. These are the wide sneakers that have been tested in our lab. And don't worry, many of them also have everyone's beloved retro aesthetics!

New Balance 2010_pieces

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

Our lab tests started strong, as we'd have never expected such a high score in our shock absorption test. With an incredibly high 121 SA, the New Balance 2010 made sure our feet were completely protected from any impact. This worked wonders, as apart from improving the overall comfort levels of the shoe, it also made us want to keep walking all day long. The ABZORB SBS is pure magic!

New Balance 2010 Shock absorption heel

Test results
2010 121 SA
Average 88 SA
Compared to 58 sneakers
Number of shoes
33 SA
Shock absorption
123 SA

Energy return

New

Catching us by surprise once again, during our wear tests we felt this New Balance propelling us back up after every step. At the beginning, it even felt like a running shoe that energized our strides! With a crazy 60.4%, the 2010 made running errands incredibly fun.

Test results
2010 60.4%
Average 50.0%
Compared to 58 sneakers
Number of shoes
40.0%
Energy return
64.0%

Heel stack

These wonderful cushioning technologies come in a tall package that reaches 35.7 mm at the heel. So not only did our feet feel incredibly comfortable, they also felt protected and shielded from any obstacles or the harsher urban surfaces.

New Balance 2010 Heel stack

Test results
2010 35.7 mm
Average 30.7 mm
Compared to 100 sneakers
Number of shoes
16.9 mm
Heel stack
50.5 mm

Forefoot stack

And we can say the same about the forefoot stack. With a higher-than-average score of 24.7 mm, our caliper reminded us that there's also plenty of material separating the ball of our feet from the floor.

New Balance 2010 Forefoot stack 

Test results
2010 24.7 mm
Average 19.5 mm
Compared to 100 sneakers
Number of shoes
9.7 mm
Forefoot stack
29.5 mm

Drop

This taller midsole left us with an average drop of 11.0 mm. This means that the heel is slightly higher than the forefoot in terms of foot position, which translates into some extra comfort for the rearfoot.

New Balance 2010 Drop

Test results
2010 11.0 mm
Average 11.2 mm
Compared to 100 sneakers
Number of shoes
3.5 mm
Drop
17.2 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

After cutting it in half, we saw the 2010 features a dual-density midsole. The foam that's closer to the foot got a 19.5 HA score when we pressed our durometer against it. This means that it's softer than average, which offers some extra plushness underfoot.

New Balance 2010 Midsole softness

Test results
2010 19.5 HA
Average 28.8 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 82 sneakers
Number of shoes
15.0 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
46.4 HA

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

In order to keep things balanced, NB decided to add a secondary foam. This compound is fairly firmer than the previous one, as our caliper returned 27.0 HA when we measured it. As it's closer to the ground, it improves the overall stability of the shoe without feeling excessively rigid. Way to go, New Balance!

New Balance 2010 Secondary foam softness

Test results
2010 27.0 HA
Average 32.4 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

Despite its dad aesthetics, the 2010 didn't really feel like a very wide and chunky shoe during our wear tests. Our standard-width feet were okay with this, but as we wanted to know more, we started our gel test.

Once the mold of the interiors of the 2010 was ready, we grabbed our caliper and measured this shoe's width at its widest part. At 93.4 mm, it's slightly wider than average!

New Balance 2010 Width / Fit

Test results
2010 93.4 mm
Average 92.5 mm
Compared to 81 sneakers
Number of shoes
85.4 mm
Width / Fit
97.0 mm

Toebox width

When we first looked at this shoe's gel mold, we noticed it was quite pointy. We moved the caliper all the way up to the toebox, and it marked 66.8 mm, which is a bit lower than average. Now that we have these two readings, we can confidently say these are not the best sneakers for people with wide feet.

New Balance 2010 Toebox width

Test results
2010 66.8 mm
Average 68.8 mm
Compared to 81 sneakers
Number of shoes
63.9 mm
Toebox width
74.1 mm

Toebox height

Even though the 2010 is not the widest pair of sneakers out there, it offers plenty of vertical space. Even if your toes are pointing up, we believe you should be fine with this NB, as its toebox height reaches 31.6 mm, making it way taller than this category's average.

New Balance 2010 Toebox height

Test results
2010 31.6 mm
Average 27.8 mm
Compared to 81 sneakers
Number of shoes
20.7 mm
Toebox height
35.0 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

New

During our wear tests, we enjoyed the 2010's solid grip. It was constant on most urban surfaces, and we never felt like we were going to slip on dry floors. We saw this crystal clear in our lab traction test, as this NB scored 0.45!

Test results
2010 0.45
Average 0.42
Compared to 57 sneakers
Number of shoes
0.23
Heel traction
0.61

Outsole design

New

With a running-inspired outsole, the 2010 has enough rubber coverage to protect the hard-wear areas. There are many cutouts and gaps with exposed foam, which makes the shoe more flexible and lightweight.

New Balance 2010 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

New

This NB scored a solid 15.2N on our flex test, which means it needed some more force than average to go all the way up to 30 degrees. Nevertheless, it didn't feel too stiff on foot or anything, as we still enjoyed a comfortable ride. 

New Balance 2010 Flexibility / Stiffness

Test results
2010 15.2N
Average 13.4N
Compared to 58 sneakers
Number of shoes
4.6N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
22.7N

Weight

Luckily, the chunky vibe of the 2010 was literally just that... a vibe. Its lightweight structure didn't make our feet feel exhausted after our wear tests. Not even if we were walking all day long! Our scale confirmed it, as it returned 13.4 oz/381g, which is lower than average.

New Balance 2010 Weight

Test results
2010 13.4 oz (381g)
Average 13.8 oz (391g)
Compared to 100 sneakers
Number of shoes
8.5 oz (241g)
Weight
20.5 oz (581g)

Breathability

During our wear tests, the 2010 felt like... a couple of comfy mini-ovens. If it was too hot, our feet just wanted to run away from it! When we took it to our lab, we understood why.

Things didn't look so bad at the beginning when we performed our light test. As you might notice in the video above, we could see our fingers' shape through the toebox's mesh easily, which might be an indicator of good airflow.

But... it turns out we were totally wrong on our first hypothesis. In our wear test, the 2010 absolutely paled in comparison to the Nike Air Max 270, which didn't have any problems letting the air in and out. On the other hand, our New Balance pair... literally choked. That's why we couldn't give it any other score than the lowest: 1/5.

New Balance 2010 Breathability_microscope_1

Thanks to our microscope, we could see this shoe's tricky design. It features a double-layered upper: there's an external overlay with big gaps, and then an internal one with a more tightly woven pattern. This might fool the eye, but there's no way it can trick our smoke machine! Our pro tip? Forget about the 2010 in the summer!

New Balance 2010 Breathability_microscope_2

Test results
2010 1
Average 3
Compared to 99 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

The running spirit of this New Balance shone happily on our lateral stability test. We moved our ankles from side to side, but we still felt well-planted. During our wear tests, we felt stable and comfortable even at the end of the day, when our feet and joints were more tired.

Torsional rigidity

Even though we're talking about a chunky and fairly tall shoe, our fingers didn't struggle that much when we twisted it. Its structure was flexible enough for us to give it an average 3/5, which means we didn't have to deal with a break-in period or any discomfort out of the box.

Even though this pair features a TPU shank at the midfoot, you can see in the video below that it bent alongside our fingers pretty nicely.

Test results
2010 3
Average 3.6
Compared to 99 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

Our tendons and muscles at the rearfoot were pretty grateful when this shoe's heel counter scored a 3/5 on our stiffness test. It felt incredibly comfortable, but its plushness didn't reach the point where it'd affect the overall support negatively. New Balance hitting the bull's eye again!

Test results
2010 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 99 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Even though this NB doesn't have the stiffest build out there, we were pretty happy with its stability.  It has a very wide landing base that let our feet find their balance in every landing, and our caliper confirmed it when it returned a massive 115.9 mm in our lab.

New Balance 2010 Midsole width - forefoot

Test results
2010 115.9 mm
Average 108.8 mm
Compared to 100 sneakers
Number of shoes
95.1 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
121.0 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel follows the same logic, but it takes it to a whole new level. With a flabbergasting score of 95.7 mm, the 2010's midsole width at the heel surpassed all our expectations! Even though this might be a little bit too much for some people, our standard-width feet felt comfortable. Also, if we wanted to go for a more supportive fit, we could always use the extra eyelet at the top to tighten things up.

New Balance 2010 Midsole width - heel

Test results
2010 95.7 mm
Average 83.8 mm
Compared to 100 sneakers
Number of shoes
67.7 mm
Midsole width - heel
103.1 mm

Durability

Leather/Suede quality

As expected from New Balance, the 2010 features high-quality materials. We started burning the suede that starts at the midfoot and goes all around the heel. As you can see, the material didn't burst into flames or end up all melted, which means it's authentic.

Then we moved the torch all the way to the front. We used the same method and, luckily, got the same results! The leather used in the area is also authentic, which is always great news.

Test results
2010 Real suede

Toebox durability

To be completely honest, we did expect a higher score on our durability test after the disaster we had to witness regarding the 2010's breathability. At 5K RPM and with 2N of force, the Dremel ended up drilling the mesh quite a bit, so we decided to give it an average 3/5. It's not a bad score but, as we were saying, we did expect something higher.

Test results
2010 3
Average 3.7
Compared to 99 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

On the other hand, its heel padding durability was just right. This area is usually on the weaker side, so we were pretty happy when it scored an average 3/5 on our Dremel test.

Test results
2010 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 99 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

Even though we walked for hours and hours during our wear tests, this New Balance's outsole didn't really seem to care. And we couldn't believe our eyes when we took it to our lab and it ended up with only 0.4 mm of damage after our Dremel test. Its durability is just otherworldly, and even though we couldn't find any hints of this compound being the brand's famous NDURANCE rubber, it still showed elite durability.

Test results
2010 0.4 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 99 sneakers
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

In order to prolong its lifespan even more, New Balance opted for a 5.0 mm-thick outsole. So, apart from featuring a really durable material, there's also a lot of it to wear away before you need to kiss the 2010 goodbye.

New Balance 2010 Outsole thickness

Test results
2010 5.0 mm
Average 5.3 mm
Compared to 100 sneakers
Number of shoes
2.9 mm
Outsole thickness
8.2 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

We have two key things to say about this New Balance's insole. First, our caliper returned 3.6 mm when we measured it, which is lower than average, so it didn't add many extra points in comfort. Even though this might sound like bad news, we were actually pretty happy, as the inner space of the 2010 isn't crazy, so a thinner midsole makes total sense. And second, it has loads of ventilation holes. Yet... this didn't really do much regarding its overall breathability.

Test results
2010 3.6 mm
Average 5.1 mm
Compared to 100 sneakers
Number of shoes
3.1 mm
Insole thickness
11.5 mm

Removable insole

You can change this shoe's insole if you need or want to. Nevertheless, if we were you... we wouldn't. Opting for a thicker piece might just make the whole fit more uncomfortable due to the lack of space, and we wouldn't risk losing the tiniest of ventilation that its holes might give us!

New Balance 2010 Removable insole

Test results
2010 Yes

Reflective elements

Time to shine! The New Balance 2010 has reflective elements all over its upper.

Test results
2010 Yes

Tongue padding

In general, these sneakers are fairly cushioned in all the right areas, prioritizing your feet's comfort.

With a massive tongue padding of 10.9 mm, the NB 2010 offers wonderful instep comfort. This prevented us from any lace bite, even if we decided to tighten the laces and secure the heel properly.

New Balance 2010 Tongue padding

Test results
2010 10.9 mm
Average 9.5 mm
Compared to 100 sneakers
Number of shoes
0.7 mm
Tongue padding
23.0 mm

Price

After thoroughly analyzing these sneakers, we honestly believe they are a bang for the buck. Its incredibly durable outsole will let you walk for hours, days, months... and whatnot. Even if you want to do it at night, its high-quality materials feature reflective accents that will keep you safe. Overall, we do think this super comfy pair of New Balance comes with loads of advantages for its price.

New Balance 2010 Price

Test results
2010 $160
Average $123
Compared to 123 sneakers
Number of shoes
$50
Price
$230

Heel tab

Who would complain if instead of a heel tab there's a pretty reflective accent? Because we definitely wouldn't!

New Balance 2010 Heel tab

Test results
2010 None