Our verdict

77
Good
  • Daily running 82
  • Tempo 35
  • Race 18
  • Stability 88
The Lems ZENSPEED+ is an interesting first attempt at a dedicated running shoe from a brand better known for casual and minimalist footwear. We really liked its stable, grounded ride, comfortable upper, and natural feel, while its versatile design works nicely for easy runs and everyday wear. Conversely, its surprisingly poor energy return takes away most of the fun, and the toebox, while roomy, isn't as wide as we expected from Lems. The high price also limits its appeal, but it remains a unique, down-to-earth option for runners who value comfort and simplicity.

Pros

  • Stable ride for daily miles
  • Perfect for casual wear and daily life
  • Moderate stack height offers enough protection
  • Secure fit for a wide range of foot shapes
  • Good build quality
  • Classic geometry feels natural and familiar
  • Strong traction
  • Can handle gym sessions
  • Lighter than it looks
  • No heel slippage

Cons

  • Energy return is disappointingly low
  • Narrow toebox (for a Lems shoe)
  • High price
  • Firm ride may feel harsh

Who should buy

In our opinion, the Lems ZENSPEED+ is an interesting option for:

  • Fans of casual/hiking Lems shoes who have been waiting for the brand's first dedicated running shoe.
  • Runners seeking a versatile daily trainer that feels comfortable for easy runs while also fitting naturally into everyday wear with jeans.
  • Those who dislike maximalist, super-wide running shoes and want a more classic, grounded feel without going too minimalist.

Lems Zenspeed+ side

Who should NOT buy

The biggest issue with the Lems ZENSPEED+ is its lack of energy return. If that really matters to you, the Altra Escalante 5 is a much better (and cheaper) alternative.

We also found that the toebox can work well for many runners with broad feet, but it doesn't have the ultra-wide design we expected from Lems. If you really need a toebox that's as wide as possible, take a look at the Altra Torin 9.

Lems Zenspeed+ parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

Lems is a brand well known in the minimalist shoe world for offering a wide range of models with low stack heights, but the ZENSPEED+ changes that formula a bit.

We would say its stack height is moderate rather than low (more on that in a minute), and that's well reflected in its shock absorption, with 110 SA in the heel and 93 SA in the forefoot.

Lems Zenspeed+ Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 110 SA
Average 131 SA
Compared to 413 running shoes
Number of shoes
24 SA
Shock absorption
184 SA

Energy return

Lems states that the ZENCELL midsole is made from highly-responsive EVA mixed with 10% PEBA. However, we found almost the opposite of a highly-responsive result. 

With just 41.6% energy return in the forefoot and 39.8% in the heel, it seems to us that Lems still needs to fine-tune the foam. This is their first running shoe, so we can expect some areas to need improvement, and it looks like the foam will be near the top of that list.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 41.6%
Average 61.4%
Compared to 410 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
83.0%

Heel stack

As we said before, we consider this more of a moderate-stack shoe than a truly low-stack design, as 30.2 mm is actually very similar to what most running shoes had a decade ago.

Lems ZENSPEED+ side

Think of it as good protection with less height than a modern daily trainer.

Lems Zenspeed+ Heel stack
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 30.2 mm
Average 35.5 mm
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Heel stack
50.1 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot also sits below the current average, measuring 24.6 mm. This follows the same design philosophy we found in the heel, offering a good amount of foam without going overboard.

Lems Zenspeed+ Forefoot stack
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 24.6 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Forefoot stack
41.3 mm

Drop

To create the ZENSPEED+, we think that Lems tried to blend its usual casual-shoe design with a road running shoe. Therefore, we found a medium drop of 5.6 mm, far from the usual 8-10 mm found in mainstream brands but also quite different from Lems' usual zero-drop geometry.

For some, this could be a problem. We can see how many Lems fans may have expected a 0 mm drop, but the brand probably wanted to avoid making a shoe that would appeal to such a niche market.

Lems Zenspeed+ Drop
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 5.6 mm
Average 8.4 mm
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.8 mm
Drop
15.6 mm

Midsole softness

Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

The shoe looks like it has a firm midsole from the outside, and that's also how we perceived the foam during our runs. After cutting the ZENSPEED+ in half, we measured the foam with our Asker C durometer. The result was 43.7 AC, confirming that it's better suited to runners who prefer a firm ride.

We also checked how it handles cold temperatures and were pleased with the outcome. It only became 10% firmer after 20 minutes sitting next to our ice creams.

Lems Zenspeed+ Midsole softness
Room temp
In cold
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 43.7 AC
Average 35.5 AC
Compared to 263 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.8 AC
Soft ←→ Firm
75.2 AC

Rocker

The Lems ZENSPEED+ keeps things classic here, avoiding an overly curved midsole and, therefore, offering a ride that matches the shoe's character.

On the flip side, heel strikers looking for some extra help with turnovers simply won't find it here. Lems promotes it as a shoe that brings you closer to a more natural running feel, and while that comes with some advantages, it also has its drawbacks.

Lems Zenspeed+ Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
Lems Zenspeed+ Internal length
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 268.7 mm
Average 269.4 mm
Compared to 299 running shoes
Number of shoes
256.0 mm
Internal length
280.4 mm

Width / Fit

Lems is also known for doing foot-shaped shoes, and the brand claims that the ZENSPEED+ follows this approach with its TrueFit design. However, when trying the ZENSPEED+, we never found it incredibly wide, so it will be interesting to put this claim to the test with our gel-based method.

In our first measurement, we found a width of 95.9 mm. That's consistent with an average design for a running shoe and should work well for most feet.

Lems Zenspeed+ Width / Fit
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 95.9 mm
Average 95.2 mm
Compared to 359 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
102.4 mm

Toebox width

A foot-shaped toebox usually shows up in this measurement, and the Lems ZENSPEED+ lands somewhere in the middle.

Lems ZENSPEED+ forefoot

At 75.8 mm, it's wider than a regular running shoe, but still narrower than the broadest shoes we've tested in the lab.

Lems Zenspeed+ Toebox width
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 75.8 mm
Average 73.2 mm
Compared to 359 running shoes
Number of shoes
65.9 mm
Toebox width
85.0 mm

Toebox height

Finally, we checked the toebox height.

At 28.7 mm, it offers plenty of room for the toes, making it a great match for a shoe designed for everyday use and a few runs per week.

Lems Zenspeed+ Toebox height
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 28.7 mm
Average 27.0 mm
Compared to 359 running shoes
Number of shoes
17.9 mm
Toebox height
34.3 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

Traction is one area where the Lems ZENSPEED+ performs really well. With a 0.73 coefficient of friction on wet concrete, you can forget about rainy days... just turn the door handle and head out for a run.

Test results
ZENSPEED+ 0.73
Average 0.53
Compared to 403 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
1.05

Outsole design

Some brands are really pushing the boundaries of exposed foam, but Lems shows that it's committed to old-school vibes across the entire shoe. That includes the increasingly rare full-length rubber coverage that protects the whole shoe.

Lems Zenspeed+ Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

This outsole design goes hand in hand with high stiffness, as does the firmer-than-usual foam. In our test, the Lems ZENSPEED+ scored above average despite its moderate stack height, recording 16.8N.

Lems Zenspeed+ Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 16.8N
Average 15.5N
Compared to 407 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.8N
Flexible ←→ Stiff
38.5N

Weight

The Lems ZENSPEED+ looks heavier than it actually is, and that's always good news. Expectations matter, and we were pleasantly surprised by its 9.1 oz (258g) weight, which we consider a very positive result.

Lems Zenspeed+ Weight
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 9.1 oz (258g)
Average 9.2 oz (261g)
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
3.5 oz (99g)
Weight
15.0 oz (424g)

Stability

Lateral stability test

One of the biggest strengths of the ZENSPEED+ is its stability. We noticed how stable it felt from the very first run, and that feeling never went away.

Several factors contribute to this stable ride, but the two main ones are the firm ZENCELL foam, which is a huge contributor, and the moderate stack height instead of a taller design.

Torsional rigidity

Torsional rigidity also scored above average at 16.3 Nm. Again, this isn't a surprise, as it contributes significantly to the planted feel, and the shoe never felt easy to twist.

Lems Zenspeed+ Torsional rigidity
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 16.3 Nm
Average 14.4 Nm
Compared to 166 running shoes
Number of shoes
3.4 Nm
Flexible ←→ Rigid
22.5 Nm

Heel counter stiffness

The heel also gets a small boost in support from its stiff, 4-out-of-5 heel counter. It may feel a bit intrusive if you want a shoe that completely disappears on your feet, but based on our previous tests, it's clear that this isn't that kind of shoe anyway.

Test results
ZENSPEED+ 4
Average 3
Compared to 477 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Lems is totally right when it claims that this shoe doesn't want to feel artificial or assisted, but rather the opposite.

The 112.4-mm forefoot width further reinforces this feel, as it avoids being overly broad and clunky while also making the shoe more manageable for everyday life.

Lems Zenspeed+ Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 112.4 mm
Average 115.1 mm
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
100.5 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
129.8 mm

Midsole width - heel

We found the same design idea in the heel, as its 88.2 mm width also sits a few millimeters below the average for road running shoes.

Lems Zenspeed+ Midsole width - heel
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 88.2 mm
Average 91.1 mm
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
67.1 mm
Midsole width - heel
112.3 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

Our first durability test focuses on the toebox, and it started on a positive note, with the ZENSPEED+ earning a solid 3/5 from us.

Test results
ZENSPEED+ 3
Average 2.6
Compared to 433 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Unlike most shoes, we found that the heel padding scored lower than the toebox. It's usually the other way around, and this 1/5 score isn't very promising for runners who tend to experience rubbing in this area.

Test results
ZENSPEED+ 1
Average 3.4
Compared to 430 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

The outsole didn't deliver an impressive performance either. With 1.5 mm of damage, it's slightly more than the usual result, pointing to a somewhat less durable rubber compound than those found on other shoes.

Test results
ZENSPEED+ 1.5 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 420 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear (Good ←→ Bad)
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

To compensate for the far-from-impressive outsole durability, Lems added a slightly thicker 3.4 mm layer of rubber than usual and, as we showed earlier, provides rubber coverage from heel to toe.

Lems ZENSPEED+ rubber coverage

With less coverage and a thinner rubber layer, things could be much worse.

Lems Zenspeed+ Outsole thickness
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 3.4 mm
Average 3.1 mm
Compared to 478 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
8.4 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

We measured the insole and found a thickness of 4.1 mm, which is more or less in line with most other rivals in the daily trainer category.

Lems Zenspeed+ Insole thickness
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 4.1 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 476 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.7 mm
Insole thickness
8.8 mm

Removable insole

One of the ZENSPEED+'s unique features compared to regular running shoes is its cork insole, which isn't the best material for energy return and likely contributes to the poor result we found earlier. That said, the good news is that it's super easy to swap it for a regular insole.

Lems ZENSPEED+ Removable insole
Test results
ZENSPEED+ Yes

Reflective elements

We always prefer reflective elements over having none at all. Here, Lems added a reflective version of its logo, which is a nice detail that enhances both the branding and the runner's visibility at night.

Test results
ZENSPEED+ Yes

Tongue padding

The easiest way to create a lacing system that works well is to use punched eyelets with a reinforced cage and flat laces. That's exactly what Lems did here, following the KISS approach to shoe design.

Lems Zenspeed+ eyelet

As for the tongue, we found it perfectly padded for long hours, with 6.6 mm of thickness. It's a sweet spot that balances comfort while avoiding unnecessary weight, something we clearly noticed when we weighed the shoe earlier.

Lems Zenspeed+ Tongue padding
Test results
ZENSPEED+ 6.6 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 481 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.0 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue features a semi-gusseted design that keeps it securely in place, and we found it absolutely flawless.

Lems Zenspeed+ Tongue: gusset type
Test results
ZENSPEED+ Both sides (semi)

Heel tab

The heel features a simple, streamlined design without any kind of heel tab.

Lems Zenspeed+ Heel tab
Test results
ZENSPEED+ None

Price

For performance-obsessed runners, the Lems ZENSPEED+ isn't a good investment. It costs as much as a premium daily trainer but delivers significantly less energy return. However, if you value other aspects of a running shoe, such as build quality, and you're drawn to Lems' aesthetics, it could still be worthy of your wallet.

Test results
ZENSPEED+ $175
Average $157
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
$55
Price
$500