Our verdict

The Danner Trail 2650, which I found to be a supremely comfortable and capable hiking shoe, boasts a heritage and style that’s brought the early 20th century into the 21st. These are more than just a statement piece. With traction that prevented me from accidentally slipping and a midsole that provided intense comfort, there’s very little to pick at in the 2650.

Pros

  • Lightweight
  • Good grip
  • Incredible midsole
  • Protective TPU shank
  • Excellent lockdown
  • Fits true to size
  • Breathable

Cons

  • Ankle support isn’t there
  • No waterproofing

Audience verdict

91
Superb!

Danner Trail 2650 review and lab test

Danner-Trail-1650_23.jpg

With a plush midsole and a solid leather/mesh construction, the Trail 2650 offers a whole lot to love. With some features that seem novel but feel very natural, the Trail 2650 is this reviewer's new go-to hiking shoe. 

Who the hiking shoe is for

Danner-Trail-1650_03.jpg

The Danner Trail 2650 is suitable for day hikes with lighter pack loads. With a super-plushy midsole and Vibram outsole, there are lots of pros to having this with you on your next trip. 

Who the Danner Trail 2650 is not for

I believe that there's a better option out there for you if: 

  • You need something with waterproofing. Try the Merrell Moab 3 GTX
  • You want a shoe with more support for longer hikes. I recommend the Adidas Terrex AX4 as it has the support you need.

The Danner Trail 2650 is wonderfully lightweight

Danner-Trail-1650_26.jpg

If you’re considering jumping into hiking shoes rather than hiking boots then you’ve come to the right place. Lighter shoes mean more weight saved (the extra grams on your feet cost more calories than on your back!)

The Danner Trail 2650 weighs in at a supremely lightweight 11.28oz (320g) which makes it one of the lightest trail shoes on the market. 

The MOST comfortable midsole

Danner-Trail-1650_22.jpg

It’s a big claim, but I haven’t felt a more comfortable hiking shoe midsole. Maybe something like the Hoka TenNine GTX but I think we can all agree that this is more thoroughbred hiking than whatever that is. 

Danner’s lightweight EVA midsole is actually pretty chunky but offers a pretty natural 8mm heel-toe drop. There was very little to break-in in terms of the midsole, which is always a bonus. I felt like I could walk for days in this. 

Danner-Trail-1650_12.jpg

One thing I have to mention though is that you lose a bit of ground feel with the Trail 2650. I quite like ground feel, but that comes from trail running where it’s helpful for knowing what you’re running on. It’s less necessary for hiking shoes. 

The Danner Trail 2650 could be more supportive

One loss with a hiking shoe is you miss out on the added ankle support. I personally feel that ankle support is often misrepresented as a necessity in hiking; if you have weak ankles you’re still likely to roll them in a boot. 

Danner-Trail-1650_14.jpg

That being said, if you do worry about your ankles, this might not be the shoe for you. Unlike other hiking shoes like the Salomon X Ultra 4 Danner hasn’t added extra strapping to keep your foot and ankle straight in difficult conditions. 

Excellent lockdown and fit

Danner’s telltale red-lacing is more than a stylish addition here. The Trail 2650 has plenty of lacing, with 15 lacing holes and a really long lace you can walk relaxed knowing your foot isn’t going anywhere. 

Danner-Trail-1650_15.jpg

On a side note, the laces are some of the best I’ve tested when it comes to slipping. In our lab, it took 38.3N to untie a knot, which is well above the average. 

Danner-Trail-1650_13.jpg

More than that, the external heel counter creates a really nice, fitted heel cup to really secure the foot into the shoe. No blisters here!

Consistent grip

With 4.25mm lugs, the depth of the Danner Trail 2650s grip worried me slightly (the average for hiking shoes is 4.3mm). That being said, for this shoe I found the grip ideal. 

Danner-Trail-1650_08.jpg

I’ll put it down to the flexibility and softness of the midsole. With a flexibility result of 31.62N (force taken to bend the shoe to 45°), the Danner Trail 2650 is a fair bit more flexible than other similar trail shoes. 

Danner-Trail-1650_17.jpg

This means that more of the shoe can get in contact with the ground, giving a greater surface area than a firmer shoe, regardless of the depth of the lugs. 

Danner-Trail-1650_18.jpg

Moreover, the Vibram outsole is reliable and durable. 

Danner-Trail-1650_21.jpg

Protection underfoot in the Danner Trail 2650

One worry I usually hear about hiking shoes with soft midsoles is the damage that can be done to your feet over time. A couple of hundred miles on sharp rocks, sticks, and even some glass; something might end up in your foot. 

Danner-Trail-1650_09.jpg

Danner’s placed a TPU shank throughout the shoe to give it some structure but also to protect the shoe (and therefore you) from the ground beneath you. It’s not a new idea, but it definitely helps keep this shoe going for longer. 

Not waterproof, but who needs it?

I might not be the best person to ask about Gore-tex in hiking shoes. While I know that it can be useful for some situations (small puddles and light rain), I don’t think it’s worth the price, weight, and loss of breathability. 

Danner-Trail-1650_25.jpg

Great news then, that I didn’t try the Danner Trail 2650 GTX, but instead went for the very water-welcoming base pair. The leather/mesh construction of the upper does not lend itself to any waterproofing and actually gets wet pretty fast. 

Danner-Trail-1650_11.jpg

While not ideal, they are super-breathable so I found my feet dried really quickly once given a chance. This can either be a pro or a con depending on how you like your hikes. 

Conclusion

I really didn’t expect to enjoy the Danner Trail 2650 as much as I did. I’d heard a lot about the fad/lifestyle following of the brand. They really surprised me though, with a super-comfy midsole, great grip and incredibly lightweight I don’t think you could go wrong with a pair of these!

Complete lab-specs overview 

  Danner Trail 2650
Whole shoe
Weight (g) 320
Drop (mm)

8

Flexibility of the shoe (N)

31.62

Flexibility of the shoe (Freezer 20 min) (N) 54.42
Flexibility of the shoe (% of change) 72.1
Lace slip test with the knot (N) 38.3
Longitudinal flexibility (1-5 scale, 5 being the stiffest) 2.0
Torsional flexibility (1-5 scale, 5 being the stiffest) 2.0
Upper
Thickness - Tongue (mm) 7.94
Width Upper - Forefoot (mm) 100.4
Width Upper - Heel (mm) 74.2
Lace Stretch (1-5 scale, 5 being the most stretchy) 3.0
Flexibility of the heel counter (1-5 scale, 5 being the stiffest) 3.0
Thickness of Heel Counter (mm) 9.42
Toe Guard No
Tongue: gusset type Full
Heel: pull tab Yes
Midsole
Width Midsole - Forefoot (mm) 110.8
Width Midsole - Heel (mm) 82.1
Durometer Midsole Heel (Room temperature) (HA) 52.67
Outsole
Outsole thickness (Heel) (mm) 5.85
Lugs Depth (mm) 4.25
Lugs (Amount) 48
Durometer Outsole Heel (Room temperature) (HC) 85.5
Insole
Insole Heel Thickness (mm) 6.3
Insole: removable Yes