Our verdict

Darimati chooses a niche path with this city-first shoe, and we believe that makes sense for a young brand born on Kickstarter. We found in the lab that the A-TPU foam delivers real bounce, which surprised us in a good way. The BR-001 performs wonderfully for casual runs and everyday wear. Still, we think the heavy build and stiff platform reduce its promised versatility. In our view, it works best for runners who value style and stability over light weight and flexibility.

Pros

  • High energy return from A-TPU foam
  • Stable ride
  • Toebox is made to last
  • Good materials
  • Neutral, everyday-ready design
  • Ideal for cold temperatures
  • Reasonably priced
  • Excellent for casual runners
  • Amazing reflective elements

Cons

  • Heavier than expected
  • Limited breathability
  • Maybe too stiff

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

We found this shoe especially suitable for:

  • Casual runners or weekend warriors who want a model that performs well on short runs and still feels comfortable for everyday wear.
  • Runners who enjoy discovering and supporting smaller brands bringing fresh ideas to the market.
  • Those looking for a daily trainer that delivers a stable ride with a lively, responsive feel underfoot based on our lab tests.

Darimati BR-001

Who should NOT buy

Darimati is a Kickstarter-born brand, and that means limited availability and slow shipping. If you need a fast-delivery, ready-to-order option, we think it’s not the best choice right now. We believe you should consider the Adidas Adizero EVO SL or the ASICS Novablast 5 instead.

We also found in the lab that the thick outsole creates a stiff-underfoot feel that may not suit everyone. If you prefer a smoother ride, we do not recommend this model. From our perspective, the Altra Experience Flow 2 is a more flexible and natural-feeling alternative while keeping a fun and bouncy ride.

Darimati BR-001 parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

Despite its moderate stack height, the Darimati BR-001 delivers reliable shock absorption, posting 130 SA in the heel and 104 SA in the forefoot in our lab tests.

These figures sit right around our lab average, and in our view, they align perfectly with the shoe’s intended purpose: short to moderate city runs.

Darimati BR-001 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
BR-001 130 SA
Average 130 SA
Compared to 320 running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
173 SA

Energy return

One of the very pleasant surprises of the Darimati BR-001 is its midsole. Many shoes from startups or small brands rely on EVA foams to reduce costs, but this model features an A-TPU foam. Yes, it’s the same compound (albeit different formulation) that you can find, for example, in the ASICS Megablast.

Thanks to the A-TPU foam, the BR-001 feels really peppy underfoot, and our lab tests confirmed it with 67.5% energy return in the heel and 68.7% in the forefoot.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
BR-001 67.5%
Average 58.6%
Compared to 317 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
83.0%

Heel stack

Darimati clearly went for a modern approach with the midsole, combining a solid stack height with a premium foam choice. The 36.6 mm we measured in the heel feels more than sufficient for this shoe, and anything higher could have made the ride feel bulky and less agile.

Darimati BR-001 Heel stack
Test results
BR-001 36.6 mm
Average 34.8 mm
Compared to 512 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot stack comes in at 25.3 mm, which feels perfectly reasonable for this type of shoe. We’re satisfied with that measurement, as this model doesn’t need a maximalist build to perform well.

Darimati BR-001 Forefoot stack
Test results
BR-001 25.3 mm
Average 26.2 mm
Compared to 512 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
38.5 mm

Drop

We identified a major discrepancy in the stated drop. Darimati lists it at 6 mm, but following our standard World Athletics-based measurement protocol, we recorded 11.3 mm.

Even a quick look at the shoe cut in half makes it clear this is not a moderate drop, and on the run it confirms that impression, feeling much closer to a Pegasus-style setup.

Darimati BR-001 Drop
Test results
BR-001 11.3 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 512 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Updated
Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

The A-TPU foam in the Darimati BR-001 feels pleasant underfoot without reaching an overly plush sensation, and after testing it ourselves, we believe it strikes a smart middle ground for a shoe designed to handle plenty of walking mixed with running in its all-purpose role.

Our Asker C durometer reading of 32.5 AC places it in the softer range on paper. However, the underfoot feel is not as soft as the numbers suggest, since the thick outsole makes the ride feel slightly firmer overall.

Darimati BR-001 Midsole softness
Test results
BR-001 32.5 AC
Average 36.3 AC
Compared to 170 running shoes
Number of shoes
19.6 AC
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
54.0 AC

Rocker

Another design detail that shows the Darimati BR-001 is built for more than just running is its rocker. While it has a mild curvature, it is less pronounced than in many modern shoes, and after testing it ourselves, we think this was a smart choice.

A highly-rockered shoe can feel awkward for daily wear, and with its moderate stack and soft foam, this more subtle rocker fits the overall design.

Darimati BR-001 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
Darimati BR-001 Internal length
Test results
BR-001 275.6 mm
Average 269.4 mm
Compared to 256 running shoes
Number of shoes
259.5 mm
Internal length
277.6 mm

Width / Fit

At its widest point, we measured a generous 97.0 mm, which makes the BR-001 especially accommodating for runners with wider feet.

This added width becomes even more important since Darimati does not offer the shoe in a 2E option, leaving standard width as the only available choice.

Darimati BR-001 Width / Fit
Test results
BR-001 97.0 mm
Average 95.1 mm
Compared to 267 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
101.1 mm

Toebox width

The toebox also performs well for most feet, measuring 73.0 mm in our second reading.

Darimati BR-001 Toebox width 2
Test results
BR-001 73.0 mm
Average 73.3 mm
Compared to 267 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
82.6 mm

Toebox height

To wrap up the fit section, we measured the toebox height.

Considering the shoe’s city-ready and lifestyle-friendly design, we were pleased to find ample room to move the toes, with a generous 33.4 mm of vertical space.

Darimati BR-001 Toebox height
Test results
BR-001 33.4 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 267 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.0 mm
Toebox height
34.3 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

Darimati is a new brand, and we had no prior data on its outsole performance. Fortunately, the BR-001 performed well in our lab, scoring 0.51 in the SATRA TM144 test.

This result indicates dependable traction on both dry and wet surfaces, making it a reliable option for all-weather runs, including city sidewalks.

Test results
BR-001 0.51
Average 0.49
Compared to 311 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.85

Outsole design

The outsole design is straightforward, featuring a full-length rubber layer with butterfly-shaped lugs. Interestingly, Darimati chose an approach that feels closer to a trail-inspired setup, but with shallow lugs, similar to what Adidas implemented with the EVO SL ATR.

Darimati BR-001 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

Because of its full-length outsole coverage, the BR-001 shows a high stiffness of 19.6N, which caught us slightly by surprise. We’re generally cautious with stiff daily trainers, as more flexible shoes usually feel more forgiving and comfortable during long hours on foot.

Still, it ultimately comes down to personal preference. Now that you have the data, you can make your own decision.

Darimati BR-001 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
BR-001 19.6N
Average 15.4N
Compared to 314 running shoes
Number of shoes
3.9N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

For us, the main drawback of the BR-001 is its weight. At 10.8 oz or 306g on our scale, it feels heavier than expected considering its stack height and A-TPU midsole, and we suspect the outsole plays a significant role here.

Perhaps in the next version Darimati can develop a lighter and more efficient outsole compound...

Darimati BR-001 Weight
Test results
BR-001 10.8 oz (306g)
Average 9.3 oz (264g)
Compared to 513 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.3 oz (149g)
Weight
12.9 oz (366g)

Breathability

After testing the Darimati BR-001 with our smoke machine, we observed slightly restricted airflow and rated it 2/5 for breathability.

It’s clear that the Korean brand prioritized comfort and durability, as the ventilation holes appear partially blocked by an additional layer, something we will check under the microscope in a minute.

There is indeed a secondary layer that reduces ventilation, but at the same time it makes the upper feel plush and comfortable for everyday use, while also adding extra durability.

Darimati BR-001 mesh

Whether this was the right decision depends on your preferences and location.

Darimati BR-001 microscope mesh

On very hot summer days the shoe will likely feel warm, although for runs under 1 hour it may not be a major issue. Still, more airflow would have been welcome.

From a build quality and comfort perspective, the upper is highly impressive, especially considering this is the first shoe developed by this startup.

Test results
BR-001 2
Average 3.7
Compared to 442 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

One area where Darimati clearly shows confidence with the BR-001 is stability. It remains a neutral running shoe, but with a clear focus on delivering a steady, grounded feel, and that is noticeable during runs.

The brand highlights this approach with its Stable Core design, making it an interesting choice for runners who want a more stable ride without moving into traditional stability-shoe territory.

Torsional rigidity

Torsional rigidity is clearly on the higher side, and we believe the large outsole is likely responsible.

We rated it 4/5, which somewhat contrasts with Darimati’s statement that "stability doesn’t mean stiffness." That may be debatable, but truth is that the BR-001 does feel stiff in practice.

Test results
BR-001 4
Average 3.5
Compared to 491 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter avoids excessive stiffness, which we appreciated, and we rated it 3/5. This aligns with many daily trainers that take a safe and moderate approach in this area.

Test results
BR-001 3
Average 2.9
Compared to 475 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

While we appreciated the controlled stack height of the BR-001, we also liked that Darimati kept the footprint sensible and avoided a bulky platform. At 116.8 mm in the forefoot, it sits slightly above our lab average.

Darimati BR-001 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
BR-001 116.8 mm
Average 114.4 mm
Compared to 513 running shoes
Number of shoes
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
127.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

Possibly due to its stability focus, the heel measures a slightly wider 95.5 mm. Even so, it’s far from excessive, and the shoe consistently felt agile and confident when taking turns, for example.

Darimati BR-001 Midsole width - heel
Test results
BR-001 95.5 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 513 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

Our durability test series begins on a high note, earning a 5/5 for toebox durability when we applied the test to the mesh. On top of that, the shoe features a very generous toe bumper that adds extra protection up front.

Test results
BR-001 5
Average 2.6
Compared to 376 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding was not among the most durable we’ve tested in the lab and we gave it a dismal 1/5. For runners who tend to wear through this area, this could be a concerning result.

Test results
BR-001 1
Average 3.4
Compared to 370 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

We recorded a disappointing result in our outsole durability test, as 2.8 mm of rubber wore away after the Dremel completed its third run. Clearly not the outcome we were hoping for.

Test results
BR-001 2.8 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 354 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

To offset the low score in our durability test, we can at least highlight the thick 3.9 mm outsole. It doesn’t completely remove our concerns, and it does add noticeable weight, so it’s very clear that the rubber isn’t meant to be the standout feature of this shoe.

Darimati BR-001 Outsole thickness
Test results
BR-001 3.9 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 509 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

There’s nothing particularly remarkable about the insole, which measures 4.0 mm thick and uses a basic material. Unfortunately, it does not feature A-TPU here.

Darimati BR-001 Insole thickness
Test results
BR-001 4.0 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 507 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.8 mm

Removable insole

The insole is fully removable, making it easy to replace with an alternative if needed.

Darimati BR-001 Removable insole
Test results
BR-001 Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

Using A-TPU brings several advantages, and one of the key ones is strong resistance to cold temperatures. After 20 minutes in our freezer, the foam became only 9% firmer, showing impressive consistency in freezing temps.

Darimati BR-001 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
BR-001 9%
Average 24%
Compared to 437 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Reflective elements

This shoe is strongly marketed for city running, so we expected visible and effective reflective elements for obvious reasons. We’re happy to say that Darimati delivered, and other brands could certainly take note of this implementation.

Test results
BR-001 Yes

Tongue padding

We liked the Salomon-inspired lacing system, which is excellent from a time-saving standpoint and makes adjustments quick and simple. However, we know that it does not work for everyone, and the good news is that it’s very easy to swap out if you prefer a more traditional setup.

The tongue keeps things minimal with 4.0 mm of padding, avoiding an overly thick foam construction. This lighter approach feels consistent with the rest of the upper and matches the shoe’s streamlined design.

Darimati BR-001 Tongue padding
Test results
BR-001 4.0 mm
Average 5.7 mm
Compared to 510 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue features a semi-gusseted design with a very narrow strip of fabric, yet it’s sufficient to enhance lockdown and keep the foot securely in place.

Darimati BR-001 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
BR-001 Both sides (semi)

Heel tab

The heel incorporates a sleek finger-loop tab that adds a stylish touch and looks genuinely eye-catching.

Darimati BR-001 Heel tab
Test results
BR-001 Finger loop