Our verdict

84
Good
  • Cushioning 81
  • Stability 88
  • Durability 76
Born of a creative collaboration between Zendaya and Law Roach, the On Cloudzone Moon makes a case for elite sneaker status, especially with its price point. But after cutting through the shoe and its marketing in our lab, we have some reservations about its true value for money. The lack of cushioning for all-day wear and medium-level durability would be our biggest question marks. But otherwise, it is a decently comfortable and sleek-looking sneaker that would get nothing but praise if it cost £50 less.

Pros

  • Impressive grip on wet surfaces
  • Lighter than average sneaker
  • Stable for a neutral shoe
  • Comfortable step-in feel
  • Perfect medium fit
  • Snappy toe-offs
  • 'Zendaya sneaker'

Cons

  • Mediocre cushioning
  • Expensive for what it offers

Who should buy

The On Cloudzone Moon is worth considering if:

  • you like the retro-runner take on a clean On Cloud shoe
  • you prefer firmer, snappier platforms to plush, max-cushioned ones
  • you need a versatile kick for various summer outfits

On Cloudzone Moon review

Who should NOT buy

Its price is probably the most off-putting aspect of the Cloudzone Moon. There is an endless array of equally appealing and comfortable, if not more so, retro trainers available at a notably lower cost!

The Nike Zoom Vomero 5, the ASICS Gel 1130, and the New Balance 2002R, to name just a few!

On Cloudzone Moon lab test

Cushioning

Shock absorption

Its high price point and 'all-day shoe' positioning can raise expectations regarding the Cloudzone Moon's cushioning.

However, its shock absorption proved to be rather moderate at 104 SA in the heel. While this is twice as much as in the adidas Samba (47 SA), it doesn't feel sufficient for spending long hours on your feet.

On Cloudzone Moon Shock absorption heel
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 104 SA
Average 88 SA
Compared to 70 trainers
Number of shoes
31 SA
Shock absorption
123 SA

Energy return

With a moderate energy return of 49.6%, the Cloudzone Moon feels decently responsive, without feeling dull. It's an optimal middle ground for walking, as it makes the ride feel predictable without 'eating up' your effort.

Test results
Cloudzone Moon 49.6%
Average 50.2%
Compared to 70 trainers
Number of shoes
40.0%
Energy return
65.0%

Heel stack

Even though we measured its heel stack at an above-average 34.4 mm, the Cloudzone Moon isn't as platformy as some other trainers. It is actually lower than the New Balance 574 (38.2 mm).

On Cloudzone Moon Heel stack
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 34.4 mm
Average 30.6 mm
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
16.9 mm
Heel stack
50.5 mm

Forefoot stack

But it does feel a little more substantial under the ball of the foot with a high forefoot stack of 25.3 mm.

On Cloudzone Moon Forefoot stack
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 25.3 mm
Average 19.5 mm
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
10.3 mm
Forefoot stack
29.5 mm

Drop

Its conventional heel-to-toe drop of 9.1 mm helps this On shoe feel on par with most other casual trainers.

With a slight heel elevation, it accommodates long hours of walking without straining the wearer's Achilles tendon and calves.

On Cloudzone Moon Drop
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 9.1 mm
Average 11.0 mm
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
3.5 mm
Drop
17.2 mm

Midsole softness

Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

The Cloudzone Moon relies on a dual-density midsole, with a softer foam layer placed atop a firmer one to balance comfort and stability.

The bottom foam showed a rather hard durometer reading of 58.5 AC, but the compressible gaps of its CloudTec design make the experience feel more forgiving.

On Cloudzone Moon Midsole softness
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 58.8 AC
Average 50.2 AC
Compared to 38 trainers
Number of shoes
34.0 AC
Soft ←→ Firm
85.3 AC

Secondary foam

Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

The top foam, on the other hand, is notably softer at 37.1 AC. It creates a comfortable step-in feel, softening the blow directly underfoot.

On Cloudzone Moon Secondary foam softness
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 37.1 AC
Average 52.9 AC
Compared to 18 trainers
Number of shoes
28.2 AC
Soft ←→ Firm
70.6 AC

Rocker

The shoe's profile is nearly flat, with no pronounced toe rockers or heel bevels. That keeps it looking sleek and streamlined.

On Cloudzone Moon Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
On Cloudzone Moon Internal length
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 267.4 mm
Average 272.1 mm
Compared to 77 trainers
Number of shoes
265.3 mm
Internal length
280.1 mm

Width / Fit

Available in one standard width only, the On Cloudzone Moon fits perfectly true to medium width.

Measuring a one-to-one gel cast of its interior, our calliper recorded 93.0 mm in its widest part. That falls right in line with the category average.

On Cloudzone Moon Width / Fit
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 93.0 mm
Average 92.4 mm
Compared to 93 trainers
Number of shoes
85.4 mm
Width / Fit
97.0 mm

Toebox width

Despite some mild tapering, the shoe's toebox also measured a medium width of 70.0 mm in the big toe area.

On Cloudzone Moon Toebox width
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 70.0 mm
Average 68.7 mm
Compared to 93 trainers
Number of shoes
61.9 mm
Toebox width
74.1 mm

Toebox height

Even its toebox height falls squarely into the middle with a calliper reading of 27.2 mm.

That way, this On shoe provides just enough wiggle room both horizontally and vertically.

On Cloudzone Moon Toebox height
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 27.2 mm
Average 27.8 mm
Compared to 93 trainers
Number of shoes
20.7 mm
Toebox height
35.0 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

Going for a walk after the rain won't be an issue thanks to this On Cloud shoe's tacky rubber.

With an impressive friction coefficient of 0.79, it delivers strong grip on wet concrete and other slippery surfaces.

Test results
Cloudzone Moon 0.79
Average 0.47
Compared to 69 trainers
Number of shoes
0.13
Heel traction
0.80

Outsole design

Similar to most other On shoes, the Cloudzone Moon's sole is only partially covered with rubber. But we can't complain because it is present in the key areas of the heel and forefoot.

On Cloudzone Moon Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

Its above-average forefoot stack and firm foam limit this On shoe's pliability, making toe-offs snappier but offering less natural flexibility.

On Cloudzone Moon forefoot flex

Measuring its stiffness at 17.1N, we found it to be on par with the New Balance 550, which is 30% stiffer than the average sneaker.

On Cloudzone Moon Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 17.1N
Average 13.3N
Compared to 70 trainers
Number of shoes
4.5N
Flexible ←→ Stiff
22.7N

Weight

In a world of chunky and overbuilt trainers, the On Cloudzone Moon keeps it light and low-profile at 11.0 oz (312g). It is surely not the lightest we've tested and doesn't exactly disappear on the foot, but it doesn't drag it down either.

On Cloudzone Moon Weight
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 11.0 oz (312g)
Average 13.7 oz (387g)
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
9.1 oz (258g)
Weight
17.7 oz (502g)

Stability

Lateral stability test

The Cloudzone Moon is a purely neutral sneaker with no added arch support to correct overpronation or excessive inward rolling of the foot.

But there is a good amount of inherent stability coming from its firm base and a nylon Speedboard shank embedded in its midsole at the midfoot.

Torsional rigidity

Updated

The aforementioned elements work together to raise this On shoe's torsional rigidity well above the average!

Twisting the Cloudzone Moon by 10 degrees in either direction, we measured a substantial torque of 18.7 Nm! That means 20% more stiffness compared to the average sneaker!

Our feet and ankles didn't have to work overtime to maintain alignment and prevent undesirable lateral rollovers.

On Cloudzone Moon Torsional rigidity
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 18.7 Nm
Average 15.5 Nm
Compared to 22 trainers
Number of shoes
9.2 Nm
Torsional rigidity
23.2 Nm

Heel counter stiffness

The shoe also packs some essential rigidity in the heel counter to steady the rearfoot without overburdening it. On a 1-5 scale, we assessed its heel counter stiffness as 3.

Test results
Cloudzone Moon 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Even though it has a visually clean-cut silhouette, we found that the Cloudzone Moon's midsole is no narrower than average.

The widest part of its forefoot showed a standard calliper reading of 110.2 mm.

On Cloudzone Moon Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 110.2 mm
Average 109.0 mm
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
95.1 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
121.4 mm

Midsole width - heel

There is no extra bulk in its heel either, as the shoe's broadest area returned a perfectly standard width of 83.6 mm.

On Cloudzone Moon Midsole width - heel
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 83.6 mm
Average 84.0 mm
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
67.7 mm
Midsole width - heel
103.1 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

As dainty as it seems, the mesh material on the Cloudzone Moon's toebox exhibited surprising wear resistance in our Dremel test!

With surface-level damage, it helped the shoe's toebox durability score a solid 4 out of 5.

Test results
Cloudzone Moon 4
Average 3.7
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

However, the textile on the shoe's collar causes concerns about premature wear, as our Dremel tore it apart within seconds.

Thus, we couldn't rate the shoe's heel padding durability any higher than 2 out of 5.

Test results
Cloudzone Moon 2
Average 3.2
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

Fortunately, the Cloudzone Moon's rubber nailed our durability test with a shallow dent of 0.8 mm.

Test results
Cloudzone Moon 0.8 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear (good to bad)
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

But we have some reservations about the long-term durability of this shoe's underside. A fairly thin 2.4 mm rubber layer and a lot of exposed foam in the midfoot can deteriorate more quickly than a thick, full-length outsole.

And that would be an unfortunate turn of events for a £180 sneaker.

On Cloudzone Moon Outsole thickness
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 2.4 mm
Average 5.1 mm
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
2.4 mm
Outsole thickness
8.2 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

A sufficiently padded insole complements the shoe's soft layer of midsole foam in creating a pleasant step-in feel.

Unlike most insoles, it's not entirely smooth but features an intricate textured pattern that creates a memory foam-like effect.

On Cloudzone Moon Insole thickness
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 4.2 mm
Average 4.9 mm
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
3.1 mm
Insole thickness
10.7 mm

Removable insole

But it's also easy to remove in case you opt for a custom orthotic.

On Cloudzone Moon Removable insole
Test results
Cloudzone Moon Yes

Reflective elements

Th On logo didn't reflect light as vividly as it did on most other On Cloud shoes we've tested.

Test results
Cloudzone Moon Yes

Tongue padding

The Cloudzone Moon packs sufficient collar and tongue padding for a comfortable, pressure-free experience. Our calliper measured its tongue thickness at a standard 8.8 mm.

On Cloudzone Moon Tongue padding
Test results
Cloudzone Moon 8.8 mm
Average 9.5 mm
Compared to 101 trainers
Number of shoes
0.7 mm
Tongue padding
23.0 mm

Tongue: gusset type

There is no risk of tongue shifting in this shoe thanks to its fully gusseted design. Not to mention a more secure midfoot lockdown.

On Cloudzone Moon Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Cloudzone Moon Both sides (full)

Heel tab

However, a gusseted tongue narrows the shoe's opening, and a finger loop makes it easier to slip the shoe on.

On Cloudzone Moon Heel tab
Test results
Cloudzone Moon Finger loop

Price

The Cloudzone Moon is one of the most expensive trainers in our catalogue, and it's not because of any outstanding comfort or quality. You're paying a considerable premium for the Zendaya and Law Roach association here.

On Cloudzone Moon Price
Test results
Cloudzone Moon $200
Compared to 108 trainers
Number of shoes
£60
Price
£220