Our verdict

Channelling that early-2000s idea of what a futuristic sneaker should look like, the ABZORB 2000 breaks up New Balance's long streak of 'boring dad shoes.' The kick's striking oversized aesthetic inevitably draws attention, whether you love it or hate it. On the functional side of things, our lab tests proved that the ABZORB 2000 ticks the boxes for a comfy, reliable daily beater with enough support and durability to last a good while.

Pros

  • Unusual retro-futuristic vibe
  • Good shock absorption for a casual kick
  • Highly stable and supportive
  • Amazing outsole grip on dry and wet
  • Solid durability and thick outsole
  • Comfortable step-in feel
  • Reflective N logo

Cons

  • Not for wide feet
  • Heavier than average

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

Having analysed the New Balance ABZORB 2000 from both a visual and a functional perspective, we believe that it can be a nice match for you if:

  • you are drawn to Y2K kicks that look like a match to the iMac G3 from early 2000s
  • you want to add a more progressive silhouette to your sneaker collection (but not as extreme as the Nike Shox)
  • you only settle for fashion&function and expect comfort and durability along with style

New Balance Abzorb 2000 review 

Who should NOT buy

If you like 2000s-inspired trainers but find this silhouette too extreme for your wardrobe, the New Balance 2002R and the 1906R provide a nice middle ground.

These kicks feature smaller, less pronounced ABZORB SBS pods and have a more classic dad-shoe vibe. Not to mention that they are much more affordable.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 lab test

Cushioning

Shock absorption

The shoe's ABZORB cushioning literally screams in caps that it's designed for shock absorption. And we are here to run our lab tests to measure exactly how much.

Recording 104 SA in the heel, we can confirm that this New Balance shoe offers more impact protection than the average lifestyle sneaker. However, it still runs behind the best cushioned kicks, even within the brand's own lineup. The New Balance 1000, by far, has the highest results at 122 SA.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Shock absorption heel
Test results
Abzorb 2000 104 SA
Average 89 SA
Compared to 64 trainers
Number of shoes
33 SA
Shock absorption
123 SA

Energy return

At first glance, it may seem like the shoe's massive ABZORB SBS pods are filled with air, like the Nike VaporMax, but that's not the case. These are, in fact, concave TPU elements that compress well but provide very little rebound.

The latter is reflected in the shoe's low energy return of only 49%. Despite its bubbly appearance, the NB ABZORB 2000 feels pretty static and is not particularly responsive.

Test results
Abzorb 2000 49.0%
Average 50.2%
Compared to 64 trainers
Number of shoes
40.0%
Energy return
64.0%

Heel stack

Despite the sneaker's massive design, its stack height is actually pretty moderate. Having cut its midsole in half, we used a digital calliper to measure the material thickness between the foot and the ground.

At 34.4 mm in the heel, it is even lower than the NB 9060 (37.3 mm) or the NB 990 v6 (39.1 mm).

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Heel stack
Test results
Abzorb 2000 34.4 mm
Average 30.7 mm
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
16.9 mm
Heel stack
50.5 mm

Forefoot stack

But it's the shoe's tall forefoot platform that is responsible for the bulk. We measured it notably higher than average at 25.9 mm.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Forefoot stack
Test results
Abzorb 2000 25.9 mm
Average 19.5 mm
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
9.7 mm
Forefoot stack
29.5 mm

Drop

That way, the NB ABZORB 1000 has a standard drop of 8.5 mm, making it comfortably ergonomic for a wide range of wearers.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Drop
Test results
Abzorb 2000 8.5 mm
Average 11.2 mm
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
3.5 mm
Drop
17.2 mm

Midsole softness

Updated
Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

Even though the shoe's midsole geometry allows some compression, every one of its components is made of very firm, even hard materials.

The primary full-length EVA foam showed a firm durometer reading of 54.1 AC, offering a very stable base directly underfoot.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Midsole softness
Test results
Abzorb 2000 54.1 AC
Average 48.3 AC
Compared to 32 trainers
Number of shoes
34.0 AC
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
62.3 AC

Secondary foam

Updated
Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

The ABZORB foam beneath it is hardly any softer, showing an equally firm durometer reading of 50.3 AC.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Secondary ABZORB foam

And finally, the ABZORB SBS pods are made of even harder TPU pods with the highest Asker C measurement of 61.0 AC.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Secondary foam softness ABZORB SBS
Test results
Abzorb 2000 50.3 AC
Average 53.8 AC
Compared to 15 trainers
Number of shoes
28.2 AC
Secondary foam (soft to firm)
70.6 AC

Rocker

The New Balance ABZORB 2000 has a very mild curvature in the toe and heel areas of the platform to ease transitions from heel to toe.

A small but necessary design tweak that helps to balance the shoe's chunky pods on the go.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
New Balance Abzorb 2000 Internal length
Test results
Abzorb 2000 267.9 mm
Average 272.3 mm
Compared to 81 trainers
Number of shoes
265.3 mm
Internal length
280.1 mm

Width / Fit

We hardly even complain about the fit and sizing of New Balance trainers, but when it comes to experimental designs like the ABZORB 2000, we expect some deviation from the norm.

Having retrieved a solid gel cast that replicates the shoe's interior, we couldn't help but notice its unusual diamond shape. Using a digital calliper, we measured the cast's widest part at only 89.8 mm.

This means the shoe is narrower than average in the ball-of-foot area, limiting its target audience to narrower foot shapes. There is no wide width for this model either.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Width / Fit
Test results
Abzorb 2000 89.8 mm
Average 92.4 mm
Compared to 87 trainers
Number of shoes
85.4 mm
Width / Fit
97.0 mm

Toebox width

The shoe's toebox also proved to be on the narrow side, with a moderate width of 67.2 mm in the big toe area.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Toebox width
Test results
Abzorb 2000 67.2 mm
Average 68.8 mm
Compared to 87 trainers
Number of shoes
63.9 mm
Toebox width
74.1 mm

Toebox height

Its vertical space, on the other hand, is on par with the sneaker average.

There is enough wiggle room with a toebox height of 27.6 mm.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Toebox height
Test results
Abzorb 2000 27.6 mm
Average 27.8 mm
Compared to 87 trainers
Number of shoes
20.7 mm
Toebox height
35.0 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

With tough black rubber on its pods, the ABZORB 2000 proved quite grippy for most urban scenarios! Mimicking a heel strike on a wet slab of concrete, we recorded this New Balance shoe's friction coefficient at an above-average 0.65.

That's a fantastic result for a casual sneaker, offering surefooted strides on both dry and wet surfaces.

Test results
Abzorb 2000 0.65
Average 0.45
Compared to 63 trainers
Number of shoes
0.13
Heel traction
0.80

Outsole design

The brand went with a segmented outsole design meant to resemble 'connected biological cells.' They perform their own functions, touching the floor at different stages of the gait cycle, yet work together as one organism.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

The ABZORB 2000 does not want to bend so easily. At 16.6N, we measured that its thick forefoot stack and large pods require more force to bend by 30 degrees than the average sneaker.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 forefoot flex

That makes it one of the stiffest NB trainers, along with the New Balance 2002R (17.8N), offering more support for long hours of walking nd standing but making the ride feel less natural.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Abzorb 2000 16.6N
Average 13.4N
Compared to 64 trainers
Number of shoes
4.6N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
22.7N

Weight

With its beefed-up proportions, we are not surprised that the New Balance ABZORB 2000 falls into the heavier range of trainers. Weighing it in a men's US size 9, we got as much as 14.6 oz (390g), which is comparable to the Nike Dunk Low (14.8 oz).

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Weight
Test results
Abzorb 2000 14.6 oz (414g)
Average 13.8 oz (390g)
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
9.1 oz (258g)
Weight
19.9 oz (564g)

Breathability

The shoe's tightly woven, no-sew mesh upper is not particularly eager to release heat and moisture from its interior.

Assessing the moderate pace of smoke expulsion through this NB shoe's toebox, we lowered its breathability score to 3 out of 5.

Our transparency test further confirmed the dense nature of this shoe's interior lining and outer mesh.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Breathability Microscope test

The latter becomes even clearer in our microscope shots, where ventilation pores are hardly visible between the treads.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Breathability upper under microscope

Test results
Abzorb 2000 3
Average 3
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

The New Balance ABZORB 2000 is not positioned as a highly stable sneaker, but its supportive nature becomes immediately apparent the moment you put it on.

The shoe's busy design incorporates a good amount of structural support, making it a viable option for people with moderate overpronation.

Torsional rigidity

Updated

First of all, this New Balance sneaker is not easily twisted. Its firm midsole components and Stability Web shank create so much torsional rigidity that it takes an above-average torque of 16.7 Nm to twist this sneaker left and right. This solid base prevents the foot from excessively rolling inwards.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Torsional rigidity
Test results
Abzorb 2000 16.7 Nm
Average 15.8 Nm
Compared to 16 trainers
Number of shoes
9.7 Nm
Torsional rigidity
23.2 Nm

Heel counter stiffness

We also found the shoe's heel design structured but moderately malleable, offering heel and ankle support without putting too much pressure on the heel bone.

Test results
Abzorb 2000 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The ABZORB 2000 has a chunky silhouette for sure. But measuring the broadest area of its forefoot at 115.2 mm, we found that it is not as wide-set as the NB 9060 (121.0 mm).

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Abzorb 2000 115.2 mm
Average 108.9 mm
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
95.1 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
121.0 mm

Midsole width - heel

And even though its heel width exceeds the average at 91.6 mm, it is nowhere near the 103.1 mm wide heel base of the 9060!

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Abzorb 2000 91.6 mm
Average 83.9 mm
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
67.7 mm
Midsole width - heel
103.1 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

Even though most of the ABZORB 2000's upper features exposed mesh, it showed decent wear resistance in our Dremel test. Assessing the damage as non-critical, we rated the shoe's toebox durability with a moderate 3 out of 5.

Test results
Abzorb 2000 3
Average 3.7
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The mesh lining inside its heel collar also resisted the Dremel fairly well, earning a middle-range score of 3 out of 5.

Test results
Abzorb 2000 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

And most importantly, the shoe's rubber outsole didn't melt under the Dremel either. In fact, it showed a better result than an average sneaker with a shallow 0.9 mm dent!

Test results
Abzorb 2000 0.9 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

With a whopping 5 mm of rubber thickness, this shoe's outsole is likely to be the last part to give up!

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Outsole thickness
Test results
Abzorb 2000 5.0 mm
Average 5.2 mm
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
2.9 mm
Outsole thickness
8.2 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

A moderate layer of foam padding buffers the foot from the shoe's firm midsole. But even though it's not a particularly plush, sink-in underfoot experience, the ABZORB 2000 feels pleasantly supportive.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Insole thickness
Test results
Abzorb 2000 3.7 mm
Average 5.1 mm
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
3.1 mm
Insole thickness
11.5 mm

Removable insole

You could use a different insert to adjust the in-shoe feel, but keep in mind that its fit is a bit narrower than average.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Removable insole
Test results
Abzorb 2000 Yes

Reflective elements

The ABZORB 2000's N logo and a small eyestay at the top proved to be reflective.

Test results
Abzorb 2000 Yes

Tongue padding

Our calliper measured the shoe tongue padding at a moderate 6.2 mm.

But most of this New Balance sneaker's interior padding is concentrated in the collar, offering a luxuriously comfortable fit around the ankle.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Tongue padding
Test results
Abzorb 2000 6.2 mm
Average 9.5 mm
Compared to 105 trainers
Number of shoes
0.7 mm
Tongue padding
23.0 mm

Tongue: gusset type

There are no gussets on the sides of this shoe's tongue, making it a traditional free-floating design.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Abzorb 2000 None

Heel tab

The shoe entry is rather effortless in this NB kick, so there is no need for a pull tab.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Heel tab
Test results
Abzorb 2000 None

Price

The ABZORB 2000's unconventional design puts it into the pricier category of New Balance trainers. It's not as premium as the Made in USA/UK models, but its overall build quality and unique design choices make it stand out from the crowd.

New Balance Abzorb 2000 Price
Test results
Abzorb 2000 $170
Compared to 120 trainers
Number of shoes
£60
Price
£220