7 Best Hiking Shoes in 2026

Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic on
7 Best Hiking Shoes in 2026

We buy shoes ourselves. We earn commissions when you buy through us, at no extra cost. Why trust us

When it comes to getting the right footgear for hiking, many are still at a loss. But don’t fret. Choosing the right pair need not be a nightmare, thanks to our best hiking shoes list and our handy buyer’s guide.

We have tested many hiking shoes to single out the best options. Whether you are after a light, urban pair or something a bit more rugged for a multi-day hike, we’ve got our top picks in different categories.

To learn about the nuances of hiking shoes, why toebox durability matters, or how stiffness affects support and stability, check out our guide.

How we test hiking shoes


At RunRepeat want to make sure you get the most up-to-date and honest reviews on the best hiking shoe options out there. Here is our approach:

  • We buy shoes ourselves: As an independent review website, we avoid sponsorships and purchase all hiking shoes with our own money to stay unbiased.
  • We test in real conditions: We take each shoe on a series of hikes on various distances and terrains to check every important aspect, including durability, comfort, waterproofness, traction, and more.
  • We go extra hard on popular shoes: We are especially wary of the most sought-after models, so we put them through our rigorous lab tests. 'Rigorous' to the point that we also slice the shoes open!

Best hiking shoes overall

What makes it the best?

It takes a lot to be crowned as the best hiking shoe, and this shoe delivers just that: a lot. It's cushioned, flexible, and waterproof. Its grip is out of this world, and there are many details, like a very padded and gusseted tongue, that seriously up the ante when it comes to overall comfort.

We took the Moab 3 GTX to the trails and cut it in half in the lab. Being able to see and measure all the components allows us to understand why this shoe leads the category. First, it's cushioning. While on the firmer side, it does not feel like a brick. It strikes the balance between ground feel and impact protection, as seen in its 85 SA rating in our shock absorption test.

Second, the grip of the Vibram outsole is 10/10. Our calliper measured the lugs to be 4.8 mm deep. Whatever we threw at them - rocks, snow, mud, gravel - they handled like pros. We can adapt as needed, since the midsole conforms to our feet, emerging 16.9% more pliable than average in our bend test.

The tongue is fully gusseted and allows nothing to get inside. The Gore-Tex membrane does the same job wonderfully. Our feet were dry whether we encountered puddles or rain. The best thing, though, about the tongue is its thickness. At 14.6 mm, it's 4.4 mm thicker than the average. It perfectly cushions the instep, and it's the reason why we never felt any lace bites.

The Gore-Tex membrane keeps the water out, but it also keeps the air from circulating. This is why we don't recommend this shoe to hikers who regularly hike in warm climates. 

Pros

  • Superb day-one comfort
  • Brilliant surface adhesion
  • Supportive like a work shoe
  • Remarkably durable
  • A-grade waterproofing
  • Sheds mud quite well
  • Protective toe box
  • Incredible overall quality
  • Incredible overall quality

Cons

  • Heavy for a low-top
  • Subpar breathability
  • Its shoelaces unravel often
  • Minimal shock absorption
Full review of Merrell Moab 3 GTX

Hiking shoes with the best durability

What makes it the best?

The adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low GTX is a beast in the mountains without feeling harsh on the feet. Lab tests reveal it offers protection without losing the cushioning, aggressive grip, and stability we need to navigate tricky terrain. However, its outstanding performance in our abrasion test proves it’s our most durable hiking shoe.

The upper remained intact after our Dremel test, scoring an impressive 4/5 in toebox durability. Moving to the outsole, the Continental Rubber got an insignificant 0.4 mm dent, making it 55% sturdier than average.

We feel well in control of our steps because of the shoe’s sturdy and grippy base. It features aggressive 6.7 mm lugs in the heel and a more versatile 3.6 mm set of lugs in the forefoot, delivering unwavering and all-encompassing traction across a wide range of surfaces.

We found the forefoot to be surprisingly forgiving, allowing us to adjust as needed in climbs and other scenarios. In our bend test, it emerged 5% more pliable than average.

The 37.2/24.6 mm stack hits the sweet spot of comfort and ground feel, with a strong 126 SA rating in the heel in our shock absorption test, proving it guards our feet from harsh landings.

However, we cannot recommend this pair to people who hike in warmer climates because of its Gore-Tex upper. Those who prioritise breathability should opt for a non-GTX shoe.

Pros

  • Well-cushioned and responsive
  • A tonne of impact protection
  • Rockered sole makes the ride smoother
  • Barely gets firmer in low temperatures
  • Excellent support and side-to-side stability
  • Top-notch waterproofing
  • Highly durable (especially the outsole)
  • Ideal grip for technical terrain
  • Sustainable materials (20%)

Cons

  • Much heavier than average
  • TPU heel clips may cause rubbing
Full review of adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low GTX

Hiking shoes with the best stability

What makes it the best?

Monster of a shoe, the Kaha 3 Low GTX remains HOKA's most well-cushioned and stable low-cut option. It's not the most affordable one either, but our lab tests confirmed that it offers indisputable value for money across nearly all areas. If you can accept its hefty weight, the Kaha 3 Low GTX delivers massive comfort and support for serious mileage and even multi-day hikes with a heavier backpack.

Pros

  • Great shock absorption for long hikes
  • Massive buffer from the trail
  • Boot-like stability for backpacking
  • Heavenly comfortable step-in feel
  • Amazing grip on mixed and hilly terrain
  • New form-fitting collar design
  • Premium-level durability

Cons

  • Much heavier than average
  • Too chunky and blocky for rocky trails
  • Not breathable
Full review of HOKA Kaha 3 Low GTX

Best hiking shoes with a wide toebox

What makes it the best?

Altra Olympus 6 Hike Low GTX made its commitment to lasting comfort clear during our hikes. Its roomy fit and excellent impact protection make it a great place to be in for long hours, while its springy ride, which we verified in the lab, creates a more effortless experience. Among hiking shoes, it’s our top pick for those with wide feet.

This Altra promises its most spacious Original FootShape Fit, and we created a gel mould replica to confirm its interior measurements. At the ball of the foot, we recorded a record-breaking 99.9 mm, the widest we’ve seen so far! Being 5.8 mm more spacious than average, those with broad feet, bunions, or extra-thick socks won’t have to deal with pressure points.

The midsole is composed of deep cushioning, particularly its mega forefoot stack of 29.5 mm, reducing strain to our toe joints. The heel stack is a more moderate 31.0 mm, but has leg-saving properties confirmed by its high 118 SA or shock absorption score.

With this shoe’s generous dimensions, we expected it to feel bulky and slow. Thankfully, its responsive midsole makes the overall experience feel lighter, with an impressive energy return score of 55.7%.

However, its thick forefoot loses the fluidity some people crave. Flexible shoes will deliver a more natural underfoot experience.

Pros

  • Excellent shock absorption
  • Comfortably soft cushioning
  • Ultra padded and cosy step-in feel
  • Exceptionally wide fit and footshaped toebox
  • Extra wide and stable platform
  • Highly durable leather and outsole
  • Excellent grip on smooth and wet rocks
  • Solid waterproofing

Cons

  • Not a true zero-drop (1.5 mm)
  • Midsole gets notably firmer in cold
  • Frail inner lining
Full review of Altra Olympus 6 Hike Low GTX

Best lightweight hiking shoes

What makes it the best?

On our test hikes with the Merrell Moab Speed 2, we already knew it was a contender for the best lightweight hiking shoe, and our lab further confirms it with a mere 11.6 oz (329g) build vs. the 13.4 oz (379g) average! Despite the 13.4% difference, this shoe blew us away with generous cushioning, solid footing, and top-tier durability.

Less weight usually means less cushioning, yet Moab Speed 2 defies the standard with a whopping 38.8 mm heel, 7.4 mm above average! All-day hikes felt effortless as the plush cushioning delivered lasting comfort. Our durometer confirms a low 31.8 AC reading, 32% softer than average.

While the foam is lighter than average, it is by no means unsteady because of the FlexPlate. This adds stiffness underfoot for a more controlled and stable experience, thereby preventing the early onset of fatigue. Our manual assessment confirms it’s hard to twist, earning a 5/5 torsional rigidity score.

Moab Speed 2’s all-around robust nature impressed us. Our Dremel was no match against the sturdy overlays in the upper and Vibram TC5+ outsole, earning 5/5 toebox durability and showing 20.0% less damage vs. average in the outsole.

However, we recommend limiting the use of this shoe to off-road surfaces and trails to preserve its life. The toothy 3.7 mm lugs tend to wear faster out in concrete and asphalt.

Pros

  • One of the lightest hiking shoes
  • Plush and abundant cushioning
  • Great support and stability
  • Perfect grip for moderate terrain
  • Excellent durability
  • Breathable for summer
  • Cosy step-in feel
  • Two loops for easy on-off

Cons

  • Frail inner lining
  • Small debris gets inside
Full review of Merrell Moab Speed 2

Hiking shoes with the best breathability

HOKA Mafate 5
84
Great

What makes it the best?

HOKA Mafate 5 gives the sensation of floating over the trails with its sky-high, cloud-like stack, airy upper, and excellent multi-terrain traction. It’s our top breathable hiking shoe that handles all distances well with its stable ride, as proven by our lab tests.

The upper feels breezy, and we never felt any heat or sweat build up despite trekking in the summer. Our lab test confirms it’s a fine choice for warm weather and all-day hikes, posting a strong 102 BR breathability score. The average running shoe’s score is only 68 BR, highlighting Mafate 5’s strong ventilation.

Each stride feels pampered with plush cushioning. Our calliper confirms a mega 42.9/33.9 mm stack, erasing ground feel almost entirely. The heel cushion returned world-class shock absorption of 160 SA, keeping our muscles and joints happy.

Surprisingly, the ride feels stable due to its Rocker Integrity Technology and broad base of 119.2/98.7 mm. Further enhancing our control on tricky terrain is the ever-reliable Vibram Megagrip outsole, earning a reliable 0.66 in our traction test. With 4.4 mm lugs, it bites into soft ground and sticks well on wet rocks. We had no slips, no matter where we hiked.

Unfortunately, with its short tongue and uneven cushioning, achieving a secure and comfortable fit is a hassle. It’s also non-gusseted, which makes it more prone to debris.

Pros

  • Even more plush cushioning
  • Enhanced energy return
  • Roomier fit than most HOKA models
  • Durable yet breathable knit upper
  • Built for long ultras
  • Outstanding Vibram Megagrip rubber
  • Same price as the previous version
  • Stable for its tall stack
  • Solid durability

Cons

  • Heavy (and heavier than version 4)
  • Tongue design could be much better
  • Could be too stiff for some
Full review of HOKA Mafate 5

Hiking shoes with the best shock absorption

What makes it the best?

Our hikes felt comfortable all the way with the ASICS Metafuji Trail beneath our feet. This cushioned cruiser offers the best shock absorption among hiking shoes we analysed in the lab, coupled with a lightweight and confidently grippy ride to keep us safe across mixed terrains.

The Metafuji Trail packs much foam between our feet and the ground, isolating us from sharp rocks and roots that we encounter. Our calliper shows a staggering stack height of 44.7/34.4 mm, keeping us cosy even during multi-hour adventures. Plus, it’s able to absorb 42% more impact than average in the heel with its 153 SA score.

Every landing is pure bliss, while every takeoff feels light and easy. For its maximalist height, we were surprised to find a low weight of 9.1 oz (258g). Compared to the average hiking shoe, it offers a significant weight savings of 31%!

The outsole features the ASICSGRIP compound, ensuring protection from slips as evidenced by its remarkable 0.80 score in our traction test. It includes 2.7 mm lugs that grip smooth trails and gravel well.

Those with wide or swollen feet may find the tapered toebox too restrictive. The Metafuji Trail is best suited for narrow feet, especially over long distances.

Pros

  • Exceptional shock absorption
  • Amazing ASICSGRIP outsole
  • High-end build quality
  • Ideal for narrow feet
  • Lightweight for a trail shoe
  • Fast-rolling forefoot rocker
  • Ideal for easy, flat-ish ultras
  • Outstanding upper with top ventilation
  • Record-breaking stack height

Cons

  • FF Blast+ foam limits energy return
  • Expensive
  • Minimal stability
  • Delicate upper prone to tearing
Full review of ASICS Metafuji Trail

Do you actually need hiking shoes?

Generally, common hiking shoes offer more protection, traction, and stability than trail runners and trainers. We have wear-tested and lab-tested all of these and can confidently guide you towards the right choice.

Salomon-X-Ultra-GTX_01.jpg

When you might get away with your running shoes: 

  • You’re the athletic type and know your way around spending time outdoors. 
  • You plan to do easy hikes: short, on rather even terrain, with no technical sections (sharp rocks, debris). Hard-packed and well-maintained trails can be covered in running shoes.

If, however, you plan to get into hiking for real and do frequent hikes, longer hikes, especially the ones with heavy backpacks and demanding terrain, then a sturdy, supportive, and grippy pair of hikers is what you need. 


We’ve inspected hiking footwear inside out - in the lab and out on the trails. What matters in hiking is: 

  1. Type of the terrain (hard ground or soft ground; hard-packed or loose)
  2. Season (do you need waterproof features? Is there any slush, mud, snow?)
  3. Weight of your backpack (backpacking asks for more stability and support)
  4. Length of the hike (easy and short hikes can be done in shoes meant for hiking fast and light, while longer hikes, especially multi-day ones, ask for support and stability). 

We’ve combined these into the most frequent combinations. Here’s how we’d go about finding the right pair. 

merrell-moab-2-gtx-lab-test.JPG

When to get an all-around day hiking shoe

You plan to do hikes that are rather easy and short. No technical terrain, scrambling, no heavy rain and snow.

Salomon Outpulse 1

We suggest getting a workhorse of a hiking shoe that will work in most cases but won’t excel at one thing specifically. 

Features to look for:

  • Lighter weight, around 14.1 oz (400g) or less 
  • Average-to-high breathability, which means shoes that scored 3, 4, or 5/5 on our breathability lab test*
  • Average-to-high flexibility because they allow for more natural foot movement. Stiffer shoes are better for technical terrain when you need extra stability. We measure the flexibility of every shoe and compare it to the average in the review.
  • Average lug depth (4 mm). We say average because the smallest lugs might not have enough grip and are best used in hybrid situations (covering both road and trails) and because very deep lugs will wear out soon and are best used on soft ground only. 

*In case you do plan to hike in wet weather, check out our list of waterproof hiking shoes we’ve tested so far. We dive into details on waterproofing further down.


Keep in mind that, by default, these shoes are less breathable. The waterproof membrane does not breathe well. 

Fast and light hikes ask for the lightest shoes

You want to cover as much ground as possible in little time. You want to move fast and light. Some brands even have an apparel category called FL (fast and light). 

Measuring the weight of different hiking shoes in RunRepeat lab

In this case, we suggest getting the lightest hiking shoes out there: 

These shoes are usually not especially stable because hikers sacrifice stability elements for lighter weight. 

adidas Terrex Trailmaker review

Hiking shoes for mud: deep, deeper, mud

Hiking on technical terrain, dealing with obstacles and debris on the trails, covering large muddy areas or even scrambling - you can’t do it all in the same shoe. At least not well.


Based on our wear tests, the deeper the lugs are, the better the hiking shoes perform in mud. What also plays a role here is the distance between the lugs. Too cramped and they collect the mud. Distanced from each other and we can’t believe how good the shoe is at shedding the mud. 

Hybrid and mud outsoles in trail running shoes
Hybrid outsole (left) which is great for road-to-trail and mud outsole (left)

Our general guideline is: use hiking shoes with deep lugs (4 mm and deeper) for soft wet terrain like mud, slush, snow. Use around-the-average lugs (4 mm) with sticky rubber for more flat surfaces (like rock). 

Depth o fthe lugs in hiking shoes
Measuring the depth of the lugs in hiking shoes in RunRepeat lab (2mm lugs on the left and 5mm lugs on the right)

Not all rubber is the same and the sticker it is, the better. Keep in mind though: softer rubber wears down faster, especially when you use mud shoes on hard surfaces (like asphalt, concrete, rocks).

hoka-anacapa-low-gtx-hardness-outsole.JPG
Measuring the hardness of the rubber with a shore C durometer

We use an HC shore durometer in our lab to measure the hardness of the rubber. Lower the number on a 1-100 scale, softer the rubber. 

Hiking shoes for technical terrain: prioritising durability and stiffness

When hiking over rocky terrain, we advise going for firmer and stiffer shoes. Soft and flexible hiking shoes are great for nimbleness and softer (less dangerous) ground. Sharp rocks, especially a lot of them, ask for a firmer midsole - so that you don’t feel every little bump underneath your feet. And they ask for stiffness because stiff shoes feel more stable and safe (than flexible shoes) on such terrain. 

stiffness of hiking shoes: machine test
To properly test the stiffness of a hiking shoe, a toebox must be locked in place and the position of the plate adjusted for the rocker, so that the heel rests on it when the toebox is secured

We use a machine to bend the shoe to 30 degrees and the more force is needed to do that, the stiffer the hiking shoe. 

Our measurements of the midsole softness are as objective as possible: we cut all the shoes in half and poke them with a durometer.

The Asker C durometer tells us how soft the midsole is. The higher the rating, the firmer the midsole. 

If you’re planning to do a hike with a lot of obstacles, fallen trees and branches, and similar objects that can’t wait to poke your toes and destroy the shoes, we recommend looking for the most durable hiking shoes

Toe bumper variation in hiking shoes
(Up) very thick rubber toe bumper that offers a lot of protection and (down) thin overlay that offers less protection

In the lab, we measure the durability of the upper and the outsole. We press the Dremel against both surfaces and examine how much damage there is. When it comes to the upper durability, we assign a rating of 1-5, where 1 is the least durable. 

Different upper durabilities in hiking shoes
Different results on upper durability tests: 5/5 on the left (very durable) and 2/5 on the right (bad durability)

In the case of the outsole, we use a tyre tread depth gauge and check out the depth of the dent (in millimetres) our Dremel has made. 


Fewer millimetres in the dent means more durability!

Dents made in the outsole of hiking shoes
Different depth of the dents made on the outsole during the outsole durability test

outsole durability in hiking shoes

Based on all those tests, here are hiking shoes that score the highest in the durability department:

Carrying a heavy backpack: look for support in hiking shoes

If you’re packing light and bringing just the essentials, lightweight hikers will do. However, if you’re backpacking or simply need to carry a heavy load, we suggest you look for hiking shoes that 

  1. offer lateral support (supportive features on the upper are present and give it more structure)
  2. are at least averagely cushioned (basically, skip minimalist hiking shoes)
  3. are on the firmer and stiffer end. 

Cushioning, firmness and stiffness are always laid out in our reviews, along with the comparison to the average. On our wear tests, we assess the lateral stability of the shoe: 


Support elements on the upper literally feel like they are locking the foot in place.

salomon-x-ultra-4-gtx-support.JPG

When it comes to cushioning, minimalist or barefoot hiking shoes are shoes we don't recommend. They don't have enough material between your feet and the ground and, therefore, not enough impact protection, any other protection, support or stability. See how flexible, wobbly and low-to-the-ground this minimalist V-trek hiking shoe is: 


As discussed above in the technical-terrain section, hiking shoes that are too soft and flexible and almost running-shoe-like will make it difficult to walk with a heavy load. 


Another thing we check in this department is the stiffness of the heel counter. Stiffer heel counters offer a better heel lockdown and, therefore, such shoes feel more stable. We rank it on a 1-5 scale, where 5 is the stiffest. 

Shock absorption in hiking shoes

When talking about hiking, we often think of protection. But, we can look at 2 types protection. One would be protection from the surroundings, like sharp obstacles, sharp rocks, tree branches, and so on. For this, we look for thick toe bumpers, strong upper materials like leather, thick and hard outsoles, and so on. 

Testing the shock absorption of hiking shoes following the ASTM F1976-13 methodology

On the other hand, we have protection from the impact forces or from the stress that our legs would have to deal with. Often, they get less on their plate thanks to the midsoles with good shock absorption. Good shock absorption means that the midsole is good at dampening the impact, so that the hikers' legs don't have to handle the impact forces on their own. That would be felt in muscles, joints, and overall legs, and would inevitably lead to premature leg fatigue and maybe even foot pain. 

hiking-shock-absorption-energy-return-2.JPG

In hiking shoes, we have 3 groups of shock absorption: low (less than 100 SA), medium (100-115 SA), and high (above 115 SA). 

Most breathable hiking shoes: best for summer

When testing breathability, we don’t just wear the shoes in hot weather but also examine them in the lab. We pump the smoke into the shoes to see how much smoke will come out and where and, based on it, give the breathability rating 1-5, where 5 is the most breathable. 


We also perform 2 more assessments: we check the upper above the flashlight and look at it under the microscope. 


All these tests combined allow us to present the most breathable hiking shoes

Hiking in rain and snow: look for waterproof hiking shoes 

In order to keep your feet dry when hiking in wet weather, we recommend getting waterproof hiking shoes. The waterproof membrane most often used here is Gore-Tex or GTX. Snow hiking shoes are also waterproof but have deeper-than-avera lugs.

Goretex closeup on hiking shoes
Gore-Tex shoes are always clearly marked with a "Gore-Tex" patch

Waterproof hiking shoes usually have “Waterproof” or “GTX” in their name. 

Other waterproof membranes present in hiking footwear
Gore-Tex is not the only waterproof membrane present in hiking footwear 

There 3 things to keep in mind when buying waterproof hiking shoes: 

  1. They are not breathable. The membrane breathes a bit but usually it is average at its best. 
  2. Water can still get inside your shoes by sliding down your legs or trousers or covering deep water levels. 
  3. Once the water gets in, it is almost impossible to get it out due to the lack of breathability. Don’t expect the shoe to dry on its own together with your socks as you keep going. This could happen in non-Goretex trail running shoes that are very breathable, but not in waterproof hiking shoes. 

salomon-x-ultra-4-gtx-review.JPG

Learning the basics: Waterproof, water-resistant, and water-repellent materials

Labels like waterproof, water-repellent, and water-resistant often cause confusion. This overview offers clear guidance: 

  Water-resistant Water-repellent Waterproof
General characteristics a tightly woven fabric that is naturally capable of resisting water upon contact fabric treated with durable water-repellent (DWR) or hydrophobic chemicals -fabric treated with DWR
-have waterproofing membranes like Gore-Tex and OutDry
-have seam-sealed construction for extra protection
Water protection level low water protection moderate water protection high water protection
Water pressure resistance 0-5000 mm (no pressure or moisture) 6000-10000 mm (light pressure) 10000-20000 mm (high to very high pressure)
Weather conditions best used in light rain shower and dry snow light rain and average snow moderate to heavy rain and average to wet snow

Hiking cold weather: hiking shoes best for winter

Not that these shoes should be waterproof but they should also behave well in cold weather. 

hoka-anacapa-low-gtx-freezer.JPG

We test this by measuring the flexibility and midsole softness at room temperature and after the shoe has spent 20 minutes in the freezer. We don’t want a shoe to feel like a brick at sub-zero temperatures!

Here are winter hiking shoes with the smallest difference in the 2 measurements: 

Wide toebox in hiking shoes: measured in the lab

When looking for hiking shoes that fit wider forefeet, it’s easy to get lost in the reviews people leave because we all have different feet.

Knowing the shape of your feet and toes is great because then you can understand where you need more room: around the ball of the foot (Greek, Egyptian) or at the big toe (Celtic, German, Roman). The last 3 shapes enjoy the non-pointy toeboxes

Because of that, our lab measurements are as objective as they get: we always use the same calliper to measure the width of the shoe and we do so 2 in places: where the shoe is the widest and where the big toe is. And, we do it on the gel mould that perfectly fills the interior of the shoe!

Pouring the liquid gel into the hiking shoe and freezing it 
toebox-width-gel-best-hiking-shoes.jpg
Once the gel has hardened, we measure the width of the shoe (where the mould is the widest)

big-toe-width-gel-best-hiking-shoes.jpg
Then, we measure the width of the toebox at the big toe. The narrower the toebox in this place, the pointier it is usually

The width of the toebox at the big toe often has a bigger value for hikers with wider feet. With this knowledge, you’re equipped with a selection of hiking shoes that actually have wider toeboxes: 

Keep in mind, though, that just like with other footwear types, some upper materials are stretchy and offer more give. Others can be very stiff, and overlays on the toebox can keep your pinky toe in a strict position with no room to splay, not even a little bit. 

You may also be interested to know the height of the toebox, especially if you're prone to black toenails or bleeding toes. To avoid the pressure coming from the top, we suggest looking for toeboxes with more vertical space. 

toebox-height-gel-best-hiking-shoes.jpg
We cut the gel mould in half and then measure the height of the toebox. This allows us to get a precise measurement 

If focusing purely on the brand's labels, here's what to look for, depending on the gender: 

 

Men

Women

Narrow

B

2A

Medium/Standard

D

B

Wide

2E

D

Extra wide

4E

2E

These labels are not the same because men's and women's feet are not the same; women tend to have narrower heels and wider forefeet. 

We wrote an in-depth guide on hiking shoes for wide feet in case you want to go into that direction.

6 steps for finding the perfect fit

Knowing your foot type makes a whole lot of difference. Aside from gauging if your feet are wide or narrow, if your feet have any special needs, make sure to treat them well.

merrell-moab-speed-gtx-walking.JPG

If you use orthotics, look for hiking shoes with a removable insole. Or, in case you are overpronating significantly or have plantar fasciitis, get the appropriate shoes that will not irritate your feet. 

Here are the 6 steps to follow if you’re new to buying hiking shoes: 

  1. Go shoe shopping in the afternoon. Expect your feet to swell after a day of activities. The same thing happens when hiking. So, it’s best to try on those new hikers late in the afternoon to get the best fit.
  2. Try it on, lace it up, and check for pressure points. There should be a thumb’s width space between your toes and the front of your shoes. If your feet move from side to side, then the hiking shoes are too wide. It should feel snug - comfortable and non-constricting. 
  3. Make sure to try the shoes with your hiking socks on. Bring the socks that you plan to wear with your hikers when shoe shopping. Avoid using cotton since this type of fabric retains moisture and fails to provide insulation. Instead, choose wool or synthetic socks.
  4. Take your preferred insoles or orthotics with you. Default insoles often leave users disappointed. Aftermarket insoles or custom orthotics can greatly improve the fit of the shoe. If this fails, you can always try another pair from another brand.
  5. Use the ramp and walk up and down. This tests the shoe’s snugness. When you go up the board, observe for any heel lift. When you go down, check if your toes hit the front of the shoes. If your heel rises more than a quarter of an inch or if your toes hit the front, adjust the laces or try sizing up.
  6. Make sure to break in your shoes before your trip. Hiking shoes, especially the heavy, leather ones, require a different break-in time. Start small by wearing the shoes inside your house with your preferred socks. This might feel awkward but in the end, your feet will surely thank you). From there, increase your miles gradually. 

Hiking shoe upper materials: mesh or leather?

We usually see hiking shoes with uppers made of synthetic mesh or leather. 

Synthetic uppers are breathable, they dry quickly and weigh less. They also feel soft right out of the box. 

Salomon Outpulse 1
Hiking shoe with a synthetic breathable upper

The downside of having a mesh upper in hiking shoes is that they are less durable than the leather ones and they get soaked easily. Also, not a lot of support comes with the mesh uppers so we usually see them in shoes that are meant for (fast and) light hiking. 

Leather (or suede, nubuck, full-grain) uppers are far more structured and supportive. 

Danner-Trail-1650_15.jpg
Hiking shoe with a leather upper

They are durable and warm. They even naturally repel water. However, they often ask for a break-in period and don’t breathe as well. Shoes with leather uppers weigh more. 

Soft rubber or hard rubber outsoles: pros and cons 

In our lab, after we’re done cutting the shoes in half, we measure the softness of the rubber with a Shore HC durometer. The lower the rating, the softer the rubber.

merrell-moab-speed-gtx-durometer-outsole.JPG
Using a shore C durometer to measure the hardness of the outsole in RunRepeat shoe lab

Softer rubber is better for deeper lugs and hiking in wet weather and on loose ground (like mud). 

Softer rubber is more flexible and it’s stickier. Harder rubber, on the other hand, is more durable, stable and overall, more protective. However, it's not as flexible as the soft rubber. Harder rubber grips better on hard flatter surfaces, dry or wet. It offers more protection to our feet.

Get noticed in the dark

Some hiking shoes come with reflective elements. We love those as they make us more visible in low-visibility hikes and it’s easier to find shoes in a dark tent when all you have is a headlamp. 

To check for these elements, we turn the light off in the lab and point the light at the shoes. See how great the KEEN Targhee III Waterproof looks in the dark! 


Author
Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic
Whether it's a vertical kilometre or an ultra, climbing in the Alps or exploring local mountains, Jovana uses every opportunity to trade walls and concrete for forests and trails. She logs at least 10h/week on trails, with no off-season, and 4x more on research on running and running shoes. With a background in physics and engineering management, she prefers her running spiced with data.