7 Best Running Shoes For Hiking in 2024
We buy shoes ourselves. We earn commissions when you buy through us, at no extra cost. Why trust us
If you’re planning to dabble in the murky world of hiking or running the trails, why pay the price of two pairs of shoes when you can have just one? Yes, you read it right. There’s an array of options you can choose from when it comes to a responsive hiker and a solid trail runner in one shoe.
We’ve provided a list of the best running shoes for hiking for outdoor enthusiasts who are looking for reliable shoes.
After hiking in many running shoes, we now give you our best selection – from the stickiest hikers to the most protective trail runners that offer the best bang for the buck.
How we test running shoes
Here at RunRepeat, we provide you with the latest updates and no-BS reviews on the best running shoes for hiking out there. These top picks are specifically highlighted after a thorough review process done by our in-house testers:
- We buy running shoes using our own funds.
- We test them to experience their performance on the trails in various conditions.
- At the lab, we put each model through a battery of tests. We measure the depth of the lugs, outsole hardness and thickness, durability of the toebox, breathability, and other features relevant to hikers.
- We cut the shoes in half to find out what's inside, look at all the layers, and perform additional tests that can only be done on a shoe cut in half.
Best running shoes for hiking overall
What makes it the best?
The Scarpa Spin Planet emerged as an exceptional road-to-trail hybrid shoe in our tests, prized for its reliability and immense breathability. Stable, comfortable, and grippy, our lab results agree it's the ideal choice for outdoor explorations and off-road adventures, earning our top spot for hiking-running.
The Spin Planet is designed in various shapes and angles to perform across various terrains. Designed for versatility, the 3.2 mm lugs were reliable on the trails without feeling too blocky on the road. Intentionally made, the set in the forefoot is for propulsion, the heel for braking, and the midfoot for stability.
With standard measurements from our durometer (23.0 HA) and calliper (32.8/26.6 mm stack height), the midsole offers a well-balanced experience. The shoe includes TPU reinforcements in the upper to guide our foot alignment effectively.
The upper brought a delightful experience, allowing our feet to breathe no matter how hot it got. In our smoke test, it’s one of the rare trail shoes that received a perfect breathability score, making it a perfect summer companion.
However, those who dream of a lightweight and responsive ride won’t find that in the Spin Planet. Those who demand more explosive midsoles should seek other options.
Pros
- 100% recycled upper
- One-of-a-kind tongue
- High build quality
- Breathability
- Stable ride
- Fantastic lug design
- Works for hiking too
- Great for midfoot strikers
Cons
- Subpar energy return
- Noticeably heavy
- No reflective elements
- No reflective elements
Running shoes for hiking with best cushioning
What makes it the best?
Fresh Foam X More Trail v3 is a reliable hybrid shoe with plenty of cloud-like cushion. It boasts a thick, buttery-soft stack, a grippy outsole, and a flexible midsole. It delivers consistent support and protection — from roads to mountains — making it our best cushioned hiking-running shoe.
It has a thick slab of dual-density Fresh Foam X that provides exceptional comfort and protection from landing impact and rocky terrains. It rises 6.8/7.3 mm above average in the heel and forefoot and measures 45.6% softer than average. It’s one of the trail shoes that spoiled our feet the most with its bouncy ride.
Armed with a grippy outsole and 5.0 mm lugs, it clings with grit onto soft dirt, mild mud, and wet roads. We can confidently cruise through most paths, knowing we won’t slip or fall.
Its midsole gives a good amount of flexibility, allowing us to manoeuvre through light to moderate trails. Our flex test confirms it's 11.4% more malleable than average, promoting a more natural running feel.
More foam means more weight. At 10.6 oz (301g), it’s heavier than the 9.5 oz (268g) average of running shoes.
Pros
- Insanely protective even without a rock plate
- Soft cushioning without feeling mushy
- Solid amount of bounce
- Incredibly stable
- Plush and airy upper
- Roomy fit
- Good grip on mild to moderate trails
- Durable outsole
- Light on the run
- Really smooth ride
- Best for easy days and long runs
- Sustainable
Cons
- Upper could use more support
- Not great for technical trails
Best running shoes for hiking for wide feet
What makes it the best?
Those of us with wide feet truly enjoyed our trials with the Altra Olympus 6. It features a breathable and durable upper, a remarkably grippy rubber, and generous room for toe splay, making it our best hiking-running shoe for wide feet in the lab.
We landed each foot confidently thanks to the broad platform of Olympus 6. Our measurements reveal it’s a wide 114.9/101.4 mm in the forefoot and heel vs. the 112.1/89.8 mm average. Additionally, it barely tapers to the front which gives room for our feet to swell. The big toe area measures a massive 87.4 mm, 8.3 mm wider than average.
The upper adds remarkably to the shoe’s comfort given its airy nature. We awarded it a perfect score in our breathability test as smoke easily escaped the shoe. While most shoes sacrifice durability at the expense of ventilation, Olympus 6 mind-blowingly aced our Dremel test too with a 5/5 durability score!
Beneath our feet lies the highly trusted Vibram Megagrip outsole. Lined with deep 3.5 mm lugs, it erased any doubts about traction. Whatever surface we stepped foot on, we never had any slips.
However, we still find the midsole lacking in terms of responsiveness. Those who crave more energy rebound should explore elsewhere.
Pros
- Outstanding durability
- Superior build quality
- Grippy Vibram outsole
- Exceptionally comfortable
- Real 0-mm drop
- Ready for the toughest adventures
- Spacious, foot-shaped toebox
- Premium quality materials
Cons
- Extremely heavy
- Slight price increase
- Lacks energy return
Best waterproof running shoes for hiking
What makes it the best?
Our top waterproof running shoe for hiking is none other than the Nike Pegasus Trail 5 GTX. Its outstanding ReactX foam, reliable grip, and superb flexibility—wrapped in the protective Gore-Tex fabric—make it a top-of-the-line water-resistant shoe.
The upper is densely woven and has a Gore-Tex membrane for protection from unwanted elements. Even smoke couldn’t escape in our lab test, proving its airtight nature. We couldn’t award it anything higher than 1/5 for breathability, which is awesome for waterproof shoes.
The ReactX foam is a star as it blends comfort with energy return. In the lab, we measured it to be 23.6% softer than average. It was such a joy to explore the trails with this responsive shoe!
We find Peg’s grip effective on uneven terrains and slippery surfaces. Its lug depth of 3.6 mm latches on any surface, helping us stay in control on steep ascents/descents and fast corners.
We felt free in our runs as the midsole offers non-intrusive flexibility for a natural feel. Our lab test verifies that it’s 29.4% more flexible than the average trail running shoe. However, it focuses more on agility with its streamlined design. Those who need more support should find a stable shoe.
Pros
- High-quality Gore-Tex membrane
- Lighter than the Pegasus Trail 5!
- Fantastic for midfoot strikers
- Doubles as a hiking and walking shoe
- Good ReactX midsole
- Amazing for winter
- Can handle all-day adventures
- Reasonable price hike
Cons
- Ankle instability for heel strikers
- Upper lacks padding
- Limited breathability
- Grip falls short on technical terrain
Best lightweight running shoes for hiking
What makes it the best?
The NNormal Kjerag is a lightweight marvel that is super-fast, super agile, and super grippy! Our lab confirms it delivers a responsive and grounded feel that allows us to take on the mountains with pure speed. This pair feels like a breath of fresh air, making it our top lightweight hiking-running shoe.
The Kjerag instantly disappeared on foot and our scales show a mere 7.5 oz (214g) build, 26.7% lighter than the average trail shoe. The midsole barely fights our natural movement, which adds to its weightless feel. Our bend test validates our experience with flexibility 45.1% better than average.
Our runs emphasised the Kjerag is focused on speed and ground feel through its slim yet responsive cushioning. Our calliper shows there’s only 25.0/16.4 mm of foam between us and the ground, which encourages the strengthening of our leg muscles.
The Kjerag features the world-class Vibram Megagrip Litebase, which feels reliable on mixed terrains. The 3.0 mm lugs gripped the ground as needed and the tough 88.0 HC rubber prevented premature wear.
However, the Kjerag’s lack of cushioning demands near-perfect form and advanced technique to avoid foot pain and injuries. Those who need more support should find a more forgiving shoe.
Pros
- Premium materials
- Vibram Megagrip outsole
- Low carbon footprint
- Race-ready fit
- Lightweight
- Stable, grounded ride with tonnes of feedback
- Ideal for short races and skyrunning events
- Handles corners with ease
- Doubles as a hiking shoe
Cons
- Not the best for heel strikers
- High price tag
- Limited breathability
- No reflective elements
Best zero drop running shoes for hiking
What makes it the best?
Staying true to Altra’s core, Lone Peak 8 delivered the most seamless zero-drop experience among hiking running shoes. Even our lab proves its minimalist build drives an agile yet stable ride, allowing us to manoeuvre through unpredictable trails with ease and control.
We have a heightened sense of the surface we’re tackling thanks to the low configuration of the shoe. Other than its below-average 22.7/21.3 mm build, it has a minimal 1.4 mm heel drop that essentially feels like none. The cushion feels protective enough and allows for more longitudinal flexibility. It was easy for us to be in control since the midsole barely fought back, showing 27.1% less resistance than average in our bend test.
The platform is composed of a dense EGO foam which gives a nice rebound and a hint of stability in our strides. Our durometer reveals it’s 11.4% firmer than average, ensuring it won’t bottom out even as we’re loaded with heavy backpacks. There are even raised sidewalls on the sides of the midsole, further contributing to a well-planted feeling.
Unfortunately, the weak spot we found is the lack of grip in wet and muddy conditions. For treks over tricky terrain, it's wise to swap out for a better-equipped shoe.
Pros
- Responsive midsole
- Natural barefoot feeling ride
- Low to the ground and stable
- Doubles as a reliable hiking shoe
- Breathable and durable ripstop upper mesh
- Secure midfoot lockdown
- Accommodating toebox
- Generously padded and comfy
- Dries quickly
- Gaiter attachment ready
Cons
- Not so grippy in wet conditions
- Subpar outsole durability
Running shoes for hiking with the best durability
What makes it the best?
Salomon XA Pro 3D v9 epitomises protection, standing out as a heavy-duty option. Its solid midsole, 3D chassis technology, and sturdy yet breathable upper collectively deliver exceptional protection throughout. Extensive lab testing confirms it's the most durable hiking running shoe.
The midsole strikes a perfect balance between cushioning and ground feel, boasting a 31.7/19.2 mm stack. This design effectively absorbs impact upon landing and shields the foot from potential debris thanks to its dense foam composition, which proves to be 17.9% more resilient than the average. This firm cushioning promotes confident strides, even when carrying heavy loads, as it remains resistant to bottoming out.
Adding to its stability is the 3D chassis, a rigid TPU layer between the midsole and outsole, reducing excessive lateral movements on demanding terrains. This feature ensures our safety on rocky and uneven ground. Moreover, the shoe's longitudinal flexibility enhances comfort, surpassing average flexibility by 18.8% in our 90-degree test.
When it comes to the upper, our lab tests affirm its impressive breathability and toebox durability, earning ratings of 4/5 and 5/5 respectively. This combination of airflow and protective features is truly remarkable.
However, the XA Pro 3D's robust design is better suited for hiking than fast and technical trail running, as it may feel too stiff and heavy for those activities.
Pros
- Tank-like foot protection
- Incredibly stable and supportive ride
- Excellent traction on mixed or rocky trails
- Great hiking/backpacking companion
- Relatively flexible despite 3D chassis
- Effectively dampens landings
- Generously padded and comfortable
- No chance of lace bite
- Durable and high-quality construction
- Eye-catching design
Cons
- A little heavy
- Stiff upper needs breaking in
- Cushioning on the firm side
- Not nimble enough for technical trails
When it’s OK to wear running shoes instead of proper hiking footwear
There’s a reason a lot of hikers we see on the trails are wearing hiking shoes. So, when can you ditch them and use trail running shoes? Here’s our recommendation based on our experience:
- When you prioritise speed and grip. Want to be fast and agile.
- When you’re hiking in very hot weather because trail shoes are much more breathable than hiking shoes
- When you’re not wearing heavy backpacks. Trail running shoes usually don’t offer enough support for that
- When you know you might also run a few sections
- When you don’t plan to hike over insanely technical, rocky terrain that would destroy the trail shoes. Hiking shoes are stiffer, more durable, and a better option in this case
3 things to look for in trail running shoes for hiking
Now that you’ve settled for trail running shoes for your hikes, here’s what to look for:
- Grip (depth of lugs) which depends on the terrain
- Breathability or waterproofness; this depends on the weather conditions
- Stability and support that you may need; this depends on the terrain, durability of the hike, and the weight you’re carrying
Below we dig deep into every section.
Grip in trail running shoes used for hiking
We split the terrain into 3 sections and, based on that, we suggest different shoes:
- Light terrain: hard-packed trails, well-maintained trails, nothing technical. For such terrain, we recommend trail running shoes with lugs that are up to 2mm deep
- Moderate terrain: or all-terrain, wide variety. Very versatile, and can do a bit of everything but nothing too extreme.
- Technical terrain: off-trail, with a lot of debris/obstacles, sharp rocks, mud, and so on. For this terrain, we recommend shoes with lugs that are at least 4mm deep.
In our shoe lab, we measure the thickness of the lugs using a digital calliper.
Of course, there’s always some overlap. Shoes with 4.5mm lugs that are very bulky don’t work well on technical terrain where speed and agility are prioritised. Just like some trail shoes with shallower lugs but with an aggressive fit can perform well on moderate terrain.
The thread pattern also plays a role here. If you want the mud to shed well, look for deep lugs that are spaced further apart.
If you plan to hike in loose, soft ground, look for lugs of different shapes and angles. Having lugs of different orientations works great for varying hikes that cover both uphills and downhills.
((local_video))
Breathability of running shoes for hiking
This is one of the best features of trail running shoes that wins the battle between the trail shoes and hiking shoes. Hiking shoes are rarely as breathable!
((local_video))
To test breathability, we pump the smoke into the trail shoes and then watch how fast the smoke comes out, where, and how much of it. Based on this observation, we rate the breathability of these shoes on a 1-5 scale. 5 is the most breathable.
Then we look at the upper under the microscope. This way, it’s easy to understand better what’s going on: are there any ventilation holes, how large are they, if there’s more than 1 layer of fabric and where the 2nd one is placed, and so on.
Breathable uppers have a loose structure that sometimes features even large ventilation holes (up), while non-breathable uppers are very tight, have no holes, and are often 2-layered (2nd layer is often the waterproof membrane).
Waterproof running shoes for hiking
If you think there will be puddles on your hike, shallow stream crossing, or light rain/snow, you might want to consider getting waterproof running shoes for hiking.
We wrote in great detail about when (not) to choose them, how to recognise them, and what to pay attention to in our guide on Best waterproof trail running shoes.
The main difference between waterproof and non-waterproof running shoes for hiking is breathability. Waterproof uppers do not breathe almost at all (on average), while in the realm of non-waterproof trail shoes you can find quite breathable ones.
This is because the waterproof uppers have an additional layer: a waterproof membrane. So, there are 2 layers instead of 1.
Stability and support of running shoes for hiking
There are 3 few things you can pay attention to if stability and support are worrying you:
- The width of the base. The wider the midsole, the more stable the shoe
- Stiffness of the base: stiffer shoes offer more support and stability
- Other supportive elements like structural stiff upper enforcements or heel counters
We use a digital calliper to measure the width of the base. We measure it both at the forefoot and at the heel but recommend focusing on the heel for hiking as that’s where we land while walking (hiking),
To test the stiffness of the trail running shoe, we clamp it at the forefoot to our table and then use a digital force gauge to bend it to 90 degrees. Then, we look at the force needed to bend it. More force = stiffer shoe.
((local_video))
So, if you want a stiffer platform for extra support and stability, we recommend these shoes below.
Stiff external heel counter that stabilises the heel and offers great support
Trail running shoes vs. hiking shoes
Here’s an overview of what to expect if you’re changing from hiking shoes to trail running shoes. These are general differences, of course, there are models that are outliers.
Trail running shoes |
Hiking shoes |
Lighter |
Heavier due to stronger materials and more protection |
Less protective; often feature a softer and breathable upper; softer outsoles |
Bigger toe bumpers; more rubber walls on the upper for protection; harder outsoles |
More flexible |
Stiffer platform. You can’t run in these. |
Not enough protection for very rocky, technical terrain. They can be easily destroyed on technical terrain. |
Very protective for rocky terrain and very durable, made to endure such activities. |
Usually not enough support for heavy backpacks |
Supportive enough for heavier backpacks |
((local_video))