7 Best Running Shoes For Hiking in 2026

Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic on
7 Best Running Shoes For Hiking in 2026

We buy shoes ourselves. We earn commissions when you buy through us, at no extra cost. Why trust us

If you’re planning to dabble in the murky world of hiking or running the trails, why pay the price of two pairs of shoes when you can have just one? Yes, you read it right. There’s an array of options you can choose from when it comes to a responsive hiker and a solid trail runner in one shoe.

We’ve provided a list of the best running shoes for hiking for outdoor enthusiasts who are looking for reliable shoes. 

After hiking in many running shoes, we now give you our best selection – from the stickiest hikers to the most protective trail runners that offer the best bang for the buck.

How we test running shoes for hiking


Here at RunRepeat, we provide you with the latest updates and no-BS reviews on the best running shoes for hiking out there. These top picks are specifically highlighted after a thorough review process done by our in-house testers: 

  • We buy running shoes using our own funds.
  • We test them to experience their performance on the trails in various conditions.
  • At the lab, we put each model through a battery of tests. We measure the depth of the lugs, traction, outsole hardness and thickness, durability of the toebox, breathability, and other features relevant to hikers. 
  • We cut the shoes in half to find out what's inside, look at all the layers, and perform additional tests that can only be done on a shoe cut in half. 

Best running shoes for hiking overall

What makes it the best?

The Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 emerged as an exceptional shoe in our tests, prized for its reliable traction and dynamic cushioning. Stable, comfortable, and propulsive, our lab results agree it's the ideal choice for outdoor explorations and off-road adventures, earning our top spot for hiking-running.

The midsole brought a delightful experience, offering a beautiful blend of propulsion and impact protection to our strides. Our energy test returns impressive scores of 64.9% in the heel and 72.4% in the forefoot, while its 127 SA rating in our shock absorption test for both areas assures plush landings.

The XU4 features Vibram Megagrip, proving its traction across various terrains with a massive 0.72 friction score in our wet-condition test. At this level, it shows 20.0% stronger grip than average, further enhanced by its versatile 3.5 mm Traction Lugs.

Our feet feel confidently planted to the ground, courtesy of XU4’s wide and rigid midsole. It showed maximum resistance in our twist test (5/5) and measures a wider-than-average 116.7/97.3, ensuring we remain centred inside the shoe.

However, those who dream of a lightweight ride won’t find that in the XU4. Its 11.0 oz (312g) makes it less agile on foot.

Pros

  • Amazing bounce from PWRRUN PB foam
  • First Xodus Ultra with a Vibram outsole
  • Stable platform underfoot
  • Premium PWRRUN+ insole
  • Works well for hiking too
  • Full-length outsole coverage
  • Excellent for ultras
  • Fantastic traction on easy terrain

Cons

  • Weight is becoming a real problem
  • Tapered toebox fit
  • Small price increase
  • Weak heel padding durability
Full review of Saucony Xodus Ultra 4

Running shoes for hiking with the best shock absorption

What makes it the best?

Salomon clearly believes gravel running has huge potential, and after spending time with the Aero Glide 4 GRVL, we understand why. We found in the lab that the midsole delivers explosive bounce while keeping the ride stable and comfortable for long miles. We also really liked how naturally the outsole transitions from asphalt to gravel roads or easy trails without feeling awkward on either surface. The warm upper and close-fitting design will not suit everyone, especially during summer, but the overall ride feels so smooth and energetic that it becomes hard not to love this shoe.

Pros

  • Incredible energy return
  • Ideal for long gravel runs or flat ultras
  • Excellent road-to-trail versatility
  • Stable despite maximalist stack height
  • Outstanding outsole durability
  • Perfect for winter running
  • Smooth ride on paved surfaces too
  • Terrific value for the performance
  • Updated Quicklace Neo lacing system

Cons

  • Fit can be a bit too snug
  • Oversized tongue may bother some
  • Hard to put on
Full review of Salomon Aero Glide 4 GRVL

Best running shoes for hiking with a wide toebox

What makes it the best?

Those of us who love a forgiving fit enjoyed our trials with the Topo Ultraventure 4. It has spacious interiors and a cushioned yet steady base, making it our best hiking-running shoe with a wide toebox in the lab.

Eager to test our observations, we created a gel mould to measure the interiors. At the widest part, the toebox measures 83.0 mm, a significant 8.4 mm above average. It gives room for our feet to swell and makes even our pinky toes feel welcome. 

We experienced comfort from mile 1 to the last, evidenced by its generous 35.1/28.5 mm cushioning. The midsole’s pleasant touch was further confirmed when we recorded top shock absorption scores of 129/107 SA. 

We landed each foot confidently thanks to the broad forefoot of Ultraventure 4, with a calliper reading of 119.4 mm. Its Vibram XS Trek compound also enhances control through its reliable grip.

However, we still find the midsole lacking in terms of responsiveness. Those who don't want a dull ride should explore elsewhere.

Pros

  • Extra-roomy toebox
  • Hardwearing Vibram outsole
  • More flexible and comfortable than version 3
  • Ideal for midfoot strikers
  • Can handle ultra races
  • Plush tongue improves comfort
  • Excellent stability in the forefoot area
  • Good lockdown with no tongue movement

Cons

  • Not for narrow-footed runners
  • Midsole lacks energy return
  • No reflective elements
  • Unstable heel
Full review of Topo Ultraventure 4

Running shoes for hiking with the best stability

What makes it the best?

We effortlessly clocked in the miles without counting while sporting Brooks Caldera 8 on the streets and trails. Our lab assessment shows it’s suitable for mixed surfaces with its outstanding stability, versatile outsole, and protective midsole.

During our runs, it immediately became clear to us that Caldera 8 is centred on stability. With tall sidewalls, lateral support is undeniable as they guide our feet forward. The next source of our surefootedness is the vast landing base, notably its standout 104.0 mm heel that’s 13.6 mm wider than average.

Caldera 8 encourages extra mileage with its plush cushioning. Its 36.7/27.9 mm stack absorbs shock excellently, confirmed by its impact protection ratings of 129 SA in the heel and 111 SA in the forefoot.

Underfoot, the TrailTack Green compound performed well on loose gravel, wet streets, and moderate terrain. With 3.6 mm lugs, it’s grippy enough on softer ground without interfering with our steps on hard-packed pavements.

Because of its bulkiness and high torsional rigidity, it lacks the speed for faster runs through technical terrain. Those who prefer more agility should consider lighter shoes.

Pros

  • Outstanding stability
  • Comfortable, smooth ride
  • Versatile on easy and moderate terrain
  • Secure, reliable lockdown
  • Fair and reasonable price
  • Dependable traction
  • Cleaner, more refined look

Cons

  • Still heavy
  • Needs more cushioning
  • Bulky, overly wide heel
  • Only for slow paces
Full review of Brooks Caldera 8

Best lightweight running shoes for hiking

NNormal Kjerag
89
Superb

What makes it the best?

The NNormal Kjerag is a lightweight marvel that is super-fast, super agile, and super grippy! Our lab confirms it delivers a responsive and grounded feel that allows us to take on the mountains with pure speed. This pair feels like a breath of fresh air, making it our top lightweight hiking-running shoe.

The Kjerag instantly disappeared on foot and our scales show a mere 7.5 oz (214g) build, 26.7% lighter than the average trail shoe. The midsole barely fights our natural movement, which adds to its weightless feel. Our bend test validates our experience with flexibility 45.1% better than average.

Our runs emphasised the Kjerag is focused on speed and ground feel through its slim yet responsive cushioning. Our calliper shows there’s only 25.0/16.4 mm of foam between us and the ground, which encourages the strengthening of our leg muscles.

The Kjerag features the world-class Vibram Megagrip Litebase, which feels reliable on mixed terrains. The 3.0 mm lugs gripped the ground as needed and the tough 88.0 HC rubber prevented premature wear.

However, the Kjerag’s lack of cushioning demands near-perfect form and advanced technique to avoid foot pain and injuries. Those who need more support should find a more forgiving shoe.

Pros

  • Premium materials
  • Vibram Megagrip outsole
  • Low carbon footprint
  • Race-ready fit
  • Lightweight
  • Stable, grounded ride with tonnes of feedback
  • Ideal for short races and skyrunning events
  • Handles corners with ease
  • Doubles as a hiking shoe

Cons

  • Not the best for heel strikers
  • High price tag
  • Limited breathability
  • No reflective elements
Full review of NNormal Kjerag

Best zero drop running shoes for hiking

What makes it the best?

Staying true to Altra’s core, Lone Peak 9 delivered the most seamless zero-drop experience among hiking running shoes. Even our lab proves its minimalist build drives an agile yet stable ride, allowing us to manoeuvre through unpredictable trails with ease and control.

We have a heightened sense of the surface we’re tackling thanks to the low configuration of the shoe. Other than its below-average 23.3/23.3 mm build, it features a rare and confirmed zero drop.

The platform is composed of a dense EGO foam which gives a nice rebound and a hint of stability in our strides. Our durometer reveals it’s a balanced 40.8 AC, ensuring it won’t bottom out even as we’re loaded with heavy backpacks.

It also features a wide toebox that is aligned with our natural foot shape to improve comfort and enhance a well-planted feeling. We used a gel mould to capture its shape and discovered the big toe area is at 85.3 mm vs. the 74.8 mm average.

Unfortunately, the weak spot we found is it’s a bit stiffer than the average. Those who prefer flexible midsoles for a full barefoot sensation should explore alternatives.

Pros

  • True zero-drop geometry
  • Extra-roomy, foot-shaped toebox
  • Vibram option finally available
  • Improved forefoot stability
  • Flat-profile, natural ride
  • Secure lacing system
  • Still a low-stack shoe!
  • Standard and wide versions
  • Good durability

Cons

  • Feels really heavy for its size
  • Stiffer than previous versions
  • Lacks airflow
  • Having two outsole versions adds confusion
Full review of Altra Lone Peak 9

Running shoes for hiking with the best durability

What makes it the best?

The La Sportiva Prodigio Max epitomises maximum protection through its heavy-duty build and generous cushioning. Its impact-reducing midsole, hard-wearing outsole, and sturdy upper collectively deliver exceptional protection throughout. Extensive lab testing confirms it's the most durable hiking-running shoe.

The outsole features deep V-shaped 5.5 mm lugs that handle various surfaces with ease. In our Dremel test, Prodigio Max only sustained 0.6 mm damage, proving its reliable underfoot protection and wear resistance compared to the 0.9 mm average.

The midsole feels good underfoot, allowing us to go the distance with its 35.1/28.0 mm stack height. It effectively absorbs impact upon landing, proven by solid shock absorption scores of 123/108 SA in the heel and forefoot, respectively.

When it comes to the dense upper, our Dremel had very little effect, earning an impressive 4/5 in durability. Moreover, the inner lining also performed well, with a 4/5 wear-resistance rating. As a solid performer in all three durability tests, we have no doubts about Prodigio Max’s long lifespan.

However, the Prodigio Max’s robust design is better suited for hiking rather than fast and technical trail running. Weighing 10.8 oz (306g), it may feel too heavy for the latter.

Pros

  • Solid traction on varied terrain
  • Made to last
  • Impressive lockdown
  • Well-built upper
  • Better-than-average energy return
  • Stable platform
  • Full-length rubber coverage
  • Suitable for year-round use
  • Smooth rockers for flat terrain
  • Very good breathability

Cons

  • Narrow toebox limits comfort
  • A bit heavier than it should
  • Not for budget-focused runners
Full review of La Sportiva Prodigio Max

When it’s OK to wear running shoes instead of proper hiking footwear

There’s a reason a lot of hikers we see on the trails are wearing hiking shoes. So, when can you ditch them and use trail running shoes? Here’s our recommendation based on our experience: 

  • When you prioritise speed and grip. Want to be fast and agile. 
  • When you’re hiking in very hot weather because trail shoes are much more breathable than hiking shoes
  • When you’re not wearing heavy backpacks. Trail running shoes usually don’t offer enough support for that 
  • When you know you might also run a few sections 
  • When you don’t plan to hike over insanely technical, rocky terrain that would destroy the trail shoes. Hiking shoes are stiffer, more durable, and a better option in this case 

running-shoes-for-hiking-4.jpg

3 things to look for in trail running shoes for hiking 

Now that you’ve settled for trail running shoes for your hikes, here’s what to look for: 

  1. Grip (depth of lugs) which depends on the terrain 
  2. Breathability or waterproofness; this depends on the weather conditions  
  3. Stability and support that you may need; this depends on the terrain, durability of the hike, and the weight you’re carrying

running-shoes-for-hiking-3.jpg

Below we dig deep into every section. 

Grip in trail running shoes used for hiking 

We split the terrain into 3 sections and, based on that, we suggest different shoes: 

  1. Light terrain: hard-packed trails, well-maintained trails, nothing technical. For such terrain, we recommend trail running shoes with lugs that are up to 2mm deep 
  2. Moderate terrain: or all-terrain, wide variety. Very versatile, and can do a bit of everything but nothing too extreme. 
  3. Technical terrain: off-trail, with a lot of debris/obstacles, sharp rocks, mud, and so on. For this terrain, we recommend shoes with lugs that are at least 4mm deep.

In our shoe lab, we measure the thickness of the lugs using a digital calliper. 

lug-depth-running-shoes-for-hiking.jpg
Measuring the depth of the lugs in trail running shoes 

Of course, there’s always some overlap. Shoes with 4.5mm lugs that are very bulky don’t work well on technical terrain where speed and agility are prioritised. Just like some trail shoes with shallower lugs but with an aggressive fit can perform well on moderate terrain. 

lug-patterns-running-shoes-for-hiking.jpg
Different thread patterns for different terrains

The thread pattern also plays a role here. If you want the mud to shed well, look for deep lugs that are spaced further apart.

running-shoes-for-hiking-5.jpg

If you plan to hike in loose, soft ground, look for lugs of different shapes and angles. Having lugs of different orientations works great for varying hikes that cover both uphills and downhills. 


Breathability of running shoes for hiking

This is one of the best features of trail running shoes that wins the battle between the trail shoes and hiking shoes. Hiking shoes are rarely as breathable! 


To test breathability, we pump the smoke into the trail shoes and then watch how fast the smoke comes out, where, and how much of it. Based on this observation, we rate the breathability of these shoes on a 1-5 scale. 5 is the most breathable. 

running-shoes-for-hiking-under-the-microscope.jpg

Then we look at the upper under the microscope. This way, it’s easy to understand better what’s going on: are there any ventilation holes, how large are they, if there’s more than 1 layer of fabric and where the 2nd one is placed, and so on. 

running-shoes-for-hiking-uppers.jpg
Under the microscope: breathable uppers (up) and non-breathable(down)

Breathable uppers have a loose structure that sometimes features even large ventilation holes (up), while non-breathable uppers are very tight, have no holes, and are often 2-layered (2nd layer is often the waterproof membrane).

Waterproof running shoes for hiking

If you think there will be puddles on your hike, shallow stream crossing, or light rain/snow, you might want to consider getting waterproof running shoes for hiking. 

stainding-in-water-running-shoes-for-hiking.jpg

We wrote in great detail about when (not) to choose them, how to recognise them, and what to pay attention to in our guide on Best waterproof trail running shoes

The main difference between waterproof and non-waterproof running shoes for hiking is breathability. Waterproof uppers do not breathe almost at all (on average), while in the realm of non-waterproof trail shoes you can find quite breathable ones. 

goretex-membrane-visible-inside-running-shoes-for-hiking.jpg
Grey layer visible on the inside is actually a Gore-Tex layer which makes the upper waterproof and also not (so or at all) breathable 

This is because the waterproof uppers have an additional layer: a waterproof membrane. So, there are 2 layers instead of 1. 

Stability and support of running shoes for hiking 

There are 3 few things you can pay attention to if stability and support are worrying you: 

  1. The width of the base. The wider the midsole, the more stable the shoe
  2. Stiffness of the base: stiffer shoes offer more support and stability 
  3. Other supportive elements like structural stiff upper enforcements or heel counters 
midsole-width-running-shoes-for-hiking.jpg
Measuring midsole width in RunRepeat lab

We use a digital calliper to measure the width of the base. We measure it both at the forefoot and at the heel but recommend focusing on the heel for hiking as that’s where we land while walking (hiking), 

To test the stiffness of the trail running shoe, we secure the toebox in place and bend the shoe to 30 degrees. Then, we look at the force needed to bend it. More force = stiffer shoe. 

testing the flexibility of running shoes for hiking: machine test

So, if you want a stiffer platform for extra support and stability, we recommend the shoes below. 

heel-tab-running-shoes-for-hiking.jpgStiff external heel counter that stabilises the heel and offers great support 

Trail running shoes vs. hiking shoes 

Here’s an overview of what to expect if you’re changing from hiking shoes to trail running shoes. These are general differences, of course, there are models that are outliers. 

Trail running shoes

Hiking shoes

Lighter 

Heavier due to stronger materials and more protection

Less protective; often feature a softer and breathable upper; softer outsoles 

Bigger toe bumpers; more rubber walls on the upper for protection; harder outsoles

More flexible

Stiffer platform. You can’t run in these.

Not enough protection for very rocky, technical terrain. They can be easily destroyed on technical terrain. 

Very protective for rocky terrain and very durable, made to endure such activities.

Usually not enough support for heavy backpacks

Supportive enough for heavier backpacks


Author
Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic
Whether it's a vertical kilometre or an ultra, climbing in the Alps or exploring local mountains, Jovana uses every opportunity to trade walls and concrete for forests and trails. She logs at least 10h/week on trails, with no off-season, and 4x more on research on running and running shoes. With a background in physics and engineering management, she prefers her running spiced with data.