Our verdict

We think the Hyperion GTS 2 brings a fresh and focused take to stability shoes. We were impressed by how agile it felt on our runs, offering just the right touch of stability without slowing things down. The shoe performed well in the lab and even better out on the road, especially for runners who enjoy ground contact. However, we believe it’s not the best match for long runs or forefoot strikers, as the high drop and thin front cushioning made it feel a bit harsh up front.

Pros

  • Lightweight build
  • Upgraded DNA Flash v2 midsole
  • Versatile for everyday use
  • Agile and nimble ride
  • Promotes foot strength
  • Outsole built for serious mileage
  • Secure lockdown
  • Reasonably priced
  • Reasonably priced

Cons

  • Not for long runs
  • Narrow heel limits rearfoot stability
  • Runs a bit warm in summer
  • Higher drop than expected

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

In our view, the Hyperion GTS 2 is a good pick for:

  • Runners who enjoyed the previous version but were hoping for a foam upgrade.
  • Those looking for a lightweight daily trainer that adds a touch of stability without going overboard.
  • Fans of shoes that steer away from the chunky-maximalist trend and prefer a feedback-rich, feather-light ride at a fair price.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2

Who should NOT buy

We think the Hyperion GTS 2 isn’t the best option for long runs or runners needing extra protection. Its low-stack setup lacks the deep-cushioned, joint-friendly feel found in long-distance-ready shoes like the ASICS Gel Kayano 31.

In our view, the narrow-and-compact midsole may also be a drawback for heel strikers who rely on a wider base for added stability. We’re convinced that alternatives such as the ASICS GT 2000 13 or the New Balance Fresh Foam X Vongo v6 are safer bets.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

We tested the Hyperion GTS 2 and found that one of its standout features is still the low stack height, which offers a grounded, feedback-rich ride that feels connected to the road.

While Brooks has been pushing their entire lineup upward, this model still stays below the average at 33.0 mm.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Heel stack
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 33.0 mm
Average 34.3 mm
Compared to 418 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

This is even more obvious in the forefoot, where we only measured 22.3 mm. Runners looking for a super-high-stack shoe should skip this one, but forefoot strikers who enjoy a close-to-the-ground ride will absolutely love the Hyperion GTS 2.

For better or worse, this is a different kind of shoe compared to modern daily trainers like the Nike Vomero 18.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Forefoot stack
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 22.3 mm
Average 25.7 mm
Compared to 418 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

Brooks claims an 8 mm drop from heel to toe, but we measured 10.7 mm. While the difference is small—grab a tape measure and see for yourself—it’s still a slight mismatch that actually makes the shoe a bit more inviting to heel strikers.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Drop
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 10.7 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 418 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.2 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The Hyperion GTS 2 comes with Brooks' updated DNA Flash v2 midsole, which we found to deliver a springy and fast-moving ride. This upgrade is a huge shift from the original Hyperion GTS, which used the first version of DNA Flash and felt a bit more muted underfoot.

We tested the midsole and recorded 20.0 HA on our durometer—giving it a moderately-cushioned, firm-enough feel. Going ultra-soft would likely have been the wrong move in a low-stack, mild-stability shoe like this, as you want a supportive platform that keeps you in control without bottoming out.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Midsole softness
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 20.0 HA
Average 20.8 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 345 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
35.0 HA

Midsole softness in cold (%)

DNA Flash v2 may be new to this shoe, but it’s still a foam that sits outside the premium tier—so we weren’t surprised to see an average 30% change in our cold-weather freezer test.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 30%
Average 25%
Compared to 344 running shoes
Number of shoes
1%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Insole thickness

The insole reflects the shoe’s stripped-down design with a feather-light build and minimal padding, adding just 2.8 mm of extra cushioning to the overall setup.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Insole thickness
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 2.8 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 414 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Rocker

Another update in the Hyperion GTS 2 is the added curvature in both the heel and forefoot. It’s a subtle design shift that may not please every runner, but the ride remains smooth and natural-feeling.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 side

We checked it and noticed a smooth-rolling sensation that felt more noticeable than before. But again, not a deal-breaker for fans of version 1.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 is true to size (72 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 400 running shoes
Number of shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Width / Fit

New

We poured liquid into the shoe to create a gel replica, allowing us to take as many measurements as needed to study the fit.

With 93.8 mm in the widest part, the shoe is slightly narrower than the average—but only by a hair. If you usually do well in most running shoes, this part of the Hyperion shouldn’t be a problem.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Width / Fit
New test (recommended)
Old test
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 93.8 mm
Average 95.3 mm
Compared to 173 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
102.4 mm

Toebox width

New

We took a second measurement of the toebox width and got 72.7 mm. Once again, it’s just a tiny step away from the average running shoe, so it should work for most runners. However, if your feet are extremely narrow or wide, the fit might feel a bit off.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Toebox width
New test (recommended)
Old test
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 72.7 mm
Average 73.5 mm
Compared to 173 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
83.5 mm

Toebox height

New

We found generous clearance for the toes at 30.3 mm—quite impressive and great for daily runs.

However, runners who prefer a snug, race-like fit might feel it’s a bit too roomy.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Toebox height
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 30.3 mm
Average 27.2 mm
Compared to 172 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.4 mm
Toebox height
33.8 mm

Traction / Grip

Forefoot traction

New

The Hyperion GTS 2 is here to keep you surefooted even if it rained the night before and the sidewalks are still wet.

Measuring its gripping capacity with a SATRA TM144 method, we recorded the shoe's coefficient of friction at 0.46. It may not be the tackiest grip among all tempo shoes, but it offers a good bite for cornering on both dry and wet concrete skid-free.

Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 0.46
Average 0.46
Compared to 212 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.83

Outsole design

New

We were pleasantly surprised by the generous rubber coverage on the Hyperion GTS 2, especially given its lightweight build. Brooks somehow managed to deliver a well-protected outsole with strategic segmentation across the forefoot and heel. Despite the minimal weight, the design includes plenty of rubber.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Outsole design

Stability

Lateral stability test

Incorporating Brooks' GuideRails support system, the Hyperion GTS 2 provides extra stability, guiding the foot without being intrusive. 

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Go To Support
Yes, "GTS" means Go To Support.

This makes it suitable for runners who need mild support during faster runs. However, those with high stability needs may want to check the Glycerin GTS 22.

Torsional rigidity

The addition of the GuideRails bumps the torsional rigidity to 4/5, up from the 3/5 we measured in the regular Brooks Hyperion 2. It’s not a major change, and most runners won’t even notice it.

Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 397 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

We tested the heel counter and found it's the same of the non-GTS version—built like what you'd expect in an average daily trainer, with a 3/5 score. Its semi-rigid design adds just enough stability for rearfoot strikers without leaning too firm.

Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 3
Average 2.9
Compared to 381 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

One thing we hope never changes in the Hyperion series is agility. In a market packed with cushion-loaded shoes that feel like tanks underfoot, this series stays sleek even in the stability version, making it a joy to run in.

We tested the forefoot and measured 112.3 mm at the midsole, which lines up perfectly with its DNA.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 112.3 mm
Average 114.2 mm
Compared to 419 running shoes
Number of shoes
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

Despite being a stability shoe, the heel is quite narrow at 86.7 mm. As we mentioned earlier, the Hyperion is an agile-and-lightweight model that skips the wide-midsole formula and gets its moderate stability from other design choices.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 86.7 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 419 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

New

We were glad to see that it remains moderately flexible, making it a good match for everyday wear too. The non-GTS version scored 13.0N in this same test, and we now measured 12.6N—a rare case where the stability version brings a touch more flex!

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Flexibility / Stiffness
New test (recommended)
Old test
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 12.6N
Average 15.0N
Compared to 220 running shoes
Number of shoes
4.6N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

The addition of stability elements like the GuideRails leads to a small 8% weight increase over the standard model. However, at 7.8 oz or 220g, it’s still a lightweight shoe that keeps the Hyperion series’ spirit alive, and it even drops a few grams compared to its predecessor.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Weight
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 7.8 oz (220g)
Average 9.3 oz (265g)
Compared to 419 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.6 oz (159g)
Weight
12.6 oz (357g)

Breathability

We found in the lab that the Hyperion GTS 2 handles airflow well enough to score 3 out of 5 in our breathability test. That means it should feel comfortable and airy during most runs—unless you're facing heat-heavy weather.

To understand this better, we moved the upper across a bright light. That helped us spot several mesh openings that allow hot air to escape. This design choice explains how the shoe maintains at least decent airflow in real-world conditions.

We then inspected the mesh under our digital microscope.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 mesh

What we discovered is that Brooks used a dual-layer construction, which slightly limits ventilation compared to single-layer designs. A thinner, single-mesh setup would have breathed better but likely worn out faster.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 mesh

In this case, Brooks chose a longer-lasting approach, leaning into an more durable build rather than chasing maximum airflow.

Lastly, we manually checked the full upper and noticed that the heel and tongue offer some comfort-oriented padding. It’s not as plush as a classic daily trainer, but it’s noticeably lighter.

Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 3
Average 3.8
Compared to 348 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

Thanks to the dual-layer mesh we mentioned earlier, the Hyperion GTS 2 earned a solid 3/5 in our Dremel test. This points to good durability, and the upper should outlast or match the rest of the shoe.

Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 3
Average 2.6
Compared to 282 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding showed strong performance in our test, outlasting the upper and scoring 4 out of 5. Because of this, we believe runners won’t need to worry about wear and tear in this area.

Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 4
Average 3.3
Compared to 277 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

The outsole did well. We tested it and found just 0.8 mm of wear after lifting the Dremel—proof that this shoe offers good durability, quite similar to what most average daily trainers deliver. And this result matters even more because the shoe is designed for runners with pronation issues, often known for being rougher on outsoles.

Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 0.8 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 260 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

We also measured the outsole thickness at 3.3 mm. That’s possibly a bit much for a shoe built around weight savings, especially since the rubber holds up well, but nothing alarming or overbuilt.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Outsole thickness
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 3.3 mm
Average 3.3 mm
Compared to 415 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.0 mm

Misc

Price

The price is one of the most appealing features of the Hyperion GTS 2. It’s a wallet-friendly option considering how fast and fun it feels, and we genuinely hope Brooks keeps this pricing approach in future versions.

Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 $140
Compared to 419 running shoes
Number of shoes
£45
Price
£270

Reflective elements

One of the few misses on the Hyperion GTS 2 is the lack of reflective elements. And while most runners might not mind, we definitely do!

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Reflective elements
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 No

Tongue padding

The textured laces are a standout detail for a shoe that’s not priced in the premium range, and the entire lacing system feels secure and really well designed.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 lacing

The tongue padding also deserves praise—it shows that Brooks put real care into crafting a lightweight, tempo-friendly trainer. Instead of stuffing it with a thick slab of foam like most brands do, they placed 5.8 mm of cushioning only where it matters most.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Tongue padding
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 5.8 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 416 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

It was great to discover that the tongue features a semi-gusseted design. In other words—it’s partially attached, combining weight-saving simplicity with a secure lockdown that keeps the foot in place.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 Both sides (semi)

Heel tab

The heel features an extended collar design, quite similar to what we’ve seen in several HOKA running shoes.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Heel tab
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 Extended heel collar

Removable insole

If you want to add a bit more cushioning to the Hyperion GTS 2, just remove the razor-thin insole and slide in a thicker one. Thanks to the generous vertical clearance, this comfort-boosting swap is totally doable.

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 Removable insole
Test results
Hyperion GTS 2 Yes