Our verdict

The Brooks Hyperion 3 is a huge update that, in our view, pushes the series in a fresh yet divisive direction. We found in the lab that its once-flexible, low-to-the-ground ride is gone, and the big weight jump is very disappointing. Still, we were impressed by the excellent upper, and the softer midsole is a welcome change. Ultimately, this update is very love-it-or-leave-it, and our testing will help you decide where you stand right away.

Pros

  • Exceptional upper
  • Good value without a price increase
  • Secure and plush fit
  • Higher stack adds versatility
  • Softer midsole than v2
  • Reliable durability
  • Excellent for heel strikers
  • Superb stretchy tongue
  • Good option for beginners

Cons

  • Much heavier than its predecessor
  • Needs more energy return
  • Lost the natural-feeling ride

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

In our view, the Brooks Hyperion 3 is a smart pick for:

  • Runners who want a state-of-the-art upper at a very reasonable price.
  • Those who felt the Hyperion 1 or 2 didn’t offer enough cushioning underfoot.
  • Heel strikers who need a comfortable, breathable, and durable option for easy days and light tempo work.

Brooks Hyperion 3

Who should NOT buy

We believe that the Hyperion 3 isn’t the best option for runners needing cushioning, as we found its shock absorption is still limited for long sessions. The Hyperion Max 3 is the natural upgrade, as it offers excellent impact protection while keeping Brooks DNA. But if you need a cost-effective shoe, then the ASICS Novablast 5 is the answer.

We also think it’s not ideal for tempo-focused runners who want high energy return. After testing, we discovered that its midsole falls a bit short, and shoes like the PUMA Velocity Nitro 4 or the Adidas Adizero EVO SL provide a more energetic running experience.

Brooks Hyperion 3 parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

Using the ASTM F1976 test, we found that the Hyperion 3 delivers almost the same shock absorption as the Hyperion 2, so you should expect minimal changes here.

We measured 130 SA in the heel and 98 SA in the forefoot, both close to the current lab average. And with shoes getting thicker every year and new supertrainers arriving into the market, results like this may soon fall into the lower 15 or 20%.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Hyperion 3 130 SA
Average 129 SA
Compared to 289 running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
173 SA

Energy return

The Hyperion 3 keeps a supercritical EVA foam, so we didn’t expect excellent energy return but also not the dull feel of plain EVA.

After we tested it, we discovered 56.0% in the heel and 59.9% in the forefoot, numbers that were strong a few years ago. However, this is not 2022 anymore, and with shoes in this price range now switching to better compounds, we think that Brooks needs to start looking for an affordable A-TPU foam as soon as possible.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Hyperion 3 56.0%
Average 58.6%
Compared to 286 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
83.0%

Heel stack

We have bad news for runners who loved the low-stack feel of the previous Hyperions. That design is gone, as the Hyperion 3 now brings 36.5 mm of stack height in the heel, which we found to be a major shift in character. Version 2 had only 32.2 mm.

This new measurement puts the shoe closer to a modern daily trainer instead of the grounded, natural setup that made earlier versions unique. And while we understand why Brooks moved in this direction, we still would have preferred a lower-stacked design here, given that a gazillion cushioned shoes are on the market nowadays.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Heel stack
Test results
Hyperion 3 36.5 mm
Average 34.8 mm
Compared to 481 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot also shifts the shoe’s character, as 25.2 mm now feels better suited for longer distances than before. It’s true that the Hyperion 3 becomes more versatile and covers a wider range, but that light, ground-focused feel from earlier versions is gone.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Forefoot stack
Test results
Hyperion 3 25.2 mm
Average 26.1 mm
Compared to 481 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
38.5 mm

Drop

The drop is massive at 11.3 mm, although a high offset has always been part of the standard Hyperion line. 

We think this setup suits heel strikers the most, but runners who prefer a higher drop—such as those with recurring Achilles tendon issues—can also benefit from this design.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Drop
Test results
Hyperion 3 11.3 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 481 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

One of the biggest complaints we heard about the Hyperion 2 was its firm feel. With a durometer reading of 26.1 HA, we think it simply wasn’t soft enough for today’s standards.

Brooks addressed this with the updated DNA Flash v2 foam, which now measures 21.0 HA. It’s still not plush if that's what you want, but remember that with a moderate stack height you can’t go ultra-soft, and that also explains why Brooks kept things firmer in the older low-stack version.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Midsole softness
Test results
Hyperion 3 21.0 HA
Average 20.4 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 407 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
36.1 HA

Rocker

Despite having a bit more foam in the heel and forefoot, we were glad to see that the rocker remains almost unchanged. It keeps only the slight curvature needed for a smooth ride without pushing into an exaggerated shape.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Brooks Hyperion 3 fits true to size (33 votes).

Small
True to size
Large

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

We found that the Hyperion 3 offers a fit that leans slightly toward a low-volume feel, yet it should work well for most runners who enjoy a closer, more compact upper.

To help you compare it with other models, we created our usual gel mould, and the first width measurement came in at 96.3 mm.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Width / Fit
Test results
Hyperion 3 96.3 mm
Average 95.1 mm
Compared to 236 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
101.1 mm

Toebox width

Our second reading focused on the toebox, where things tightened up to 72.1 mm, giving us a clearer idea of why the shoe felt a bit snug during our runs.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Toebox width
Test results
Hyperion 3 72.1 mm
Average 73.3 mm
Compared to 236 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
82.6 mm

Toebox height

The third measurement confirmed the low-volume feel we noticed.

At just 24.7 mm, it’s clear that while the Hyperion 3 can now cover a bit more distance, Brooks still shaped it with a speed-focused design in mind.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Toebox height
Test results
Hyperion 3 24.7 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 236 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.0 mm
Toebox height
33.9 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

The outsole of the Hyperion 3 offers solid grip in dry conditions with a 0.45 score. On wet surfaces it feels a bit less secure, though we think it still handles light rain reasonably well.

Test results
Hyperion 3 0.45
Average 0.48
Compared to 280 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.84

Outsole design

Taking a look at the outsole, we found that it has two big oval rubber pieces in the heel with small rectangular openings, and the midfoot shows exposed foam with simple lines and a shallow cutout around it.

The forefoot uses a wide V-shaped rubber area made of long rectangle shapes, each split by foam channels, creating a clear and organised layout. And because now there's a little bit less of rubber overall, that takes a small toll on traction as we found before.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

The Hyperion 3 adds more stack height and, as expected, becomes a stiffer shoe. It moves from 13.0N to 15.8N in this test, creating yet another step away from the natural-feeling design it had in earlier versions.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Hyperion 3 15.8N
Average 15.2N
Compared to 283 running shoes
Number of shoes
4.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

One of the things we appreciated in the Hyperion 2 was its extreme lightness, as it was a shoe that almost disappeared underfoot during our runs. We tested version 3 and discovered that feeling is gone, as the shoe now weighs 8.6 oz or 244g, a major jump from the 7.2 oz or 203g of its predecessor.

In our view, this sharp increase could be a real deal-breaker for many runners, and may lead some to look for version 2 at a discount.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Weight
Test results
Hyperion 3 8.6 oz (244g)
Average 9.3 oz (265g)
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.3 oz (149g)
Weight
12.9 oz (366g)

Breathability

Brooks may be behind brands like ASICS or PUMA in pure performance, but there is one area where they are clearly on top: uppers. We were amazed by the Hyperion Elite 5, and the Hyperion 3 arrives with one of the best uppers you can get at this price point.

It uses a double jacquard mesh that delivers excellent ventilation and great comfort. In our airflow test, it reached a perfect 5/5.

Ventilation is not limited to the toebox. Most of the upper lets air escape well, making this shoe a top option for runners in very hot climates.

Brooks Hyperion 3 mesh microscope

Under the microscope, we found a very nice detail. Instead of using an inner layer that blocks airflow like many other brands, Brooks aligned the holes of both layers to keep air moving.

Brooks Hyperion 3 mesh close up

Comfort is also outstanding thanks to the tongue, which uses variable padding instead of a single foam sheet. In our opinion, this upper has a premium touch that you rarely find at such a low price.

Test results
Hyperion 3 5
Average 3.7
Compared to 411 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

Brooks added small sidewalls on both sides of the shoe, giving the Hyperion 3 a slight stability boost and helping offset the higher stack compared to earlier versions. However, we still think this model works best for neutral runners who don’t need extra support.

Torsional rigidity

Except for a few rare cases, the bigger the midsole, the stiffer the shoe, and the Hyperion 3 follows that pattern. The jump in stack makes the stiffness easy to feel compared to version 2. We gave it a 4/5 instead of the previous 3/5, taking away more of that flexible, natural feel underfoot.

Test results
Hyperion 3 4
Average 3.5
Compared to 460 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter is also stiffer than the previous version, now scoring one point higher at 4/5. Brooks added extra padding in the heel to make this added stiffness barely noticeable, though.

Test results
Hyperion 3 4
Average 2.9
Compared to 444 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The Hyperion 3 is bigger in every direction, whether you look at width or height, in the heel or forefoot. We found a small increase in the front area, which now measures 115.0 mm and sits closer to the current average.

Thankfully, Brooks didn’t push this too far, and the shoe still feels more agile than many modern daily trainers. Still, it’s clearly different from the nimble design of the past two versions.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Hyperion 3 115.0 mm
Average 114.3 mm
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel follows the same design update as the forefoot and now measures 88.5 mm. This change won’t appeal to everyone, but runners who want a bit more stability in the rearfoot will appreciate what version 3 offers.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Hyperion 3 88.5 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

We already showed that the upper is fantastic in many ways, but we still needed to check durability. It didn’t disappoint, delivering a solid 3/5 score despite its aggressive and lightweight design.

Test results
Hyperion 3 3
Average 2.6
Compared to 345 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding uses plenty of foam for a soft step-in feel, which often struggles in our Dremel test, but the Hyperion 3 held up surprisingly well and earned a solid 4 out of 5.

Test results
Hyperion 3 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 339 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

The final durability test targets the outsole, where we double the tool’s speed to match the tougher rubber. The Hyperion 3 held strong once more, showing only 0.9 mm of material worn away.

Test results
Hyperion 3 0.9 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 323 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

And the rubber needs to be durable, because it’s only 2.4 mm thick in an effort to keep the weight down. That goal didn’t quite work out, but a thicker outsole would have pushed the weight even higher.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Outsole thickness
Test results
Hyperion 3 2.4 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 478 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The Hyperion 3 comes with a 4.8 mm insole, which is right in line with what we see in most shoes.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Insole thickness
Test results
Hyperion 3 4.8 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 476 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.6 mm

Removable insole

You can also swap in a custom insole or a podiatrist-made orthotic without any issues.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Removable insole
Test results
Hyperion 3 Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

One of the positive updates in the midsole comes from the DNA Flash v2 foam, which became only 17% firmer after 20 minutes in our freezer. That’s a very solid outcome.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Hyperion 3 17%
Average 25%
Compared to 406 running shoes
Number of shoes
1%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Reflective elements

There’s a small triangular reflective detail on the heel of the Hyperion 3, offering a helpful touch of visibility for cars approaching from behind.

Test results
Hyperion 3 Yes

Tongue padding

The lacing system is excellent, and the stretchy tongue setup with a pull tab that also works as a lace loop is extremely well executed, delivering a perfect lockdown. It’s interesting how some brands struggle with tongue design while others get it right, and we think that Brooks delivers a genuinely impressive one here.

Brooks Hyperion 3 tongue loop

In terms of thickness, the tongue comes with just 3.1 mm of padding in the thickest area, but we tested it and felt it was more than enough. There’s no pressure from the laces, and this shoe isn’t meant for 2 or 3h runs anyway.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Tongue padding
Test results
Hyperion 3 3.1 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 479 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue of the Hyperion 3 is excellent, matching what we often see in higher-priced shoes. Its semi-gusseted design keeps it centred with ease while staying exceptionally comfortable.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Hyperion 3 Both sides (semi)

Price

In our view, the Hyperion 3 is fairly priced for what it offers. We would love to see a more advanced foam in the midsole, but considering the strong build quality and excellent upper, it still feels like a reasonable deal.

Test results
Hyperion 3 $140
Compared to 482 running shoes
Number of shoes
£45
Price
£290

Heel tab

The heel features a small extension that you can easily grab and use as a practical pull tab.

Brooks Hyperion 3 Heel tab
Test results
Hyperion 3 Pull tab