7 Best Running Shoes For Low Arches in 2023

Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen on
7 Best Running Shoes For Low Arches in 2023
We earn affiliate commissions at no extra cost to you when you buy through us. Why trust us

Running longer miles is not easy – especially for low-arch or flat-footed runners wearing the wrong shoes. If you’re one of them, there are key factors to look for in running shoes that may help you feel supported and comfortable.

We’ve rounded up and purchased 100+ low-arch running shoes available in the market today. Equipped with our shoe testing lab and our staff of dedicated testers, we’ve tested and looked for the best stability tech, arch support, and motion control design to come up with our top picks of the best shoes for runners with low arches.

Depending on your specific needs, we’ve selected our best picks in different categories. Whether you want the best value for your money, a solid choice for the trails, or a more budget-friendly option, we’ve got you covered.

Best running shoes for low arches overall

What makes it the best?

In our runs, Adrenaline GTS 23 kept our arches supported while making sure we remained comfortable. Despite being a stability shoe, it doesn’t force us to run in a particular way. Our lab results and actual runs show it has a good balance of stiff and flexible elements for low-key support — making it our top running shoe for low arches.

The balanced foam feels soft underfoot yet feels firm enough for steady strides. Our durometer confirms it’s 18.4% softer than the average running shoe. With a wider-than-average landing platform, it ensures a securely planted sensation. Further promoting steady landings is its GuideRails technology, which is integrated into the sides of the heels to support excess movement. 

Steady support is given in the most natural way thanks to its adaptive midsole. In our flex test, it boldly exceeds the average by 41.2%. This elevates comfort to the next level since it blocks off any fighting sensation from the midsole.

The ultra-breathable upper keeps our runs sweat and blister-free, thanks to the large ventilation holes we spotted under our microscope. This shoe showed very impressive airflow vs. all our lab-tested shoes.

We warn caution that the pair’s subtle support might not be enough for extreme overpronators. These runners should try out more aggressive stability shoes.


  • Excellent stability without being intrusive
  • Ideal for easy miles
  • Specifically designed for heel strikers
  • Outstanding breathability
  • Comfortable and cushioned
  • Availability in narrow and wide sizes
  • Capable of handling tempo paces
  • Not expensive at all


  • The engineered mesh upper lacks durability
  • Lacks cushion for forefoot strikers
Full review of Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23

Best daily training running shoes for low arches

Hoka Arahi 6

What makes it the best?

Hoka Arahi 6 is a light, low-key stability shoe offering gentle support. It’s tailor-made to accommodate low arches and overpronators through its wide and balanced platform. Through lab tests and actual runs, we crown it as the best daily trainer among low-arch shoes.

Striking the middle ground between comfort and support, it has a balanced cushion with J-Frame technology. Its high-density J-shaped foam surrounds the midsole providing steady support. Yet the cushion has enough stack to mute out ground feel. Its forefoot rises 4.0 mm above average, resulting in a more leveled platform. This results in even weight distribution and less localized tension.

Further ensuring a planted sensation is the vast platform. It provides an extra 2.1 mm in the forefoot and a major 7.4 mm in the heel. This means it’s a great stability option for all types of foot-strikers. 

Despite the dense foam and wide platform, it's surprisingly light. At a sleek 8.9 oz (252g), it’s much lighter than the average running shoe (9.5 oz / 268g). What’s even more amazing is that stability shoes are usually above 10.0 oz (283g).

Hoka missed Arahi 6’s grip. With less outsole to cover the midsole and harder rubber (less traction), we’re hesitant to corner at high speeds.


  • Fits true to size
  • Balanced cushioning
  • Lightweight for stability shoes
  • Good lockdown
  • Stable platform
  • Fun to run in
  • Very comfortable
  • Improved lacing


  • Grip is not reliable
  • Durability problems
Full review of Hoka Arahi 6

Best budget running shoes for low arches

ASICS GT 1000 12

What makes it the best?

Stability shoes average $139 upon release, while ASICS GT 1000 12 offers the same support — with much more comfort — for the affordable price of $100. Unfazed by the standard, this shoe excels in natural movement, durability, and out-of-this-world breathability. We’re confident this is the best budget low-arch running shoe.

ASICS’ GEL is the main stability feature of this pair. Integrated into the outer heel, it ensures safe and sound landings on the plush Flytefoam. Our durometer shows the foam is 46.9% softer than average, providing relieving support in the arch. The subtle guidance doesn’t feel obtrusive since the midsole feels very fluid. Our flex test validates it’s a mindblowing 60.4% more flexible than average.

The outsole delivers traction without sacrificing durability. It maintains the equilibrium through its 74.8 HC softer-than-average rubber and 4.8 mm thicker-than-average material. Softer rubber means more grip, while a thicker outsole means it’s more resistant to wear.

Light in the pocket and on the feet, it weighs 9.6 oz (271g). Most stability shoes weigh above 10.0 oz (283g). Its top-tier upper has countless ventilation holes for breathability. Goodbye, blisters and sweaty feet!

While this shoe gives all the support and comfort, the Flytefoam isn’t responsive and bouncy enough to pick up the pace.


  • Incredible value for the price
  • Cushioned and soft midsole
  • Offers great stability
  • GEL technology in the heel
  • Perfectly comfortable for cross-training or walking
  • Built to endure long-distance runs
  • Offers exceptional breathability
  • Durable outsole with a long lifespan


  • Flytefoam could offer better energy return
  • Upper lacks durability
Full review of ASICS GT 1000 12

Best speed training shoes for low arches

Saucony Tempus

What makes it the best?

Saucony Tempus is unlike any other, bringing a fresh approach to arch support, speed, and stability. Other than its wide base and rigid heel, this stability shoe surprises us with its light nature and soft, springy midsole. It provides the guidance and speed needed for any distance — making it our top speed trainer for low-arch runners.

Plush foam spoils our feet, feeling buttery-smooth underneath. Our durometer confirms its velvet touch, measuring 23.0% softer than average. The cushion is bouncy and keeps our momentum strong. Further improving our speed is the rocker geometry that encourages higher cadence and smooth turnovers.  

Overall, our runs feel steady without being forced to run in a certain way. Saucony Tempus delivers stability without being invasive through its wider-than-average landing platform and rigid heel counter. In our stiffness test, the heel scored 4/5 (vs. 2.7 average). A higher number means it’s tougher to bend.

Its airy nature allows us to be quick on our feet. At 9.4 oz (266 g), it’s much lighter than the 10.5 oz (298.3g) average of stability shoes.

Its price point tips the scale in the other direction. At $160, it’s at the higher end of the spectrum vs. the $139 average of stability shoes and even the $145 average of other speed trainers.


  • Stable but not aggressive
  • Responsive ride
  • Smooth transitions
  • Outsole is super solid
  • Bites on wet roads
  • Snug and secure fit
  • Breathable on warm days
  • Roomy toe box
  • Not heavy


  • Causes heel rubs
  • Expensive
Full review of Saucony Tempus

Best cushioned running shoes for low arches

What makes it the best?

The 30th iteration of Gel Kayano is our recommendation for the best-cushioned low-arch running shoes. This daily trainer holds the perfect mix of comfort and support with its ultra-stacked and soft cushion and 4D Guidance System. It delivers a breezy, buttery-smooth ride in a sure-footed manner, which often isn’t the case for maximalist shoes. 

Rising to 39.7/27.7 mm in the heel and forefoot, its skyscraper stack sits well above the average for added comfort. The cherry on the top is the FF Blast+ — ASICS' softest cloud-like foam. This combo feels so luxurious we could handle long miles without feeling tired.

GK30 proves a cushioned shoe can be steady. Its new 4D Guidance System and its wide platform are the main ingredients to a stable ride. The softer foam used right under the arch adjusted well to the shape of our feet for custom protection. The midsole is insanely spacious and can accommodate even the widest feet, measuring 124.3/105.4 mm in the forefoot and heel. That’s an extra 11.2/15.3 mm more than the average!

As expected, this wide and padded shoe weighs 10.7 oz (303g) vs. the 9.5 oz (268g) average. Not everyone needs a maximalist shoe. Other athletes may check lighter options.


  • Exceptionally cushioned
  • Impressively stable with 4D Guidance System
  • Lighter than it seems
  • Top-notch breathability
  • Effective maximalist design
  • Superior durability and comfort
  • Ideal for high-mileage runners
  • Ultra-plush FF Blast+ foam
  • Amazing build quality


  • Actual drop exceeds stated measurement
  • Midsole might require a break-in period
Full review of ASICS Gel Kayano 30

Best lightweight running shoes for low arches

What makes it the best?

Saucony Guide 16 is our top lightweight low-arch running shoe, providing low-key guidance despite its airy build and flexible midsole. It redefines the usual rigid stability shoe by mixing traditional and modern features to complete a stability system without being too forceful. 

The first thing that amazed us upon testing was the shoe’s light weight since stability shoes tend to be heavy. This lightweight runner only sits at 9.7 oz (275g), while its counterparts weigh an average of 10.5 oz (298.3g).

Next is how flexible it is, providing smoother mid-to-forefoot transitions. While stability shoes tend to be stiff, Guide 16 emerges 32.8% more flexible than the average running shoe (including neutral trainers). It’s easy to control and allows our feet to stride in its natural form.

The main support of this shoe lies in the firm midsole and its HOLLOW-TECH frame. It’s designed to catch our feet. The cushion that hugs our feet feels firm but has enough foam for support and shock absorption. The shoe’s sidewalls and sole flaring contribute to keeping our feet steady, with the rigid heel locking it down in place. In our stiffness test, it received the highest 5/5 score.

Guide 16 performs best on easy-to-tempo runs but lacks the explosive energy for faster paces. If speed is a priority, this shoe won’t deliver.


  • Softer, more comfortable upper
  • Breathable
  • Excellent lockdown
  • Good guidance without being too intrusive
  • Protective and fairly responsive
  • Good grip
  • Natural-feeling ride
  • Roomy toe box
  • Lightweight
  • Best for daily miles and as a walking shoe


  • Uncomfortable for going sockless
  • Firm cushioning
  • Does not like to go fast
  • Durability is so-so
Full review of Saucony Guide 16

Best long distance running shoes for low arches

Hoka Gaviota 5

What makes it the best?

We felt Gaviota 5's arch support through its cloud-like foam that dampens the impact of long miles. It’s immensely comfortable while providing stability through its wide platform and balanced cushion. Through lab tests and actual runs, we endorse this pair as the best long-distance shoe for low arches.

We find its plush cushioning, even on the forefoot, to be suited even to high-mileage enthusiasts. It stands 32.7 mm high (vs. 24.5 mm average), making it a great stability shoe for forefoot strikers. The foam feels velvety and our durometer confirms it’s 12.9 HA, 46.5% softer than average. Supported by a firmer 22.0 HA secondary foam, it's integrated into high-impact areas for better balance. 

Another stability feature is the massive base. Its 125.1/106.6 mm forefoot and heel is one of the widest we’ve tested with our caliper. That’s an extra 11.9/16.5 mm space for stable landings. This pair shines in terms of lateral stability with the H-Frame guiding us in place.

Gaviota 5 is not only accommodating to wide feet, but it’s also great for tropical weather! With a thin mesh and countless ventilation holes, the upper keeps our feet away from sweat and blisters. Its 5/5 rating on our lab breathability test confirms our observation.

We found Gaviota 5’s low heel-to-toe drop of 2.2 mm less suited for extreme heel-strikers and athletes with lower-leg issues.


  • Remarkably stable
  • Breathable and comfortable upper
  • Lightweight for its size
  • Plushier than ever
  • Good stability option for forefoot strikers
  • Ideal for wide feet
  • Excellent for long runs


  • Low drop might pose issues for heel strikers
  • Performs poorly in colder conditions
  • Not for narrow feet
Full review of Hoka Gaviota 5

Comparison of the 7 best running shoes for low arches

+ + Add a product
+ + Add a product
+ + Add a product
+ + Add a product
+ + Add a product
+ + Add a product
+ + Add a product
+ + Add a product
Users rating
Best price
# of colorways

How we test running shoes

As a team of experienced runners, we constantly test the latest offerings in the low-arch running shoe category. Each pair of shoes is put to the wringer – lab-tested and wear-tested – and to see how it fares as compared to others in the selection. The entire process specifically includes:

  • Buying all the running shoes on this list with our own money. We follow this to keep everything transparent, honest, and unbiased.
  • Cutting the shoes into pieces in our lab. This allows us to get a much closer look at the parts and techs.
  • Weighing and measuring 30+ parameters from stability, cushioning motion control technology, and many others. We also compare the measurements and scores we extract to the average values for running shoes.
  • Wear-testing the shoe in various training conditions and racing environments. We log at least 30 to 50 miles for each model. 

Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob is a fan of short distances with a 5K PR at 15:58 minutes. Based on 35 million race results, he's among the fastest 0.2% runners. Jens Jakob previously owned a running store, when he was also a competitive runner. His work is regularly featured in The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC and the likes as well as peer-reviewed journals. Finally, he has been a guest on +30 podcasts on running.