7 Running Shoes With The Best Traction in 2025

Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic on
7 Running Shoes With The Best Traction in 2025

We buy shoes ourselves. We earn commissions when you buy through us, at no extra cost. Why trust us

We all want to avoid investing in a new pair of running shoes and ending up slipping at the first hint of rain or when the surface becomes slicker. Hearing about other people's experiences can be valuable, but only to a point. Many forget to check how many factors are the same in those experiences, from rubber coverage and outsole design to foot strike, pronation, and the surface type. This all led us to start testing the traction in the lab. A standardized test and comparable results are a runner’s dream come true. 

How we test Running shoes with the traction


Every running shoe that enters the lab has been chosen by us and paid for with our money. Our testers run in the shoes to get a personal feel of them, and then the shoes are taken to the lab, where we perform a battery of tests. To do the tests, we have to cut the running shoes in half, remove their upper, and tear them into smaller pieces. We use different machines and tools, like durometers, a smoke pump, a microscope, digital calipers, and machines made specifically for testing the traction or energy return. 

Once we’re done testing, we publish all the results on our website. These results allow you to compare the shoes and allow us to present the shoes that perform the best. 

Running shoes with the best traction overall

What makes it the best?

The ASICS Gel Nimbus 27 is a comfort-focused trainer, driven by its plush and ultra-thick midsole. It’s loaded with supportive features that keep every touchdown stable—especially when its Hybrid ASICSGRIP outsole delivers record-breaking grip in our lab tests. Ultimately, it’s our best high-traction running shoe.

The Gel Nimbus 27 inspires confident footing, rain or shine. In our wet-condition test, we recorded an outstanding 0.84 friction score, making the Hybrid ASICSGRIP rubber 78.7% grippier than average! At this rate, slips are out of the picture.

Further enhancing a well-planted sensation are the midsole sidewalls, extra-wide platform, and unyielding midsole. Our caliper verifies the landing base is massive at 119.5/99.8 mm. Meanwhile, the shoe is very resistant to twisting, backed up by its 5/5 torsional rigidity score in our manual test.

Staying true to its name, Gel Nimbus 27 offers a cloudlike cushion, rising to a sky-high 42.7/34.4 mm. It takes away the harshness of the ground and reduces landing impact with its high 136 SA rating in the heel and forefoot in our shock absorption test. Racking up the miles feels soothing in this pair!

However, this shoe is ideal for recovery days or easy miles. It feels bottom-heavy at 10.6 oz (299g) and lacks the versatility for faster paces.

Pros

  • Even more foam underfoot!
  • Premium-feel, breathable upper
  • Fantastic stability
  • Improved toebox with extra wiggle room
  • Flexible knit tongue
  • True maximalist comfort for recovery runs
  • Amazing heel lockdown
  • Top-tier grip

Cons

  • Feels bulky and heavy
  • Minor price increase
  • Lacks energy return
Full review of ASICS Gel Nimbus 27

Best tempo shoes with high traction

What makes it the best?

The PUMA Deviate Nitro 3 is a great choice for runners who want a little extra excitement in their tempo training. We discovered that this shoe comes with a carbon plate similar to those used in racing shoes, offering excellent energy return, traction, and cushioning, all at a very reasonable price. In our assessment, while there is still room for improvement in breathability, outsole durability, and weight, the overall update is clearly positive.

Pros

  • Exceptional grip on all surfaces
  • Competitively priced
  • Responsive carbon plate
  • Adapts well to all paces
  • Enhanced knit upper
  • Ideal for tempo workouts
  • Great at navigating tight turns

Cons

  • Needs better energy return
  • Minor increase in weight
  • Ventilation could be better
  • Narrow toebox
Full review of PUMA Deviate Nitro 3

High traction running shoes with the best stability

What makes it the best?

The ASICS Gel Kayano 32 is all about keeping our footing steady. Lab evaluations show that from its dependable grip to the presence of the 4D Guidance System, along with other support features, it’s impossible to lose our balance in this shoe. GK32 leaves a good impression with its overall sturdy construction that’s hard to wear down.

We unpacked the midsole and discovered the 4D Guidance System in the midfoot, which serves as a stabilizer for our arches. It also has tall sidewalls and a massive platform that keeps our feet centered. Our caliper shows it’s broader than average at 119.8/97.2 mm.

Another feature that helps us stay in control is its confidence-inspiring traction. In our wet-condition test, the Hybrid ASICSGRIP rubber generated a solid 0.84 score, making it a whopping 78.7% grippier than average. We moved through wet pavements wholeheartedly without losing balance.

Despite GK32’s top-tier traction, it maintains impressive durability, which rarely happens in the lab. Our Dremel only managed to shave off 0.7 mm, which is 30.0% less than average. Moreover, the toebox and heel padding resisted damage better than average, receiving remarkable scores of 4/5.

Unfortunately, what GK32 can’t offer is a dynamic ride. Runners looking for a responsive shoe should go for trainers with higher energy output.

Pros

  • Amazing shock absorption
  • Plush and breathable upper
  • Made to last
  • Dependable for most pronators
  • Heavy-duty outsole with excellent grip
  • Stable as a table
  • Pillow-soft heel padding
  • Improved fit
  • Excellent build quality

Cons

  • Not for soft-foam lovers
  • Bad energy return
  • Overpriced in Europe
Full review of ASICS Gel Kayano 32

Best race shoes with high traction

What makes it the best?

We think the PUMA Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 is one of the most aggressive supershoes ever made. In our lab tests, we found it explosively fast, delivering a thrilling experience that few competitors can match. Its state-of-the-art foam, featherlight build, and innovative plate design combine to deliver lab-proven gains in running efficiency. However, our testing also showed that its extreme instability, decoupled midsole and fragile materials make it impractical for most runners.

Pros

  • Insanely fast and incredibly fun
  • Exceptional energy return from A-TPU foam
  • Premium Ultraweave upper
  • Innovative extended plate design
  • Perfect for 5K/10K
  • Excellent shock absorption for long distances
  • Includes two different lace types
  • Reliable lockdown
  • Huge weight reduction compared to version 2

Cons

  • Higher price than before
  • Extremely unstable
  • Very limited durability
  • Unsuitable for heel strikers
Full review of PUMA Fast-R Nitro Elite 3

Best supertrainers with high traction

ASICS Superblast 2
90
Superb!

What makes it the best?

If budget isn't a barrier, we're confident in declaring the ASICS Superblast 2 the ultimate training shoe, and we think it even doubles as an exceptional racer for most. With a world-class midsole, a significantly improved upper, a more effective outsole, and all the cherished features of its predecessor preserved, this shoe excels in speed, cushioning, and versatility. And although it's not the most accommodating for wider feet and has seen a minor increase in weight, we believe that ASICS has surpassed expectations with this update, delivering an exceptional running shoe.

Pros

  • Fantastic new upper
  • Improved overall comfort
  • Grippier outsole without cutouts
  • Durability enhancements
  • Excellent weight/cushioning ratio
  • Supreme stability
  • Works at every pace and distance

Cons

  • Slight weight gain
  • Fit remains tight
  • Minimal tongue padding
  • Energy return is not on par with the price
Full review of ASICS Superblast 2

Most versatile running shoes with high traction

What makes it the most versatile?

We were amazed by the PUMA Velocity Nitro 4 and its explosive energy return at such a fair price. We loved the lightweight feel, the grippy PumaGrip outsole, and the fun ride. While it’s not ideal for long distances and the forefoot runs a bit snug, we firmly believe this is one of the most impressive daily trainers we’ve tested in the lab.

Pros

  • Impressive energy return
  • Lightweight and agile underfoot
  • Superior traction from PumaGrip outsole
  • Handles tempo efforts with ease
  • Flexible and comfortable for everyday use
  • Accurate real drop
  • Natural-feeling, non-rockered design
  • Balanced cushioning with some ground feel
  • Looks really cool

Cons

  • Not ideal for long runs
  • Fit leans toward the narrow side
  • Midsole becomes firmer in cold conditions
  • Slight price increase
Full review of PUMA Velocity Nitro 4

High traction running shoes with the best value

What makes it the best?

The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 continues its legacy with a lightweight build and colorful design while advancing key aspects like cushioning and traction. In our extensive testing, we found it ideal for midfoot and forefoot strikers who need a versatile and reasonably-priced shoe capable of handling both daily runs and demanding speedwork. And it remains a fantastic choice for triathletes!

Pros

  • Lightweight
  • Exceptional grip
  • Attention-grabbing aesthetic
  • Gusseted tongue
  • Comfortable upper
  • Great for triathlon
  • Really versatile
  • Fantastic price point
  • Breathability

Cons

  • Upper longevity
  • Minimal tongue padding
  • Still not enough energy return
Full review of ASICS Noosa Tri 16

High traction is of great importance to runners who live in a wet climate or often run in rainy and snowy conditions. Rain, slush, snow, whatever makes the roads wet and slippery. Add occasional slick areas to that equation (e.g., mall stairs, tiles around fountains), and you really need a superb grip. 

testing running shoes with high traction

As seen in the image above, we have to tear the shoes into pieces to test everything. This allows us to get a complete picture of traction and shoes overall.

4 things to know about running shoes with high traction 

We back everything with our lab data. But, as a starting point, we recommend getting familiar with these features of running shoes with high traction: 

  1. You can recognize them in the shop only if you memorized the rubber compounds that perform highly on the traction test. It is, however, recommended to look for rubber outsoles, which means no exposed midsole or as little as possible. Also, new premium rubber is grippier than rubberized EVA outsoles. 
  2. Thicker (and more durable) outsoles will last longer, which means they will be able to provide traction for longer. A thin outsole that quickly reveals foam beneath the rubber is a bad choice. 
  3. Some running shoes are so grippy you may hear them while running or they may even feel like they are working against you, as if they were kind of stopping you in place. This is a great sign. 
  4. On average, running shoes with high traction are more expensive than the rest of the running shoes. This is related to many other features that are present in such shoes, but still, it’s good to be prepared. 

Getting the lab data for traction of running shoes

When testing the traction in our lab, we are actually measuring the dynamic coefficient of friction (CoF). This number tells us how good the running shoe is when it comes to traction. Lower than 0.25, and we consider it unsafe even for dry surfaces, between 0.25 and 0.45, it has a good grip on dry terrain, and shoes with CoF higher than 0.45 are considered to excel on dry, slick and wet surfaces. 


Testing the traction of road running shoes in RunRepeat lab 

When doing this test, we follow the SATRA TM144 methodology. Here’s what that means: 

  • We press the shoe with a force of 500N against the sliding surface at a 7-degree angle. This mimics the real-life contact with the ground that happens during the gait 
  • We test the traction at the forefoot. In other categories, where the main movement and activity happen at the heel, we test it at the heel. 
  • The surface we perform this test on is a concrete slab. We regularly make fresh slabs to avoid inconsistent results due to their wear and tear. 
concrete-slabs-traction-test.jpg
Concrete slabs made specifically for the traction test in our lab

The role of outsole durability, outsole thickness, and rubber coverage 

Previously, we thought that softer rubber is stickier and less durable, while harder rubber is more durable and less grippy. Things have changed. Today, we have premium compounds that deliver superb grip while remaining highly durable. What makes this relation so weak? Well, we have to take into account the outsole material (compound type), the thickness of the outsole, and its coverage. 


Testing the durability of the outsole with a dremel

Once our dremel is done, we use a tire tread gauge to measure the depth of the hole. Deeper hole = less durable outsole. Here, it’s obvious that the outsole will last longer if there’s more of it. But not many shoes can afford that, especially race ones, where light weight is the goal. 

outsole-thickness-and-traction.jpg
Different outsole thickness measurements

And finally, we get to the outsole coverage. Looking at the outsole design, it’s easy to notice that some outsoles are almost fully covered with rubber, some have it only at the forefoot, and some are in-between. Obviously, the greater the coverage (where you land), the better the grip! More ground contact is what we’re looking for. 

different-outsole-designs-traction.jpg
Different outsole designs, from left to right: less rubber, more exposed midsole, to almost full rubber coverage

The sooner you destroy the outsole, the sooner you’ll experience slipping (traction will worsen). 

Rubber or rubberized outsole: what to expect

Given that the traction depends on what’s at the bottom of the running shoe, we have to focus on 2 main options. Running shoes can have a rubber outsole, which means they have a proper rubber layer at the bottom. They can also have a rubberized EVA outsole, which is a blend of EVA foam and rubber. 

rubberized outsole design
Rubberized outsole found in Under Armour Velociti Elite 2

To compensate for this low durability, brands have to make rubberized outsoles thicker.

durability of the rubberized outsole
Very low durability of the rubberized outsole, our Dremel ate through it!

Based on our lab data, running shoes with rubber outsoles score higher on the traction test. Rubberized outsoles offer more flexibility and a quieter ride, but they fall short in durability. In order to cut weight and increase shoe flexibility, you may also find exposed midsole on some outsoles. 

While the rubberized outsole and exposed midsole may look similar, the rubberized outsole is made to be used for traction like a rubber outsole; the exposed midsole is not. Exposed midsole is extremely non-durable and not grippy.

Outsole design for wet weather 

Dealing with a lot of rain on the roads means your outsoles actually have to channel water and keep you safe. Outsoles made for such weather should have grooves and channels, just like car tyres do when they are made for wet terrain. And they should score high on the traction test!

exposed-midsoles-variations-traction.jpg
Running shoes with a greater area of exposed midsole are a bad idea for wet weather. It's better to look for more rubber coverage

Still, it’s not easy to eyeball the traction of the outsole. Given that it depends heavily on the material (the rubber compound used), we urge runners to always check the lab data. 

channels-grooves-outsole-traction.jpg
Shoes with excellent traction, it's easy to notice the channels (on the right especially) that channel the rain away

If you plan to run in wet weather, there are other things to take into consideration, like breathability, water resistance levels, and price. We covered this in great detail in our guide about the best waterproof shoes

waterproof-upper-traction.jpg

Running shoe brands with the best traction

It’s always tricky to present data in averages, because there will be running shoes that perform excellently and poorly; however, the averages still tell a story. In the case of running shoes and their traction, analyzing our lab data, we’ve discovered that Puma, Asics, and Altra make the shoes with the highest traction. On the other hand, Nike, for example, took the last spot. 

pumagrip-asicsgrip-outsoles-traction.jpg
PUMAGRIP and ASICSGRIP are basically at the top of the high-traction list in our lab

If you want to learn more about our analysis, read about it in our guide on outsoles

While brands can have their own rubber compounds and technologies, they can also collaborate with Vibram. Having a Vibram outsole is like having a Gore-Tex membrane, it’s the most known name in the world. Vibram is significantly more present in the trail world (trail running and hiking), though. 

vibram-outsoles-traction.jpg

Brands like La Sportiva, NNormal, Merrell, Hoka, Topo, etc. offer shoes with Vibram outsoles. The good thing is, if you decide to find shoes with a Vibram outsole, you won’t be able to miss it. The logo is always present, just like already-mentioned Gore-Tex. 

Price of running shoes with the best traction

We already saw that traction is not a standalone feature that is correlated with 1 shoe feature only. So, looking at the average prices is tricky, because what also comes into play are: type of foams which includes shock absorption and energy return, outsole thickness and weight of the shoe,… this all plays a role in the overall price. 

However, if we wanted to have a look at the shoes with high traction as a group, we’d find out that their price averages at $171. The average price of running shoes with moderate traction sits at $144 and with low traction at $77. 

The good thing is, these prices are manufacturer’s suggested retail prices, which means it’s how much they retail for, once released. If you want to find a good discount, head over to our dedicated Deals page

Author
Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic
Whether it's a vertical kilometre or an ultra, climbing in the Alps or exploring local mountains, Jovana uses every opportunity to trade walls and concrete for forests and trails. She logs at least 10h/week on trails, with no off-season, and 4x more on research on running and running shoes. With a background in physics and engineering management, she prefers her running spiced with data.