Our verdict

Mixing its history in sports, streetwear, and the brand's typical high-quality design, Converse has jumped away from its comfort zone with the Run Star Trainer. This pair features a really solid and durable upper made using authentic suede. Its flexible and lightweight structure made our walks really comfortable from the very first moment we put this shoe on. Also, as its 90's retro vibe is incredibly trendy nowadays, it looks good with literally anything. Nevertheless, its slim and narrow profile makes it a sworn enemy of people with wide feet.

Pros

  • High quality design: authentic suede and waxed laces
  • Incredibly durable upper materials
  • Really flexible and lightweight
  • Top tier insole
  • Mix and match wonder
  • Trendy 90's retro style
  • Cheaper alternative to the Samba

Cons

  • Not for wide feet
  • Not for all day wear

Audience verdict

89
Good!

Who should buy

Don't let the Run Star Trainer run away from you if:

  • You put quality first, second, and third (this pair features authentic suede and top-notch waxed laces).
  • You're looking for a really durable and stylish shoe to show off in town.
  • You adore the Samba but you want to break the mold with something different.
  • You're a retro lover and you want some sneakers that look good with everything you've got in your wardrobe.

Converse Run Star Trainer_outdoor_01

Who should NOT buy

Forget about this shoe if you've got wide feet, pointy toes, or anything in between. Its worryingly narrow profile and solid upper just won't give in, so the space this Converse provides is limited. As an alternative, if you don't mind changing brands, the Adidas Superstar might just be your new sole-mate. Its 90's sporty style and high-quality design make its affordable price hard to believe!

Then, if you're looking for something comfortable to wear all day but you don't want to deal with the extra weight, ASICS keeps it affordable with the Gel 1130, which also has a retro vibe but in a different design.

Converse Run Star Trainer_pieces

Cushioning

Heel stack

Our caliper returned 17.2 mm when we measured the Converse Run Star Trainer's heel stack. It's a whole 42% lower than average, which means your feet will feel closer to the ground. If you have tried the Samba before, it's pretty much the same kind of feeling!

Converse Run Star Trainer Heel stack-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer 17.2 mm
Average 29.6 mm
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
16.9 mm
Heel stack
50.5 mm

Forefoot stack

At 13.7 mm, the forefoot stack is also really close to the floor, breaking with the chunky sneakers trend that's so popular nowadays.

Converse Run Star Trainer Forefoot stack-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer 13.7 mm
Average 18.7 mm
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
9.7 mm
Forefoot stack
28.3 mm

Drop

As both stack heights are pretty close, this Converse has a very low drop: 3.5 mm. Followed by the Nike Killshot 2, the Run Star Trainer is the sneaker with the lowest drop we've tested so far. This translates into a flatter ride (toes and heels feel pretty much at the same level), which makes the muscles of your ankles and calves work a little bit harder than your hips and knees.

Converse Run Star Trainer Drop-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer 3.5 mm
Average 10.9 mm
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
3.5 mm
Drop
22.6 mm

Insole thickness

As this Converse doesn't have a midsole, the insole is the only cushioning piece that separates your foot from the outsole. At 6.3 mm and with a memory foam design, the brand made sure it was thicker and softer than usual to provide some very much appreciated comfort.

Converse Run Star Trainer Insole thickness-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer 6.3 mm
Average 5.1 mm
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
3.1 mm
Insole thickness
14.2 mm

Size and fit

Size

We do not have enough votes yet (10+ is required). Please help contribute if you own this shoe, or add votes to other shoes you own.

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

Small True to size Large

Toebox width - widest part

Just by looking at it, we can tell this Converse pair definitely has a sleek profile. Our caliper confirmed it by marking 91.3 mm when we measured the toebox width at the widest part. This is yet another record for the Run Star Trainer, as it's the sneaker with the narrowest widest part (as contradictory as it might sound) we've seen in our lab.

Converse Run Star Trainer Toebox width - widest part-1

We believe this might be an issue if you're planning to wear this pair during the entire day. Feet get swollen after walking for hours, which translates into them needing more space. The key point here is that, during our lab tests, we found this Converse's upper uses a suede material that's not very stretchy, so it might lead to discomfort.

Test results
Run Star Trainer 91.3 mm
Average 98.8 mm
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
91.3 mm
Toebox width - widest part
107.7 mm

Toebox width - big toe

With 73.8 mm at the big toe, this shoe is definitely pointy. Even our standard-width feet could feel the really snug fit of the Run Star Trainer, which is bad news for wide-foot sneakerheads. And the same goes for people whose toes are pointing up!

Converse Run Star Trainer Toebox width - big toe-1

Also, during our wear tests, we found out this shoe doesn't have a lot of vertical space. This only adds fuel to the fire for those people, as this Converse might pressure their toes uncomfortably.

Test results
Run Star Trainer 73.8 mm
Average 74.9 mm
Compared to 79 sneakers
Number of shoes
63.7 mm
Toebox width - big toe
83.0 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

Despite its sporty style and heritage, this Converse is not a shoe to play sports with. It didn't give our ankles much trouble when we moved them from side to side. Even though it has a foot-hugging structure, it's definitely not built to stop your ankles from overextending themselves.

Torsional rigidity

The 1/5 it scored on our torsional rigidity test just backed this up: as you can see, our fingers could twist it easily. This reflects its comfortable and easy nature, as the Run Star Trainer felt comfortable from the very first moment we put it on. In conclusion: you can forget about a painful break-in period!

Test results
Run Star Trainer 1
Average 3.5
Compared to 79 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel follows pretty much the same logic. It agreed to bend as soon as our thumb pushed it, so we decided to give it a 2/5 on our stiffness test. As it features a rubber extension from the outsole that offers some extra structure, it didn't earn the most flexible score this time.

Test results
Run Star Trainer 2
Average 3.2
Compared to 79 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

When we looked at the bottom of this Converse model, we realized its midsole followed its overall slim structure. At only 99.7 mm, it doesn't shine because of its stability. It's still comfortable, as it doesn't reach the extremely narrow nature of the Adidas SL 72... but we believe you'll enjoy it the most if you're looking for a pair with a very narrow profile.

Converse Run Star Trainer Midsole width - forefoot-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer 99.7 mm
Average 108.5 mm
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
95.1 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
121.0 mm

Midsole width - heel

On the other hand, and as we feared, the heel does mirror the narrowness of the SL 72. At only 70.8 mm, if you're looking for a supportive shoe, this isn't it.

Converse Run Star Trainer Midsole width - heel-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer 70.8 mm
Average 83.1 mm
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
67.7 mm
Midsole width - heel
103.1 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

Partly, one of the reasons why these sneakers felt so comfortable from the very first minute we put them on is their extreme longitudinal flexibility. When we took them to our lab, our force gauge marked only 11.2N when we flexed them all the way up to 90 degrees. This is a crazy 51% lower than average, which reflects why the Run Star Trainer bent so easily alongside our feet when we walked around town with it.

Test results
Run Star Trainer 11.2N
Average 22.9N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
5.8N
Stiffness
60.5N

Weight

The lightweight nature of this pair was just one more reason why our feet fell in love with it. Its stylish design comes at only 11.4 oz/322.0g, which is a solid 18% lower than average.

This, added to the overall flexibility of the Run Star Trainer, translated into an easy and comfortable ride during our wear tests, as our feet didn't have to deal with any extra weight.

Converse Run Star Trainer Weight-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer 11.75 oz (333g)
Average 13.86 oz (393g)
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
8.50 oz (241g)
Weight
22.61 oz (641g)

Breathability

Just by having a quick look at this Converse's solid suede and nylon upper, we guessed breathability wouldn't be its strongest point.

When we took it to our lab, our light test showed no traces of ventilation holes.

As you can see, our smoke test was directly affected by this... and not in a good way! The Train of its name definitely does not refer to the form of transportation, as the Run Star Trainer refused to let any of the smoke go throughout the 10 seconds of the test. Consequently, we could only give it a sad 1/5 on our breathability test, which is totally understandable if we compare its performance to the ASICS Gel NYC's.

Converse Run Star Trainer Breathability-3

Last but not least, our microscope showed us why there's no way this shoe's design could favor airflow.

Converse Run Star Trainer Breathability-4

Test results
Run Star Trainer 1
Average 3
Compared to 79 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Leather/Suede quality

We burned one of the suede patches of this shoe to see if its materials were authentic or synthetic.

We weren't welcomed by a big flame or a sticky mess, which proves the Run Star Trainer features real suede. Its affordable price makes it hard to believe, but trust us: it's scientifically-proven true!

Test results
Run Star Trainer Real suede

Toebox durability

We're more than happy to tell you that the Run Star Trainer confirms the "low breathability = high durability" rule.

At 5K RPM and with 3.2N of force, our Dremel drilled its toebox mercilessly. Even though we saw blue dust and debris flying around from the very first second, when we put the tool aside we realized the damage was not bad at all. In fact, it didn't even come close to affecting its integrity negatively. This wonderful result earned it a perfect 5/5 on our toebox durability test.

Test results
Run Star Trainer 5
Average 3.8
Compared to 79 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Sadly, the heel padding showed poor durability. Once again with the same 5K RPM and 3.2N of force, our Dremel chewed on this Converse pair like a mouse finding some fresh cheese.

As you can see, the results were disappointing: the tool managed to eat away pretty much all the material. Consequently, we could only give it a 1/5 on our heel padding durability test, which creates an awful contrast with the previous excellent result.

Test results
Run Star Trainer 1
Average 3.2
Compared to 79 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

At 85.0 HC, our durometer indicated the Run Star Trainer features an outsole just as hard as the average. This usually indicates a nice balance of durability and grip.

Converse Run Star Trainer Outsole hardness-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer 85.0 HC
Average 85.4 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 79 sneakers
Number of shoes
72.9 HC
Outsole hardness
91.3 HC

Outsole durability

Even though our Dremel came back stronger for its last test, this Converse also got back on its feet to show another great result on durability. This time at 10K RPM, the tool attacked the Run Star Trainer's outsole during 22 seconds.

Just by looking at it, we realized the damages were not so bad. Our tread gauge confirmed it by returning 1.0 mm when we measured them, which means this shoe is as durable as the average. In other words, it should be by your side for a while, as its outsole is made to last.

Test results
Run Star Trainer 1.0 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 79 sneakers
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

As the Run Star Trainer doesn't have a midsole, the brand decided to go for a padded insole and a thick outsole in order to protect your feet from harsh urban surfaces. Our caliper marked 7.8 mm, which is a whole 31% chunkier than average.

Converse Run Star Trainer Outsole thickness-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer 7.8 mm
Average 5.4 mm
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
3.1 mm
Outsole thickness
12.5 mm

Misc

Grip / Traction

Making use of its sporty heritage, the Converse Run Star Trainer provided us with great traction during our wear tests walking around town.

Converse Run Star Trainer_outdoor_08

It features a linear pattern full of cuts that favors flexibility, but overall it keeps it simple. We can't say this pair bites the floor like there's no tomorrow, but we really can't complain either. It does its job well, and that's what matters to us.

Price

These retro sporty sneakers look really similar to the iconic Samba, yet they are $10 cheaper! We believe Converse has joined the 90s trend with a very solid pair that features durable and real suede in a low-profile and high-quality design. But the best part is that looks stunning with baggy jeans, sports clothes, mini-skirts, and everything in between!

Converse Run Star Trainer_outdoor_04

Test results
Run Star Trainer $90
Average $118
Compared to 107 sneakers
Number of shoes
$50
Price
$220

Reflective elements

This Converse doesn't have any reflective elements.

Converse Run Star Trainer Reflective elements-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer No

Tongue padding

The simple and minimalist vibe of the Run Star Trainer is portrayed on its thin tongue. Our caliper marked only 3.8 mm, which is way lower than average. Even though this reduces the overall weight of the shoe, we'd advise you not to tie your laces too tight... just in case.

Converse Run Star Trainer Tongue padding-1

Also, during our wear tests, the tongue did dance a little bit from side to side. Even though we really like the waxed laces of this Converse pair, they couldn't keep it in place, which was a bit annoying to be honest.

Converse Run Star Trainer_outdoor_011

Test results
Run Star Trainer 3.8 mm
Average 9.1 mm
Compared to 80 sneakers
Number of shoes
0.7 mm
Tongue padding
38.4 mm

Heel tab

To keep its retro aesthetics unmatched, the Run Star Trainer doesn't have a heel tab. But it features a non-gusseted tongue, so we didn't really need it to put the shoe on; its opening made it pretty easy!

Instead, we were welcomed by a leather patch with the name of the brand in a color-blocking design that added a really cool contrasting touch.

Converse Run Star Trainer Heel tab-1

Test results
Run Star Trainer None

Removable insole

This Converse pair features a removable insole, which means you can just change it if you need or want to.

Converse Run Star Trainer Removable insole-1

But there are 3 things we want to warn you about:

  • First, its alarmingly narrow midsole might not make this easy, as some insoles might just not fit width-wise.
  • Second, it's not the most spacious sneaker out there, and even though it features a thick insole, adding an even bigger one might lead to discomfort due to compression.
  • Third, if you go for a thinner insole to get some extra inner room, this might also lead to discomfort. Just keep in mind the insole of the Run Star Trainer is the only padded piece separating your feet from its outsole.
Test results
Run Star Trainer Yes