Our verdict

The Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 is a firm-riding workhorse that suits runners who dislike plush running shoes. The upper provides superb comfort but lacks breathability, which could be a drawback in warm climates. However, the outsole is impressively durable—we tested it in the lab and were genuinely impressed by its resilience. And while its flexibility makes it a solid option for walking and all-day wear, the firm foam and snug fit may not accommodate every runner’s needs.

Pros

  • Built-to-last outsole
  • Stable ride for neutral runners
  • Comfortable upper with plush padding
  • Great for walking
  • Reliable grip on dry surfaces
  • All-around reflectivity
  • Affordable price

Cons

  • Poor breathability
  • Firm midsole
  • Narrow toebox limits toe splay
  • Lacks energy return

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

We believe that the Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 is a great option for:

  • Runners seeking a shoe with a long-lasting outsole and a comfort-focused upper at a reasonable price.
  • Beginners wanting a firm, stable ride for their first running shoe.
  • Weekend warriors needing a reliable pick for easy runs and long walks.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6

Who should NOT buy

We believe that runners seeking a plush ride at a budget-friendly price will be disappointed with the HOVR Sonic 6. Its firm midsole lacks the soft feel found in shoes like the Nike Winflo 11, which offers a more pleasant underfoot feel while maintaining strong value.

Additionally, we think the midsole stack height may be a bit thin by today’s standards, which may not provide enough protection for heavier runners. If you're looking for a highly-cushioned yet affordable alternative, the ASICS Gel Pulse 15 and the Saucony Axon 3 are far better options for you.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

When we measured the midsole, we found a 30.2 mm stack height in the heel. While this might not match today’s ultra-high trends, it still provides a good level of impact absorption.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Heel stack
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 30.2 mm
Average 34.1 mm
Compared to 386 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot sits below average at 23.2 mm—sufficient for short, easy runs but likely lacking for longer sessions. That said, we believe this isn’t a major drawback, as the shoe isn’t designed for extended distances anyway.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Forefoot stack
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 23.2 mm
Average 25.5 mm
Compared to 386 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

Through our evaluation, we measured an actual drop of 7.0 mm from heel to forefoot—slightly lower than the advertised 8 mm by Under Armour.

In our view, this moderate offset provides a well-balanced ride that accommodates various footstrikes, though it feels slightly less beginner-friendly than the higher drop geometries we typically see in cheap running shoes.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Drop
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 7.0 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 386 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.2 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 boasts a dual-density midsole, combining two different foams. The primary blue layer is in the heel and midfoot, while the secondary white layer is placed in the forefoot.

Pressing our durometer against the main layer of UA HOVR foam gave us an average reading of 27.0 HA. That’s on the firmer side, and in our experience, it translated into a dense underfoot feel with minimal give.

For runners craving a plush, pillow-like ride, this shoe won’t deliver. Instead, it’s designed for those who appreciate a secure platform.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Midsole softness
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 27.0 HA
Average 20.9 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 313 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
38.9 HA

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

We tested the secondary foam layer and recorded a firm 30.0 HA on our durometer—an exceptionally high result. In our view, Under Armour likely chose this firmer EVA material to offset the lower stack height in the forefoot.

It's also worth noting that, being a basic EVA formulation, high energy return is simply out of the equation. We found that the shoe lacks the lively bounce found in more advanced foam technologies.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Secondary foam softness
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 30.0 HA
Average 24.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Midsole softness in cold (%)

After placing the shoe in the freezer for 20 minutes, the midsole only became 8% firmer. That's quite good for an EVA-based foam, although it's heavily influenced by the fact that this foam is not plush at all.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 8%
Average 25%
Compared to 313 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Insole thickness

We found the insole to be slightly thinner than average at 3.6 mm, which aligns well with this shoe’s modest stack height.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Insole thickness
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 3.6 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 382 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Rocker

Unlike many modern running shoes, we found that Under Armour stuck with a classic, non-rockered profile for the HOVR Sonic 6, opting for a more traditional shape that works well for easy running and walking alike.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 side

This was clear from the start, but we confirmed it by measuring the toe spring.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

We do not have enough votes yet (10+ is required). Please help contribute if you own this shoe, or add votes to other shoes you own.

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Toebox width - widest part

How does the HOVR Sonic 6 fit? When we first slipped our feet in, we found it snug—definitely not on the roomier side. To get precise numbers, we turned to our signature gel mold test.

After solidifying in the fridge, the mold revealed a 94.2 mm measurement—slightly narrower than what we typically record in the lab.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Toebox width - widest part
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 94.2 mm
Average 95.6 mm
Compared to 132 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Toebox width - widest part
101.1 mm

Toebox width - big toe

Our second measurement in the big toe area showed a pronounced taper at 71.1 mm, reinforcing that this shoe is best suited for narrower feet. And we can confirm that it won't accommodate wide-footed runners comfortably.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Toebox width - big toe
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 71.1 mm
Average 73.5 mm
Compared to 132 running shoes
Number of shoes
67.9 mm
Toebox width - big toe
82.4 mm

Toebox height

We also measured the toebox height, a crucial factor for runners needing extra vertical space. At 27.2 mm, the HOVR Sonic 6 falls within the average range, providing sufficient clearance without causing any fit issues.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Toebox height
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 27.2 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 131 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.4 mm
Toebox height
32.5 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

In our view, one of the standout advantages of the HOVR Sonic 6 is its great stability, even without a wide platform. The blend of firm foam and a huge plastic heel cup works really well especially for heel strikers needing extra support.

Torsional rigidity

Another stability boost comes from the shoe’s high torsional rigidity, which we rated 4/5. That’s impressively firm for a daily trainer, adding extra support for those who need a more structured ride.

Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 365 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter sits at a moderate 3/5 stiffness, aligning with most neutral running shoes. Given the firm midsole and torsionally rigid build, additional reinforcement in this area wasn’t necessary for stability.

Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 3
Average 2.9
Compared to 349 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

With a narrow 107.0 mm forefoot, this shoe is better suited for runners who don’t need extra width rather than those who prefer maximalist designs.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 107.0 mm
Average 114.1 mm
Compared to 387 running shoes
Number of shoes
103.3 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel maintains the same narrow design at 86.7 mm. Instead of widening the base, Under Armour focused on adding rigidity and a firmer underfoot feel to ensure adequate stability for neutral runners.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Midsole width - heel
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 86.7 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 387 running shoes
Number of shoes
73.0 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

While it offers notable torsional rigidity, its longitudinal flexibility stands out, making it a solid choice for daily wear or even as a walking shoe.

Bending it to 90 degrees required just 19.6N of force.

Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 19.6N
Average 28.1N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 369 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
72.1N

Weight

When it comes to weight, we believe Under Armour could make some improvements. Considering the cushioning level of the HOVR Sonic 6, its 10.10 oz (286g) build feels somewhat excessive even for a shoe in this budget-friendly category. However, it's not quite bad enough to be a dealbreaker.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Weight
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 10.09 oz (286g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 387 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.61 oz (159g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

Upon unboxing the HOVR Sonic 6, we observed the presence of ventilation holes in the upper. However, some inner layer seemed to obstruct them, raising concerns about their effectiveness. To assess this, we conducted our standard smoke test.

Regrettably, the test revealed limited airflow, leading us to assign a 2/5 ventilation score. While this design may not be ideal for summer runs, individuals in cooler climates might appreciate the added warmth.

Our digital microscope analysis confirmed that the mesh is on the thicker side and that the ventilation holes present throughout the midfoot and heel are not fully open due to a secondary black layer.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Light

Despite these ventilation shortcomings, we must say that, for a budget-friendly shoe, the upper offers impressive comfort.

In fact, many runners might find the trade-off between reduced breathability and enhanced coziness acceptable.

Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 2
Average 3.8
Compared to 316 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

We put the upper through our rigorous Dremel test. The result? A respectable 3/5 score—outlasting many running shoes in its price range.

Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 3
Average 2.5
Compared to 250 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

On the downside, we found the heel padding to be quite underwhelming, scoring just 2/5.

While this might not be a real issue for most runners, those prone to wearing down this area should consider more durability-focused options readily available in the market.

Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 2
Average 3.2
Compared to 246 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

The outsole incorporates a "High Abrasion Rubber" compound that, while not the grippiest we’ve tested, performed as expected given its firm 89.0 HC durometer reading. This isn’t surprising for a budget-friendly shoe, where longevity often takes precedence over traction.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 outsole design

Coverage is quite extensive, with most areas well-protected except for a small section on the medial side. However, we believe that this is not a concern, as the design still ensures reliable wear resistance across high-wear zones.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Outsole hardness
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 89.0 HC
Average 79.9 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 367 running shoes
Number of shoes
57.3 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

We tested the rubber with our Dremel and discovered outstanding durability—just 0.5 mm of wear!

Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 0.5 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 228 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

We had been wondering why this shoe felt heavier than expected, and after testing, we found the main reason—Under Armour opted for an ultra-thick 4.5 mm rubber outsole, which is significantly above average.

The upside is obvious—this outsole is built to withstand countless miles. However, the trade-off is a noticeably firmer underfoot feel and added weight. In our opinion, a slightly thinner rubber layer—somewhere between 2.5 and 3.5 mm—would have struck a better balance between durability and weight.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Outsole thickness
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 4.5 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 386 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.0 mm

Misc

Price

For runners who enjoy a firm, stable ride and don’t prioritize energy return, we believe the HOVR Sonic 6 offers solid value with its long-lasting outsole and comfort-driven upper. However, we also think that some of its drawbacks are significant enough that, regardless of price, it simply won’t work for everyone.

Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 $100
Average $146
Compared to 387 running shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$285

Reflective elements

The HOVR Sonic 6 boasts full 360-degree reflectivity.

While many shoes lack any reflective elements, this one outshines even several high-end models across major brands, making it a superb choice for running in low-light conditions.

Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 Yes

Tongue padding

We found a straightforward lacing system with punched eyelets that does the job well, featuring an extra eyelet for those wanting a more locked-in feel around the ankle. There's also a much-needed tongue loop to keep everything securely in place and prevent unwanted shifting.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 tongue

One of the standout features of the HOVR Sonic 6 is its ultra-plush tongue, which we absolutely loved. With 9.8 mm of thick padding, it delivers a comfort-driven feel over the instep.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Tongue padding
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 9.8 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 384 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

At this price point, a gusseted tongue would be a welcome addition, but in our experience, shoes like the HOVR Sonic 6 rarely include one. As expected, the tongue isn’t fixed to the sides here either.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 None

Heel tab

We found no heel tab on the HOVR Sonic 6, but slipping our feet in was effortless. In our experience, the design works fine without it. However, a cool-looking pull tab in v7 wouldn’t hurt.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Heel tab
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 None

Removable insole

We found the insole easily replaceable, and in our experience, it’s a basic insert with average comfort—nothing worth holding onto if you prefer an upgrade.

Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 Removable insole
Test results
HOVR Sonic 6 Yes