Our verdict

The Salomon Aero Glide 2 excels as a no-frills option—comfortable, stable, and well-crafted, ticking all the boxes for a dependable daily trainer that delivers consistent performance throughout the year. We were impressed by its high-quality upper and grippy outsole, ensuring many miles of reliable running. However, we found that it's a bit rigid torsionally, and the cushioning doesn’t quite match the energy return and fun ride of its similarly-priced competitors.

Pros

  • 360-degree reflectivity
  • Lightweight for its size
  • Enhanced upper
  • Superbly stable
  • Ideal for heel strikers
  • Well-protected outsole
  • Masters daily mileage with ease
  • Great for winter too!

Cons

  • Excessively rigid
  • Still lacks a gusseted tongue
  • Lower-than-expected stack height
  • Tapered toebox

Audience verdict

94
Superb!

Who should buy

After extensive testing in our lab and on the road, we're excited to confirm that the Salomon Aero Glide 2 is:

  • An exceptional upgrade for fans of the original, enhancing the upper while maintaining the same versatility.
  • An ideal daily trainer for those who prefer a high heel-to-toe drop, providing rearfoot strikers with the support they need.
  • A perfect road companion for enthusiasts of Salomon’s trail shoes, offering a seamless and stable transition to road running.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 side

Who should NOT buy

We think the Aero Glide 2 falls short for runners seeking flexibility in a daily trainer. Its rigid build makes it really difficult to twist. In our experience, this might not be ideal for your daily runs if you're after a natural ride. Get the Brooks Ghost 16 or the Altra Experience Flow instead.

Additionally, we believe this model isn't the best choice for forefoot and midfoot strikers, as its high 11.3 mm drop doesn't cater to those running styles. If you're looking for a low-drop shoe, we recommend the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 or the New Balance Fresh Foam More v5 instead.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

Salomon advertises a 41 mm stack height in the heel for this model, but our measurements show a significant discrepancy, finding only 35.5 mm.

Despite this, we think that most heel strikers will find the 35.5 mm sufficient for both daily and extended runs—offering ample cushioning for long distances.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Heel stack
Test results
Aero Glide 2 35.5 mm
Average 34.0 mm
Compared to 356 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot's stack height measured slightly lower than expected at 24.2 mm, as verified by our digital callipers.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 side shoe

Although this measurement is lower than average, it didn’t come as a surprise since it aligns precisely with the previous version.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Forefoot stack
Test results
Aero Glide 2 24.2 mm
Average 25.4 mm
Compared to 356 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

Salomon says there's a 10-mm drop here, but we measured an 11.3-mm offset—a slight deviation that keeps the high-drop, wedge-like design anyway. Though primarily suited for heel strikers, the elevated offset can benefit anyone, especially those prone to issues with their calves and Achilles tendons.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Drop
Test results
Aero Glide 2 11.3 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 356 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.8 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The Aero Glide 2's midsole, made entirely from Salomon's Energy Foam—an EVA-based mix enhanced with olefin for added resilience—mirrors On Running's Helion with its formulation and feels very similar underfoot, minus the signature clouds, of course.

This midsole offers a balanced, stable feel, ideal for those who favour security without the plushness. It also maintains the foot well-secured and prevents bottoming out in the forefoot, which is key due to the reduced cushioning in this area.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Energy Foam
The midsole includes some tiny wave-shaped wrinkles that enhance compression.

Energy return in this model remains consistent with its predecessor and typical daily trainers—decent but not as awesome like the Pebax-based midsole of the Nike Invincible 3. However, while not a standout feature, it's far from being a drawback.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Midsole softness
Test results
Aero Glide 2 22.5 HA
Average 21.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 284 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
41.5 HA

Midsole softness in cold (%)

In our cold-temperature evaluation, we noticed a minor 19.5% uptick.

This enhanced cold-weather capability stems from the blend of OBC (Olefin Block Copolymers) with the midsole's base EVA, outperforming regular EVA foams.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Difference in midsole softness in cold
Test results
Aero Glide 2 19.5%
Average 25.5%
Compared to 283 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Midsole softness in cold
100%

Insole thickness

We measured the Ortholite insole of the Aero Glide 2 and found it to be 4.1 mm thick—comparable to most daily trainers, aside from Saucony models, which typically feature thicker sockliners.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Insole thickness
Test results
Aero Glide 2 4.1 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 352 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Rocker

The Aero Glide 2 boasts Salomon's "Reverse Camber," a term they use to describe a ski-inspired rocker that initiates in the midfoot with a moderate toe spring—something we've seen in numerous other shoes. Given the shoe's substantial heel-to-toe drop and average cushioning, a more aggressive toe spring isn't necessary.

But hey Salomon, we also think that there's really no need to assign fancy names to a standard feature of a shoe!

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

We do not have enough votes yet (10+ is required). Please help contribute if you own this shoe, or add votes to other shoes you own.

Owners of this shoe, how do you like the size?

Small True to size Large

Toebox width - widest part

We've noticed a trend towards more generous toebox designs lately, and the Aero Glide 2 perfectly embodies this shift, offering a widened 99.8 mm across its widest upper section—an uptick from the earlier 98.5 mm of v1.

Additionally, our evaluations revealed a subtle yet significant boost in toebox height, enhancing comfort for those with larger feet. This broader design is crucial since the shoe is available only in standard width.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Toebox width at the widest part
Test results
Aero Glide 2 99.8 mm
Average 98.5 mm
Compared to 357 running shoes
Number of shoes
89.5 mm
Toebox width - widest part
109.1 mm

Toebox width - big toe

However, we found that the upper tapers excessively—narrowing down to a snug 76.4mm in the big toe area. This could be a deal-breaker for those with really wide feet.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Toebox width at the big toe
Test results
Aero Glide 2 76.4 mm
Average 78.3 mm
Compared to 231 running shoes
Number of shoes
60.4 mm
Toebox width - big toe
92.5 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

Stability-wise, this is a neutral shoe offers excellent support through several design enhancements—elevated midsole sidewalls, a substantial heel bevel, and a prominent longitudinal groove—all contributing to a more centered gait during runs.

Torsional rigidity

The trade-off with the Aero Glide 2, however, is a ride that differs markedly from the flexible daily trainers some runners favour—it's way more rigid, feeling akin to certain mild stability trainers like the Hoka Arahi 7.

We rated it at an iron-like 5/5 in this manual assessment.

Test results
Aero Glide 2 5
Average 3.3
Compared to 335 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

Salomon moves back the Aero Glide 2 towards the daily trainer spectrum by incorporating a heel counter akin to those seen in models like the On Cloudmonster 2, which has a mid-level stiffness rating of 3/5.

In our experience, this addition provides a good balance—offering enough support to stabilise the heel effectively without becoming overly rigid or causing discomfort. And this feature is crucial for a shoe designed to be friendly to the Achilles tendon.

Test results
Aero Glide 2 3
Average 2.9
Compared to 319 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

With a width of 120.6 mm, the AG2 is notably wide—similar to stability shoes, which typically offer a supportive base.

This might be too much for runners with perfect neutral techniques, but those with minor pronation or supination will find it very helpful.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
Aero Glide 2 120.6 mm
Average 114.1 mm
Compared to 357 running shoes
Number of shoes
100.5 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
127.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

At its widest, the heel of the shoe measures 97.5 mm, echoing the forefoot's broad design. This gargantuan size is especially good for runners who strike with their heels first, confirming our view that Salomon targets those runners.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Midsole width in the heel
Test results
Aero Glide 2 97.5 mm
Average 90.8 mm
Compared to 357 running shoes
Number of shoes
74.9 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

The shoe's high torsional rigidity doesn't extend to its longitudinal stiffness, thankfully making it more comfortable for easy runs, jogging, and walking.

Using our signature 90-degree bend test, we were forced to push with 24.4N, which is lower than typical and aligns well with most daily trainers. This flexibility enhances comfort and is great for everyday use.

Test results
Aero Glide 2 24.4N
Average 28.5N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 339 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Stiffness
94.4N

Stiffness in cold (%)

After conducting another round of testing in our freezer, the outcome was impressive—showing only a 26.7% increase in stiffness. This result represents another successful validation of the EVA+OBC mix that Salomon utilizes in the Energy Foam midsole.

Test results
Aero Glide 2 26.7%
Average 33.8%
Compared to 339 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Stiffness in cold
148%

Weight

Weighing in at 9.5 oz or 268g, the Aero Glide 2 maintains its predecessor’s weight—which we see as great news, especially because the redesigned upper enhances comfort significantly, and this update boasts an increased amount of rubber covering the midsole.

In terms of weight, we think the shoe maintains an excellent balance when compared to other cushioned daily trainers. Although it isn't as feather-light as some competitors, such as the Hoka Mach 6, it comfortably stays under the 10-oz threshold. Good job, Salomon!

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Weight
Test results
Aero Glide 2 9.45 oz (268g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 357 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.26 oz (149g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

We thoroughly examined the Aero Glide 2's upper and found it exceptionally plush and welcoming, yet initial doubts about its breathability were present due to a lack of visible ventilation holes.

To accurately gauge the shoe's breathability, we hooked up a custom 3D-printed piece to our smoke machine. The results were revealing and positive—awarding the Aero Glide 2 an impressive 4 out of 5 for ventilation. This test confirmed that the shoe handles heat evacuation more efficiently than initially suspected!

Rather than employing multiple ventilation holes, Salomon opts for a high-quality, variable-density, paper-thin engineered mesh. This design choice effectively allows air to escape from critical areas like the toebox and medial sides, ensuring breathability without compromising the shoe's structure.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 microscope

Upon closer inspection under the microscope, we noticed much better Salomon’s approach. Contrary to many brands, they placed the structural layer on the exterior with a softer fabric on the interior, likely aimed at boosting comfort.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 close up

Overall, we really think the 3D Mesh upper of the Aero Glide 2 is superb. It strategically avoids potentially irritating seams and provides padding precisely where needed like in the heel, all while maintaining a remarkably low weight.

Test results
Aero Glide 2 4
Average 3.8
Compared to 286 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

Employing an upper devoid of large ventilation holes naturally enhances durability—there are fewer weak points where damage might occur.

We discovered this firsthand with the Aero Glide 2, which earned a stellar 4/5 in our durability tests, a notable achievement for a road running shoe.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Toebox durability
Test results
Aero Glide 2 4
Average 2.5
Compared to 220 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

We've found here in the lab that while the heel padding typically outperforms the toebox, it only garnered a score of 3 out of 5 this time.

Despite this score not being alarming, we had hoped for more resilience from a daily trainer in this section.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Heel padding durability
Test results
Aero Glide 2 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 216 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

We discovered that the traction is highly effective, smoothly handling groomed trails and gravel roads, though it obviously excels on roads. 

The CONTAGRIP rubber—used in many Salomon trail shoes—registers at a solid 81.9 HC, which should deliver adequate lifespan.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 outsole coverage

We also found that the outsole coverage stands out among daily trainers, featuring a significant design shift from the norm with a large central groove and horizontal cutouts in the heel and forefoot.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Outsole hardness
Test results
Aero Glide 2 81.9 HC
Average 80.1 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 337 running shoes
Number of shoes
52.1 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

Eager to assess the durability of the CONTAGRIP rubber, we initiated our last Dremel test without delay.

The Aero Glide 2's outsole showed a moderate 1.1 mm indentation post-test—an average performance that, while not the top-tier of toughness, suggests a sturdy lifespan due to its full-length coverage and substantial thickness.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Outsole durability
Test results
Aero Glide 2 1.1 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 198 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Speaking about thickness—it's a crucial aspect of durability! At 3.4 mm, we believe Salomon's designers struck an excellent balance by using ample rubber to ensure a lifespan of at least 400 miles while not putting too much bulk.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Outsole thickness
Test results
Aero Glide 2 3.4 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 356 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.6 mm

Misc

Price

The Aero Glide 2 maintains its pricing, a welcome stability in an era where many brands are nudging up their prices. We also think that priced below high-end models like the Saucony Triumph 22, it offers a sweet spot for runners seeking a value-oriented yet somewhat premium running experience.

Test results
Aero Glide 2 $160
Compared to 357 running shoes
Number of shoes
£45
Price
£300

Reflective elements

Salomon's journey from trail to road shoes might explain our surprise at the Aero Glide 2's exceptional reflectivity—something we didn't quite anticipate, especially because its predecessor had none.

We discovered strategically placed, high-visibility pieces along the heel and sides—achieving a rare 360-degree reflectivity that sets this model apart from many other competitors.

Test results
Aero Glide 2 Yes

Tongue padding

We were thrilled to discover that, despite the tongue not being attached to the sides, Salomon made a notable improvement in this test. We found the tongue comfortably plush yet not overly thick at 7.9 mm, which is ideal for those marathon-training long runs.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 lacing system

Additionally, we were impressed by the lacing system, which has rectangular eyelets that perfectly accommodate the flat laces. That's how it should be done!

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Tongue padding
Test results
Aero Glide 2 7.9 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 354 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

A major disappointment with the Aero Glide 2 is its non-gusseted tongue—a hard-to-ignore flaw in a shoe priced at £160. While the tongue loop offers a partial fix, we strongly believe the next version should feature a properly gusseted tongue to justify its high cost.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Aero Glide 2 None

Heel tab

The Salomon Aero Glide 2 and noticed its heel area, like its predecessor, lacks a finger loop tab—often a handy feature for slipping the shoe on with ease. While this isn't a major issue and we appreciated the extra cushioning in this area, a tab would be very welcome for version 3.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Heel tab
Test results
Aero Glide 2 None

Removable insole

We easily swapped out the insole for a third-party sockliner in the Salomon Aero Glide 2—its standard dimensions accommodated the change without any issues.

Salomon Aero Glide 2 Removable insole
Test results
Aero Glide 2 Yes