Our verdict

The Nike Zoom Rival Multi stands out as a budget-friendly spike made for athletes who want to cover many track and field events with one shoe. In our view, its direct track feel and broad versatility make it a strong pick for hurdles, jumps, sprints, and multi-event competitions like the heptathlon or decathlon. However, we think that its all-around design and lack of a premium foam make it less appealing for long distances or advanced athletes who prioritise performance.

Pros

  • Very affordable price
  • Versatile for multiple events
  • Flexible build
  • Beginner-friendly geometry
  • Replaceable 6-pin setup with tool included
  • Comfortable heel padding
  • Direct track feel
  • Premium laces
  • Looks good!

Cons

  • Not ideal for 1500m+ specialists
  • Too all-around for pure sprinters
  • Lacks energy return

Audience verdict

91
Great!
  • Top 30% most popular tracking shoes

Who should buy

We believe that the Nike Zoom Rival Multi is a good option for:

  • Runners who want to do a bit of everything on the track without spending much.
  • Athletes looking for a durable and reliable spike for track and field use.
  • Owners of a long-distance spike who want a versatile, low-cost pair for other events.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi

Who should NOT buy

Runners focused only on 1500 metres and longer should skip the Rival Multi. We found in testing that its multi-event design gives away too much distance-specific comfort and cushioning. Instead, go for the Nike Zoom Rival Distance.

We also think pure sprinters should choose a speed-focused model instead. In our experience, the Rival Multi feels too all-around and not sharp enough. We recommend the Nike Ja Fly 4 or the Nike Maxfly 2.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

The Zoom Rival Multi stays well below the 20 mm World Athletics limit with 12.7 mm of heel stack height, and we think that’s the right approach.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi side

This spike is built for a wide range of events rather than long-distance races, so maximising foam would only add unnecessary weight.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Heel stack
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 12.7 mm
Average 15.9 mm
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
10.4 mm
Heel stack
19.9 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot is even more aggressive in its design, with just 8.3 mm of thickness.

During our testing, we found that the connection with the track feels very direct, whether you enjoy that sensation or not.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Forefoot stack
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 8.3 mm
Average 15.2 mm
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
8.3 mm
Forefoot stack
19.7 mm

Drop

Nike takes a beginner-friendly approach here that fits the Zoom Rival Multi’s low price. Instead of a flat geometry, we measured a 4.4 mm drop, which better supports runners who are used to heel striking in road shoes.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Drop
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 4.4 mm
Average 0.7 mm
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
-8.5 mm
Drop
5.1 mm

Midsole softness

Updated
Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

We found that Nike uses only a thin layer of foam in the heel and both sides of the midfoot, and it’s quite firm at 43.1 AC. 

Nike Zoom Rival Multi foam

While that sits around our lab average, it’s worth noting that most running spikes lean firm. This approach makes sense, as softer foams can feel weird on the track, especially in events like hurdles or jumps.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Midsole softness
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 43.1 AC
Average 43.3 AC
Compared to 19 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
25.9 AC
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
58.7 AC

Size and fit

Size

Nike Zoom Rival Multi fits slightly small (14 votes).

Small
True to size
Large

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
Nike Zoom Rival Multi Internal length
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 268.7 mm
Average 262.3 mm
Compared to 18 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
256.0 mm
Internal length
270.0 mm

Width / Fit

To verify how the Rival Multi fits, we created a gel mould of the interior and took precise measurements.

The result came in at 88.0 mm of width, which aligns closely with the average and matches the snug fit we expect from Nike spikes.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Width / Fit
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 88.0 mm
Average 88.6 mm
Compared to 19 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
85.9 mm
Width / Fit
91.2 mm

Toebox width

The toebox sits around average (68.7 mm) and maintains that same feel. We noted that it’s definitely not roomy, as expected from a track spike. 

Nike Zoom Rival Multi pov

A snug fit that limits toe movement may not suit road or trail shoes, but here it's key to enhance security and control.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Toebox width
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 68.7 mm
Average 68.9 mm
Compared to 19 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
64.3 mm
Toebox width
74.1 mm

Toebox height

We found a bit more room in the toe area, measuring 27.3 mm.

There’s nothing concerning here, and it may even be a benefit for runners who prefer a slightly more relaxed fit. In fact, it could be ideal for those tackling varied track workouts across multiple events and wanting to rely on a single pair.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Toebox height
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 27.3 mm
Average 25.8 mm
Compared to 19 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
21.0 mm
Toebox height
32.0 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

Without a carbon plate and designed for newcomers to the sport, we see it as a positive that the Nike Zoom Rival Multi proved to be quite flexible in our longitudinal stiffness test. It scored a well-below-average 8.9N.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 8.9N
Average 14.8N
Compared to 21 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
3.4N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
31.6N

Weight

By using slightly less foam than the Rival Distance, Nike trims a few grammes and brings the Rival Multi down to 6.0 oz or 170g.

It’s not exceptionally light, but still quite solid considering its low price, which limits the use of advanced lightweight materials.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Weight
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 6.0 oz (170g)
Average 5.7 oz (161g)
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
4.6 oz (129g)
Weight
6.8 oz (193g)

Breathability

The engineered mesh of the Rival Multi differs from the one used in the Distance version. However, both approaches lead to a similar outcome, as it also scored 3/5 in our breathability test.

Nike concentrates ventilation in the tongue and toebox, while reinforcing the midfoot more than in most spikes. This makes sense for a model designed for multiple events, where the upper must handle twisting forces beyond straight-line running.

Under the microscope, we observed a material without large ventilation holes, yet open enough to allow a decent level of airflow. Overall, we think this is a well-judged design choice given the obvious budget limitations here.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi microscope

The upper uses a two-layer construction, which stood out to us, as most running spikes rely on a single-layer mesh to save weight.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi mesh

We also want to highlight the heel area, where comfort is noticeably improved thanks to the generous padding.

Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 3
Average 3.8
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Torsional rigidity

Updated

Need more proof of the Zoom Rival Multi’s flexible nature? With just 6.7 Nm of torsional rigidity, it stands out as one of the most bendable and forgiving spikes available right now.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Torsional rigidity
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 6.7 Nm
Average 10.9 Nm
Compared to 17 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
6.7 Nm
Torsional rigidity
17.4 Nm

Heel counter stiffness

In our manual test, the Rival Multi received a 2/5 heel counter score. It provides a bit of structure and light support, which is a good idea given the versatile focus of this spike.

Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 2
Average 1.7
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Given that the Rival Multi is less focused on efforts lasting more than one minute, it makes sense that Nike made this spike slightly narrower than the Rival Distance, prioritizing agility and stable landings. That’s why we measured 90.1 mm here instead of the 97.6 mm found in its sibling.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 90.1 mm
Average 95.5 mm
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
87.6 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
103.6 mm

Midsole width - heel

On the other hand, the heel has the exact same width at 66.7 mm. That places it around average and reinforces the beginner-friendly focus we found throughout the shoe.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Midsole width - heel
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 66.7 mm
Average 63.3 mm
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
54.0 mm
Midsole width - heel
73.3 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

The engineered mesh of the Rival Multi earned a solid 3/5 in our test, which is already quite good. But Nike also aimed for outstanding durability, adding substantial TPU overlays to protect the upper from damage caused by the big toenail, so real-use durability is just exceptional.

Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 3
Average 2.4
Compared to 21 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding also scored 3 out of 5, which is not outstanding but certainly enough to ensure a solid lifespan.

Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 3
Average 3.6
Compared to 21 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole thickness

We found that Nike played it safe here as well, using 2.7 mm of outsole thickness, a solid amount that should prevent premature wear after only a few training sessions.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Outsole thickness
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 2.7 mm
Average 2.7 mm
Compared to 21 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
4.5 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The Zoom Rival Multi includes a non-removable insole with a thickness of 3.2 mm.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Insole thickness
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 3.2 mm
Average 2.8 mm
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
1.7 mm
Insole thickness
3.9 mm

Tongue padding

Nike goes the extra mile here by equipping this budget-friendly and versatile spike with the same textured laces seen in the Alphafly 3.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi tongue

The tongue also caught our attention for its ultra-thin build, exactly what we expect in a track spike, and we verified our feelings finding just 1.4 mm of cushioning.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Tongue padding
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi 1.2 mm
Average 2.2 mm
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
7.5 mm

Heel tab

The heel features a simple design without any added elements, clearly prioritising cost-effectiveness.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Heel tab
Test results
Zoom Rival Multi None

Price

One of the main reasons to choose the Rival Distance is its affordable price. It costs roughly half as much as a Nike daily trainer for road running, making it a great value.

Test results
Zoom Rival Multi $80
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
£70
Price
£200

Removable pins

The Rival Multi features a 6-pin layout, and you can easily swap all the pins for different shapes or depths, as the required tool is included in the box.

Nike Zoom Rival Multi Removable pins