Our verdict

The Lems Boulder Boot is not your typical hiking boot. Its minimal sole with a (nearly) zero-drop offset promotes ground feel and natural biomechanics on the trail. Exceptionally light and flexible, it felt like a second skin on our feet, offering an almost barefoot-like experience. We also appreciated the generous toe box in its voluminous toebox, which screams 'foot first.' But as appealing as it all sounds, this boot is not for everyone, and folks who are new to minimalist footwear must tread carefully.

Pros

  • Exceptionally lightweight
  • Wide foot-shaped toebox
  • Ultra-flexible construction
  • Inherently stable and grounded
  • Good traction on smooth surfaces
  • Excellent upper durability
  • Classy look for casual use

Cons

  • Not a true zero drop (3.3 mm)
  • Poor outsole durability
  • Not breathable

Audience verdict

94
Superb!

Who should buy

The Boulder Boot is one of Lems' longstanding silhouettes, and we can wholeheartedly recommend it to outdoor enthusiasts who:

  • need a boot for a mix of light hiking on groomed trails and casual use
  • are into minimalist footwear because they love feeling more connected to the ground
  • prefer a natural fit with plenty of toe space
  • want a boot that passes the style test and transitions seamlessly from the campsite to the restaurant

Lems Boulder Boot review

Who should NOT buy

Our lab tests confirmed that the Boulder Boot's outsole is not cut out for any serious or at least moderate hiking. A more rugged option would be the Lems Outlander, and if you don't mind other brands, the Altra Lone Peak 9 Waterproof Mid or the Altra Lone Peak Hiker 2.

Altra is one of the few outdoor brands that shares Lems' minimalist philosophy of zero-drop and foot-shaped footwear.

Lems Boulder Boot lab test and review

Cushioning

Shock absorption

There is a clear reason why the Lems Boulder Boot recorded some of the lowest shock-absorption measurements among hiking boots. Showing as little as 58 SA in the heel, this minimalist silhouette offers about 40% less impact protection than the average boot.

Lems Boulder Boot Shock absorption heel
Test results
Boulder Boot 58 SA
Average 92 SA
Compared to 30 hiking boots
Number of shoes
56 SA
Shock absorption
122 SA

Energy return

Comprising blown rubber and a thin PU insole, the Boulder Boot lacks a midsole foam layer. And the aforementioned duo falls short of any tangible energy return to make the ride lively or springy. Hence, the boot's very low rebound measurements of 39.0%.

Test results
Boulder Boot 39.0%
Average 49.8%
Compared to 30 hiking boots
Number of shoes
37.0%
Energy return
66.0%

Heel stack

According to the product specs, the Lems boot should have a 10 mm stack height. However, our calliper readings showed that it's nearly twice as thick at 18.2 mm, when both the insole and the outsole are considered.

And that's actually great news because a 10 mm underfoot buffer wouldn't get you very far, even on a highly manicured trail. Yet, the Boulder is still the most minimalist outdoor boot in our lab, offering a very light buffer from sticks and stones.

Lems Boulder Boot Heel stack
Test results
Boulder Boot 18.2 mm
Average 36.0 mm
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
26.2 mm
Heel stack
46.9 mm

Forefoot stack

The boot's forefoot stack is just as expectedly low at only 14.9 mm. It's not the type of footwear you want to jump into straight away, without allowing your toe joints and the balls of your feet at least a short adaptation period.

Lems Boulder Boot Forefoot stack
Test results
Boulder Boot 14.9 mm
Average 23.0 mm
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
14.9 mm
Forefoot stack
31.0 mm

Drop

A zero-drop offset is one of the key features of the Lems Boulder Boot. In this setup, the wearer's heel is supposed to be positioned at the same height above the ground as their toes.

However, our calliper showed a notable discrepancy with the specs at 3.3 mm! That's a pretty tangible deviation for minimalist footwear, especially for someone who specifically looks for that 0.0 offset.

Lems Boulder Boot Drop
Test results
Boulder Boot 3.3 mm
Average 13.1 mm
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
0.6 mm
Drop
21.0 mm

Midsole softness

Updated
Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

Technically, the Lems Boulder Boot has no midsole, but we still pressed our durometer against its blown-rubber sole to give you a better understanding of its underfoot feel.

And just as one might expect from a no-foam boot, the tool showed a very firm reading of 67.5 AC. One of the firmest in the category.

Lems Boulder Boot Midsole softness
Test results
Boulder Boot 67.5 AC
Average 47.6 AC
Compared to 24 hiking boots
Number of shoes
31.3 AC
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
69.3 AC

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
Lems Boulder Boot Internal length
Test results
Boulder Boot 266.3 mm
Average 271.0 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
259.9 mm
Internal length
281.4 mm

Width / Fit

Lems prides itself on designing foot-friendly lasts, and the Boulder Boot is built on the brand's Wide Natural-Shape last as well. And true enough, its width and toebox shape can only be compared to that of Altra and KEEN boots.

But let's back this up with some numbers from our gel mould of the boot's interiors.

Measuring the mould's widest area, we recorded an above-average reading of 97.1 mm, which indeed puts this Lems boot into the wide category.

Lems Boulder Boot Width / Fit
Test results
Boulder Boot 97.1 mm
Average 93.8 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
89.7 mm
Width / Fit
98.8 mm

Toebox width

The rounded shape of this boot's toebox also proved to be wide. With a calliper reading of 75.3 mm, it accommodates all five toes without discrimination, allowing them to splay naturally rather than get cramped together.

Lems Boulder Boot Toebox width
Test results
Boulder Boot 75.3 mm
Average 71.3 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
64.5 mm
Toebox width
80.9 mm

Toebox height

Nothing can stop you from wearing thick woollen socks with the Lems Boulder Boot in the chilly season, as its vertical space is quite generous as well!

And if you worry about that thick, moc toe stitch that welds canvas and leather panels together on top of the toebox, they form the foot nicely and never feel abrasive.

Lems Boulder Boot Toebox height
Test results
Boulder Boot 31.3 mm
Average 27.5 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
22.7 mm
Toebox height
33.5 mm

Traction / Grip

Forefoot traction

In this review, we're looking at the original nylon Boulder Boot, and not the Grip Waterproof version. The latter is marketed as having a grippier outsole than the regular boot, priced at £190, £50 more.

But to be fair, even the regular Boulder Boot showed rather good traction in our lab tests. With a friction coefficient of 0.48, it grips smooth and even wet surfaces well enough to keep us surefooted.

Test results
Boulder Boot 0.48

Lug depth

In the case of this Lems boot, it would be more accurate to say sipe depth instead of lug depth because there are no toothy lugs as such. But the sipes in its rubber go as deep as 3.5 mm, creating a myriad of channels to disperse water and reduce hydroplaning. 

However, in sloppy environments like muddy trails, snow, or wet grass, the outsole just doesn’t have enough bite to deliver confident footing.

Lems Boulder Boot Lug depth
Test results
Boulder Boot 3.5 mm
Average 4.3 mm
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
3.0 mm
Lug depth
6.0 mm

Outsole design

The entire length of the Boulder Boot's outsole is lined with deep sipes that also serve as flex grooves, enhancing grip by increasing flexibility.

However, this boot is only suitable for light, hard-packed, and predictable trails. For a more aggressive outsole from Lems, consider the Boulder Summit, the Outlander, or the Summit Pro.

Lems Boulder Boot Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

As a minimalist boot, the Lems Boulder boasts an ultra-flexible construction that also makes it easy to pack. Requiring as little as 14.3N of force to bend by 30 degrees, it is 50% more flexible than the average hiking boot and can practically be rolled into a ball if you need to!

Lems Boulder Boot Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Boulder Boot 14.3N
Average 30.7N
Compared to 30 hiking boots
Number of shoes
12.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
65.7N

Weight

Quite expectedly, the Boulder Boot turned out to be the lightest in our hiking boot catalog, tipping the scale at only 11.2 oz (318g)! About 7 oz (200g) lighter than the category average, it is just barely there!

Lems Boulder Boot Weight
Test results
Boulder Boot 11.2 oz (318g)
Average 18.4 oz (523g)
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
11.2 oz (318g)
Weight
28.3 oz (802g)

Breathability

The original Lems Boulder Boot we're testing isn't waterproof, but its sturdy nylon upper barely lets any air through.

Even though you can see tiny plumes of smoke right above the boot's toebox in our smoke-pumping test above, it's not enough to raise its breathability score any higher than 1 out of 5.

Lems Boulder Boot Breathability Microscope test

And it's no surprise, considering how tightly woven the boot's nylon is, based on the microscope shot!

Lems Boulder Boot Breathability under microscope

Test results
Boulder Boot 1
Average 1.3
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

Stability works differently in minimalist hiking boots, as their grounded soles themselves make the ride inherently stable. And there is no towering platform that requires additional stability elements to prevent ankle rolls.

But please note that these boots are intended for very easy hikes and casual use, so there is absolutely no ankle support for carrying any heavy loads or traversing even moderately technical terrain.

Torsional rigidity

Torsional rigidity is simply nonexistent here, as the Lems Boulder Boot is meant to flow with the natural motion of your foot.

Test results
Boulder Boot 1
Average 4.4
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

And there is no need for a stiff heel counter either. With nothing but a full-grain leather overlay adding a bit of structure in the rearfoot, we assessed the boot's heel counter stiffness at only 2 out of 5.

Test results
Boulder Boot 2
Average 3.6
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Surprisingly, the Boulder Boot is not even the slimmest in terms of midsole width. The widest part of its forefoot clocked in at a nearly-average 109.3 mm on our caliper.

Lems Boulder Boot Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Boulder Boot 109.3 mm
Average 111.4 mm
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
96.3 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
124.6 mm

Midsole width - heel

However, the heel is about 10 mm narrower than average at 77.1 mm, echoing the boot's minimalist design.

Lems Boulder Boot Midsole width - heel
Test results
Boulder Boot 77.1 mm
Average 87.4 mm
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
71.7 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.1 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

A heavy-duty 1200-denier nylon is the primary upper material of this Lems boot. Used in military gear, backpacks, and even rugged horse blankets, this synthetic fabric also proved its abrasion resistance in our Dremel test.

With only cosmetic scuffing, it earned the Boulder Boot a high toebox durability score of 4 out of 5.

Lems Boulder Boot Price

The high-wear areas of this Lems boot, however, are made of even more abrasion-resistant full-grain leather. It is used for the toe rand, the heel cover, and the eyestay.

Test results
Boulder Boot 4
Average 4.3
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Inside the boot, a polyester lining with a classy plaid print also showed off its strong abrasion resistance. With minimal wear and tear, the fabric also scored high in our durability test, earning 4 out of 5!

Test results
Boulder Boot 4
Average 3.5
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

The Boulder Boot's sole is made of Injection Blown Rubber (IBR), and as the name suggests, it is a mixture of air and rubber that helps keep the boot's weight down. But, unfortunately, the durability of this material pales in comparison to regular black rubber...

Our Dremel burned through the IBR like it was butter, leaving a deep 1.4 mm dent after only 18 seconds. As one of the worst outsole durability results among hiking boots, it is yet another confirmation that the Lems Boulder Boot is for light use only.

Test results
Boulder Boot 1.4 mm
Average 0.8 mm
Compared to 38 hiking boots
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Because the boot's outsole also acts as the midsole, it is significantly thicker than the average at 10.8 mm.

Lems Boulder Boot Outsole thickness

Misc

Insole thickness

Lems' proprietary Minimal Cork Insole measured 4.2 mm thick at the heel. Its top layer (0.8 mm) is made of cork, offering some natural cooling if you choose to wear the Boulder Boot without socks. The rest of it is made of a breathable, open-cell PU material for comfort and some odour control.

Lems Boulder Boot Insole thickness
Test results
Boulder Boot 4.2 mm
Average 5.9 mm
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
3.7 mm
Insole thickness
8.0 mm

Removable insole

We found the insole to be easily removable, and Lems actually states on its product page that the insole can be removed to increase volume inside the boot or improve contact with the ground.

Lems Boulder Boot Removable insole
Test results
Boulder Boot Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

Firm to begin with, the IBR sole of this boot doesn't get much harder in low temperatures either. After keeping the boot in the freezer for 20 minutes, we repeated our durometer measurement and recorded only a 7% increase in firmness.

Lems Boulder Boot Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Boulder Boot 7%
Average 20%
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
4%
Midsole softness in cold
50%

Reflective elements

No reflective elements were detected on the Lems Boulder Boot in our dark room test.

Lems Boulder Boot Reflective elements
Test results
Boulder Boot No

Tongue padding

The internal padding of this Lems boot is limited only to the collar area. With a thickness of 9.3 mm, the foam provides sufficient buffering for the laces and the boot edges over the ankle.

Lems Boulder Boot Tongue padding
Test results
Boulder Boot 9.3 mm
Average 11.1 mm
Compared to 45 hiking boots
Number of shoes
5.9 mm
Tongue padding
15.1 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The Boulder Boot's tongue is non-gusseted, which is fine for a non-waterproof boot. And we never experience issues with tongue sliding to the side because of how wide it is and how deeply it is placed under the quarters.

Lems Boulder Boot Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Boulder Boot None

Heel tab

A leather pull loop at the heel facilitates easy entry. Meanwhile, two pairs of speed hooks help lace and unlace the boot faster.

Lems Boulder Boot Heel tab
Test results
Boulder Boot Finger loop

Price

At £150, the Boulder Boot is the cheapest boot in Lems' lineup, which is reasonable given its minimal setup and the absence of waterproofing or a rugged outsole.

Lems Boulder Boot fit
Test results
Boulder Boot $155
Compared to 47 hiking boots
Number of shoes
£110
Price
£350

Vegan options

In this review, we tested the Navy Stout colorway of the Boulder Boot, which is not vegan, given the full-grain leather pieces.

But if you prefer a fully plant-based option, go for the Black colorway, which is 100% nylon. But please note that you may need to order a half-size larger than your normal US size.