7 Best Running Shoes For Orthotics in 2026

We buy shoes ourselves. We earn commissions when you buy through us, at no extra cost. Why trust us
Running shoes that can fit orthotics should be wide. Given the number of wide-running shoes on the market, choosing the best one can be troublesome. Plus, some shoes look perfect, but their insole is glued to the bottom and can't be removed. Because of that, we're here to offer the best running shoes we've found and tested that can be a home for your orthotics.
We have selected the finest models from various categories to get you out of the misery of the trial-and-error task of obtaining the suitable pair for you.
How we test running shoes for orthotics
We don’t just randomly choose the orthotic-friendly running shoes we put on this list. Here's how our process looks like behind the scenes:
- Buying running shoes with our own money. We do this to avoid brand loyalty and bias.
- Logging lots of test runs.
- We remove the insole when possible and make sure to note if it's not possible to do that without damaging the insole or the bottom.
- Slicing the shoes into pieces. We hate working in the dark. We unravel all the elements present in the shoes.
- We use our tools like a calliper, durometer, and Dremel to accurately describe each shoe with 20+ data points. We also note the thickness of the insole and how fancy or cheap it is.
Best orthotic-friendly running shoes overall





































What makes it the best?
Running in the Novablast 5 feels effortlessly smooth with its plush and peppy midsole. Our feet experienced its remarkable speed and comfort, and our lab results agree! Combined with its stable base and light build, it’s easily our best orthotic-friendly shoe.
We measured a massive stack beneath our feet, standing at 40.9/33.5 mm. It feels decadent underfoot, exceptionally guarded from the brunt of repeated landing impact, as confirmed by high shock absorption scores of 141/134 SA. Despite its softness, the midsole feels snappy and comes to life during our intervals and tempo workouts, backed up by high energy return scores of 63.6% in the heel and 66.5% in the forefoot.
With a calliper in hand, we measured the midsole to be wider than average at 122.3/97.6 mm, freely accommodating most custom orthotics. Not only that, it gives us a confidence-boosting platform that naturally secures our footing during toe-offs and landings.
Surprisingly, Novablast 5 feels lighter than it looks. Our scales show it’s only 9.0 oz (245g), measuring below the 9.3 oz (265g) average despite its above-average height. What also keeps the feeling light is its adaptive midsole, which our bend test reveals is 26.3% more flexible than average.
While Novablast 5 can sustain high speeds, we find that it still lacks the energy return and agility of a racer. We recommend super shoes to runners seeking to smash PBs.
Pros
- Improved energy return with FF Blast MAX foam
- Plushiest foam in a Novablast yet
- Keeps the same price as v4
- Higher stack height for extra cushioning
- Enhanced flexibility
- Lighter than its predecessor
- Best Novablast ever for wide feet
- Exceptional weight-to-cushion balance
- Works for short, medium and long runs
Cons
- Breathability could be improved
- Toebox durability
- Toebox durability
Best orthotic-friendly daily running shoes































What makes it the best?
We cut open and ran in many orthotic-friendly shoes, and the Gel Nimbus 28 stood out as the best daily trainer. It perfectly encapsulates a reliable workhorse for gobbling daily mileage with its generous and shock-absorbing cushion and stable ride.
The midsole is a standout feature, offering joint-protecting cushioning for endless miles. It’s exceptionally tall, with calliper measurements of 39.5/34.3 mm, yet its shock absorption rating of 137 SA in the heel and 133 SA in the forefoot is our true saving grace. Both exceed their respective averages; however, the forefoot is a significant 25.5% more protective than the average.
Surprisingly, each touchdown felt stable despite its pillowy midsole. Inspecting the shoe further in the lab revealed midsole sidewalls and a vast landing space, measuring 119.0/99.1 mm.
However, we find that the shoe’s underwhelming energy return makes it ideal for easy runs. Runners who want a versatile shoe for speed training should go for another pair.
Pros
- Excellent step-in comfort
- High shock absorption
- True max-stack midsole
- Stable despite its size
- Grippy Hybrid ASICSGRIP outsole
- Lighter than previous version
- Good for cold weather
- Fantastic lockdown
- Ideal for easy runs
Cons
- Poor energy return
- Second price hike in a row
- Breathability could be better
Orthotic-friendly running shoes with the best shock absorption































What makes it the best?
After rigorous testing in the lab and on the streets, we confidently pick the Mizuno Wave Sky 9 as the ultimate choice for runners seeking maximum shock absorption in orthotics-friendly shoes. With reliable traction and indulgent cushioning, we devoured miles while keeping slips and fatigue away. On top of that, it offers ventilation for a refreshing ride.
Our calliper reveals a staggering stack height, notably its 44.3 mm heel. The generous slab of foam assures supreme comfort for any distance, runner or foot strike. Even forefoot strikers have 38.1 mm of foam for impact protection. Not only that, but the cushion itself offers a high level of shock absorption. At 145/142 SA, its heavenly touch is undeniable, reducing the load on our legs by 8% and 35% better than their respective averages.
The X10 carbon rubber packs a lot of bite into it, and we had no instances of losing control even when the streets got wet. Testing for traction in the lab, it blew us away with its 0.64 friction score, meaning it offers 23% stronger grip than average!
Topping it all off is a breezy upper that gave our feet room to breathe. Our smoke test confirms its strong airflow with a 4/5 rating.
As expected, this shoe takes on a lot of weight (10.4 oz/295g) and is 12% heavier than average. Those searching for cloudlike lightness won’t find that here.
Pros
- Premium-level shock absorption
- Soft midsole
- Ideal for forefoot/midfoot strikers
- High quality upper
- Excellent grip even on wet
- Unmatched overall comfort
- High breathability
Cons
- Overpriced for a daily beater
- Downgraded energy return
- Stiff midsole for a daily trainer
Best orthotic-friendly running shoes with a wide toebox
































What makes it the best?
With its roomy dimensions and forgiving fit, the Topo Atmos 2 provides outstanding comfort for runners with wide feet, bunions, or custom orthotics. Heavy on cushioning yet light on bend resistance, Atmos 2 keeps surprising us in the lab. However, it ultimately stands out with the best wide toebox among orthotic-friendly running shoes.
Atmos 2 features Topo’s anatomical toebox, which explains why all our toes rested comfortably inside the shoe. To verify further, we created a gel mould to measure the shoe’s interiors. The toebox width we recorded is 82.0 mm, which is massive and can easily accommodate wide or swollen feet compared to the 73.2 mm average. The extra room it offers is almost hard to believe!
Atmos 2 keeps our legs fresh with its thick slab of foam measuring 39.6/32.7 mm. Besides its height, we recorded top-level shock absorption scores of 145 SA in the heel and 123 SA in the forefoot.
Despite its thickness, Atmos 2 maintains a fluid midsole that’s easy to manoeuvre. In our bend test, we recorded it to be 9% more pliable than average, helping reduce the energy we need to exert to push off forward.
However, runners looking for extra energy from the shoe will be disappointed in the Atmos 2. It’s focused on comfort rather than performance.
Pros
- Softer, more comfortable midsole
- Exceptionally roomy anatomical toebox
- Deep cushioning for easy miles
- Reasonably flexible despite high stack
- Good outsole durability
- Comfortable upper
- Performs well in cold weather
- Smooth, predictable ride
- Good option for all-day wear too
Cons
- Slight weight gain
- Less stable than v1
- Too roomy for slim feet
- Lacks energy return
Best lightweight orthotic-friendly running shoes



































What makes it the best?
Upon lab-testing and running with orthotic-friendly shoes, we discovered ASICS Noosa Tri 16 leads the pack in the lightweight category. This workhorse excels across the board—offering responsiveness and grip for intervals, impact protection for long runs, and flexibility for recovery days. For such a light build, it’s packed with features that make our runs lively and vibrant.
At a mere 7.7 oz (217g), it’s exceptionally airy for its cushioning and remains 18.1% lighter than average. Along with its free-flowing midsole, we can move naturally and be quick on our feet. In our flex test, it bent in all the right places with a force 3.9% below average.
Noosa Tri 16 offers impressive shock absorption despite its moderate stack height. Scoring 129 SA in the heel and a notable 118 SA in the forefoot, it dampens landing impact effectively, allowing us to chase more miles with fresh legs. The shoe also offers an impressive 60.5% energy return in the forefoot, aiding our forward momentum.
In our tests, the ASICSGRIP rubber returned a sky-high 0.79 in our traction test, delivering exceptional grip and ensuring our safety and surefootedness no matter where we run.
With its above-average measurements in the forefoot and minimal 5.9 mm drop, this shoe is ideal for midfoot and forefoot strikers. Those who land on their heels should go for a steeper-dropped trainer.
Pros
- Lightweight
- Exceptional grip
- Attention-grabbing aesthetic
- Gusseted tongue
- Comfortable upper
- Great for triathlon
- Really versatile
- Fantastic price point
- Breathability
Cons
- Upper longevity
- Minimal tongue padding
- Still not enough energy return
Best orthotic-friendly trail running shoes
































What makes it the best?
Brooks Caldera 8 shines in offering subtle stability and unwavering traction while putting a premium on comfort. It guides our feet without changing our natural stride and spoils us with a cushioned midsole. We switched the insole to our orthotics easily without issues. Based on our lab results and runs, it claims the top spot for trail running among orthotic-friendly shoes.
The outsole features TrailTack Green compound, with versatile 3.6 mm lugs that handle easy to moderate terrain with ease. We tested for the rubber’s traction and recorded a remarkable 0.59 result, showing its resilience even in rainy weather.
Each footfall is met with a vast base that inspires safe landings. Our calliper shows that its 116.6/104.0 mm midsole is wider than the average. Another stability feature is the tall sidewalls that limit excessive lateral movement, proven by its maximum 5/5 torsional rigidity score.
The cushion feels comfortable, validated by our calliper with a 36.7/27.9 mm stack. Reaching shock absorption levels of 129/111 SA, our muscles and joints felt well-protected.
Given all its generous features, it lacks the agility to pick up the pace. Performance runners should go for a lighter and more responsive shoe.
Pros
- Outstanding stability
- Comfortable, smooth ride
- Versatile on easy and moderate terrain
- Secure, reliable lockdown
- Fair and reasonable price
- Dependable traction
- Cleaner, more refined look
Cons
- Still heavy
- Needs more cushioning
- Bulky, overly wide heel
- Only for slow paces
Best budget orthotic-friendly running shoes































What makes it the best?
Kind to our wallets and our feet, the adidas Ultrarun 5 offers comfort and versatility with its £70 price, making it 43.7% cheaper than the average running shoe. Lab results reveal that it offers a roomy fit, manoeuvrable midsole, and steady ride, making it our best budget pick in the orthotic-friendly category.
Its effortless sensation is further enhanced by its bendable midsole. In our flex test, we found that it needs only 15.0N to reach 30 degrees, which means it needs minimal effort to bend our feet and move forward. Overall, the ride feels natural and freeing.
Its accommodating fit keeps our feet relaxed, making sure we don’t have any pressure points even if our feet swell. Our solidified gel mould confirms its roomy interiors with a wide 97.6 mm measurement.
Besides the front part of the shoe, the heel also measures a broad 95.3 mm. With more room to find our footing, our landings feel well-planted and secure.
However, while the Ultrarun 5 offers a bit of everything, it doesn’t excel in anything. We recommend runners seeking energy return or more impact protection to invest in other pairs.
Pros
- Fantastic option for beginners
- Budget-friendly price
- Good durability
- Works well as a casual sneaker too
- Cosy step-in feel
- Good grip
- Ultraboost-inspired look
- Stable for heel strikers
Cons
- Feels bulky and bottom-heavy
- Lacks an energetic ride
- Runs a bit warmer than ideal
Intro: what you should know about orthotics and running shoes
If fitting an orthotic into the shoe was easy, we wouldn’t still be seeing so many questions about which shoes can actually be used with orthotics. Because of this, we cover both scenarios: using full-length orthotics and short (heel only or ¾ length) inserts.
When looking at running shoes to use with your orthotics, it’s important to take into account:
- What the orthotic is for, as this will tell you whether it can be placed inside neutral or stability shoes, whether the shoes need to be stiffer or firmer, and so on. The easiest route: the same specialist who prescribed the orthotics also recommends running shoe choices.
- The thickness and the design of the orthotic. You can compare its thickness to that of the insole you’re swapping it with, and pay attention to the heel counter shape and stiffness to make sure your heels get locked in place together with the orthotics.
- In most cases, orthotics are not used in barefoot or minimalist running shoes, as they offer minimal to no stability and support.
As you can see, it’s not just about swapping these. Orthotics may change the heel drop; they can work against the shoe, or they can make the shoe too tight at the toebox, at the instep, or at the heel.
It’s also important that you actually need the orthotics, meaning you’ve seen a specialist who has prescribed them to you. There’s a lot of wiggle room when it comes to orthotics, even in the scientific literature:
- Whittaker et al. 2018 reviewed 19 trials with 1,660 participants and found moderate-quality evidence that orthoses beat sham devices when it comes to heel pain and looking at the 7-12 week-long use.
- Rasenberg et al. 2018, however, reviewed 20 trials and concluded orthoses were ineffective for plantar heel pain.
- Tran and Spry 2023 looked at adults with plantar heel pain using custom-made and prefabricated orthoses. They found no difference in pain reduction or functional improvement in the 6 weeks to 12 months period.
- And, looking and 24 runners who ran 20 minutes in both custom-made and prefabricated orthoses, Gil-Calvo et al. 2020 found no significant differences: healthy runners kept their movement patterns regardless of the orthosis type.
| The safest path is to get advice from someone you trust and who has extensive experience in running and orthoses. |
Fitting full-length orthotics into running shoes: 5 features to pay attention to
The obvious first rule is: the shoe has to have a removable insole. Running shoes usually can’t brag about their toebox height and fitting an orthotic on top of the existing insole would make the shoes simply unusable, in most cases. But, it’s not just about the toebox height. Let’s have a look:
- The insole has to be removable (and not glued to the midsole).
- We recommend running shoes with at least 29.0 mm of toebox height without the insole. In our lab, this means that we combine 2 tests: toebox height (measured while the insole is inside) and insole thickness.
- In order to keep the orthotic in place, the heel counter must not be fully flexible. We recommend heel counters that scored at least 2/5 on our stiffness test.
- Midsole softness is important because when running shoes are too soft, you may struggle with the orthotics.
- Arch support is often the topic, but most people are concerned about the contoured rise (bump) under the arch. If the orthotic has it, it does not mean that the shoe does too. Stability running shoes have many other stabilising elements for overpronators. This is usually something that your specialist would pay attention to.
Because orthotics can be used for different foot conditions, they can be placed in daily trainers, but also tempo and even super shoes; they can be used in neutral and stability running shoes. But you need to understand the purpose of the orthotic and the shoe to make sure they will go together well.
And, the best thing to do is to check your running shoe options with your specialist of choice.
Removable insoles: a must
In our lab, we always check whether the insole is removable and we publish this finding in the reviews. This is often not enough to determine whether an orthotic will fit properly into the running shoes.
Toebox height: lab data
We created a special gel formula which allows us to pour liquid into the shoes, freeze them together, and then take out a gel cast which perfectly represents the shoes’ interiors.
VIDEO gel
We cut the cast in half lengthwise, just like we cut the shoes when we need to measure the stack heights. Then, we use a digital calliper to measure the toebox height.
IMAGE toebox height
Measuring the toebox height: this height excludes insole thickness
Because we pour the liquid into the shoes while they still have their insoles in, now we need to add the insole thickness to the toebox height measurement.
IMAGE insole thickness, add a collage
For orthotics, we recommend running shoes which have at least 29.0 mm of vertical room in the toebox without the insole. Keep in mind that the average insole thickness in road running shoes is 4.4 mm and in trail running shoes it sits at 4.6 mm. Jackson et al. 2025 looked at 1,000 custom orthotic precriptions and found that 3 mm was the most common shell thickness (54%).
IMAGE in photoshop, mark what we’re recommending
Heel issues: locking the orthotic in place
When you swap the insole with your orthotic, what’s stopping it from wiggling around? Or even slipping vertically, together with your heel? The heel counter. Given that the orthotics usually have a different shape at the heel than the insoles, and may make your heels sit higher, it’s important for them to be properly locked in place. A cup-shaped heel counter that’s rather stiff can do this.
VIDEO
In our lab, we push and squeeze the heel counter to assess its stiffness and then rank it on a 1-5 scale. 5/5 is the stiffest option and 1/5 the most flexible one. We recommend skipping 1/5 heel counters and going with a stiffness of at least 2/5.
IMAGE shapes of heel counters
When it comes to heel counter shapes, avoiding a heel flare may help, and opting for something more cup-like.
IMAGE sidewalls
We also recommend paying attention to the height of the sidewalls, especially if your orthotic is significantly thicker at the heel than the insole you’re replacing.
Heel drop changes in running shoes for orthotics
If you need to use orthotics, you’re most likely dealing with some foot condition or issue that needs attention. It’s when heel-to-toe drop might be relevant too. So your heel may be sitting higher with no lockdown issues, but with other consequences.
iMAGE heel drop
It’s important to compare the thickness of the insole you’re taking out with the orthotics you are putting in, because the orthotics may change the heel to toe drop of the shoes if their heel is significantly thicker than the forefoot.
A higher heel drop will utilise your higher-leg muscles more, while a lower one will put more stress on your feet, Achilles, and calves. Depending on your foot condition, this is something not to be taken lightly. We’ve covered this topic in great detail here: Heel to Toe Drop: The Ultimate Guide.
Midsole softness for orthotics: when softer is not better
Very soft midsoles can also be very unstable. This is especially inconvenient when the orthotic is trying to stabilise your foot or help with overpronation, but it can’t because its platform is not adequate.
IMAGE midsole softness
Based on our lab data, midsoles are tagged as soft when they score lower than 33 AC on the durometer test. When they are in the 33-42 AC range, we consider them moderately soft, and higher than 42 AC, firm. If your orthotics are meant to provide stability and you choose very soft shoes, the result may be very disappointing.
VIDEO curb
To be on the safe side, you may want to consider running shoes whose midsoles score at least 33 AC on the durometer.
Arch support and running shoes for orthotics
In theory, using orthotics with contours that resist the flattening of the arches may lead to discomfort and over-correcting if the shoe offers a traditional aggressive medial post. But, stability running shoes usually come with other technologies that help with overpronation, like side walls, stiff heel counters and heel clips, dual-density midsole foams, and so on.
So, this can be an issue, but the better question is whether the shoe itself is good for the orthotics. There are neutral running shoes that may offer a better combination of platform width, firmness, and heel counter stiffness for you than the stability ones.
4 signs the orthotics are not a good match for the running shoes of your choice
Once you’ve removed the default insole and inserted your orthotics, things may feel weird:
- If your toes are too squished, from the sides or the top, the toebox vertical clearance is not good enough. You need a higher toebox overall.
- If your heel is sitting too high now, it may feel like the shoe is not cradling your heel anymore, or as if your feet may spill over the sidewalls. Heel slipping is common too. In this case, the walls around the heel are too low for the given orthotic. It also doesn't help when the heel counter isn't stiff enough and isn't shaped to lock your heel in place.
- High pressure over the instep. This means that the orthotic is too thick for the shoe (most likely much thicker than the insole you took out) and now the shoe can’t accommodate your foot properly.
- The orthotic is not locked in place, or it feels like it’s working against you. This may happen if the midsole is too soft, if the shoe is simply too flexible (longitudinally or torsionally), or if it has corrective features that are messing up the orthotic’s work.
VIDEO heel slipping i fwe have it
Using partial orthotics in running shoes
Compared to the full-length orthotics, there’s 1 difference, and you can read that in bullet 1 or 2 below:
- If your orthotics are sulcus length, they end just proximal to the toes, so you still have to take into account everything, as if they were full length. The toebox height still matters even though the orthotics don’t reach the tip of the shoe.
- When it comes to partial orthotics, like 3/4 length or heel only, you do have 1 worry less: the toebox height.
- Is the heel counter stiff enough? Shaped well to keep the orthotic and your heel in place?
- Are the sidewalls high enough after you’ve swapped the insole with the orthotic?
- Is the orthotic changing heel-to-toe drop and are you ready for that?
- Is the shoe working well with the orthotic (and not severely messing with its purpose)?
- Is the platform supportive enough (firm/rigid) to allow the orthotic to do its job?
We’ve already covered all the bullets above when discussing full-length orthotics.
Supershoes and orthotics
There’s no rule saying you can’t use orthotics in super shoes. However, you need to be familiar with
- What the orthotics are supposed to do
- What the shoe is like and whether that will play along or against the orthotic’s purpose
Keep in mind that super shoes are often very stiff and that may not work well with your orthotics. The average stiffness of road running shoes is 15.5N, while super shoes don’t score below 17.0N, with some reaching as high as 28.4N.
If, however, you're considering super trainers, we've got you covered.











