Our verdict

The Brooks Hyperion Tempo stands out as a low-stacked gem in a world dominated by maximalist running shoes. In our tests, it delivered a blend of old-school, racing-flat vibes in a sleek, modern package, and tipped the scales at just 7 ounces. While we found the midsole lacking energy return and the £150 price a bit steep, it's undoubtedly among the top choices for those seeking a versatile, non-plated shoe. It's perfect for easy jogs, tempo runs and track workouts, all wrapped in one.

Pros

  • Exceptionally lightweight
  • Ideal for track workouts
  • Upper fits comfortably
  • Outstanding grip on flat surfaces
  • Durable outsole and upper
  • Good breathability
  • Feels quick and agile
  • Great for developing foot muscles

Cons

  • Midsole could benefit from more energy return
  • Not suitable for long runs at all
  • Might be slightly overpriced

Audience verdict

89
Great!

Who should buy

We think the Brooks Hyperion Tempo is an exceptional choice for:

  • Fans of racing flats from the past decade seeking a fun and long-lasting training shoe suitable for a variety of paces.
  • Individuals looking for an ultra-lightweight shoe for track workouts who prefer not to use spikes.
  • Runners aiming to strengthen their foot muscles with a non-plated, low-stacked shoe.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo

Who should NOT buy

We suggest passing on the Brooks Hyperion Tempo if you're searching for a non-plated shoe that can handle long runs. In our view, it lacks the necessary cushioning for runs exceeding an hour. For this purpose, we believe there are better yet still lightweight options on the market, such as the Brooks Hyperion Max or the Hoka Mach 5.

Also, if you're a fan of plush midsoles, the Brooks Hyperion Tempo might not be your ideal tempo shoe. A great alternative at a similar price point is the Nike Streakfly or the New Balance Rebel v3. Or, if adding a nylon plate to the mix doesn't bother you, we recommend the Saucony Endorphin Speed 3.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo

Cushioning

Heel stack

The heel stack of this shoe is slightly thinner than average, measuring only 28.7 mm.

This might be an issue for heavier runners who are heel strikers, as well as for those who want to use this shoe for long runs, since it's not designed for that purpose. However, for shorter, faster runs, it's a delight to run in.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Heel stack
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 28.7 mm
Average 33.9 mm
Compared to 365 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

With just 19.7 mm in the forefoot, the Brooks Hyperion Tempo looks back to the past, aiming for those racing-flat vibes that engage your foot muscles and your ankle dorsiflexion.

This approach isn't bad at all—it's simply different. In an era dominated by carbon plates, it's beneficial to train and strengthen the muscles in your feet and enhance big toe mobility. The Brooks Hyperion Tempo is one of the best shoes on the market for this purpose.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Forefoot stack
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 19.7 mm
Average 25.3 mm
Compared to 365 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

The heel and forefoot difference results in a 9.0-mm heel-to-toe drop. This makes the Tempo a better option for heel strikers.

However, midfoot/forefoot strikers who plan to use this shoe for track workouts can also appreciate the reduced calf strain due to the high drop.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Drop
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 9.0 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 365 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The heel counter seemed quite average to us, offering a safe heel lock without being too intrusive. We rated it a 3 out of 5, which aligns with most neutral shoes.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Midsole softness
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 22.3 HA
Average 21.1 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 292 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
38.9 HA

Midsole softness in cold

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

After placing the shoe in the freezer for a 20-minute cool-down, we retested it to see the results. The new measurement on our durometer is 26.5 HA.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Midsole softness in cold
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 26.5 HA
Average 26.2 HA
Compared to 291 running shoes
Number of shoes
11.1 HA
Midsole softness in cold (soft to firm)
47.0 HA

Midsole softness in cold (%)

That's just an 18.8% increase, an outstanding result for an EVA-based foam, which typically underperforms in this test.

This confirms that even in winter, the midsole will provide a consistent feel and maintain its high-level performance.

Test results
Hyperion Tempo 19%
Average 26%
Compared to 292 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Insole thickness

At just 2.8 mm, the insole is nearly half as thin as that of an average shoe. This is just another method of reducing weight, though it comes at the cost of some comfort.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Insole thickness
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 2.8 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 361 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Size and fit

Size

Brooks Hyperion Tempo is true to size (112 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 306 running shoes
Number of shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Toebox width - widest part

One of our initial concerns when we first held this featherlight shoe was that it might be too narrow. However, that worry vanished the moment we put the shoe on our feet.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo upper

After measuring it in the lab, we confirmed our initial impressions. At 97.2 mm, we consider it to have an average fit, suitable for the majority of runners without any issues.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Toebox width at the widest part
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 97.2 mm
Average 98.5 mm
Compared to 366 running shoes
Number of shoes
91.6 mm
Toebox width - widest part
104.9 mm

Toebox width - big toe

Additionally, some runners with wide feet can also find comfort in this shoe, as it doesn't taper much and is wider than the average shoe in the big toe area (79.5 mm).

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Toebox width at the big toe
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 79.5 mm
Average 78.4 mm
Compared to 240 running shoes
Number of shoes
67.6 mm
Toebox width - big toe
89.2 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

The DNA Flash midsole is not only lightweight and responsive but also excels in keeping your foot stable as you run. This stability is a direct feature of being too soft.

Additionally, its low stack height brings you closer to the ground, offering much more stability than you'd find in maximalist shoes.

Torsional rigidity

Another advantage of minimising the stack height is that Brooks doesn't have to create a rigid shoe to achieve a decent level of stability, nor do they need to insert a plate.

As a result, they've crafted a flexible shoe—rated 2/5 by our team in the lab—that effortlessly twists and bends. This feature is particularly impressive during track workouts, as it actively engages your feet, creating a "wow!" feeling due to its flexibility and natural ride.

Test results
Hyperion Tempo 2
Average 3.3
Compared to 344 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter seemed quite average to us, offering a safe heel lock without being too intrusive. We rated it a 3 out of 5, which aligns with most neutral shoes.

Test results
Hyperion Tempo 3
Average 2.9
Compared to 328 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

When we first visually inspected the midsole dimensions of the shoe, it appeared slightly narrower than the average. Despite our first impression, the forefoot is quite average at 112.5 mm, which adds to the overall stability of the shoe.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 112.5 mm
Average 114.0 mm
Compared to 366 running shoes
Number of shoes
103.3 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

However, the heel measurement aligned more with our initial observation, measuring 83.7 mm with our callipers. This is quite narrow, similar to a competition shoe.

In fact, based on its stack height and geometry, this shoe could be an excellent choice for 5K/10K races. However, in our opinion, it falls short of being a top contender in that category due to its midsole, which doesn't match the quality of top-tier racing foams like ZoomX or Lightstrike Pro.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Midsole width in the heel
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 83.7 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 366 running shoes
Number of shoes
73.0 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

We already demonstrated how twistable this shoe is, and now it's time to test its longitudinal stiffness.

In our 90-degree bend test, the Tempo scored similarly to a minimalist shoe, requiring only 12.8N of force. This is absolutely astonishing and again contributes to its comfortable ride. It also means the shoe can handle short, easy runs if needed. And you can bring it to the gym!

Test results
Hyperion Tempo 12.8N
Average 28.2N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 348 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
72.1N

Stiffness in cold

We repeated the same test under cold temperatures to see if the stiffness underfoot changed after spending 20 minutes in the freezer. In this scenario, the shoe was slightly stiffer at 16.1N, but the difference was barely noticeable.

Test results
Hyperion Tempo 16.1N
Average 36.7N
Compared to 348 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.5N
Stiffness in cold
89.2N

Stiffness in cold (%)

In fact, with only a 26% change, it outperforms most shoes on the market. It appears to us that the nitrogen infusion in the EVA foam has indeed paid off.

Test results
Hyperion Tempo 26%
Average 34%
Compared to 348 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Stiffness in cold
105%

Weight

If there's one area where this shoe truly excels, it's in its remarkable lightness. Weighing in at an ideal 7.0 oz (198g), it stands as one of the lightest training shoes ever crafted.

This makes it an exceptional choice for those seeking, for instance, a versatile road running shoe that's perfect for track workouts and equally suitable for road use.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Weight
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 6.98 oz (198g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 366 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.61 oz (159g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

The Brooks Hyperion Tempo is one of the shoes with the most obvious ventilation holes we've seen in our lab.

We were eager to see if these holes worked as expected, so we put the smoke-pumping machine in the upper and started the test. We were pleased with how well the shoe breathes, though it's still slightly behind the best in the market, earning it a 4 out of 5 rating.

Brooks uses a rather dense engineered mesh, making those holes crucial. Under the light, when we moved the cut-in-half upper, the ventilation points were clearly visible.

However, don't expect high airflow in the midfoot area—though for a tempo-focused model, this is less important than in a long-run shoe.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo microscope

Next, we examined the shoe under a microscope to get a closer look at the holes.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo airflow

The mesh seems thick and durable, which can reduce airflow, so Brooks simply laser-cut some holes in the upper—a straightforward and effective way to improve breathability. 

However, this design has a downside—debris and small rocks can get into the toebox since there's no protective layer under the holes.

Test results
Hyperion Tempo 4
Average 3.8
Compared to 295 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

One of the key benefits of using a tough mesh is its outstanding durability. Yet, we were concerned that the laser-cut ventilation holes might compromise this feature.

However, our Dremel test pleasantly surprised us! The Tempo performed admirably, securing another impressive 4 out of 5 rating. This impressive achievement in such a challenging test was made possible because Brooks smartly maintained sufficient space between the holes.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Toebox durability
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 4
Average 2.5
Compared to 229 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Following the successful Dremel test on the toe area, we shifted our focus to the heel to see if the good results would persist.

Sadly, they didn't. The heel sustained considerable damage after undergoing the same test at 5K RPM (3.2N), leading us to give it a disappointing 2 out of 5 rating.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Heel padding durability
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 2
Average 3.2
Compared to 225 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

We then turned our attention to the shoe's outsole. This design makes it more suitable for dry, flat surfaces like asphalt, concrete, or a track.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo
The outsole features a central channel designed to aid in lateral flexing and to channel water away.

With this in mind, we used a durometer set to the Shore C scale and recorded a result of 85.1 HC. This is slightly harder than average, so we're curious to see how this will affect the shoe's durability.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Outsole hardness
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 85.1 HC
Average 80.1 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 346 running shoes
Number of shoes
60.3 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

To test whether the outsole's high hardness really works, we used the Dremel again, this time at 10K RPM and the same 3.2N force.

Post-test, we noted an impressively tiny 0.2 mm indentation, which confirms the outsole's excellent durability. The Hyperion Tempo is really built to last and has good rubber coverage.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Outsole durability
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 0.2 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 207 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

With a substantial 3.3 mm outsole thickness, we see more evidence of this outsole's longevity.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo outsole

In fact, we believe Brooks could shave off nearly a millimetre of foam to reduce some extra weight from this already featherlight shoe.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Outsole thickness
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 3.3 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 365 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.0 mm

Misc

Reflective elements

The Hyperion Tempo completely lacks reflective elements, an omission that's quite noticeable in a £150 shoe, especially for those who run in low-light conditions.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Reflective elements
Test results
Hyperion Tempo No

Tongue padding

As a speed training shoe with a major focus on minimising weight, we were pleasantly surprised to find a 5.8-mm thick tongue.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo tongue

This ensures comfort and a secure lockdown.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Tongue padding
Test results
Hyperion Tempo 5.8 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 363 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

For a price of £150, we expect a gusseted tongue to prevent it from shifting side-to-side during high-speed workouts, which is the shoe's intended purpose.

This feature should definitely be included in the next version.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Hyperion Tempo None

Heel tab

The Hyperion Tempo lacks a heel tab, but it was absolutely not necessary for slipping our feet into the shoe. Moreover, its absence contributes to the shoe's impressive weight savings...

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Heel tab
Test results
Hyperion Tempo None

Removable insole

The insole is removable, and there's enough of space inside, so we easily swapped it with insoles from other shoes without any problems.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Removable insole
Test results
Hyperion Tempo Yes