Verdict from 100+ user reviews

7 reasons to buy

  • Puma Suede SD is very comfortable and perfect for all day walking as reported by a number of users.
  • The stylish look made this an awesome addition to the shoe game, according to a few users.
  • Several sneaker fans adore the suede lining which gives warmth, especially in cold weather.
  • Others find the Smash SD version better than the Classic Suede because it is easier to clean.
  • Like most Puma sneakers, this kick is offered at a very budget-friendly range.
  • The shoe is available in a broad range of width, from narrow to extra wide, which is another point scored for the Smash SD.
  • A number of buyers admire the classic retro style.

2 reasons not to buy

  • Few criticized the low shoe height of Puma Suede SD making it tight across the top of the feet even when laces are loosened.
  • A small number of users complain about the durability  after just a few months of slight use.

Bottom line

The Puma Smash SD is a shoe inspired by tennis, but can also be used for running. It allows the user to own a sporty and fresh look that goes well with almost any style. The Smash Suede provides firm ankle and arch support, which is perfect for an all-day walking.

For people who are looking for comfortable retro style sneakers, this shoe might be a perfect choice for them. At a very affordable price, buyers are in for a treat in comfort with a versatile outlook for daily wear.

Tip: see the best sneakers.

Good to know

The Smash SD is a solid choice for those who are looking for a sneaker that is sports-driven. It comes in men, women and kids sizes.  True to its tennis heritage, the shoe has very good hold and support for those who want to stay active while looking good. 

Puma Smash SD adds a stylish look to your footwear pool. It has a stylish suede upper, lace-up closure, a comfortable tongue and ankle cuff with cushioning and Puma Formstrip to cap it off. The Smash SD sporty trainers certainly display a classic style that can be easily paired with any casual wear item. People who are on the go can certainly feel at home with the performance and style of the Smash SD.

Puma Smash SD has a leather Formstrip which differentiated it from the Puma Classic Suedes. This upgrade in the material used for the Puma branding makes it easier for the Smash SD to maintain.  The presence of herringbone pattern of the rubber outsole provides an excellent traction for this pair.

Back in 1968 when everyone was going gaga over basketball shoes, Puma had the guts to introduce the Puma Smash Leather, a classic tennis shoe made in the mold of the Adidas Stan Smith. While some of the other brands were relying heavily on the clout of endorses to gain ground in the streetwear and performance scene, Puma depended on the pure performance and aesthetic appeal of the Smash to capture a fair share of the market.

Just a year after the overwhelming success of the Puma Smash Leather, a suede version was unveiled to the public. With a more understated style, the Puma Smash was now considered to be a major player in the performance and lifestyle wear.

The Smash SD served as the warm-up shoes of great athletes like Clyde Frazier and Tommie Smith. During the 80s, it accomplished an improved level of fame through hip hop and streetwear lovers. And to this day, Smash SD is one of Puma’s most celebrated sports-inspired iconic style.

  • Puma Smash SD has cushioned insole which provides secured and comfortable fit.
  • It offers enhanced ankle and arch support.
  • It has a soft, full suede upper and classic tennis look.
  • A herringbone-like outsole delivers very good grip on a variety of surfaces.

Rankings

How Puma Smash SD ranks compared to all other shoes
Top 43% sneakers
All sneakers
Top 48% Puma sneakers
All Puma sneakers
Top 43% low sneakers
All low sneakers

Popularity

The current trend of Puma Smash SD.
Compare to another shoe:
Author
Danny McLoughlin
Danny McLoughlin

Danny is a sports nut with a particular interest in football and running. He loves to watch sports as much as he loves to play. Danny was lead researcher on RunRepeat and The PFA’s report into Racial Bias in Football Commentary. His football and running research has been featured in The Guardian, BBC, New York Times and Washington Post.