Our verdict

We tested the Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX and found it to be a great winter-ready version of the regular model. It keeps the same soft cushioning and long-lasting feel, now with a water-blocking upper that’s perfect for cold, wet days. We really liked how comfortable and stable it felt on our runs. However, we think the price bump from the non-GTX version is a bit steep, and the tighter toebox might be a problem for some—especially those who wear thick socks in winter.

Pros

  • Winter-ready design
  • Cozy upper ensures all-day comfort
  • Stable ride
  • Durable construction
  • Soft midsole ideal for long distances
  • Lightweight build for a GTX shoe
  • Reliable traction on wet surfaces
  • Reflective elements

Cons

  • High price bump from 880 v14
  • Gore-Tex integration could be better
  • Toebox is narrower than expected
  • Not ideal for forefoot strikers

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

After testing the New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX, we recommend it for:

  • Runners who enjoy New Balance daily trainers and want a winter-ready version with a plush, comfort-driven ride.  
  • Those looking for a cold-weather shoe that’s versatile enough for errands and relaxed runs alike.  
  • Heel strikers training for a spring race in harsh winters who need a dependable pick for freezing conditions.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX

Who should NOT buy

We believe the New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX may not be the best choice for budget-conscious runners, as its high price point could be a deterrent. For a more wallet-friendly alternative, we suggest the Nike Winflo 11 GTX, which offers a waterproof upper suitable for winter and wet conditions at a lower cost.

Additionally, for those seeking a versatile shoe capable of handling both road and trail surfaces, the 880 v14 GTX's design is primarily suited for pavement. In such cases, we recommend considering hybrid options like the Nike Pegasus Trail 5 GTX or the Hoka Challenger 7 GTX.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

We found that the Gore-Tex layer didn’t cut into cushioning at all—our measurement still showed 35.4 mm stack in the heel. That confirmed the shoe keeps its daily-trainer comfort even with the added waterproof protection.

Although it doesn’t step into ultra-cushioned territory, we think this height strikes a great balance—especially for runners wanting a versatile option. From our perspective, adding more foam would have been a mistake.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Heel stack
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 35.4 mm
Average 34.2 mm
Compared to 400 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

The 880 v14 GTX’s forefoot stack measured 24.1 mm with our caliper, landing just below the current lab average. We discovered that forefoot strikers might bottom out on fast runs—but some actually crave that close-to-ground feel, right?

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Forefoot stack
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 24.1 mm
Average 25.6 mm
Compared to 400 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

However, with its sky-high 11.3 mm heel-to-toe drop, this isn’t the best match for forefoot strikers. We think it’s much better suited for heel strikers—or midfoot runners seeking a more forgiving option for their calves.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Drop
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 11.3 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 400 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The Gore-Tex version of the 880 v14 mostly differs from the standard one through its upper—everything else should remain unchanged. To confirm that, we sliced the shoe in half and pressed our durometer directly onto the core foam, as brands often add a protective layer to the exterior of the midsole.

According to our findings, this is the classic Fresh Foam X—soft and comfortable—with a durometer reading of just 14.6 HA.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Midsole softness
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 14.6 HA
Average 21.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 327 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
35.0 HA

Midsole softness in cold (%)

While Fresh Foam X feels plush and comfort-oriented, its EVA base limits energy return. On top of that, we found it becomes noticeably firmer in cold weather—hardening by a steep 37% in our 20-minute freezer test.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 37%
Average 25%
Compared to 327 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Insole thickness

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX features a soft-and-cushy sockliner that we measured at 5.0 mm thick.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Insole thickness
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 5.0 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 396 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Rocker

We discovered that the 880 v14 has a moderate rocker, something that pairs naturally with its flexible ride and average stack height.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX rocker side

This type of geometry feels right at home in a shoe built for both relaxed city walks and easy-paced runs.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Rocker

Size and fit

Size

We do not have enough votes yet (10+ is required). Please help contribute if you own this shoe, or add votes to other shoes you own.

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Toebox width - widest part

Gore-Tex shoes sometimes alter the fit compared to their non-waterproof siblings because of the thicker, weather-shielding membrane. We were curious to see if this was also the case for the Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX.

After creating our custom gel mold, we found that that the GTX version fits a bit snugger. At 93.9 mm, it’s tighter than the accommodating 96.8 mm we measured in the standard model—a difference that was clear from the first try-on.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Toebox width - widest part
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 93.9 mm
Average 95.5 mm
Compared to 155 running shoes
Number of shoes
90.9 mm
Toebox width - widest part
102.4 mm

Toebox width - big toe

The big toe zone also loses space in the GTX version—shrinking from 76.2 mm to 73.6 mm. It’s not a dramatic change, but for wide-footed runners, it will matter a lot.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Toebox width - big toe
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 73.6 mm
Average 73.7 mm
Compared to 155 running shoes
Number of shoes
67.9 mm
Toebox width - big toe
83.5 mm

Toebox height

New Balance gave the regular version an impressively tall toebox—at 28.5 mm, it stood above the average and delivered a spacious, upward-moving feel that made toe splay incredibly easy and pressure-free on our runs.

However, after testing the GTX edition, we discovered a more compact fit with just 24.8 mm. This shift makes the shoe feel tighter on the toes—something that certain runners may dislike.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Toebox height
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 24.8 mm
Average 27.2 mm
Compared to 154 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.4 mm
Toebox height
33.8 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX is a neutral running shoe, but its added midsole width and rigid structure enhance stability noticeably more than what we usually find in average daily trainers.

We also noticed a slight boost in stability compared to the non-GTX version. That's likely thanks to the snugger upper, which creates a firmer lockdown and offers a more stable landing platform underneath.

Torsional rigidity

The 880 v14 scored 3/5 in our previous lab test, but this GTX version bumped it up to 4/5—likely thanks to the weatherproof membrane and the more robust, winter-ready upper.

Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 379 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

We saw the same pattern in the heel counter. While the regular model scored an average 3/5 for stiffness, the Gore-Tex version climbed to 4/5.

That added structure clearly contributes to its enhanced stability.

Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 4
Average 2.9
Compared to 363 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The forefoot on this GTX version felt exceptionally broad—something we typically associate with stability-focused shoes. We measured it at 121.8 mm, which is slightly more than what we recorded in the non-waterproof model.

This ultra-generous platform seems to hit the upper limit of what’s reasonable for a daily trainer.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 121.8 mm
Average 114.2 mm
Compared to 401 running shoes
Number of shoes
103.3 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel feels much more reasonable—still wider than average, but capped at 93.5 mm. From our perspective, this makes sense, and trimming a bit the extra-wide forefoot in the next update could add a touch of agility to the ride.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Midsole width - heel
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 93.5 mm
Average 90.8 mm
Compared to 401 running shoes
Number of shoes
73.0 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

One of the things we really enjoyed in the 880 v14 was its ultra-flexible build—scoring just 20.6N in our 90-degree bend test. That’s gone in the GTX version.

The thicker Gore-Tex upper raised stiffness to 28.2N, aligning it more with the average shoe. While still a decent result for a daily trainer, that yoga-like feel has definitely faded.

Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 28.2N
Average 28.1N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 383 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
72.1N

Weight

And what about the weight? That’s often a downside in Gore-Tex models—heavier fabric usually bring extra grams, obviously. But we discovered a pleasant surprise here.

According to our scale, this GTX version stays lightweight at 9.20 oz or 261g, adding just 0.35 oz or 10g over the regular one. Quite nice!

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Weight
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 9.21 oz (261g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 401 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.61 oz (159g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

As with nearly every Gore-Tex upper we've tested, breathability in this model fell far short of expectations. And yes, despite Gore-Tex's repeated claims, this material just isn’t breathable. Not even close.

It's clear that the airflow of the toebox is virtually nonexistent—and the side-by-side video with the non-GTX version makes this evident. That’s a 1/5 from us.

We confirmed this once more by placing the upper over a powerful LED light—only the tongue allowed a hint of light through, showing it’s the sole area with a bit of ventilation, but also revealing that it doesn't feature waterproof protection.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX microscope

Under our microscope, we discovered a regular engineered mesh upper paired with a secondary layer that delivers full waterproof protection with a focus on insulation. It’s clearly built for shielding feet, not letting them breathe.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX mesh

Afterwards, we isolated the upper for closer inspection and found that the white Gore-Tex membrane clashed hard with the black colorway. From the inside, it feels oddly cheap—almost like a DIY waterproof 880 v14.

Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 1
Average 3.8
Compared to 330 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

The multi-layer build of this GTX version delivers outstanding wear resistance. We found zero weak spots during testing and gave it an awesome 5/5, which clearly improves the 3/5 from its standard sibling.

Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 5
Average 2.5
Compared to 264 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Afterward, we shifted our focus to the heel padding, which landed an average 3/5. While it’s not a standout result, we were still fairly pleased.

Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 260 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

We used a Shore C durometer and measured the outsole at 81.5 HC—a spot-on average result. It comes with water-channeling grooves that boost drainage, a smart addition in any winter-ready shoe.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX outsole

We also liked seeing minimal exposed foam, which is a common issue that makes running shoes very slippery in wet conditions.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Outsole hardness
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 81.5 HC
Average 79.8 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 381 running shoes
Number of shoes
57.0 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

The rubber compound used by New Balance held up nicely in our Dremel test. Using a tire tread gauge, we measured just 0.9 mm of wear, which is a good outcome.

Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 0.9 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 242 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

We found that New Balance added an extra millimeter of rubber to the Gore-Tex version, bringing it to 4.4 mm. This outsole thickness—combined with the results from our Dremel test—delivers long-lasting durability.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Outsole thickness
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 4.4 mm
Average 3.3 mm
Compared to 398 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.0 mm

Misc

Price

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX adds a $20 premium, which feels slightly overpriced if you ask us. A $10–15 bump would seem fairer, but honestly, few GTX shoes are this comfort-packed and all-around versatile.

Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX $160
Average $146
Compared to 401 running shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$275

Reflective elements

Using the brand logo as reflective detail is a smart double win—it boosts safety while keeping the design clean and functional.

Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Yes

Tongue padding

The tongue received a light redesign, with slightly less padding to help balance the extra weight from Gore-Tex. Still, at 5.8 mm, we think there’s enough cushion for long runs well over 90 minutes.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX tongue design

The laces are flat, and easy to adjust—just what we expected from a daily trainer at this price point.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Tongue padding
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX 5.8 mm
Average 5.9 mm
Compared to 398 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

We found that the tongue gets a smart upgrade in the GTX version, moving from a semi-gusseted design to a full one.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Both sides (full)

Heel tab

The heel design follows the recent road lineup from New Balance. Therefore, it skips the heel tab and displays the model number. In our view, it’s functional but falls short in the style department.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Heel tab
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX None

Removable insole

If you want to swap in a thinner insole for extra toe room, there’s no problem—this one isn’t glued to the midsole, so removal is quick and easy.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Removable insole
Test results
Fresh Foam X 880 v14 GTX Yes