Nuestra conclusión
- Las números 1 entre las mejores zapatillas Merrell de trail running (2023)
Pros
- Fieles a la talla
- Sin periodo de adaptación
- Pisada cómoda
- Ligeras
- Transpirabilidad excelente
- Precio razonable
Contras
- Rendimiento medio
- No son muy resistentes
- Mal agarre
Veredicto de los usuarios
- Top 20% entre zapatillas de trail running
- Top 27% entre zapatillas de running neutras
Comparativa
La zapatillas de running más parecidas
+ + Añadir unas zapatillas | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Puntuación global | 89 Muy buenas | 79 Aceptables | 79 Aceptables | 81 Buenas | |
Precio | 130 € | 90 € | 120 € | 80 € | |
Terreno de trail | Sencillo | Sencillo | Sencillo | SencilloModerado | |
Arch support | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | |
Peso laboratorio Peso marca | 9.6 oz / 271g 10.6 oz / 300g | 10.2 oz / 288g 10.8 oz / 305g | 10.3 oz / 292g 10.4 oz / 295g | 11.1 oz / 314g 10.6 oz / 300g | |
Drop laboratorio Drop marca | 13.5 mm 10.0 mm | 10.9 mm 10.0 mm | 17.3 mm 10.0 mm | 10.4 mm | |
Técnica de carrera | Talón | Talón | Talón | Talón | |
Talla | - | Tallan bien | Tallan bien | Tallan bien | |
Rigidez de la mediasuela | Equilibrada | Equilibrada | Equilibrada | Equilibrada | |
Diferencia de la rigidez de la mediasuela en frío | Estándar | Pequeña | Pequeña | Estándar | |
Durabilidad de la parte delantera | Buena | Decente | Buena | Muy mala | |
Durabilidad del acolchado del talón | Alta | Baja | Media | Media | |
Durabilidad de la suela exterior | Buena | Buena | Decente | - | |
Transpirabilidad | Baja | Baja | Media | Media | |
Anchura de la parte delantera en la zona más ancha | - | Media | Media | Media | |
Anchura de la parte delantera en la zona del dedo gordo | - | Ancha | Media | Estrecha | |
Flexibilidad | Flexible | Moderada | Flexible | Moderada | |
Diferencia de la rigidez en frío | Estándar | Estándar | Pequeña | Grande | |
Rigidez torsional | Rígidas | Rígidas | Rígidas | Moderadas | |
Rigidez del contrafuerte del talón | Moderado | Rígido | Moderado | Rígido | |
Profundidad del dibujo de la suela | 2.9 mm | 2.6 mm | 3.5 mm | 3.0 mm | |
Altura de la suela en la zona del talón laboratorio Altura de la suela en la zona del talón marca | 32.6 mm 29.0 mm | 32.6 mm 32.0 mm | 34.3 mm 27.0 mm | 33.3 mm | |
Antepié laboratorio Antepié marca | 19.1 mm 19.0 mm | 21.7 mm 22.0 mm | 17.0 mm 17.0 mm | 22.9 mm | |
Anchuras disponibles | EstándarAncho | Estándar | EstándarAncho | EstándarAnchoExtra Ancho | |
Estación | Todas las estaciones | Todas las estaciones | Todas las estaciones | Todas las estaciones | |
Removable insole | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Orthotic friendly | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Clasificación | #82 Top 27% | #276 10% inferior | #279 10% inferior | #254 18% inferior | |
Popularidad | #244 21% inferior | #134 Top 44% | #257 17% inferior | #44 Top 15% |
Who should buy
We believe the Merrell Moab Flight is a solid choice for:
- Budget-conscious runners seeking a reliable, durable, and versatile trail shoe.
- Heel strikers looking for a trail model with a substantial heel-to-toe drop.
- Hikers who occasionally hit the trails for easy runs and prefer a do-it-all shoe.
Who should NOT buy
For runners tackling hot conditions, we believe the Moab Flight isn’t the best choice—its heavily padded upper significantly limits breathability. If airflow is a priority, we suggest looking at the Salomon Genesis or the Brooks Cascadia 18, both of which offer better toebox ventilation while maintaining durability.
Additionally, despite sporting the Vibram logo on the side, this shoe doesn’t feature the premium Megagrip outsole—it uses the more affordable EcoStep compound. If traction is a key factor, we think the Merrell Agility Peak 5 is a wise upgrade. Though it costs a bit more, it delivers world-class grip across multiple surfaces.
Amortiguación
Altura de la suela en la zona del talón
In our first lab test, we recorded a comfortably-thick 32.6 mm stack height at the heel. According to our findings, this generous cushioning creates a protective landing experience—perfectly suitable for heel-striking runners who prioritize impact protection.

Moab Flight | 32.6 mm |
Media | 32.1 mm |
Altura de la suela en el antepié
In our testing, we discovered that if cushioning is your main concern, it's better to land heel-first—because with just 19.1 mm of stack height, there's limited foam up front.
On the other hand, runners preferring a more natural experience should actually enjoy this design, as it allows for a closer connection to the ground.

Moab Flight | 19.1 mm |
Media | 24.5 mm |
Drop
We measured a staggering 13.5-mm heel-to-toe drop—far beyond the official 10 mm. That’s a significant difference, reinforcing that this shoe is heavily geared toward heel strikers.
Most forefoot and midfoot strikers should avoid this shoe, with only those with Achilles tendon or calf issues might find this ultra-elevated heel beneficial for reducing strain.

Moab Flight | 13.5 mm |
Media | 7.6 mm |
Suavidad de la mediasuela
The Moab Flight features FloatPro foam, a standard EVA material found in most Merrell shoes. According to our testing, it lacks the springy sensation of modern foams, delivering a noticeably firm underfoot feel—confirmed by our durometer at 24.0 HA.
Runners craving a plush, cloud-like experience on the trails may find this disappointing, though its budget-friendly price reflects the trade-off. In our view, getting a more responsive option like the Nike Pegasus Trail 5 could be a smarter investment for runners concerned about cushioning.

Moab Flight | 24.0 HA |
Media | 22.6 HA |
Rigidez de la mediasuela en frío (%)
Since it's an EVA-based foam, we expected subpar performance in our freezer test. However, the Moab Flight held up surprisingly well, firming up by only 27%—a better result than we anticipated!

Moab Flight | 27% |
Media | 26% |
Grosor de la plantilla
With 50% recycled materials, the insole stands out for its above-average thickness at 6.4 mm—much more than we typically measure in the lab. It adds significant cushioning, particularly in the forefoot.

Moab Flight | 6.4 mm |
Media | 4.7 mm |
Rocker
Runners expecting a super-rockered ride—like in The North Face Vectiv Enduris 3—won’t find it here. The Moab Flight sticks to a more traditional running geometry, which, in our opinion, suits its beginner-friendly price and hiking-ready build far better.
With its sky-high heel-to-toe drop, adding an aggressive rocker would have been unnecessary too. We believe Merrell made the right call by keeping it classic!

Tallaje y ajuste
Talla
Todavía no tenemos suficientes votos (se necesitan más de 10). Si tienes estas zapatillas, o cualquier otro modelo de nuestro catálogo, siempre puedes echarle una mano a la comunidad votando.
Anchura de la parte delantera - zona más ancha
The toebox of the Merrell Moab Flight leans toward a snug fit. We found that this enhances control when cornering, though runners with wider feet may find it restrictive.
According to our measurements, the widest part of the forefoot comes in at 93.2 mm, which aligns with Merrell’s pattern of slightly-narrow designs in their trail lineup.

Moab Flight | 93.2 mm |
Media | 96.3 mm |
Anchura de la parte delantera - dedo gordo
The toebox has a moderate taper, with our second measurement at 73.9 mm in the big toe area. While less restrictive than the widest point, it remains below average, and therefore it's ideal for runners seeking a snug-and-secure fit or those with narrow feet.

Moab Flight | 73.9 mm |
Media | 74.9 mm |
Altura de la parte delantera
The toebox height stands above average at 28.3 mm, making it a solid choice for runners who prioritize upward toe movement and extra vertical space.
To sum it up: when it comes to fit, expect reduced room for toe splay, a snug feel around the ball of the foot and arch, but generous vertical clearance—an essential feature for some runners to prevent black toenails.

Moab Flight | 28.3 mm |
Media | 27.2 mm |
Estabilidad
Prueba de estabilidad lateral
After testing the Moab Flight on its ideal terrain, we found its stability to be decent, though far from sufficient for runners with pronation concerns. It's best suited for those with a neutral gait, as its midsole lacks the width to counteract excess movement.
Rigidez torsional
We found the Moab Flight slightly rigid for its stack height, but a 4/5 torsional rigidity rating is still quite common among trail shoes due to the outsole design. However, for an average road running shoe, this level of stiffness would feel a bit excessive.
Moab Flight | 4 |
Media | 3.6 |
Rigidez del contrafuerte del talón
The heel counter offers a balanced mix of stiffness and flexibility, scoring 3/5 in our tests. Unlike the previous test, this result closely aligns with the feel of a road daily trainer, providing a comfortable yet supportive fit.
Moab Flight | 3 |
Media | 3.1 |
Anchura de la mediasuela - antepié
As we mentioned earlier, the key reason we recommend this shoe for neutral runners is its midsole dimensions.
This average design enhances its agile feel, making it a solid choice for most runners and hikers. However, with a 112.9 mm forefoot, it’s still best suited for neutral runners or those with only mild pronation needs.

Moab Flight | 112.9 mm |
Media | 112.4 mm |
Anchura de la mediasuela - talón
We felt the same way about the heel, which sits right around the average at 89.4 mm. Merrell played it safe here—no surprises!

Moab Flight | 89.4 mm |
Media | 89.7 mm |
Flexibilidad / Rigidez
We found that while the Merrell Moab Flight offers noticeable torsional rigidity, it remains impressively flexible in longitudinal movement, scoring just 14.2N in this test.
That’s a key factor—had it been overly stiff in our 90-degree challenge, it could have compromised its hiking appeal.
Moab Flight | 14.2N |
Media | 27.2N |
Peso
We were pleased with the weight of the Merrell Moab Flight. At just 9.55 oz (271g), it sits well below the average, making it a lightweight option for trail adventures.

Moab Flight | 9.56 oz (271g) |
Media | 10.23 oz (290g) |
Transpirabilidad
Upon unboxing the Moab Flight in our lab, we initially expected decent breathability due to the visible ventilation holes in the toebox. However, after running our tests, we quickly realized that airflow was far from impressive.
We observed that very little air escaped through the upper, earning the shoe a mere 2/5 in this test. While this may be a drawback for runners in hot climates, those who prefer extra insulation for cooler weather might appreciate the reduced ventilation.
To investigate further, we moved the upper over our LED light and saw almost no light passing through—a clear indicator that airflow is severely restricted. This strongly suggested that Merrell prioritized other aspects over breathability.
Our microscope analysis confirmed the issue. While the toebox does feature ventilation holes, they are largely obstructed by an internal layer. This additional fabric enhances comfort but significantly blocks airflow, preventing proper heat dissipation.
Lastly, we examined the upper’s overall structure and found that Merrell heavily focused on plush padding throughout.
While this contributes to a cozy feel, it further limits breathability. As a result, we don’t recommend this shoe for summer use, though it should provide excellent warmth and comfort in colder conditions.
Moab Flight | 2 |
Media | 3.2 |
Durabilidad
Durabilidad de la parte delantera
Merrell reinforced the upper to enhance durability in the toe cap area, but the engineered mesh itself proved impressively tough, scoring a solid 4/5 in our Dremel test. This wasn’t unexpected, as less-ventilated uppers often come with added resilience.
Moab Flight | 4 |
Media | 3.1 |
Durabilidad del acolchado del talón
The Moab Flight held up well against our Dremel, earning another solid 4/5 in the heel padding durability test. Hopefully, this level of resilience carries over to the outsole as well!
Moab Flight | 4 |
Media | 2.8 |
Dureza de la suela
Focusing on the outsole, we found that Merrell opted for Vibram rubber, which typically ensures solid traction and durability. However, this model uses the budget-friendly EcoStep compound rather than the premium Megagrip, an expected trade-off given the shoe’s accessible price point.
Hardness landed right around average at 85.0 HC, and we were pleased with the generous rubber coverage. The outsole incorporates several cutouts aimed at improving flexibility, and in our assessment, they won’t compromise grip or durability due to their strategic placement and compact size. However, they may easily trap mud when the Moab Flight is used in wet conditions.

Moab Flight | 85.0 HC |
Media | 85.7 HC |
Durabilidad de la suela
The Vibram EcoStep compound held up remarkably well in our Dremel test, showing only 0.8 mm of wear when we lifted the tool—an impressive result that speaks to its durability.
Moab Flight | 0.8 mm |
Media | 1.0 mm |
Grosor de la suela
Thanks to the impressive durability of this rubber, Merrell applied less thickness than most brands at just 1.6 mm, helping to reduce weight and making this shoe noticeably lighter compared to its competitors.

Moab Flight | 1.6 mm |
Media | 2.3 mm |
Varios
Profundidad del dibujo de la suela
The Moab Flight’s outsole features relatively shallow lugs, measuring just 2.9 mm at their highest point. This design leans more toward easy trails, making it a less-than-ideal choice for tackling technical terrain.
The outsole blends chevron-shaped lugs for improved traction on inclines with a mix of geometric shapes in the center and sides. This variation aims to balance grip and flexibility while shedding debris effectively. However, given the cutouts and shallower depth, we anticipate that wet or loose terrain could present traction challenges.

Moab Flight | 2.9 mm |
Media | 3.5 mm |
Precio
One of the most enticing aspects of the Merrell Moab Flight is its price. Few shoes offer this level of versatility and comfort (plus a Vibram outsole!) for just a bit over 100 bucks, making it a solid value in the trail-running market.
Moab Flight | $110 |
Elementos reflectantes
It also features reflective elements, which we truly appreciate for the added visibility and safety they provide in low-light conditions.
Moab Flight | Sí |
Acolchado de la lengüeta
In terms of comfort, the Moab Flight delivers impressive plushness for its price. One of the key contributors is its generously padded tongue, which we particularly appreciated during long walks through the forest.

When we measured it using our digital calipers, the screen displayed a substantial 11.0 mm—far more padding than we typically see. Honestly, Merrell could have trimmed it down to 7 or 8 mm without sacrificing comfort, but we’re certainly not complaining!

Moab Flight | 11.0 mm |
Media | 6.4 mm |
Lengüeta: tipo de refuerzo
One surprising highlight of the Moab Flight is its semi-gusseted tongue—a feature rarely found in budget-friendly trail shoes. This unexpected addition enhances its value, making it an even better deal!

Moab Flight | Ambos lados (semi) |
Tirador del talón
The Moab Flight lacks a heel tab, but in our experience, gripping the heel for an easy pull-on isn’t much of a hassle.

Moab Flight | Ninguno |
Plantilla extraíble
The thick FloatPro insole is removable, offering two advantages. First, runners with larger feet can replace it with a thinner option to create more room in the toebox. Second, those needing orthotics can easily swap them in for a customized fit.

Moab Flight | Sí |