Our verdict

We found in the lab that the Merrell Nova 4 brings meaningful upgrades in weight, comfort, and overall feel, and we liked its flexible, beginner-friendly design. In our view, its breathable upper and fair price make it a strong pick for newcomers to the trails. However, we believe the shoe’s high drop and weak energy return make it a poor fit for advanced runners seeking a more lively and cushioned ride.

Pros

  • Excellent trail shoe for beginners
  • Ideal for heel strikers
  • Noticeably lighter than Nova 3
  • Strong breathability
  • Comfortable, fully redesigned upper
  • Versatile 4.0-mm lugs
  • Works for hiking too
  • Reasonable price
  • Fully gusseted tongue

Cons

  • Extremely low energy return
  • High drop can feel awkward
  • Weak heel padding
  • Firm feel underfoot

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

Based on our testing, we found that the Merrell Nova 4 is a great match for:

  • Beginners who want an affordable way to try trail running without overthinking gear.
  • Heel strikers who prefer a high-drop trail shoe that feels supportive in every landing.
  • Runners who want a simple, no-frills model and are not focused on performance.
  • Fans of the Nova 3 who liked the shoe but wished it was lighter.

Merrell Nova 4

Who should NOT buy

In our view, the Nova 4’s ultra-low energy return makes it a poor choice for anyone who wants a lively, bounce-filled ride. We found that its foam feels flat and slow, and we believe there are far better responsive options—like the New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro v9 or the Nike Pegasus Trail 5—that deliver a more dynamic experience.

We also believe that its steep, high-drop geometry creates an awkward feel for midfoot and forefoot strikers. If that's your footstrike, the shoe simply pushes you forward in a way that feels forced and far from smooth on trails. From our perspective, those who prefer moderate or low-drop shoes will get a far more natural ride in the ASICS Gel Trabuco 13 or the Altra Experience Wild 2.

Merrell Nova 4 parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

We found that the Nova 4 delivers average shock absorption with 118 SA in the heel and 103 SA in the forefoot. While the heel result is nearly identical to the Nova 3, the higher forefoot score noticeably improves one of the previous model’s weak points.

Merrell Nova 4 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Nova 4 118 SA
Average 122 SA
Compared to 74 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
62 SA
Shock absorption
160 SA

Energy return

New

The FloatPro foam in the Merrell Nova 4 delivered a very weak result in our energy return test. There’s not much to praise with 41.9% in the heel and 44.7% in the forefoot, especially when the previous version performed better.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Nova 4 41.9%
Average 55.5%
Compared to 74 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
42.0%
Energy return
76.0%

Heel stack

There’s a bit more foam underfoot in the Nova 4, as we measured 37.7 mm in the heel compared to 34.1 mm in version 3. It’s not a huge change, but it does push the shoe closer to maximalist territory... which is simply Merrell following current trends.

Merrell Nova 4 Heel stack
Test results
Nova 4 37.7 mm
Average 32.6 mm
Compared to 164 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
16.3 mm
Heel stack
47.3 mm

Forefoot stack

The higher forefoot stack is what finally fixes the low shock absorption of its predecessor, now measuring a much more reasonable 25.6 mm. However, this also creates a big difference from heel to toe, so it’s worth taking a closer look.

Merrell Nova 4 Forefoot stack
Test results
Nova 4 25.6 mm
Average 25.0 mm
Compared to 164 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
13.4 mm
Forefoot stack
36.7 mm

Drop

Merrell lists the Nova 4 at an 8 mm drop, which is already on the higher side for a trail shoe and makes it more friendly for beginners and heel strikers.

However, after we tested the shoe on runs, we discovered that it definitely does not feel anywhere near 8 mm, and our lab measurement of 12.1 mm confirmed that huge difference.

Merrell Nova 4 Drop
Test results
Nova 4 12.1 mm
Average 7.6 mm
Compared to 163 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.1 mm
Drop
17.3 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The FloatPro foam disappointed us before with its low energy return, although this only matters if you want a lively feel underfoot for serious running, since for casual runs or hiking it is not a big issue. 

As for softness, we discovered during our runs that the shoe feels a bit firm, and while this is mainly a matter of taste, it will not satisfy you if you prefer a plush feel underfoot, yet it can work great if you enjoy a slightly-firm and more stable ride.

Merrell Nova 4 Midsole softness
Test results
Nova 4 23.5 HA
Average 21.9 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 140 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
9.1 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
39.0 HA

Rocker

The Nova 3 already had a slightly rockered shape, but the Nova 4 takes it further with a much larger heel bevel clearly aimed at helping heel strikers. The forefoot stays more relaxed, which fits well with a flexible shoe that has a moderate stack height.

Merrell Nova 4 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

We found that the Merrell Nova 4 fit our foot nicely during our first runs, but we know that feeling-based impressions are misleading, so we tested it with our unique gel method so you can get a fair measurement.

The first result came in at 96.9 mm, giving us an objective starting point for evaluating its real fit.

Merrell Nova 4 Width / Fit
Test results
Nova 4 96.9 mm
Average 95.7 mm
Compared to 85 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
89.8 mm
Width / Fit
100.4 mm

Toebox width

The second measurement focused on the toebox, and we found 74.5 mm, which puts the Nova 4 in a very average range that should suit most of you. And if you have wide feet, Merrell also offers a wide version in select countries.

Merrell Nova 4 Toebox width
Test results
Nova 4 74.5 mm
Average 74.6 mm
Compared to 85 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
67.1 mm
Toebox width
85.3 mm

Toebox height

There’s also plenty of vertical space for your toes to move comfortably.

We found 31.0 mm in our final measurement, rounding out a secure and trail-ready fit.

Merrell Nova 4 Toebox height
Test results
Nova 4 31.0 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 85 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
21.5 mm
Toebox height
31.8 mm

Traction / Grip

Forefoot traction

Merrell ended its agreement with Vibram for the Nova line, so the Nova 4 switches to the brand’s own Quantum Grip rubber.

This may seem like bad news, but the previous TC5+ outsole was not Megagrip and scored only 0.37 in our test. After we tested the new compound, we discovered an improved 0.41 result, and even though it sits below the lab average, we found that anything above 0.40 performs well on a wide mix of trail conditions.

Test results
Nova 4 0.41
Average 0.60
Compared to 21 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
0.35
Forefoot traction
0.81

Lug depth

The Nova 4 uses versatile 4.0 mm lugs that strike a nice middle ground, giving solid grip on easy and moderate trails while still handling the occasional stretch of more technical terrain without trouble.

Merrell Nova 4 Lug depth
Test results
Nova 4 4.0 mm
Average 3.5 mm
Compared to 163 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Lug depth
5.4 mm

Outsole design

New

The outsole of the Nova 4 changes a lot from version 3. Now it features less coverage for weight loss purposes and improved flexibility, both of which are achieved. 

In terms of lug design, we observed that the Nova 4 uses a mixed layout built for all-round grip. The heel features backward-facing, chevron-style lugs for braking control. The midfoot switches to smaller, flatter transition lugs that keep the ride smooth, and the forefoot uses forward-facing chevron lugs with sharper edges.

Merrell Nova 4 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

Flexibility gets a strong boost thanks to the new outsole design and Merrell’s FlexConnect technology, which uses specific grooves to create easier movement in all directions. We tested it and measured only 11.4N for a natural ride, a great improving coming from 15.0N in version 3.

Merrell Nova 4 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Nova 4 11.4N
Average 14.5N
Compared to 74 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
3.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
26.4N

Weight

Many small updates can deliver a big win, and the weight drop here is a perfect example. We measured just 9.6 oz or 272g, a huge improvement over the Nova 3’s 10.8 oz or 305g.

If the Nova 3 felt heavy, this completely solves it... while adding even more foam underfoot.

Merrell Nova 4 Weight
Test results
Nova 4 9.6 oz (272g)
Average 10.2 oz (289g)
Compared to 164 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
7.5 oz (213g)
Weight
12.7 oz (359g)

Breathability

The upper of the Nova 4 is completely new and fully redesigned. For a shoe priced on the lower end of the trail market, it looks surprisingly good at first glance, and we made sure to analyse every detail in our tests.

Starting with our smoke test, we discovered strong airflow in the toebox. We rated it 4/5, which makes sense given the oversized ventilation holes Merrell added to this model.

Merrell used a very thin recycled mesh similar to what we usually see in road shoes, then reinforced key areas to protect it from common wear points on the trail.

Merrell Nova 4 mesh

Under the microscope, the engineered mesh showed large, open holes that allow air to pass through easily. The secondary inner layer adds comfort and protection without blocking ventilation.

Merrell Nova 4 mesh microscope

In our view, the upper is one of the Nova 4’s biggest strengths. It breathes well, feels comfortable in every area, and looks really cool.

Test results
Nova 4 4
Average 3.2
Compared to 140 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

The Merrell Nova 4 provides average stability, standing far apart from oversized trail tanks like the HOKA Mafate X. Its reasonable dimensions and high flexibility mean your body handles part of the stabilising work, and for many runners, that more natural feel is exactly what they want.

Torsional rigidity

We rated this shoe 4/5 for torsional rigidity. We honestly expected a bit more flex, but with the added stack height, it may simply not be realistic.

Test results
Nova 4 4
Average 3.6
Compared to 158 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter provides a natural feel with minimal restriction, which helps with comfort in the Nova 4—especially on day-long hikes or long runs. We scored it 2 out of 5.

Test results
Nova 4 2
Average 3
Compared to 156 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

We noticed that the forefoot looks clearly wider than the midfoot and heel when the shoe is flipped over. After we tested it with our digital callipers, we discovered 118.0 mm, which surprised us at first.

 

Then we remembered the super-high drop of this model and how the ride constantly shifts you forward, so it makes sense that Merrell added extra width up front to keep the shoe stable in that area.

Merrell Nova 4 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Nova 4 118.0 mm
Average 112.7 mm
Compared to 164 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
102.1 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.0 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel sits near the average at 89.8 mm, and it feels stable enough for heel strikers with a neutral running style. We also liked that this reasonable width helps the shoe stay agile, something that is getting harder to find in modern trail models.

Merrell Nova 4 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Nova 4 89.8 mm
Average 89.8 mm
Compared to 164 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
72.0 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.0 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

Despite scoring high in ventilation, the Nova 4’s upper held up well in our Dremel test and earned a solid 3/5. It’s not amazing, but considering the summer-ready mesh and the lower price, it’s actually pretty impressive.

Test results
Nova 4 3
Average 3
Compared to 121 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding performed poorly at 2/5, and we think this area clearly needs attention in future versions.

Test results
Nova 4 2
Average 3
Compared to 120 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

The new Quantum Grip rubber could be a bit more durable, as we discovered that 1.1 mm of material disappeared after the Dremel test. It’s not a bad result overall and feels fair for the price.

Test results
Nova 4 1.1 mm
Average 0.9 mm
Compared to 114 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

There is 1.6 mm of outsole thickness, which offers enough protection from small trail hazards. However, the Nova 4 drops the rock plate found in earlier versions, so protection against sharper impacts is reduced in exchange for lighter weight.

Merrell Nova 4 Outsole thickness
Test results
Nova 4 1.6 mm
Average 2.2 mm
Compared to 164 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
0.9 mm
Outsole thickness
5.5 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

One of Merrell’s unique touches is the insole. Instead of a regular insert, they use a thicker 6.0 mm version made with 50% recycled foam and treated with an odor-neutralizing finish named Cleansport NXT, which is a nice upgrade.

Merrell Nova 4 Insole thickness
Test results
Nova 4 6.0 mm
Average 4.7 mm
Compared to 161 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
2.1 mm
Insole thickness
7.9 mm

Removable insole

If you want extra room in the toebox, just swap the thick stock insole for a thinner one from another shoe. The original insole is fully removable.

Merrell Nova 4 Removable insole
Test results
Nova 4 Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

At least the FloatPro foam doesn’t get excessively firm in cold conditions, which is a small consolation after its weak energy return performance. It became 20% firmer after spending 20 minutes in the freezer.

Merrell Nova 4 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Nova 4 20%
Average 26%
Compared to 140 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
5%
Midsole softness in cold
64%

Reflective elements

The Nova 4 skips reflective elements, which isn’t a major drawback but would have been a welcome addition.

Merrell Nova 4 Reflective elements
Test results
Nova 4 No

Tongue padding

The lacing system of the Nova 4 has been totally revamped, and it now features thin, hi-vis laces that run through punched eyelets instead of lace loops, creating a more durable and simple setup. The tongue strap also remains in place to keep the laces tidy and secure, adding a subtle yet helpful detail for many runners.

Merrell Nova 4 laces

The tongue stays extremely plush at 10.6 mm, giving excellent instep protection and offering a soft, comfortable feel that lasts for long mountain days without causing any soreness at all.

Merrell Nova 4 Tongue padding
Test results
Nova 4 10.6 mm
Average 6.4 mm
Compared to 164 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
1.3 mm
Tongue padding
12.3 mm

Tongue: gusset type

Having a fully gusseted tongue in a shoe priced below most competitors is a pleasant surprise, even if it’s not entirely unexpected given that version 3 already used the same design.

Merrell Nova 4 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Nova 4 Both sides (full)

Price

The Merrell Nova 4 gets a modest 5-dollar price bump, but it’s still an increase. And while the shoe brings some solid updates and remains fairly priced overall, we think it’s time for a better foam to fully justify what it costs now.

Test results
Nova 4 $130
Compared to 164 trail running shoes
Number of shoes
£55
Price
£260

Heel tab

In its push to shed as much weight as possible, we found that the shoe drops the heel tab as well.

Merrell Nova 4 Heel tab
Test results
Nova 4 None